You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mahout.apache.org by Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> on 2012/06/06 19:37:00 UTC
Mahout Release : 0.7
Hi dev,
Please notify when the code is completely freezed.
Paritosh
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
IRC is generally really a bad way with Hadoop since we are spread over a
gazillion time zones. You might get a response on IRC
Or not.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org> wrote:
> What's the best way to ask quick questions? IRC?
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>.
Ping. Any feedback on the questions below?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:43 PM, tom pierce <tc...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> It's going to be tough, because we actually planned to have the release
>>> out already and none of us really is a YARN expert.
>>
>> I can definitely help with the YARN part and I can totally offer the testing
>> infrastructure on Bigtop's Jenkins that deploys fully distributed cluster
>> based on Hadoop 0.4.0 and can run Mahout tests (well, at this point
>> it is really just a wrapper around Mahout examples, but still).
>
> Good news: both of the issues seem to be easy to fix (but a bit tedious
> when it comes to preserving behavior for Hadoop 1.X codeline).
>
> Can someone, please, take a look at the very preliminary patch
> (based on the work Bilung Lee did for CDH4) I've attached to the
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1017
>
> and let me know:
> 1. whether something like this can be considered for 0.7 inclusion
> 2. what would be the preference for keeping old behavior around
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:43 PM, tom pierce <tc...@apache.org> wrote:
>> It's going to be tough, because we actually planned to have the release
>> out already and none of us really is a YARN expert.
>
> I can definitely help with the YARN part and I can totally offer the testing
> infrastructure on Bigtop's Jenkins that deploys fully distributed cluster
> based on Hadoop 0.4.0 and can run Mahout tests (well, at this point
> it is really just a wrapper around Mahout examples, but still).
Good news: both of the issues seem to be easy to fix (but a bit tedious
when it comes to preserving behavior for Hadoop 1.X codeline).
Can someone, please, take a look at the very preliminary patch
(based on the work Bilung Lee did for CDH4) I've attached to the
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1017
and let me know:
1. whether something like this can be considered for 0.7 inclusion
2. what would be the preference for keeping old behavior around
Thanks,
Roman.
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Robin Anil <ro...@gmail.com>.
On Jun 7, 2012 8:49 AM, "Roman Shaposhnik" <rv...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:43 PM, tom pierce <tc...@apache.org> wrote:
> > It's going to be tough, because we actually planned to have the release
> > out already and none of us really is a YARN expert.
>
> I can definitely help with the YARN part and I can totally offer the
testing
> infrastructure on Bigtop's Jenkins that deploys fully distributed cluster
> based on Hadoop 0.4.0 and can run Mahout tests (well, at this point
> it is really just a wrapper around Mahout examples, but still).
>
> > Unfortunately, our own Jenkins tasks that run clustering examples aren't
> > passing right now, either, so I'm not even sure whether the problem is
> > new to Hadoop 2.
>
> And that's essentially where I need your help guys. I'll dig into this
issue
> tomorrow, but given that I'm rather new to Mahout (still) I might need
> some support. What's the best way to ask quick questions? IRC?
>
I fixed Jenkins. Try now. I am travelling so mail is better for me and many
others.
> > Is the test you're running just a script based on this wiki page?
> >
> >
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAHOUT/Clustering+of+synthetic+control+data
>
> Pretty much. Yes. Although it has been packages as a Bigtop integration
test
> artifact, but it really is a very thin veneer.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
IRC is generally really a bad way with Hadoop since we are spread over a
gazillion time zones. You might get a response on IRC
Or not.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org> wrote:
> What's the best way to ask quick questions? IRC?
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Robin Anil <ro...@gmail.com>.
On Jun 7, 2012 8:49 AM, "Roman Shaposhnik" <rv...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:43 PM, tom pierce <tc...@apache.org> wrote:
> > It's going to be tough, because we actually planned to have the release
> > out already and none of us really is a YARN expert.
>
> I can definitely help with the YARN part and I can totally offer the
testing
> infrastructure on Bigtop's Jenkins that deploys fully distributed cluster
> based on Hadoop 0.4.0 and can run Mahout tests (well, at this point
> it is really just a wrapper around Mahout examples, but still).
>
> > Unfortunately, our own Jenkins tasks that run clustering examples aren't
> > passing right now, either, so I'm not even sure whether the problem is
> > new to Hadoop 2.
>
> And that's essentially where I need your help guys. I'll dig into this
issue
> tomorrow, but given that I'm rather new to Mahout (still) I might need
> some support. What's the best way to ask quick questions? IRC?
>
I fixed Jenkins. Try now. I am travelling so mail is better for me and many
others.
> > Is the test you're running just a script based on this wiki page?
> >
> >
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAHOUT/Clustering+of+synthetic+control+data
>
> Pretty much. Yes. Although it has been packages as a Bigtop integration
test
> artifact, but it really is a very thin veneer.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:43 PM, tom pierce <tc...@apache.org> wrote:
>> It's going to be tough, because we actually planned to have the release
>> out already and none of us really is a YARN expert.
>
> I can definitely help with the YARN part and I can totally offer the testing
> infrastructure on Bigtop's Jenkins that deploys fully distributed cluster
> based on Hadoop 0.4.0 and can run Mahout tests (well, at this point
> it is really just a wrapper around Mahout examples, but still).
Good news: both of the issues seem to be easy to fix (but a bit tedious
when it comes to preserving behavior for Hadoop 1.X codeline).
Can someone, please, take a look at the very preliminary patch
(based on the work Bilung Lee did for CDH4) I've attached to the
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1017
and let me know:
1. whether something like this can be considered for 0.7 inclusion
2. what would be the preference for keeping old behavior around
Thanks,
Roman.
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:43 PM, tom pierce <tc...@apache.org> wrote:
> It's going to be tough, because we actually planned to have the release
> out already and none of us really is a YARN expert.
I can definitely help with the YARN part and I can totally offer the testing
infrastructure on Bigtop's Jenkins that deploys fully distributed cluster
based on Hadoop 0.4.0 and can run Mahout tests (well, at this point
it is really just a wrapper around Mahout examples, but still).
> Unfortunately, our own Jenkins tasks that run clustering examples aren't
> passing right now, either, so I'm not even sure whether the problem is
> new to Hadoop 2.
And that's essentially where I need your help guys. I'll dig into this issue
tomorrow, but given that I'm rather new to Mahout (still) I might need
some support. What's the best way to ask quick questions? IRC?
> Is the test you're running just a script based on this wiki page?
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAHOUT/Clustering+of+synthetic+control+data
Pretty much. Yes. Although it has been packages as a Bigtop integration test
artifact, but it really is a very thin veneer.
