You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@commons.apache.org by apirom9 <gi...@git.apache.org> on 2018/10/30 15:30:36 UTC
[GitHub] commons-lang pull request #378: add more test cases to use ImmutablePair cla...
GitHub user apirom9 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/378
add more test cases to use ImmutablePair class as key for java.util.HashMap and java.util…
….TreeMap
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/apirom9/commons-lang master
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/378.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #378
----
commit e4e92570188763170f9291f62cd388e7e5b9d119
Author: Apirom Na Nakorn <ap...@...>
Date: 2018-10-30T15:28:31Z
add test use ImmutablePair class with java.util.HashMap and java.util.TreeMap
----
---
[GitHub] commons-lang issue #378: add more test cases to use ImmutablePair class as k...
Posted by coveralls <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/378
[![Coverage Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/19808163/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/19808163)
Coverage remained the same at 95.233% when pulling **9011769b215e72d96d9888f7073cb0545dd35a8d on apirom9:master** into **0fcd4ce92ad860a47ae85b1fc7b7e5cd35c8738e on apache:master**.
---
[GitHub] commons-lang pull request #378: add more test cases to use ImmutablePair cla...
Posted by apirom9 <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user apirom9 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/378
---
[GitHub] commons-lang issue #378: add more test cases to use ImmutablePair class as k...
Posted by apirom9 <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user apirom9 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/378
Close this pull request because changes already in pull request #379
---