You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org> on 2004/02/02 20:54:07 UTC

Converting Coyote to Java2 collections

Are there any big complaints if I convert Coyote to use Java2 
collections ? (less sync)
Or is the pure JDK 1.1 compatibility still a big plus ?

Rémy


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: Converting Coyote to Java2 collections

Posted by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>.
Bill Barker wrote:
> As long as they go back to j-t (esp. Expirer & Reaper), I'm +1.

I can leave those two classes, no problem. It's not as if they were 
really big.

Rémy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: Converting Coyote to Java2 collections

Posted by Bill Barker <wb...@wilshire.com>.
As long as they go back to j-t (esp. Expirer & Reaper), I'm +1.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Remy Maucherat" <re...@apache.org>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <to...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 5:14 AM
Subject: Re: Converting Coyote to Java2 collections


Bill Barker wrote:
> I suppose that Coyote can be optional for TC 3.3.  I'm a bit less
> comfortable on using them in o.a.t.u (since that would force a Java2
> requirement on 3.3).

Stuff I'm considering for removal:
- o.a.t.util.collections (except MultiMap - which might as well be
merged into Parameters, BTW)
- o.a.t.util.log (except SLH and CL)
- o.a.t.util.mx (experiments for commons-modeler)
- o.a.t.util.threads: Epirer, Reaper, ThreadPoolMX

Of course, I'm only using TC 5, so ... ;)

Rémy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: Converting Coyote to Java2 collections

Posted by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>.
Bill Barker wrote:
> I suppose that Coyote can be optional for TC 3.3.  I'm a bit less
> comfortable on using them in o.a.t.u (since that would force a Java2
> requirement on 3.3).

Stuff I'm considering for removal:
- o.a.t.util.collections (except MultiMap - which might as well be 
merged into Parameters, BTW)
- o.a.t.util.log (except SLH and CL)
- o.a.t.util.mx (experiments for commons-modeler)
- o.a.t.util.threads: Epirer, Reaper, ThreadPoolMX

Of course, I'm only using TC 5, so ... ;)

Rémy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

[PROPOSAL] Configurable session id length

Posted by Jan Luehe <Ja...@Sun.COM>.
Is there any interest in making the session id length configurable?
If so, please consider my patch (attached).

Thanks,

Jan

Re: Converting Coyote to Java2 collections

Posted by Bill Barker <wb...@wilshire.com>.
If you want to move o.a.t.u.log back to j-t, I've got no objection.  I don't
think that anybody is using o.a.t.u.handler.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Remy Maucherat" <re...@apache.org>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <to...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: Converting Coyote to Java2 collections


Bill Barker wrote:
> I suppose that Coyote can be optional for TC 3.3.  I'm a bit less
> comfortable on using them in o.a.t.u (since that would force a Java2
> requirement on 3.3).

The thing which was annoying me the most was the attributes Hashtable in
the request.
I think util is using mostly custom structures for GC and speed.

There's also deprecated stuff in util (logging, etc). Should this also
be left in for compatibility ?

Rémy


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: Converting Coyote to Java2 collections

Posted by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>.
Bill Barker wrote:
> I suppose that Coyote can be optional for TC 3.3.  I'm a bit less
> comfortable on using them in o.a.t.u (since that would force a Java2
> requirement on 3.3).

The thing which was annoying me the most was the attributes Hashtable in 
the request.
I think util is using mostly custom structures for GC and speed.

There's also deprecated stuff in util (logging, etc). Should this also 
be left in for compatibility ?

Rémy


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: Converting Coyote to Java2 collections

Posted by Bill Barker <wb...@wilshire.com>.
I suppose that Coyote can be optional for TC 3.3.  I'm a bit less
comfortable on using them in o.a.t.u (since that would force a Java2
requirement on 3.3).

----- Original Message -----
From: "Remy Maucherat" <re...@apache.org>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <to...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 11:54 AM
Subject: Converting Coyote to Java2 collections


Are there any big complaints if I convert Coyote to use Java2
collections ? (less sync)
Or is the pure JDK 1.1 compatibility still a big plus ?

Rémy


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

RE: Converting Coyote to Java2 collections

Posted by "Filip Hanik (lists)" <de...@hanik.com>.
no complaints here :)

just be careful of those ConcurrentModificationException(s) that are lurking
in the iterators :-)

Filip

-----Original Message-----
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:remm@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 11:54 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Converting Coyote to Java2 collections


Are there any big complaints if I convert Coyote to use Java2
collections ? (less sync)
Or is the pure JDK 1.1 compatibility still a big plus ?

Rémy


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.576 / Virus Database: 365 - Release Date: 1/30/2004

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.576 / Virus Database: 365 - Release Date: 1/30/2004


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org