Thanks,
Roman.
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:43 PM, tom pierce <tc...@apache.org> wrote:
> It's going to be tough, because we actually planned to have the release
> out already and none of us really is a YARN expert.
I can definitely help with the YARN part and I can totally offer the testing
infrastructure on Bigtop's Jenkins that deploys fully distributed cluster
based on Hadoop 0.4.0 and can run Mahout tests (well, at this point
it is really just a wrapper around Mahout examples, but still).
> Unfortunately, our own Jenkins tasks that run clustering examples aren't
> passing right now, either, so I'm not even sure whether the problem is
> new to Hadoop 2.
And that's essentially where I need your help guys. I'll dig into this issue
tomorrow, but given that I'm rather new to Mahout (still) I might need
some support. What's the best way to ask quick questions? IRC?
> Is the test you're running just a script based on this wiki page?
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAHOUT/Clustering+of+synthetic+control+data
Pretty much. Yes. Although it has been packages as a Bigtop integration test
artifact, but it really is a very thin veneer.
Thanks,
Roman.
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by tom pierce <tc...@apache.org>.
It's going to be tough, because we actually planned to have the release
out already and none of us really is a YARN expert. If there's some
common trap we're falling into with how we're specifying paths or
setting up jobs and we can fix it easily, I'm guessing no one would
object. Of course, we'd have to stay compatible with Hadoop 0.20/0.23.
Unfortunately, our own Jenkins tasks that run clustering examples aren't
passing right now, either, so I'm not even sure whether the problem is
new to Hadoop 2. Is the test you're running just a script based on this
wiki page?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAHOUT/Clustering+of+synthetic+control+data
-tom
On 06/06/2012 05:14 PM, Robin Anil wrote:
> Roman. I don't think there are many yarn experts here. Why don't you be the
> one. Test out the example scripts on hadoop with yarn and let us know. If
> its a trivial fix we can submit that. If its not then we cannot. There is
> only one way to know. You.
> On Jun 6, 2012 10:22 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" <rv...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
>>> Can I start working on the release now?
>> Just an FYI (and a plea ;-)): Bigtop is readying to release the first
>> Apache
>> Hadoop distribution based on Hadoop 2.0.0-alpha. It would be really
>> nice if we can provide our users with the Mahout 0.7.0 working on top
>> of YARN out of the box. Please let me know if I can help with testing
>> such a combination. I've already filed a couple of minor JIRAs:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1017
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1016
>> but haven't seen any activity on them.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Roman.
>>
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by tom pierce <tc...@apache.org>.
It's going to be tough, because we actually planned to have the release
out already and none of us really is a YARN expert. If there's some
common trap we're falling into with how we're specifying paths or
setting up jobs and we can fix it easily, I'm guessing no one would
object. Of course, we'd have to stay compatible with Hadoop 0.20/0.23.
Unfortunately, our own Jenkins tasks that run clustering examples aren't
passing right now, either, so I'm not even sure whether the problem is
new to Hadoop 2. Is the test you're running just a script based on this
wiki page?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAHOUT/Clustering+of+synthetic+control+data
-tom
On 06/06/2012 05:14 PM, Robin Anil wrote:
> Roman. I don't think there are many yarn experts here. Why don't you be the
> one. Test out the example scripts on hadoop with yarn and let us know. If
> its a trivial fix we can submit that. If its not then we cannot. There is
> only one way to know. You.
> On Jun 6, 2012 10:22 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" <rv...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
>>> Can I start working on the release now?
>> Just an FYI (and a plea ;-)): Bigtop is readying to release the first
>> Apache
>> Hadoop distribution based on Hadoop 2.0.0-alpha. It would be really
>> nice if we can provide our users with the Mahout 0.7.0 working on top
>> of YARN out of the box. Please let me know if I can help with testing
>> such a combination. I've already filed a couple of minor JIRAs:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1017
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1016
>> but haven't seen any activity on them.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Roman.
>>
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Robin Anil <ro...@gmail.com>.
Roman. I don't think there are many yarn experts here. Why don't you be the
one. Test out the example scripts on hadoop with yarn and let us know. If
its a trivial fix we can submit that. If its not then we cannot. There is
only one way to know. You.
On Jun 6, 2012 10:22 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" <rv...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
> > Can I start working on the release now?
>
> Just an FYI (and a plea ;-)): Bigtop is readying to release the first
> Apache
> Hadoop distribution based on Hadoop 2.0.0-alpha. It would be really
> nice if we can provide our users with the Mahout 0.7.0 working on top
> of YARN out of the box. Please let me know if I can help with testing
> such a combination. I've already filed a couple of minor JIRAs:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1017
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1016
> but haven't seen any activity on them.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Robin Anil <ro...@gmail.com>.
Roman. I don't think there are many yarn experts here. Why don't you be the
one. Test out the example scripts on hadoop with yarn and let us know. If
its a trivial fix we can submit that. If its not then we cannot. There is
only one way to know. You.
On Jun 6, 2012 10:22 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" <rv...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
> > Can I start working on the release now?
>
> Just an FYI (and a plea ;-)): Bigtop is readying to release the first
> Apache
> Hadoop distribution based on Hadoop 2.0.0-alpha. It would be really
> nice if we can provide our users with the Mahout 0.7.0 working on top
> of YARN out of the box. Please let me know if I can help with testing
> such a combination. I've already filed a couple of minor JIRAs:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1017
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1016
> but haven't seen any activity on them.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
> Can I start working on the release now?
Just an FYI (and a plea ;-)): Bigtop is readying to release the first Apache
Hadoop distribution based on Hadoop 2.0.0-alpha. It would be really
nice if we can provide our users with the Mahout 0.7.0 working on top
of YARN out of the box. Please let me know if I can help with testing
such a combination. I've already filed a couple of minor JIRAs:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1017
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1016
but haven't seen any activity on them.
Thanks,
Roman.
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
> Can I start working on the release now?
Just an FYI (and a plea ;-)): Bigtop is readying to release the first Apache
Hadoop distribution based on Hadoop 2.0.0-alpha. It would be really
nice if we can provide our users with the Mahout 0.7.0 working on top
of YARN out of the box. Please let me know if I can help with testing
such a combination. I've already filed a couple of minor JIRAs:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1017
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1016
but haven't seen any activity on them.
Thanks,
Roman.
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
Everything I contributed is in the category of minor fixes, minor
speed-ups. It's fair to say "many small fixes and improvements".
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
> I need some help in collecting the news points. Please add whatever point
> should go as a release news item.
