You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@calcite.apache.org by Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com> on 2019/07/21 07:28:41 UTC
[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Hi all,
Approximately one month has passed from the previous release (Calcite
1.20.0) and I was thinking that it would be nice to have the next release
out by the end of August. To do this I think we should try to have an RC
around the 20 of August.
The progress towards the next release can be seen in [1]. As you can
observe we do not have many issues marked for fixing for 1.21.0 but we do
have many pull requests.
I would like to invite committers to go over the existing PRs and for those
that we plan to review and finalize in the next month or so set the fix
version to 1.21.0 adding an appropriate comment.
In term of priorities, I think we should emphasize on finalizing and
merging PRs that are blocking other open source projects and commercial
products from upgrading to the latest release. If it is not already done
please assign this issues the highest priority (blocker) and set the fix
version to 1.21.0.
Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in FIFO order.
Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged to
contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
Don't hesitate to reply to this thread if the plan above is not convenient
for you!
Best,
Stamatis
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
AW: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Julian Feinauer <j....@pragmaticminds.de>.
Hi Stamatis,
Thank you for the overview.
Currently Julian is working on a Pr of mine which does not exactly fix CALCITE-1935 but at least bring in the first support for MATCH_RECOGNIZE which I would consider at list a partial success.
But as the PR is rather big and the branch lived for two years Julian had to comment whether he thinks he can manage it.
Best
JulianF
Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet
-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Von: Chunwei Lei
An: dev@calcite.apache.org
Cc:
Thanks for your work, Stamatis!
Besides issues you mentioned above, I wonder if CALCITE-1581
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1581> can be included in
1.21.0.
Best,
Chunwei
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 6:29 AM Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> We are about three weeks before RC0 and we still have a big number of
> pending PRs.
> Moreover there are only a few Jira cases that are marked to be fixed in
> 1.21.0.
>
> If we assume that we have 10 active committers at the moment and each one
> of them takes on ~5 PRs till the 20th of August,
> we should have at least 50 Jiras marked to be resolved for the next
> version.
>
> I would like to kindly ask people to go through the PRs, select those that
> are going to make it for 1.21.0, and set the fix version accordingly.
>
> At the moment we have resolved 46 issues in Jira [1]. It would be great if
> we could bring this number to 50 by 7th of August.
>
> I've seen that Enrico started another thread about regressions on 1.20.0.
> Let's try to attack this issues first to allow people upgrade to the latest
> release.
>
> Among the issues that we would like to include in 1.21.0, I would like to
> highlight the following:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3142
>
> Best,
> Stamatis
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 1:56 PM Chunwei Lei <ch...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for release at end of August.
> >
> > > Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in FIFO
> > order.
> > Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged to
> > contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
> >
> > +1 since it is very important for encouraging contributors.
> >
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Chunwei
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:19 AM Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > >Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in FIFO
> > > order.
> > > Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged to
> > > contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
> > >
> > > There are 110+ PRs on the GitHub page, what should we do ?
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Danny Chan
> > > 在 2019年7月22日 +0800 AM6:19，dev@calcite.apache.org，写道：
> > > >
> > > > Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in FIFO
> > > order.
> > > > Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged to
> > > > contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Chunwei Lei <ch...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for your work, Stamatis!
Besides issues you mentioned above, I wonder if CALCITE-1581
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1581> can be included in
1.21.0.
Best,
Chunwei
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 6:29 AM Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> We are about three weeks before RC0 and we still have a big number of
> pending PRs.
> Moreover there are only a few Jira cases that are marked to be fixed in
> 1.21.0.
>
> If we assume that we have 10 active committers at the moment and each one
> of them takes on ~5 PRs till the 20th of August,
> we should have at least 50 Jiras marked to be resolved for the next
> version.
>
> I would like to kindly ask people to go through the PRs, select those that
> are going to make it for 1.21.0, and set the fix version accordingly.
>
> At the moment we have resolved 46 issues in Jira [1]. It would be great if
> we could bring this number to 50 by 7th of August.
>
> I've seen that Enrico started another thread about regressions on 1.20.0.
