You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "David Smiley (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/03/16 05:55:33 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-4242) A better spatial query parser
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
David Smiley updated SOLR-4242:
-------------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.7)
4.8
> A better spatial query parser
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-4242
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4242
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: spatial
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Fix For: 4.8
>
>
> I've been thinking about how spatial support is exposed to Solr users.
> Presently there's the older Solr 3 stuff, most prominently seen via \{!geofilt} and \{!bbox} done by [~gsingers] (I think). and then there's the Solr 4 fields using a special syntax parsed by Lucene 4 spatial that looks like mygeofield:"Intersects(Circle(1 2 d=3))" What's inside the outer parenthesis is parsed by Spatial4j as a shape, and it has a special (non-standard) syntax for points, rects, and circles, and then there's WKT. I believe this scheme was devised by [~ryantxu].
> I'd like to devise something that is both comprehensive and is aligned with standards to the extent that it's prudent. The old Solr 3 stuff is not comprehensive and not standardized. The newer stuff is comprehensive but only a little based on standards. And I think it'd be nicer to implement it as a Solr query parser. I'll say more in the comments.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org