>
> I have added these two :
>
> Outlier removal capability implemented in K-Means, Fuzzy K, Canopy and
> Dirichlet Clustering
> New Clustering implementation for K-Means, Fuzzy K, Canopy and Dirichlet
> using Cluster Classifiers
>
> This is the link to 0.7 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+MAHOUT+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%220.7%22+AND+status+%3D+Resolved+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC&mode=hide
>
>
> On 06-06-2012 23:07, Paritosh Ranjan wrote:
>>
>> Hi dev,
>>
>> Please notify when the code is completely freezed.
>>
>> Paritosh
>
>
>
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com>.
I need some help in collecting the news points. Please add whatever
point should go as a release news item.
I have added these two :
Outlier removal capability implemented in K-Means, Fuzzy K, Canopy and
Dirichlet Clustering
New Clustering implementation for K-Means, Fuzzy K, Canopy and Dirichlet
using Cluster Classifiers
This is the link to 0.7 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+MAHOUT+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%220.7%22+AND+status+%3D+Resolved+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC&mode=hide
On 06-06-2012 23:07, Paritosh Ranjan wrote:
> Hi dev,
>
> Please notify when the code is completely freezed.
>
> Paritosh
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
There's a way, sure, but the easiest thing truly is to re-run the
build. If tests have definitely passed, you can "-DskipTests" to
really speed it up. Make sure you undo whatever happened in the build
first with the rollback command.
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
> Got a Java Heap Space Error in the last step of uploading mahout distribution :(.
> Is there any workaround for this, can I manually upload the artifacts for mahout-distribution?
> Otherwise I will have to repeat the complete length build again ( with increased Java Heap Space ).
>
> [INFO] [INFO] Trace
> [INFO] java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
>
RE: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com>.
Drew,
I must thank you for this help as it did work. I also feel that I should share the findings with the group.
Somehow, both of these commands did not work for me ( to skip tests ).
mvn -Darguments="-DskipTests=true" release:prepare ...
mvn -Darguments="-Dmaven.test.skip" release:prepare ...
But this one did work :
mvn -DpreparationGoals="clean compile" release:prepare ...
Apart from this, there was one more thing related to Heap Size Error that I experienced while building the release.
I had to
export _JAVA_OPTIONS="-Xmx1g"
to get rid of the Heap Size Error.
Setting JAVA_OPTS did not help. I don't know why.
I will update the "How To Release" page with these.
Paritosh
________________________________________
From: Paritosh Ranjan
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 10:35 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: RE: Mahout Release : 0.7
Thanks Drew. This certainly looks like the way to do it.
However, the tests have already executed. Will use it if the upload fails again.
Thanks,
Paritosh
________________________________________
From: Drew Farris [drew@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 10:25 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Paritosh,
If you end up needed to do another release:prepare, try something like:
mvn -Darguments="-DskipTests=true" release:prepare
mvn -Darguments="-Dmaven.test.skip" release:prepare
Or to skip the verify goal entirely:
mvn -DpreparationGoals="clean compile" release:prepare
See: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-release-plugin/prepare-mojo.html
- Drew
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
> Tried with -DskipTests also. Tests still run. Not a issue, rebuilding again ( tests are made to run :)).
> And, maven.test.skip does exist, I use it. Its even written on the link (page) you have shared.
> ________________________________________
> From: Sean Owen [srowen@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 8:55 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
>
> I have never seen maven.test.skip, so looked it up -- it's really
> supposed to be skipTests:
>
> http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/examples/skipping-test.html
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
>> No, it did not skip tests through -Dmaven.test.skip.
>> Rebuilding from scratch ( with tests ).
RE: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com>.
After two tries ( due to Java Heap Space Error ), I have been successful in creating the release candidate for Mahout 0.7.
It can be found at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-216/.
________________________________________
From: Paritosh Ranjan [pranjan@xebia.com]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 10:35 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: RE: Mahout Release : 0.7
Thanks Drew. This certainly looks like the way to do it.
However, the tests have already executed. Will use it if the upload fails again.
Thanks,
Paritosh
________________________________________
From: Drew Farris [drew@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 10:25 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Paritosh,
If you end up needed to do another release:prepare, try something like:
mvn -Darguments="-DskipTests=true" release:prepare
mvn -Darguments="-Dmaven.test.skip" release:prepare
Or to skip the verify goal entirely:
mvn -DpreparationGoals="clean compile" release:prepare
See: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-release-plugin/prepare-mojo.html
- Drew
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
> Tried with -DskipTests also. Tests still run. Not a issue, rebuilding again ( tests are made to run :)).
> And, maven.test.skip does exist, I use it. Its even written on the link (page) you have shared.
> ________________________________________
> From: Sean Owen [srowen@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 8:55 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
>
> I have never seen maven.test.skip, so looked it up -- it's really
> supposed to be skipTests:
>
> http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/examples/skipping-test.html
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
>> No, it did not skip tests through -Dmaven.test.skip.
>> Rebuilding from scratch ( with tests ).
RE: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com>.
Thanks Drew. This certainly looks like the way to do it.
However, the tests have already executed. Will use it if the upload fails again.
Thanks,
Paritosh
________________________________________
From: Drew Farris [drew@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 10:25 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Paritosh,
If you end up needed to do another release:prepare, try something like:
mvn -Darguments="-DskipTests=true" release:prepare
mvn -Darguments="-Dmaven.test.skip" release:prepare
Or to skip the verify goal entirely:
mvn -DpreparationGoals="clean compile" release:prepare
See: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-release-plugin/prepare-mojo.html
- Drew
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
> Tried with -DskipTests also. Tests still run. Not a issue, rebuilding again ( tests are made to run :)).
> And, maven.test.skip does exist, I use it. Its even written on the link (page) you have shared.
> ________________________________________
> From: Sean Owen [srowen@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 8:55 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
>
> I have never seen maven.test.skip, so looked it up -- it's really
> supposed to be skipTests:
>
> http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/examples/skipping-test.html
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
>> No, it did not skip tests through -Dmaven.test.skip.
>> Rebuilding from scratch ( with tests ).
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Drew Farris <dr...@apache.org>.
Paritosh,
If you end up needed to do another release:prepare, try something like:
mvn -Darguments="-DskipTests=true" release:prepare
mvn -Darguments="-Dmaven.test.skip" release:prepare
Or to skip the verify goal entirely:
mvn -DpreparationGoals="clean compile" release:prepare
See: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-release-plugin/prepare-mojo.html
- Drew
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
> Tried with -DskipTests also. Tests still run. Not a issue, rebuilding again ( tests are made to run :)).