> Let's try to attack this issues first to allow people upgrade to the latest
> release.
>
> Among the issues that we would like to include in 1.21.0, I would like to
> highlight the following:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3142
>
> Best,
> Stamatis
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 1:56 PM Chunwei Lei <ch...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for release at end of August.
> >
> > > Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in FIFO
> > order.
> > Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged to
> > contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
> >
> > +1 since it is very important for encouraging contributors.
> >
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Chunwei
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:19 AM Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > >Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in FIFO
> > > order.
> > > Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged to
> > > contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
> > >
> > > There are 110+ PRs on the GitHub page, what should we do ?
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Danny Chan
> > > 在 2019年7月22日 +0800 AM6:19，dev@calcite.apache.org，写道：
> > > >
> > > > Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in FIFO
> > > order.
> > > > Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged to
> > > > contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>.
We are about three weeks before RC0 and we still have a big number of
pending PRs.
Moreover there are only a few Jira cases that are marked to be fixed in
1.21.0.
If we assume that we have 10 active committers at the moment and each one
of them takes on ~5 PRs till the 20th of August,
we should have at least 50 Jiras marked to be resolved for the next version.
I would like to kindly ask people to go through the PRs, select those that
are going to make it for 1.21.0, and set the fix version accordingly.
At the moment we have resolved 46 issues in Jira [1]. It would be great if
we could bring this number to 50 by 7th of August.
I've seen that Enrico started another thread about regressions on 1.20.0.
Let's try to attack this issues first to allow people upgrade to the latest
release.
Among the issues that we would like to include in 1.21.0, I would like to
highlight the following:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3142
Best,
Stamatis
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 1:56 PM Chunwei Lei <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for release at end of August.
>
> > Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in FIFO
> order.
> Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged to
> contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
>
> +1 since it is very important for encouraging contributors.
>
>
>
> Best,
> Chunwei
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:19 AM Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in FIFO
> > order.
> > Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged to
> > contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
> >
> > There are 110+ PRs on the GitHub page, what should we do ?
> >
> > Best,
> > Danny Chan
> > 在 2019年7月22日 +0800 AM6:19，dev@calcite.apache.org，写道：
> > >
> > > Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in FIFO
> > order.
> > > Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged to
> > > contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Chunwei Lei <ch...@gmail.com>.
+1 for release at end of August.
> Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in FIFO
order.
Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged to
contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
+1 since it is very important for encouraging contributors.
Best,
Chunwei
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:19 AM Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in FIFO
> order.
> Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged to
> contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
>
> There are 110+ PRs on the GitHub page, what should we do ?
>
> Best,
> Danny Chan
> 在 2019年7月22日 +0800 AM6:19，dev@calcite.apache.org，写道：
> >
> > Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in FIFO
> order.
> > Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged to
> > contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com>.
>Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in FIFO order.
Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged to
contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
There are 110+ PRs on the GitHub page, what should we do ?
Best,
Danny Chan
在 2019年7月22日 +0800 AM6:19，dev@calcite.apache.org，写道：
>
> Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in FIFO order.
> Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged to
> contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>.
+1 to the proposed schedule.
Thanks for being RM for this release, Stamatis!
Francis
On 22/07/2019 4:39 am, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Stamatis,
> We are trying to upgrade HerdDB to 1.20 but we are stuck into a little
> problem with simple aggregations [1]
> I will try to give feedback as it is possible, if there is a problem in
> Calcite I will be happy to try to report it before 1.21. I hope it is only
> a problem on HerdDB
>
>
> Cheers
> Enrico
>
> [1] https://github.com/diennea/herddb/pull/404
>
> Il dom 21 lug 2019, 17:49 Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
>> +1 for release at end of August.
>>
>> +1 to figure out which PRs could make it into the release, and work on
>> that list in FIFO order. We tend to merge PRs that are in good shape, and
>> by active contributors, and we tend to ignore old PRs that are never going
>> to make it, but we tend to ignore the important PRs in the middle.
