You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ambari.apache.org by "Hudson (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/06/08 21:56:01 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (AMBARI-11790) Configuration.removeProperty() should remove all occurrences of the given property

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-11790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14577737#comment-14577737 ] 

Hudson commented on AMBARI-11790:
---------------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in Ambari-trunk-Commit #2858 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-Commit/2858/])
AMBARI-11790. Remove all occurrences of a property from a configuration hierarchy (jspeidel: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ambari.git&a=commit&h=6a9d590aaeeb24045a62fa3780582dbb51a7521f)
* ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/topology/ConfigurationTest.java
* ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/topology/Configuration.java


> Configuration.removeProperty() should remove all occurrences of the given property
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-11790
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-11790
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: blueprints
>    Affects Versions: ambari-2.1.0
>            Reporter: John Speidel
>            Assignee: John Speidel
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: ambari-2.1.0
>
>   Original Estimate: 1h
>  Remaining Estimate: 1h
>
> If a property exists at multiple levels in a configuration such as in a blueprint and in the stack, only the most advanced occurrence of the property is removed, which in this case would be the blueprint configuration.  Instead, all occurrences of the property should be removed from the config hierarchy such that a subsequent call to getPropertyValue() for the removed property would return null.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)