> And, maven.test.skip does exist, I use it. Its even written on the link (page) you have shared.
> ________________________________________
> From: Sean Owen [srowen@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 8:55 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
>
> I have never seen maven.test.skip, so looked it up -- it's really
> supposed to be skipTests:
>
> http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/examples/skipping-test.html
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
>> No, it did not skip tests through -Dmaven.test.skip.
>> Rebuilding from scratch ( with tests ).
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Drew Farris <dr...@gmail.com>.
Paritosh,
If you want to try it again at some point, try:
mvn -Darguments="-DskipTests=true" release:prepare
Or something along the lines of:
mvn -DpreparationGoals="clean compile" release:prepare
Drew
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
> Tried with -DskipTests also. Tests still run. Not a issue, rebuilding again ( tests are made to run :)).
> And, maven.test.skip does exist, I use it. Its even written on the link (page) you have shared.
> ________________________________________
> From: Sean Owen [srowen@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 8:55 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
>
> I have never seen maven.test.skip, so looked it up -- it's really
> supposed to be skipTests:
>
> http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/examples/skipping-test.html
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
>> No, it did not skip tests through -Dmaven.test.skip.
>> Rebuilding from scratch ( with tests ).
RE: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com>.
Tried with -DskipTests also. Tests still run. Not a issue, rebuilding again ( tests are made to run :)).
And, maven.test.skip does exist, I use it. Its even written on the link (page) you have shared.
________________________________________
From: Sean Owen [srowen@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 8:55 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
I have never seen maven.test.skip, so looked it up -- it's really
supposed to be skipTests:
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/examples/skipping-test.html
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
> No, it did not skip tests through -Dmaven.test.skip.
> Rebuilding from scratch ( with tests ).
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
I have never seen maven.test.skip, so looked it up -- it's really
supposed to be skipTests:
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/examples/skipping-test.html
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
> No, it did not skip tests through -Dmaven.test.skip.
> Rebuilding from scratch ( with tests ).
RE: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com>.
No, it did not skip tests through -Dmaven.test.skip.
Rebuilding from scratch ( with tests ).
________________________________________
From: Paritosh Ranjan [pranjan@xebia.com]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 8:38 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: RE: Mahout Release : 0.7
I think -Dmaven.test.skip and -DskipTests=true will both skip tests.
The question is whether they will skip tests while release:prepare is executing.
I am going to try it soon. Will tell the results.
________________________________________
From: Robin Anil [robin.anil@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 8:35 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
-DskipTests=true ?
On Jun 8, 2012 1:30 PM, "Sean Owen" <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> AFAIK the -D option will still work; I don't recall exactly, but try it.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
> > The release plugin executes the tests automatically.
> > How can I skip the tests ( I would really like to skip tests, will save
> a lot of time )
> >
> > Will something like this work
> >
> > mvn -Pmahout_release release:prepare release:perform -Dmaven.test.skip
> >
> > or are you referring to changing the release plugins configuration in
> pom?
> >
>
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
I don't think that is the case. But if you have just run them and are
trying to cut a clean release, it is reasonable to want to cycle on the
release itself without the tests.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Dan Brickley <da...@danbri.org> wrote:
> On 8 June 2012 20:38, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
> > I think -Dmaven.test.skip and -DskipTests=true will both skip tests.
>
> Is it fair to say we're all skipping the tests, almost all of the
> time? Doesn't feel a healthy habit... How hard would it be to have a
> named option for running a faster 'lite tests' subset?
>
> Dan
>
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
On Jun 12, 2012, at 3:36 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
> On 8 June 2012 20:38, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
>> I think -Dmaven.test.skip and -DskipTests=true will both skip tests.
>
> Is it fair to say we're all skipping the tests, almost all of the
> time? Doesn't feel a healthy habit... How hard would it be to have a
> named option for running a faster 'lite tests' subset?
I think most of us run them regularly, but it is a bit of a burden. At a minimum, it would be nice if we could parallelize the modules (I don't have any hope for parallelizing at the class level). We also could likely annotate the M/R tests and be able to run them separately.
-Grant
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Dan Brickley <da...@danbri.org>.
On 8 June 2012 20:38, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
> I think -Dmaven.test.skip and -DskipTests=true will both skip tests.
Is it fair to say we're all skipping the tests, almost all of the
time? Doesn't feel a healthy habit... How hard would it be to have a
named option for running a faster 'lite tests' subset?
Dan
RE: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com>.
I think -Dmaven.test.skip and -DskipTests=true will both skip tests.
The question is whether they will skip tests while release:prepare is executing.
I am going to try it soon. Will tell the results.
________________________________________
From: Robin Anil [robin.anil@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 8:35 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
-DskipTests=true ?
On Jun 8, 2012 1:30 PM, "Sean Owen" <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> AFAIK the -D option will still work; I don't recall exactly, but try it.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
> > The release plugin executes the tests automatically.
> > How can I skip the tests ( I would really like to skip tests, will save
> a lot of time )
> >
> > Will something like this work
> >
> > mvn -Pmahout_release release:prepare release:perform -Dmaven.test.skip
> >
> > or are you referring to changing the release plugins configuration in
> pom?
> >
>
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Robin Anil <ro...@gmail.com>.
-DskipTests=true ?
On Jun 8, 2012 1:30 PM, "Sean Owen" <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> AFAIK the -D option will still work; I don't recall exactly, but try it.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
> > The release plugin executes the tests automatically.
> > How can I skip the tests ( I would really like to skip tests, will save
> a lot of time )
> >
> > Will something like this work
> >
> > mvn -Pmahout_release release:prepare release:perform -Dmaven.test.skip
> >
> > or are you referring to changing the release plugins configuration in
> pom?
> >
>
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
AFAIK the -D option will still work; I don't recall exactly, but try it.
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
> The release plugin executes the tests automatically.
> How can I skip the tests ( I would really like to skip tests, will save a lot of time )
>
> Will something like this work
>
> mvn -Pmahout_release release:prepare release:perform -Dmaven.test.skip
>
> or are you referring to changing the release plugins configuration in pom?
>
RE: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com>.
The release plugin executes the tests automatically.
How can I skip the tests ( I would really like to skip tests, will save a lot of time )
Will something like this work
mvn -Pmahout_release release:prepare release:perform -Dmaven.test.skip
or are you referring to changing the release plugins configuration in pom?
________________________________________
From: Shannon Quinn [squinn.squinn@gmail.com] on behalf of Shannon Quinn [squinn@gatech.edu]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 8:20 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
When I did the 0.6 release Sean gave specific instructions that you'll
need MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx1g in order for the tests to pass. It doesn't relate
to the upload part but since the two processes are subsequent I do
recall getting burned by a similar error.
