Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT avail

[Ben Laurie <be...@gonzo.ben.algroup.co.uk>]

Brian Behlendorf wrote:
> 
> brian       96/11/23 12:13:13
> 
>   Modified:    .         avail
>   Log:
>   Added Sameer and Laurel to list of cvs committers so they can work on docs.
>   We really need a way to allow groups of folks access to distinct modules...

You can do that with appropriate perms/group ownership in the repository, and
group membership for the users.

Cheers,

Ben.

-- 
Ben Laurie                Phone: +44 (181) 994 6435  Email: ben@algroup.co.uk
Freelance Consultant and  Fax:   +44 (181) 994 6472
Technical Director        URL: http://www.algroup.co.uk/Apache-SSL
A.L. Digital Ltd,         Apache Group member (http://www.apache.org)
London, England.          Apache-SSL author

Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT avail

[Brian Behlendorf <br...@organic.com>]

On Sat, 23 Nov 1996, Ben Laurie wrote:
> Brian Behlendorf wrote:
> > 
> > brian       96/11/23 12:13:13
> > 
> >   Modified:    .         avail
> >   Log:
> >   Added Sameer and Laurel to list of cvs committers so they can work on docs.
> >   We really need a way to allow groups of folks access to distinct modules...
> 
> You can do that with appropriate perms/group ownership in the repository, and
> group membership for the users.

Okay, so, if I create a unix GID "ap-docs" and put the folks expected to do
docs work in that, and then "chgrp -R ap-docs ~cvs/apache/htdocs/htdocs/manual", 
that would be correct?  I figured cvs might have its own module/permissions
management structure that would have to be appeased, but I guess not.

Also, can we remove the top-level "apache-docs" tree, and apache/docs, and
apache/manual, now that we've decided apache/htdocs/manual is the place to be?

	Brian

--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
brian@organic.com  www.apache.org  hyperreal.com  http://www.organic.com/JOBS