You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tapestry.apache.org by Jochen Berger <fo...@googlemail.com> on 2011/10/13 08:56:35 UTC
Underscore binding
Hi there,
I've been struggling whether to post this on the users' or the devs'
list, but I ended up asking here. Sorry if that's not appropriate.
So, from Tapestry 5.3, the underscore.js library is shipped. While I'm
quite happy about that fact, I'm getting issues with a JS library that
also ships underscore and also binds it to window._.
I also asked the devs to use the noConflict() mode to bind it in their
own namespace and I'd like to propose the same to you. I think that if
libraries provide a noConflict() mode, we should use it and not make the
"Prototype mistake", if you know what I mean.
I guess T5._ would be a good place for underscore.js to live in. And you
would still be free to bind it to a function-scoped var _ if you wanted to.
What do you think, should I raise a JIRA or do you think it's nonsense?
Jochen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Underscore binding
Posted by Taha Hafeez Siddiqi <ta...@gmail.com>.
Hi Jochen
Definitely not nonsense :)
Please file a jira
regards
Taha
On Oct 13, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Jochen Berger wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've been struggling whether to post this on the users' or the devs' list, but I ended up asking here. Sorry if that's not appropriate.
> So, from Tapestry 5.3, the underscore.js library is shipped. While I'm quite happy about that fact, I'm getting issues with a JS library that also ships underscore and also binds it to window._.
> I also asked the devs to use the noConflict() mode to bind it in their own namespace and I'd like to propose the same to you. I think that if libraries provide a noConflict() mode, we should use it and not make the "Prototype mistake", if you know what I mean.
> I guess T5._ would be a good place for underscore.js to live in. And you would still be free to bind it to a function-scoped var _ if you wanted to.
> What do you think, should I raise a JIRA or do you think it's nonsense?
>
> Jochen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org