On 6/8/12 2:11 PM, Paritosh Ranjan wrote:
> Got a Java Heap Space Error in the last step of uploading mahout distribution :(.
> Is there any workaround for this, can I manually upload the artifacts for mahout-distribution?
> Otherwise I will have to repeat the complete length build again ( with increased Java Heap Space ).
>
> [INFO] [INFO] Trace
> [INFO] java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Jeff Eastman [jdog@windwardsolutions.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 6:14 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
>
> Yes, I'm done.
>
> On 6/8/12 5:16 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>> so Robin and Jeff,
>>
>> Are you done?
>>
>> (paritosh, all you need to do is ask directly)
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Paritosh Ranjan<pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Author: robinanil
>>> Date: Thu Jun 7 04:50:16 2012
>>> New Revision: 1347388
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1347388&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Seems like 32bit jvm only takes about 3 trying with smaller number to make
>>> builds correct
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1347347&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Fixing examples build, reduced jvm to just fit the 32bit machine
>>>
>>> Author: jeastman
>>> Date: Wed Jun 6 17:24:47 2012
>>> New Revision: 1346993
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346993&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> MAHOUT-1028:
>>> - Added zero vector corner case detection to 2 other CosineDistanceMeasure
>>> - All tests run
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346978&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> MAHOUT-1028:
>>> - Added unit test that produced a NaN pdf value with zero vector and/or
>>> zero cluster center
>>> - Added zero vector corner case detection to CosineDistanceMeasure
>>> - All tests run
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Ted Dunning [ted.dunning@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 9:24 AM
>>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
>>>
>>> Who is it that is committing?
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Paritosh Ranjan<pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The commits are indeed bug fixes.
>>>> The point is, do we wait for more commits like these or just go out and
>>>> release with what ever is committed.
>>>> ________________________________________
>>>> From: Ted Dunning [ted.dunning@gmail.com]
>>>> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 12:26 AM
>>>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
>>>>
>>>> I saw the announcement. As far as I am concerned, the freeze is on.
>>>>
>>>> That shouldn't stop all commits, but it should stop all commits not
>>>> intended to fix release bugs.
>>>>
>>>> Can you say who put in those commits?
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Paritosh Ranjan<pr...@xebia.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> Is the code freezed for 0.7?
>>>>> I checked out twice for release yesterday, but some commits came after
>>>>> that.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, I will wait till code freeze is announced again.
>>>>> ________________________________________
>>>>> From: Paritosh Ranjan [pranjan@xebia.com]
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 7:37 PM
>>>>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: Mahout Release : 0.7
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi dev,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please notify when the code is completely freezed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Paritosh
>>>>>
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Shannon Quinn <sq...@gatech.edu>.
When I did the 0.6 release Sean gave specific instructions that you'll
need MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx1g in order for the tests to pass. It doesn't relate
to the upload part but since the two processes are subsequent I do
recall getting burned by a similar error.
On 6/8/12 2:11 PM, Paritosh Ranjan wrote:
> Got a Java Heap Space Error in the last step of uploading mahout distribution :(.
> Is there any workaround for this, can I manually upload the artifacts for mahout-distribution?
> Otherwise I will have to repeat the complete length build again ( with increased Java Heap Space ).
>
> [INFO] [INFO] Trace
> [INFO] java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Jeff Eastman [jdog@windwardsolutions.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 6:14 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
>
> Yes, I'm done.
>
> On 6/8/12 5:16 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>> so Robin and Jeff,
>>
>> Are you done?
>>
>> (paritosh, all you need to do is ask directly)
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Paritosh Ranjan<pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Author: robinanil
>>> Date: Thu Jun 7 04:50:16 2012
>>> New Revision: 1347388
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1347388&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Seems like 32bit jvm only takes about 3 trying with smaller number to make
>>> builds correct
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1347347&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Fixing examples build, reduced jvm to just fit the 32bit machine
>>>
>>> Author: jeastman
>>> Date: Wed Jun 6 17:24:47 2012
>>> New Revision: 1346993
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346993&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> MAHOUT-1028:
>>> - Added zero vector corner case detection to 2 other CosineDistanceMeasure
>>> - All tests run
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346978&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> MAHOUT-1028:
>>> - Added unit test that produced a NaN pdf value with zero vector and/or
>>> zero cluster center
>>> - Added zero vector corner case detection to CosineDistanceMeasure
>>> - All tests run
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Ted Dunning [ted.dunning@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 9:24 AM
>>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
>>>
>>> Who is it that is committing?
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Paritosh Ranjan<pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The commits are indeed bug fixes.
>>>> The point is, do we wait for more commits like these or just go out and
>>>> release with what ever is committed.
>>>> ________________________________________
>>>> From: Ted Dunning [ted.dunning@gmail.com]
>>>> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 12:26 AM
>>>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
>>>>
>>>> I saw the announcement. As far as I am concerned, the freeze is on.
>>>>
>>>> That shouldn't stop all commits, but it should stop all commits not
>>>> intended to fix release bugs.
>>>>
>>>> Can you say who put in those commits?
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Paritosh Ranjan<pr...@xebia.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> Is the code freezed for 0.7?
>>>>> I checked out twice for release yesterday, but some commits came after
>>>>> that.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, I will wait till code freeze is announced again.
>>>>> ________________________________________
>>>>> From: Paritosh Ranjan [pranjan@xebia.com]
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 7:37 PM
>>>>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: Mahout Release : 0.7
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi dev,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please notify when the code is completely freezed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Paritosh
>>>>>
RE: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com>.
I will do the complete process again. Need to revert pom's first.
And need to update How to Release document later ( add point to increase Java Heap Space before release ) :)
________________________________________
From: Paritosh Ranjan [pranjan@xebia.com]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 8:11 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: RE: Mahout Release : 0.7
Got a Java Heap Space Error in the last step of uploading mahout distribution :(.
Is there any workaround for this, can I manually upload the artifacts for mahout-distribution?
Otherwise I will have to repeat the complete length build again ( with increased Java Heap Space ).
[INFO] [INFO] Trace
[INFO] java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
________________________________________
From: Jeff Eastman [jdog@windwardsolutions.com]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 6:14 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Yes, I'm done.
On 6/8/12 5:16 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> so Robin and Jeff,
>
> Are you done?
