You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to pluto-dev@portals.apache.org by Marc Veary <nw...@googlemail.com> on 2007/07/06 13:55:04 UTC
Java 5 with the trunk
Hi,
Is everyone using Java 5 or greater when compiling the trunk?
The reason I ask is that Maven complained when I compiled a class with
generics - so I have unpdated the project POM to force the use of Java 5.
But I didn't want to raise a JIRA on this until I had checked.
Kind regards,
--
Marc
Re: Java 5 with the trunk
Posted by Marc Veary <nw...@googlemail.com>.
I'll create a JIRA for it and add a patch.
On 7/6/07, Elliot Metsger <em...@jhu.edu> wrote:
>
> Yeah we are requiring Java 5 on the trunk. The POM should be updated to
> reflect that.
>
> Elliot
>
> Marc Veary wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is everyone using Java 5 or greater when compiling the trunk?
> >
> > The reason I ask is that Maven complained when I compiled a class with
> > generics - so I have unpdated the project POM to force the use of Java
> 5.
> > But I didn't want to raise a JIRA on this until I had checked.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > --
> > Marc
> >
>
Re: Java 5 with the trunk
Posted by Elliot Metsger <em...@jhu.edu>.
Yeah we are requiring Java 5 on the trunk. The POM should be updated to
reflect that.
Elliot
Marc Veary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is everyone using Java 5 or greater when compiling the trunk?
>
> The reason I ask is that Maven complained when I compiled a class with
> generics - so I have unpdated the project POM to force the use of Java 5.
> But I didn't want to raise a JIRA on this until I had checked.
>
> Kind regards,
> --
> Marc
>
Re: Java 5 with the trunk
Posted by Marc Veary <nw...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Craig,
Bit by bit - the 'little and often' approach I have found to be the best in
refactoring work, so generally I will do one class and related classes at a
time. I don't even want to do a whole package at one go. Change-test,
change-test, etc.
Kind regards,
--
Marc
On 7/6/07, CDoremus@hannaford.com <CD...@hannaford.com> wrote:
>
>
> Marc,
>
> I agree with Elliot that we should now use Java 5 on the trunk, but I'd
> like to add that we should keep the pluto-1.1.x branch at JDK 1.4compatibility.
>
> What is your strategy on doing the Generics refactoring? Are you doing on
> everything at once. or one or more modules at a time?
>
> Thank you for all your hard work the last few weeks.
> /Craig
>
>
>
> *"Marc Veary" <nw...@googlemail.com>*
>
> 07/06/2007 07:55 AM Please respond to
> pluto-dev@portals.apache.org
>
> To
> pluto-dev@portals.apache.org cc
>
> Subject
> Java 5 with the trunk
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Is everyone using Java 5 or greater when compiling the trunk?
>
> The reason I ask is that Maven complained when I compiled a class with
> generics - so I have unpdated the project POM to force the use of Java 5.
> But I didn't want to raise a JIRA on this until I had checked.
>
> Kind regards,
> --
> Marc
>
>
Re: Java 5 with the trunk
Posted by CD...@hannaford.com.
Marc,
I agree with Elliot that we should now use Java 5 on the trunk, but I'd
like to add that we should keep the pluto-1.1.x branch at JDK 1.4
compatibility.
What is your strategy on doing the Generics refactoring? Are you doing on
everything at once. or one or more modules at a time?
Thank you for all your hard work the last few weeks.
/Craig
"Marc Veary" <nw...@googlemail.com>
07/06/2007 07:55 AM
Please respond to
pluto-dev@portals.apache.org
To
pluto-dev@portals.apache.org
cc
Subject
Java 5 with the trunk
Hi,
Is everyone using Java 5 or greater when compiling the trunk?
The reason I ask is that Maven complained when I compiled a class with
generics - so I have unpdated the project POM to force the use of Java 5.
But I didn't want to raise a JIRA on this until I had checked.
Kind regards,
--
Marc