You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fx-dev@ws.apache.org by Yves Langisch <li...@langisch.ch> on 2005/03/24 09:27:50 UTC
Signing huge SOAP requests
All,
Is there anyone having experiences (memory requirements,
performance, ...) with signing huge SOAP requests (w/o attachments, body
is about 100MB) with WSS4J?
Thanks
Yves
Re: Signing huge SOAP requests
Posted by Werner Dittmann <We...@t-online.de>.
Yves,
looking at this it seems that this is not a problem of WSS4J but of the
underlying
XML security lib. WSS4J delegates the whole signature processing to
xmlsec lib.
Maybe you can copy your problem to the xmlsec mailing list? AFAIK there
were some
discussions about signing very large objects on this list some time ago.
Regards,
Werner
Yves Langisch schrieb:
>Not at all!
>
>We really have huge data to sign. And obviously the in-memory
>DOM-representation itself is not the problem. With appropriate VM-params I'm
>able to parse a 100MB file into a DOM-document. The problems start while
>signing. The memory demand is much higher than during parsing and I'm able
>to sign "only" a 10MB SOAP request.
>
>Are there any streaming/event based (SAX, StAX) security libraries which are
>able to handle such huge requests (performance has not top priority)?
>
>Yves
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:davanum@gmail.com]
>Sent: Donnerstag, 24. März 2005 13:55
>To: Yves Langisch
>Cc: fx-dev@ws.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Signing huge SOAP requests
>
>You kidding me? that's huge!. problem is that the whole thing needs to
>be in DOM as xml-security (AND the w3c specs) works on DOM and not
>streaming/sax stuff.
>
>-- dims
>
>On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:27:50 +0100, Yves Langisch <li...@langisch.ch> wrote:
>
>
>>All,
>>
>>Is there anyone having experiences (memory requirements,
>>performance, ...) with signing huge SOAP requests (w/o attachments, body
>>is about 100MB) with WSS4J?
>>
>>Thanks
>>Yves
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
RE: Signing huge SOAP requests
Posted by Yves Langisch <li...@langisch.ch>.
Not at all!
We really have huge data to sign. And obviously the in-memory
DOM-representation itself is not the problem. With appropriate VM-params I'm
able to parse a 100MB file into a DOM-document. The problems start while
signing. The memory demand is much higher than during parsing and I'm able
to sign "only" a 10MB SOAP request.
Are there any streaming/event based (SAX, StAX) security libraries which are
able to handle such huge requests (performance has not top priority)?
Yves
-----Original Message-----
From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:davanum@gmail.com]
Sent: Donnerstag, 24. März 2005 13:55
To: Yves Langisch
Cc: fx-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Signing huge SOAP requests
You kidding me? that's huge!. problem is that the whole thing needs to
be in DOM as xml-security (AND the w3c specs) works on DOM and not
streaming/sax stuff.
-- dims
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:27:50 +0100, Yves Langisch <li...@langisch.ch> wrote:
> All,
>
> Is there anyone having experiences (memory requirements,
> performance, ...) with signing huge SOAP requests (w/o attachments, body
> is about 100MB) with WSS4J?
>
> Thanks
> Yves
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
RE: Signing huge SOAP requests
Posted by Yves Langisch <li...@langisch.ch>.
Not at all!
We really have huge data to sign. And obviously the in-memory
DOM-representation itself is not the problem. With appropriate VM-params I'm
able to parse a 100MB file into a DOM-document. The problems start while
signing. The memory demand is much higher than during parsing and I'm able
to sign "only" a 10MB SOAP request.
Are there any streaming/event based (SAX, StAX) security libraries which are
able to handle such huge requests (performance has not top priority)?
Yves
-----Original Message-----
From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:davanum@gmail.com]
Sent: Donnerstag, 24. März 2005 13:55
To: Yves Langisch
Cc: fx-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Signing huge SOAP requests
You kidding me? that's huge!. problem is that the whole thing needs to
be in DOM as xml-security (AND the w3c specs) works on DOM and not
streaming/sax stuff.
-- dims
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:27:50 +0100, Yves Langisch <li...@langisch.ch> wrote:
> All,
>
> Is there anyone having experiences (memory requirements,
> performance, ...) with signing huge SOAP requests (w/o attachments, body
> is about 100MB) with WSS4J?
>
> Thanks
> Yves
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
Re: Signing huge SOAP requests
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
You kidding me? that's huge!. problem is that the whole thing needs to
be in DOM as xml-security (AND the w3c specs) works on DOM and not
streaming/sax stuff.
-- dims
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:27:50 +0100, Yves Langisch <li...@langisch.ch> wrote:
> All,
>
> Is there anyone having experiences (memory requirements,
> performance, ...) with signing huge SOAP requests (w/o attachments, body
> is about 100MB) with WSS4J?
>
> Thanks
> Yves
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/