>
> (paritosh, all you need to do is ask directly)
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Paritosh Ranjan<pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
>
>> Author: robinanil
>> Date: Thu Jun 7 04:50:16 2012
>> New Revision: 1347388
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1347388&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Seems like 32bit jvm only takes about 3 trying with smaller number to make
>> builds correct
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1347347&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fixing examples build, reduced jvm to just fit the 32bit machine
>>
>> Author: jeastman
>> Date: Wed Jun 6 17:24:47 2012
>> New Revision: 1346993
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346993&view=rev
>> Log:
>> MAHOUT-1028:
>> - Added zero vector corner case detection to 2 other CosineDistanceMeasure
>> - All tests run
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346978&view=rev
>> Log:
>> MAHOUT-1028:
>> - Added unit test that produced a NaN pdf value with zero vector and/or
>> zero cluster center
>> - Added zero vector corner case detection to CosineDistanceMeasure
>> - All tests run
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Ted Dunning [ted.dunning@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 9:24 AM
>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
>>
>> Who is it that is committing?
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Paritosh Ranjan<pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The commits are indeed bug fixes.
>>> The point is, do we wait for more commits like these or just go out and
>>> release with what ever is committed.
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Ted Dunning [ted.dunning@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 12:26 AM
>>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
>>>
>>> I saw the announcement. As far as I am concerned, the freeze is on.
>>>
>>> That shouldn't stop all commits, but it should stop all commits not
>>> intended to fix release bugs.
>>>
>>> Can you say who put in those commits?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Paritosh Ranjan<pr...@xebia.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> Is the code freezed for 0.7?
>>>> I checked out twice for release yesterday, but some commits came after
>>>> that.
>>>>
>>>> So, I will wait till code freeze is announced again.
>>>> ________________________________________
>>>> From: Paritosh Ranjan [pranjan@xebia.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 7:37 PM
>>>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Mahout Release : 0.7
>>>>
>>>> Hi dev,
>>>>
>>>> Please notify when the code is completely freezed.
>>>>
>>>> Paritosh
>>>>
RE: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com>.
Got a Java Heap Space Error in the last step of uploading mahout distribution :(.
Is there any workaround for this, can I manually upload the artifacts for mahout-distribution?
Otherwise I will have to repeat the complete length build again ( with increased Java Heap Space ).
[INFO] [INFO] Trace
[INFO] java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
________________________________________
From: Jeff Eastman [jdog@windwardsolutions.com]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 6:14 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Yes, I'm done.
On 6/8/12 5:16 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> so Robin and Jeff,
>
> Are you done?
>
> (paritosh, all you need to do is ask directly)
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Paritosh Ranjan<pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
>
>> Author: robinanil
>> Date: Thu Jun 7 04:50:16 2012
>> New Revision: 1347388
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1347388&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Seems like 32bit jvm only takes about 3 trying with smaller number to make
>> builds correct
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1347347&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fixing examples build, reduced jvm to just fit the 32bit machine
>>
>> Author: jeastman
>> Date: Wed Jun 6 17:24:47 2012
>> New Revision: 1346993
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346993&view=rev
>> Log:
>> MAHOUT-1028:
>> - Added zero vector corner case detection to 2 other CosineDistanceMeasure
>> - All tests run
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346978&view=rev
>> Log:
>> MAHOUT-1028:
>> - Added unit test that produced a NaN pdf value with zero vector and/or
>> zero cluster center
>> - Added zero vector corner case detection to CosineDistanceMeasure
>> - All tests run
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Ted Dunning [ted.dunning@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 9:24 AM
>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
>>
>> Who is it that is committing?
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Paritosh Ranjan<pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The commits are indeed bug fixes.
>>> The point is, do we wait for more commits like these or just go out and
>>> release with what ever is committed.
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Ted Dunning [ted.dunning@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 12:26 AM
>>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
>>>
>>> I saw the announcement. As far as I am concerned, the freeze is on.
>>>
>>> That shouldn't stop all commits, but it should stop all commits not
>>> intended to fix release bugs.
>>>
>>> Can you say who put in those commits?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Paritosh Ranjan<pr...@xebia.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> Is the code freezed for 0.7?
>>>> I checked out twice for release yesterday, but some commits came after
>>>> that.
>>>>
>>>> So, I will wait till code freeze is announced again.
>>>> ________________________________________
>>>> From: Paritosh Ranjan [pranjan@xebia.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 7:37 PM
>>>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Mahout Release : 0.7
>>>>
>>>> Hi dev,
>>>>
>>>> Please notify when the code is completely freezed.
>>>>
>>>> Paritosh
>>>>
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Jeff Eastman <jd...@windwardsolutions.com>.
Yes, I'm done.
On 6/8/12 5:16 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> so Robin and Jeff,
>
> Are you done?
>
> (paritosh, all you need to do is ask directly)
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Paritosh Ranjan<pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
>
>> Author: robinanil
>> Date: Thu Jun 7 04:50:16 2012
>> New Revision: 1347388
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1347388&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Seems like 32bit jvm only takes about 3 trying with smaller number to make
>> builds correct
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1347347&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fixing examples build, reduced jvm to just fit the 32bit machine
>>
>> Author: jeastman
>> Date: Wed Jun 6 17:24:47 2012
>> New Revision: 1346993
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346993&view=rev
>> Log:
>> MAHOUT-1028:
>> - Added zero vector corner case detection to 2 other CosineDistanceMeasure
>> - All tests run
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346978&view=rev
>> Log:
>> MAHOUT-1028:
>> - Added unit test that produced a NaN pdf value with zero vector and/or
>> zero cluster center
>> - Added zero vector corner case detection to CosineDistanceMeasure
>> - All tests run
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Ted Dunning [ted.dunning@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 9:24 AM
>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
>>
>> Who is it that is committing?
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Paritosh Ranjan<pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The commits are indeed bug fixes.
>>> The point is, do we wait for more commits like these or just go out and
>>> release with what ever is committed.
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Ted Dunning [ted.dunning@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 12:26 AM
>>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
>>>
>>> I saw the announcement. As far as I am concerned, the freeze is on.
>>>
>>> That shouldn't stop all commits, but it should stop all commits not
>>> intended to fix release bugs.
>>>
>>> Can you say who put in those commits?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Paritosh Ranjan<pr...@xebia.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> Is the code freezed for 0.7?
>>>> I checked out twice for release yesterday, but some commits came after
>>>> that.
>>>>
>>>> So, I will wait till code freeze is announced again.
>>>> ________________________________________
>>>> From: Paritosh Ranjan [pranjan@xebia.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 7:37 PM
>>>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Mahout Release : 0.7
>>>>
>>>> Hi dev,
>>>>
>>>> Please notify when the code is completely freezed.
>>>>
>>>> Paritosh
>>>>
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
so Robin and Jeff,
Are you done?