>>
>> Julian
>>
>>> On Jul 21, 2019, at 2:28 AM, Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Approximately one month has passed from the previous release (Calcite
>>> 1.20.0) and I was thinking that it would be nice to have the next release
>>> out by the end of August. To do this I think we should try to have an RC
>>> around the 20 of August.
>>>
>>> The progress towards the next release can be seen in [1]. As you can
>>> observe we do not have many issues marked for fixing for 1.21.0 but we do
>>> have many pull requests.
>>>
>>> I would like to invite committers to go over the existing PRs and for
>> those
>>> that we plan to review and finalize in the next month or so set the fix
>>> version to 1.21.0 adding an appropriate comment.
>>>
>>> In term of priorities, I think we should emphasize on finalizing and
>>> merging PRs that are blocking other open source projects and commercial
>>> products from upgrading to the latest release. If it is not already done
>>> please assign this issues the highest priority (blocker) and set the fix
>>> version to 1.21.0.
>>>
>>> Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in FIFO
>> order.
>>> Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged to
>>> contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
>>>
>>> Don't hesitate to reply to this thread if the plan above is not
>> convenient
>>> for you!
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Stamatis
>>>
>>> [1]
>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>.
Stamatis,
We are trying to upgrade HerdDB to 1.20 but we are stuck into a little
problem with simple aggregations [1]
I will try to give feedback as it is possible, if there is a problem in
Calcite I will be happy to try to report it before 1.21. I hope it is only
a problem on HerdDB
Cheers
Enrico
[1] https://github.com/diennea/herddb/pull/404
Il dom 21 lug 2019, 17:49 Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> +1 for release at end of August.
>
> +1 to figure out which PRs could make it into the release, and work on
> that list in FIFO order. We tend to merge PRs that are in good shape, and
> by active contributors, and we tend to ignore old PRs that are never going
> to make it, but we tend to ignore the important PRs in the middle.
>
> Julian
>
> > On Jul 21, 2019, at 2:28 AM, Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Approximately one month has passed from the previous release (Calcite
> > 1.20.0) and I was thinking that it would be nice to have the next release
> > out by the end of August. To do this I think we should try to have an RC
> > around the 20 of August.
> >
> > The progress towards the next release can be seen in [1]. As you can
> > observe we do not have many issues marked for fixing for 1.21.0 but we do
> > have many pull requests.
> >
> > I would like to invite committers to go over the existing PRs and for
> those
> > that we plan to review and finalize in the next month or so set the fix
> > version to 1.21.0 adding an appropriate comment.
> >
> > In term of priorities, I think we should emphasize on finalizing and
> > merging PRs that are blocking other open source projects and commercial
> > products from upgrading to the latest release. If it is not already done
> > please assign this issues the highest priority (blocker) and set the fix
> > version to 1.21.0.
> >
> > Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in FIFO
> order.
> > Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged to
> > contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
> >
> > Don't hesitate to reply to this thread if the plan above is not
> convenient
> > for you!
> >
> > Best,
> > Stamatis
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com>.
+1 for release at end of August.
+1 to figure out which PRs could make it into the release, and work on that list in FIFO order. We tend to merge PRs that are in good shape, and by active contributors, and we tend to ignore old PRs that are never going to make it, but we tend to ignore the important PRs in the middle.
Julian
> On Jul 21, 2019, at 2:28 AM, Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Approximately one month has passed from the previous release (Calcite
> 1.20.0) and I was thinking that it would be nice to have the next release
> out by the end of August. To do this I think we should try to have an RC
> around the 20 of August.
>
> The progress towards the next release can be seen in [1]. As you can
> observe we do not have many issues marked for fixing for 1.21.0 but we do
> have many pull requests.
>
> I would like to invite committers to go over the existing PRs and for those
> that we plan to review and finalize in the next month or so set the fix
> version to 1.21.0 adding an appropriate comment.
>
> In term of priorities, I think we should emphasize on finalizing and
> merging PRs that are blocking other open source projects and commercial
> products from upgrading to the latest release. If it is not already done
> please assign this issues the highest priority (blocker) and set the fix
> version to 1.21.0.
>
> Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in FIFO order.
> Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged to
> contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
>
> Don't hesitate to reply to this thread if the plan above is not convenient
> for you!
>
> Best,
> Stamatis
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the effort, Stamatis Zampetakis !
Best,
Danny Chan
在 2019年9月2日 +0800 PM8:15，Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>，写道：
> I'm preparing RC0.
>
> Please do not commit to master until further notice.
>
> Best,
> Stamatis
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:23 PM Vova Vysotskyi <vv...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Great, thanks Stamatis!
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Volodymyr Vysotskyi
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:28 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Let's include CALCITE-3115; I will merge it now.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 11:26 AM Vova Vysotskyi <vv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Let's get CALCITE-3115 <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3115
> > > > >
> > > > into the release. PR is ready, but there are some concerns about
> > breaking
> > > > existing clients.
> > > > It would be good to make a decision about this PR.
> > > >
> > > > Kind regards,
> > > > Volodymyr Vysotskyi
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 5:34 AM Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Nice Kanban, thanks for the effort Stamatis Zampetakis !
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Danny Chan
> > > > > 在 2019年9月1日 +0800 AM6:46，Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>，写道：
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We are really close in getting this release out. There are only a
> > few
> > > > > issue
> > > > > > [1] left to handle before building RC0.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I guess CALCITE-3314 and CALCITE-3315 will be done in the next 48
> > > > hours.
> > > > > > That leaves mainly CALCITE-1581 but if we don't manage to get it in
> > > on
> > > > > > time, I guess we can leave it for 1.22.0.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please be extra cautious with pushes to the master to avoid last
> > > minute
> > > > > > regressions.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Stamatis
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 10:42 AM Igor Guzenko <
> > > > > ihor.huzenko.igs@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hello Julian,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'll work on the CALCITE-3297 and try to fix quickly.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Igor
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>.
I'm preparing RC0.
Please do not commit to master until further notice.
Best,
Stamatis
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:23 PM Vova Vysotskyi <vv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Great, thanks Stamatis!
>
> Kind regards,
> Volodymyr Vysotskyi
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:28 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Let's include CALCITE-3115; I will merge it now.
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 11:26 AM Vova Vysotskyi <vv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Let's get CALCITE-3115 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3115
> > > >
> > > into the release. PR is ready, but there are some concerns about
> breaking
> > > existing clients.
> > > It would be good to make a decision about this PR.
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Volodymyr Vysotskyi
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 5:34 AM Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Nice Kanban, thanks for the effort Stamatis Zampetakis !
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Danny Chan
> > > > 在 2019年9月1日 +0800 AM6:46，Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>，写道：
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > We are really close in getting this release out. There are only a
> few
> > > > issue
> > > > > [1] left to handle before building RC0.
> > > > >
> > > > > I guess CALCITE-3314 and CALCITE-3315 will be done in the next 48
> > > hours.
> > > > > That leaves mainly CALCITE-1581 but if we don't manage to get it in
> > on
> > > > > time, I guess we can leave it for 1.22.0.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please be extra cautious with pushes to the master to avoid last
> > minute
> > > > > regressions.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Stamatis
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 10:42 AM Igor Guzenko <
> > > > ihor.huzenko.igs@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello Julian,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'll work on the CALCITE-3297 and try to fix quickly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Igor
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Vova Vysotskyi <vv...@gmail.com>.
Great, thanks Stamatis!
Kind regards,
Volodymyr Vysotskyi
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:28 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Let's include CALCITE-3115; I will merge it now.
>
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 11:26 AM Vova Vysotskyi <vv...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Let's get CALCITE-3115 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3115
> > >
> > into the release. PR is ready, but there are some concerns about breaking
> > existing clients.
> > It would be good to make a decision about this PR.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Volodymyr Vysotskyi
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 5:34 AM Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Nice Kanban, thanks for the effort Stamatis Zampetakis !
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Danny Chan
> > > 在 2019年9月1日 +0800 AM6:46，Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>，写道：
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > We are really close in getting this release out. There are only a few
> > > issue
> > > > [1] left to handle before building RC0.
> > > >
> > > > I guess CALCITE-3314 and CALCITE-3315 will be done in the next 48
> > hours.
