You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by "massive.boisson" <ma...@gmail.com> on 2006/11/20 13:19:41 UTC
Object Message
Hi,
I have 2 questions about ObjectMessage:
1. are there any performance issue with ObjectMessages generally speaking
because looking thru forums not many people use it? Any good alternatives?
(I saw what James was doing recently, but I am using Java client)
2. I am getting NotSerializableException no matter what I try. My object is
implementing Serializable, I even tried with String for test. I have a
remove broker listening to tcp connections. Any ideas?
Sincerely,
--MB
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Object-Message-tf2668658.html#a7441481
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Object Message
Posted by "massive.boisson" <ma...@gmail.com>.
Ok, I'll use Seriliazation. I got it to work, I'd rather not say what I did
wrong, I don't think there is any chance someone else will do that :)
Thanks.
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 11/20/06, massive.boisson <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2. I am getting NotSerializableException no matter what I try. My object
>> is
>> implementing Serializable, I even tried with String for test. I have a
>> remove broker listening to tcp connections. Any ideas?
>
> No - got a test case?
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Object-Message-tf2668658.html#a7448942
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Object Message
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 11/20/06, massive.boisson <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have 2 questions about ObjectMessage:
>
> 1. are there any performance issue with ObjectMessages generally speaking
> because looking thru forums not many people use it? Any good alternatives?
> (I saw what James was doing recently, but I am using Java client)
Quite a lot of folks use ObjectMessage - its certainly pretty fast
these days (serialization used to be slow in the Java 1.2 days).
The only real alternative is write your own Externalizable code or use
some kinda XML data binding
> 2. I am getting NotSerializableException no matter what I try. My object is
> implementing Serializable, I even tried with String for test. I have a
> remove broker listening to tcp connections. Any ideas?
No - got a test case?
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/