You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to github@arrow.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/05/01 18:48:53 UTC

[GitHub] [arrow-datafusion] alamb commented on issue #234: Consider publishing crate as arrow-datafusion

alamb commented on issue #234:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/234#issuecomment-830677355


   @andygrove  I personally think we should not confuse things by adding a new crate name. Once we get the arrow-rs versions releasing more regularly then I think we should start releasing datafausion on whatever cadence makes sense for it
   
   I think people can draw their own conclusion of its maturity based on the number / frequency of major releases
   
   Other than marketing / appearance of maturity, I don't think there is any  technical difference between publishing datafusion major versions and pre 1.0 versions 0.1, 0.2, etc. 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org