> > > > That leaves mainly CALCITE-1581 but if we don't manage to get it in
> on
> > > > time, I guess we can leave it for 1.22.0.
> > > >
> > > > Please be extra cautious with pushes to the master to avoid last
> minute
> > > > regressions.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Stamatis
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 10:42 AM Igor Guzenko <
> > > ihor.huzenko.igs@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello Julian,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'll work on the CALCITE-3297 and try to fix quickly.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Igor
> > > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>.
Let's include CALCITE-3115; I will merge it now.
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 11:26 AM Vova Vysotskyi <vv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Let's get CALCITE-3115 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3115
> >
> into the release. PR is ready, but there are some concerns about breaking
> existing clients.
> It would be good to make a decision about this PR.
>
> Kind regards,
> Volodymyr Vysotskyi
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 5:34 AM Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Nice Kanban, thanks for the effort Stamatis Zampetakis !
> >
> > Best,
> > Danny Chan
> > 在 2019年9月1日 +0800 AM6:46，Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>，写道：
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > We are really close in getting this release out. There are only a few
> > issue
> > > [1] left to handle before building RC0.
> > >
> > > I guess CALCITE-3314 and CALCITE-3315 will be done in the next 48
> hours.
> > > That leaves mainly CALCITE-1581 but if we don't manage to get it in on
> > > time, I guess we can leave it for 1.22.0.
> > >
> > > Please be extra cautious with pushes to the master to avoid last minute
> > > regressions.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Stamatis
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 10:42 AM Igor Guzenko <
> > ihor.huzenko.igs@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello Julian,
> > > >
> > > > I'll work on the CALCITE-3297 and try to fix quickly.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Igor
> > > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Vova Vysotskyi <vv...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
Let's get CALCITE-3115 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3115>
into the release. PR is ready, but there are some concerns about breaking
existing clients.
It would be good to make a decision about this PR.
Kind regards,
Volodymyr Vysotskyi
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 5:34 AM Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nice Kanban, thanks for the effort Stamatis Zampetakis !
>
> Best,
> Danny Chan
> 在 2019年9月1日 +0800 AM6:46，Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>，写道：
> > Hello,
> >
> > We are really close in getting this release out. There are only a few
> issue
> > [1] left to handle before building RC0.
> >
> > I guess CALCITE-3314 and CALCITE-3315 will be done in the next 48 hours.
> > That leaves mainly CALCITE-1581 but if we don't manage to get it in on
> > time, I guess we can leave it for 1.22.0.
> >
> > Please be extra cautious with pushes to the master to avoid last minute
> > regressions.
> >
> > Best,
> > Stamatis
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 10:42 AM Igor Guzenko <
> ihor.huzenko.igs@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Julian,
> > >
> > > I'll work on the CALCITE-3297 and try to fix quickly.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Igor
> > >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com>.
Nice Kanban, thanks for the effort Stamatis Zampetakis !
Best,
Danny Chan
在 2019年9月1日 +0800 AM6:46，Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>，写道：
> Hello,
>
> We are really close in getting this release out. There are only a few issue
> [1] left to handle before building RC0.
>
> I guess CALCITE-3314 and CALCITE-3315 will be done in the next 48 hours.
> That leaves mainly CALCITE-1581 but if we don't manage to get it in on
> time, I guess we can leave it for 1.22.0.
>
> Please be extra cautious with pushes to the master to avoid last minute
> regressions.
>
> Best,
> Stamatis
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 10:42 AM Igor Guzenko <ih...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Julian,
> >
> > I'll work on the CALCITE-3297 and try to fix quickly.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Igor
> >
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
We are really close in getting this release out. There are only a few issue
[1] left to handle before building RC0.
I guess CALCITE-3314 and CALCITE-3315 will be done in the next 48 hours.
That leaves mainly CALCITE-1581 but if we don't manage to get it in on
time, I guess we can leave it for 1.22.0.
Please be extra cautious with pushes to the master to avoid last minute
regressions.
Best,
Stamatis
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 10:42 AM Igor Guzenko <ih...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello Julian,
>
> I'll work on the CALCITE-3297 and try to fix quickly.
