You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Joe Rozner <jo...@deadbytes.net> on 2010/06/23 03:42:56 UTC
Ruby bindings don't work with 1.9 + patch
The ruby bindings were having issues being used with Ruby 1.9 due to changes in the case syntax. Here is a patch file that fixes the issue.
Joe Rozner
joe@deadbytes.net
Re: Ruby bindings don't work with 1.9 + patch
Posted by Joe Rozner <jo...@deadbytes.net>.
Sorry about that, I was in a rush to get it done and wasn't really paying attention. And yes, it should be back ported to the 1.6 branch.
Joe Rozner
On Jun 24, 2010, at 4:15 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> Applied in r957507. I noticed the patch was against 1.6.12, but it
> applied cleanly to trunk. In the future, please make patches against
> trunk (and hopefully include a log message).
>
> Should this be backported to the 1.6.x branch?
>
> Cheers,
> -Hyrum
>
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Joe Rozner <jo...@deadbytes.net> wrote:
>> Sorry about that, here is the patch file again as a .txt file.
>>
>> Joe Rozner
>>
>>
>> On Jun 23, 2010, at 12:25 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Joe Rozner [mailto:joe@deadbytes.net]
>>>> Sent: woensdag 23 juni 2010 5:43
>>>> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Ruby bindings don't work with 1.9 + patch
>>>>
>>>> The ruby bindings were having issues being used with Ruby 1.9 due to
>>>> changes in the case syntax. Here is a patch file that fixes the issue.
>>>>
>>>> Joe Rozner
>>>> joe@deadbytes.net
>>>
>>> Hi Joe,
>>>
>>> Your patch didn't reach the list. Can you try resending your patch?
>>> (Possibly with a .txt extension)
>>>
>>> I can't check your patch now to check if it has one, but adding a log
>>> message to your patch (either in the patch file or in the mail) makes
>>> reviewing much easier.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Bert
>>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: Ruby bindings don't work with 1.9 + patch
Posted by Joe Rozner <jo...@deadbytes.net>.
Sorry about that, I was in a rush to get it done and wasn't really paying attention. And yes, it should be back ported to the 1.6 branch.
Joe Rozner
On Jun 24, 2010, at 4:15 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> Applied in r957507. I noticed the patch was against 1.6.12, but it
> applied cleanly to trunk. In the future, please make patches against
> trunk (and hopefully include a log message).
>
> Should this be backported to the 1.6.x branch?
>
> Cheers,
> -Hyrum
>
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Joe Rozner <jo...@deadbytes.net> wrote:
>> Sorry about that, here is the patch file again as a .txt file.
>>
>> Joe Rozner
>>
>>
>> On Jun 23, 2010, at 12:25 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Joe Rozner [mailto:joe@deadbytes.net]
>>>> Sent: woensdag 23 juni 2010 5:43
>>>> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Ruby bindings don't work with 1.9 + patch
>>>>
>>>> The ruby bindings were having issues being used with Ruby 1.9 due to
>>>> changes in the case syntax. Here is a patch file that fixes the issue.
>>>>
>>>> Joe Rozner
>>>> joe@deadbytes.net
>>>
>>> Hi Joe,
>>>
>>> Your patch didn't reach the list. Can you try resending your patch?
>>> (Possibly with a .txt extension)
>>>
>>> I can't check your patch now to check if it has one, but adding a log
>>> message to your patch (either in the patch file or in the mail) makes
>>> reviewing much easier.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Bert
>>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: Ruby bindings don't work with 1.9 + patch
Posted by Joe Swatosh <jo...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:15 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
<hy...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
> Applied in r957507. I noticed the patch was against 1.6.12, but it
> applied cleanly to trunk. In the future, please make patches against
> trunk (and hopefully include a log message).
>
> Should this be backported to the 1.6.x branch?
>
> Cheers,
> -Hyrum
>
Thanks Joe and Hyrum,
I'm working on getting the bindings to build 1.8.7 on mingw, so I'm
completely distracted and barely keeping up with the list....
--
Joe Swatosh
Re: Ruby bindings don't work with 1.9 + patch
Posted by "Hyrum K. Wright" <hy...@mail.utexas.edu>.
Applied in r957507. I noticed the patch was against 1.6.12, but it
applied cleanly to trunk. In the future, please make patches against
trunk (and hopefully include a log message).
Should this be backported to the 1.6.x branch?
Cheers,
-Hyrum
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Joe Rozner <jo...@deadbytes.net> wrote:
> Sorry about that, here is the patch file again as a .txt file.
>
> Joe Rozner
>
>
> On Jun 23, 2010, at 12:25 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Joe Rozner [mailto:joe@deadbytes.net]
>>> Sent: woensdag 23 juni 2010 5:43
>>> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
>>> Subject: Ruby bindings don't work with 1.9 + patch
>>>
>>> The ruby bindings were having issues being used with Ruby 1.9 due to
>>> changes in the case syntax. Here is a patch file that fixes the issue.
>>>
>>> Joe Rozner
>>> joe@deadbytes.net
>>
>> Hi Joe,
>>
>> Your patch didn't reach the list. Can you try resending your patch?
>> (Possibly with a .txt extension)
>>
>> I can't check your patch now to check if it has one, but adding a log
>> message to your patch (either in the patch file or in the mail) makes
>> reviewing much easier.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bert
>>
>
>
>
Re: Ruby bindings don't work with 1.9 + patch
Posted by Joe Rozner <jo...@deadbytes.net>.
Sorry about that, here is the patch file again as a .txt file.
Joe Rozner
RE: Ruby bindings don't work with 1.9 + patch
Posted by Bert Huijben <be...@qqmail.nl>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Rozner [mailto:joe@deadbytes.net]
> Sent: woensdag 23 juni 2010 5:43
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Ruby bindings don't work with 1.9 + patch
>
> The ruby bindings were having issues being used with Ruby 1.9 due to
> changes in the case syntax. Here is a patch file that fixes the issue.
>
> Joe Rozner
> joe@deadbytes.net
Hi Joe,
Your patch didn't reach the list. Can you try resending your patch?
(Possibly with a .txt extension)
I can't check your patch now to check if it has one, but adding a log
message to your patch (either in the patch file or in the mail) makes
reviewing much easier.
Thanks,
Bert