(paritosh, all you need to do is ask directly)
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
> Author: robinanil
> Date: Thu Jun 7 04:50:16 2012
> New Revision: 1347388
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1347388&view=rev
> Log:
> Seems like 32bit jvm only takes about 3 trying with smaller number to make
> builds correct
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1347347&view=rev
> Log:
> Fixing examples build, reduced jvm to just fit the 32bit machine
>
> Author: jeastman
> Date: Wed Jun 6 17:24:47 2012
> New Revision: 1346993
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346993&view=rev
> Log:
> MAHOUT-1028:
> - Added zero vector corner case detection to 2 other CosineDistanceMeasure
> - All tests run
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346978&view=rev
> Log:
> MAHOUT-1028:
> - Added unit test that produced a NaN pdf value with zero vector and/or
> zero cluster center
> - Added zero vector corner case detection to CosineDistanceMeasure
> - All tests run
> ________________________________________
> From: Ted Dunning [ted.dunning@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 9:24 AM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
>
> Who is it that is committing?
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
>
> > The commits are indeed bug fixes.
> > The point is, do we wait for more commits like these or just go out and
> > release with what ever is committed.
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Ted Dunning [ted.dunning@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 12:26 AM
> > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
> >
> > I saw the announcement. As far as I am concerned, the freeze is on.
> >
> > That shouldn't stop all commits, but it should stop all commits not
> > intended to fix release bugs.
> >
> > Can you say who put in those commits?
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Is the code freezed for 0.7?
> > > I checked out twice for release yesterday, but some commits came after
> > > that.
> > >
> > > So, I will wait till code freeze is announced again.
> > > ________________________________________
> > > From: Paritosh Ranjan [pranjan@xebia.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 7:37 PM
> > > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > > Subject: Mahout Release : 0.7
> > >
> > > Hi dev,
> > >
> > > Please notify when the code is completely freezed.
> > >
> > > Paritosh
> > >
> >
>
RE: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com>.
Ok Thanks.
Most probably, I will create release candidates tonight ( few hours from now ).
________________________________________
From: Robin Anil [robin.anil@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 12:14 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
I am not checking in anything that is large. I am doing a best effort QA of
things, fixing minor issues as and when I see them. Like I said on the
thread. Release is not being blocked by anything. the ngram bug is not
reproducible. Please start creating candidates, so I can test them.
Robin
------
Robin Anil
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
> paritosh,
>
> Another approach is to simply start cutting a release with the
> understanding that it might get derailed by a change. At this point, I
> think you have a good chance of success.
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
>
> > Author: robinanil
> > Date: Thu Jun 7 04:50:16 2012
> > New Revision: 1347388
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1347388&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Seems like 32bit jvm only takes about 3 trying with smaller number to
> make
> > builds correct
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1347347&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Fixing examples build, reduced jvm to just fit the 32bit machine
> >
> > Author: jeastman
> > Date: Wed Jun 6 17:24:47 2012
> > New Revision: 1346993
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346993&view=rev
> > Log:
> > MAHOUT-1028:
> > - Added zero vector corner case detection to 2 other
> CosineDistanceMeasure
> > - All tests run
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346978&view=rev
> > Log:
> > MAHOUT-1028:
> > - Added unit test that produced a NaN pdf value with zero vector and/or
> > zero cluster center
> > - Added zero vector corner case detection to CosineDistanceMeasure
> > - All tests run
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Ted Dunning [ted.dunning@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 9:24 AM
> > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
> >
> > Who is it that is committing?
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > The commits are indeed bug fixes.
> > > The point is, do we wait for more commits like these or just go out and
> > > release with what ever is committed.
> > > ________________________________________
> > > From: Ted Dunning [ted.dunning@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 12:26 AM
> > > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
> > >
> > > I saw the announcement. As far as I am concerned, the freeze is on.
> > >
> > > That shouldn't stop all commits, but it should stop all commits not
> > > intended to fix release bugs.
> > >
> > > Can you say who put in those commits?
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is the code freezed for 0.7?
> > > > I checked out twice for release yesterday, but some commits came
> after
> > > > that.
> > > >
> > > > So, I will wait till code freeze is announced again.
> > > > ________________________________________
> > > > From: Paritosh Ranjan [pranjan@xebia.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 7:37 PM
> > > > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Mahout Release : 0.7
> > > >
> > > > Hi dev,
> > > >
> > > > Please notify when the code is completely freezed.
> > > >
> > > > Paritosh
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Robin Anil <ro...@gmail.com>.
I am not checking in anything that is large. I am doing a best effort QA of
things, fixing minor issues as and when I see them. Like I said on the
thread. Release is not being blocked by anything. the ngram bug is not
reproducible. Please start creating candidates, so I can test them.
Robin
------
Robin Anil
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
> paritosh,
>
> Another approach is to simply start cutting a release with the
> understanding that it might get derailed by a change. At this point, I
> think you have a good chance of success.
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
>
> > Author: robinanil
> > Date: Thu Jun 7 04:50:16 2012
> > New Revision: 1347388
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1347388&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Seems like 32bit jvm only takes about 3 trying with smaller number to
> make
> > builds correct
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1347347&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Fixing examples build, reduced jvm to just fit the 32bit machine
> >
> > Author: jeastman
> > Date: Wed Jun 6 17:24:47 2012
> > New Revision: 1346993
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346993&view=rev
> > Log:
> > MAHOUT-1028:
> > - Added zero vector corner case detection to 2 other
> CosineDistanceMeasure
> > - All tests run
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346978&view=rev
> > Log:
> > MAHOUT-1028:
> > - Added unit test that produced a NaN pdf value with zero vector and/or
> > zero cluster center
> > - Added zero vector corner case detection to CosineDistanceMeasure
> > - All tests run
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Ted Dunning [ted.dunning@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 9:24 AM
> > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
> >
> > Who is it that is committing?
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > The commits are indeed bug fixes.
> > > The point is, do we wait for more commits like these or just go out and
> > > release with what ever is committed.
> > > ________________________________________
> > > From: Ted Dunning [ted.dunning@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 12:26 AM
> > > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
> > >
> > > I saw the announcement. As far as I am concerned, the freeze is on.
> > >
> > > That shouldn't stop all commits, but it should stop all commits not
> > > intended to fix release bugs.
> > >
> > > Can you say who put in those commits?
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is the code freezed for 0.7?
> > > > I checked out twice for release yesterday, but some commits came
> after
> > > > that.
> > > >
> > > > So, I will wait till code freeze is announced again.
