Different backend storage (columnar)

[Sonny Heer <so...@gmail.com>]

We are using Kylin 1.6 for a while now.  One the problems we continue to
run into is having to maintain HBase backend.  Typically regionservers go
down for different reasons.

We prefer to move to a columnar storage backend.  I heard there was a
version of kylin that replaced HBase?  Any updates on this and where we can
get a hold of this?

Thanks

Re: Different backend storage (columnar)

[prasanna lakshmi <pr...@gmail.com>]

Please make it available different back end database.I am also facing the
same issue in cluster. In my clusters physical servers are getting down
because of kylin. Please make kylin as light weight tool. It's performance
is too good but it needs so many other resources too.My critical situation
is all my kylin servers are getting down frequently,so it's affecting other
applications also running in the same servers. Can you please tell me in
what conditions kylin make servers to down physically.

On Dec 9, 2017 3:13 AM, "Sonny Heer" <so...@gmail.com> wrote:

> We are using Kylin 1.6 for a while now.  One the problems we continue to
> run into is having to maintain HBase backend.  Typically regionservers go
> down for different reasons.
>
> We prefer to move to a columnar storage backend.  I heard there was a
> version of kylin that replaced HBase?  Any updates on this and where we can
> get a hold of this?
>
> Thanks
>

Re: Different backend storage (columnar)

[Sonny Heer <so...@gmail.com>]

Thanks for the info Billy!

I figured I'd ask here if there was an option to replace HBase with one of
the popular columnar storages (parquet, arrow, etc.).  Sounds like there
KyStorage is something similar.  I will dig into this more.  HBase is just
overkill for what we want to do here...

On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Billy Liu <bi...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hello Sonny,
>
> There are some vendor solutions based on Apache Kylin core. They have
> different storage engines to provide strong stability and other enterprise
> features. I have sent you another mail offline to go through the vendor
> products.
>
> 2017-12-09 5:43 GMT+08:00 Sonny Heer <so...@gmail.com>:
>
>> We are using Kylin 1.6 for a while now.  One the problems we continue to
>> run into is having to maintain HBase backend.  Typically regionservers go
>> down for different reasons.
>>
>> We prefer to move to a columnar storage backend.  I heard there was a
>> version of kylin that replaced HBase?  Any updates on this and where we can
>> get a hold of this?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>
>

Re: Different backend storage (columnar)

[Billy Liu <bi...@apache.org>]

Hello Sonny,

There are some vendor solutions based on Apache Kylin core. They have
different storage engines to provide strong stability and other enterprise
features. I have sent you another mail offline to go through the vendor
products.

2017-12-09 5:43 GMT+08:00 Sonny Heer <so...@gmail.com>:

> We are using Kylin 1.6 for a while now.  One the problems we continue to
> run into is having to maintain HBase backend.  Typically regionservers go
> down for different reasons.
>
> We prefer to move to a columnar storage backend.  I heard there was a
> version of kylin that replaced HBase?  Any updates on this and where we can
> get a hold of this?
>
> Thanks
>