>
> Thanks,
> Igor
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Igor Guzenko <ih...@gmail.com>.
Hello Julian,
I'll work on the CALCITE-3297 and try to fix quickly.
Thanks,
Igor
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com>.
Julian, I’m going to merge CALCITE-2302 if you do not have strong objections.
Best,
Danny Chan
在 2019年8月28日 +0800 AM12:58，Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>，写道：
> Igor,
>
> Can you please help with
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3297? It was caused, in
> part, by your changes in
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3138.
>
> Julian
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 3:06 AM Igor Guzenko <ih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > It would be great to include CALCITE-3115 [1] into the release.
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3115
> > [2] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1397
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Igor
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 5:43 AM Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for the review for CALCITE-2302, Julian.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Danny Chan
> > > 在 2019年8月26日 +0800 PM12:27，Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>，写道：
> > > > Sounds good.
> > > > * I am reviewing 3122 and will commit shortly.
> > > > * I see Danny has asked me to final review 2302. I'll do that tomorrow.
> > > > * Who owns 1581?
> > > >
> > > > Julian
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 1:28 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > According to the discussion in JIRA the following issues seem to be
> > > very
> > > > > close to been resolved:
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1581
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122
> > > > >
> > > > > I will wait for those to be merged and then I will start the release
> > > > > process. I would like to kindly ask the reviewers involved to check
> > > that
> > > > > there is nothing more left to do.
> > > > >
> > > > > I will start moving the remaining issues to 1.22.0. Let me know if
> > > there is
> > > > > anything else that we should include in this release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Stamatis
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019, 11:04 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I’ve poked Khai Tran re. 3122 (Pig).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Aug 16, 2019, at 11:20 PM, Stamatis Zampetakis <
> > > zabetak@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The release is advancing quite well, yet we have 22 issues marked
> > > for
> > > > > > > 1.21.0 [1].
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > From those, the following 5 seem to be the most important:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1581
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3224
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3228
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I will try to have an RC for the 26th of August so let's try to
> > > get them
> > > > > > in.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:51 AM Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Let’s get the CALCITE-2302[1]: the full implicit type cast
> > > support into
> > > > > > > > 1.21 !
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/706
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > Danny Chan
> > > > > > > > 在 2019年7月21日 +0800 PM3:28，Stamatis Zampetakis <zabetak@gmail.com
> > > > ，写道：
> > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Approximately one month has passed from the previous release
> > > (Calcite
> > > > > > > > > 1.20.0) and I was thinking that it would be nice to have the
> > > next
> > > > > > release
> > > > > > > > > out by the end of August. To do this I think we should try to
> > > have an
> > > > > > RC
> > > > > > > > > around the 20 of August.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The progress towards the next release can be seen in [1]. As
> > > you can
> > > > > > > > > observe we do not have many issues marked for fixing for
> > > 1.21.0 but we
> > > > > > do
> > > > > > > > > have many pull requests.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I would like to invite committers to go over the existing PRs
> > > and for
> > > > > > > > those
> > > > > > > > > that we plan to review and finalize in the next month or so
> > > set the fix
> > > > > > > > > version to 1.21.0 adding an appropriate comment.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > In term of priorities, I think we should emphasize on
> > > finalizing and
> > > > > > > > > merging PRs that are blocking other open source projects and
> > > commercial
> > > > > > > > > products from upgrading to the latest release. If it is not
> > > already
> > > > > > done
> > > > > > > > > please assign this issues the highest priority (blocker) and
> > > set the
> > > > > > fix
> > > > > > > > > version to 1.21.0.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs
> > > in FIFO
> > > > > > > > order.
> > > > > > > > > Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get
> > > discouraged to
> > > > > > > > > contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Don't hesitate to reply to this thread if the plan above is not
> > > > > > > > convenient
> > > > > > > > > for you!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > > Stamatis
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
Igor,
Can you please help with
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3297? It was caused, in
part, by your changes in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3138.