> > > > ________________________________________
> > > > From: Paritosh Ranjan [pranjan@xebia.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 7:37 PM
> > > > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Mahout Release : 0.7
> > > >
> > > > Hi dev,
> > > >
> > > > Please notify when the code is completely freezed.
> > > >
> > > > Paritosh
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
paritosh,
Another approach is to simply start cutting a release with the
understanding that it might get derailed by a change. At this point, I
think you have a good chance of success.
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
> Author: robinanil
> Date: Thu Jun 7 04:50:16 2012
> New Revision: 1347388
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1347388&view=rev
> Log:
> Seems like 32bit jvm only takes about 3 trying with smaller number to make
> builds correct
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1347347&view=rev
> Log:
> Fixing examples build, reduced jvm to just fit the 32bit machine
>
> Author: jeastman
> Date: Wed Jun 6 17:24:47 2012
> New Revision: 1346993
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346993&view=rev
> Log:
> MAHOUT-1028:
> - Added zero vector corner case detection to 2 other CosineDistanceMeasure
> - All tests run
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346978&view=rev
> Log:
> MAHOUT-1028:
> - Added unit test that produced a NaN pdf value with zero vector and/or
> zero cluster center
> - Added zero vector corner case detection to CosineDistanceMeasure
> - All tests run
> ________________________________________
> From: Ted Dunning [ted.dunning@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 9:24 AM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
>
> Who is it that is committing?
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
>
> > The commits are indeed bug fixes.
> > The point is, do we wait for more commits like these or just go out and
> > release with what ever is committed.
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Ted Dunning [ted.dunning@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 12:26 AM
> > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
> >
> > I saw the announcement. As far as I am concerned, the freeze is on.
> >
> > That shouldn't stop all commits, but it should stop all commits not
> > intended to fix release bugs.
> >
> > Can you say who put in those commits?
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Is the code freezed for 0.7?
> > > I checked out twice for release yesterday, but some commits came after
> > > that.
> > >
> > > So, I will wait till code freeze is announced again.
> > > ________________________________________
> > > From: Paritosh Ranjan [pranjan@xebia.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 7:37 PM
> > > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > > Subject: Mahout Release : 0.7
> > >
> > > Hi dev,
> > >
> > > Please notify when the code is completely freezed.
> > >
> > > Paritosh
> > >
> >
>
RE: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com>.
Author: robinanil
Date: Thu Jun 7 04:50:16 2012
New Revision: 1347388
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1347388&view=rev
Log:
Seems like 32bit jvm only takes about 3 trying with smaller number to make builds correct
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1347347&view=rev
Log:
Fixing examples build, reduced jvm to just fit the 32bit machine
Author: jeastman
Date: Wed Jun 6 17:24:47 2012
New Revision: 1346993
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346993&view=rev
Log:
MAHOUT-1028:
- Added zero vector corner case detection to 2 other CosineDistanceMeasure
- All tests run
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346978&view=rev
Log:
MAHOUT-1028:
- Added unit test that produced a NaN pdf value with zero vector and/or zero cluster center
- Added zero vector corner case detection to CosineDistanceMeasure
- All tests run
________________________________________
From: Ted Dunning [ted.dunning@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 9:24 AM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Who is it that is committing?
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
> The commits are indeed bug fixes.
> The point is, do we wait for more commits like these or just go out and
> release with what ever is committed.
> ________________________________________
> From: Ted Dunning [ted.dunning@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 12:26 AM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
>
> I saw the announcement. As far as I am concerned, the freeze is on.
>
> That shouldn't stop all commits, but it should stop all commits not
> intended to fix release bugs.
>
> Can you say who put in those commits?
>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
>
> > Is the code freezed for 0.7?
> > I checked out twice for release yesterday, but some commits came after
> > that.
> >
> > So, I will wait till code freeze is announced again.
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Paritosh Ranjan [pranjan@xebia.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 7:37 PM
> > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > Subject: Mahout Release : 0.7
> >
> > Hi dev,
> >
> > Please notify when the code is completely freezed.
> >
> > Paritosh
> >
>
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
Who is it that is committing?
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
> The commits are indeed bug fixes.
> The point is, do we wait for more commits like these or just go out and
> release with what ever is committed.
> ________________________________________
> From: Ted Dunning [ted.dunning@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 12:26 AM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
>
> I saw the announcement. As far as I am concerned, the freeze is on.
>
> That shouldn't stop all commits, but it should stop all commits not
> intended to fix release bugs.
>
> Can you say who put in those commits?
>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
>
> > Is the code freezed for 0.7?
> > I checked out twice for release yesterday, but some commits came after
> > that.
> >
> > So, I will wait till code freeze is announced again.
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Paritosh Ranjan [pranjan@xebia.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 7:37 PM
> > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > Subject: Mahout Release : 0.7
> >
> > Hi dev,
> >
> > Please notify when the code is completely freezed.
> >
> > Paritosh
> >
>
RE: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com>.
The commits are indeed bug fixes.
The point is, do we wait for more commits like these or just go out and release with what ever is committed.
________________________________________
From: Ted Dunning [ted.dunning@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 12:26 AM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
I saw the announcement. As far as I am concerned, the freeze is on.
That shouldn't stop all commits, but it should stop all commits not
intended to fix release bugs.
Can you say who put in those commits?
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
> Is the code freezed for 0.7?
> I checked out twice for release yesterday, but some commits came after
> that.
>
> So, I will wait till code freeze is announced again.
> ________________________________________
> From: Paritosh Ranjan [pranjan@xebia.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 7:37 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Mahout Release : 0.7
>
> Hi dev,
>
> Please notify when the code is completely freezed.
>
> Paritosh
>
Re: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
I saw the announcement. As far as I am concerned, the freeze is on.
That shouldn't stop all commits, but it should stop all commits not
intended to fix release bugs.
Can you say who put in those commits?
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com> wrote:
> Is the code freezed for 0.7?
> I checked out twice for release yesterday, but some commits came after
> that.
>
> So, I will wait till code freeze is announced again.
> ________________________________________
> From: Paritosh Ranjan [pranjan@xebia.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 7:37 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Mahout Release : 0.7
>
> Hi dev,
>
> Please notify when the code is completely freezed.
>
> Paritosh
>
RE: Mahout Release : 0.7
Posted by Paritosh Ranjan <pr...@xebia.com>.
Is the code freezed for 0.7?
I checked out twice for release yesterday, but some commits came after that.
So, I will wait till code freeze is announced again.
________________________________________
From: Paritosh Ranjan [pranjan@xebia.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 7:37 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Mahout Release : 0.7
Hi dev,
Please notify when the code is completely freezed.
Paritosh