Julian
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 3:06 AM Igor Guzenko <ih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> It would be great to include CALCITE-3115 [1] into the release.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3115
> [2] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1397
>
> Thanks,
> Igor
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 5:43 AM Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the review for CALCITE-2302, Julian.
> >
> > Best,
> > Danny Chan
> > 在 2019年8月26日 +0800 PM12:27，Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>，写道：
> > > Sounds good.
> > > * I am reviewing 3122 and will commit shortly.
> > > * I see Danny has asked me to final review 2302. I'll do that tomorrow.
> > > * Who owns 1581?
> > >
> > > Julian
> > >
> > > On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 1:28 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > According to the discussion in JIRA the following issues seem to be
> > very
> > > > close to been resolved:
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1581
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122
> > > >
> > > > I will wait for those to be merged and then I will start the release
> > > > process. I would like to kindly ask the reviewers involved to check
> > that
> > > > there is nothing more left to do.
> > > >
> > > > I will start moving the remaining issues to 1.22.0. Let me know if
> > there is
> > > > anything else that we should include in this release.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Stamatis
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019, 11:04 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > I’ve poked Khai Tran re. 3122 (Pig).
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Aug 16, 2019, at 11:20 PM, Stamatis Zampetakis <
> > zabetak@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The release is advancing quite well, yet we have 22 issues marked
> > for
> > > > > > 1.21.0 [1].
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From those, the following 5 seem to be the most important:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1581
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3224
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3228
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I will try to have an RC for the 26th of August so let's try to
> > get them
> > > > > in.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:51 AM Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Let’s get the CALCITE-2302[1]: the full implicit type cast
> > support into
> > > > > > > 1.21 !
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/706
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > Danny Chan
> > > > > > > 在 2019年7月21日 +0800 PM3:28，Stamatis Zampetakis <zabetak@gmail.com
> > >，写道：
> > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Approximately one month has passed from the previous release
> > (Calcite
> > > > > > > > 1.20.0) and I was thinking that it would be nice to have the
> > next
> > > > > release
> > > > > > > > out by the end of August. To do this I think we should try to
> > have an
> > > > > RC
> > > > > > > > around the 20 of August.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The progress towards the next release can be seen in [1]. As
> > you can
> > > > > > > > observe we do not have many issues marked for fixing for
> > 1.21.0 but we
> > > > > do
> > > > > > > > have many pull requests.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I would like to invite committers to go over the existing PRs
> > and for
> > > > > > > those
> > > > > > > > that we plan to review and finalize in the next month or so
> > set the fix
> > > > > > > > version to 1.21.0 adding an appropriate comment.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In term of priorities, I think we should emphasize on
> > finalizing and
> > > > > > > > merging PRs that are blocking other open source projects and
> > commercial
> > > > > > > > products from upgrading to the latest release. If it is not
> > already
> > > > > done
> > > > > > > > please assign this issues the highest priority (blocker) and
> > set the
> > > > > fix
> > > > > > > > version to 1.21.0.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs
> > in FIFO
> > > > > > > order.
> > > > > > > > Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get
> > discouraged to
> > > > > > > > contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Don't hesitate to reply to this thread if the plan above is not
> > > > > > > convenient
> > > > > > > > for you!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > Stamatis
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> >
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Igor Guzenko <ih...@gmail.com>.
Hello everyone,
It would be great to include CALCITE-3115 [1] into the release.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3115
[2] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1397
Thanks,
Igor
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 5:43 AM Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the review for CALCITE-2302, Julian.
>
> Best,
> Danny Chan
> 在 2019年8月26日 +0800 PM12:27，Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>，写道：
> > Sounds good.
> > * I am reviewing 3122 and will commit shortly.
> > * I see Danny has asked me to final review 2302. I'll do that tomorrow.
> > * Who owns 1581?
> >
> > Julian
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 1:28 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > According to the discussion in JIRA the following issues seem to be
> very
> > > close to been resolved:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1581
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122
> > >
> > > I will wait for those to be merged and then I will start the release
> > > process. I would like to kindly ask the reviewers involved to check
> that
> > > there is nothing more left to do.
> > >
> > > I will start moving the remaining issues to 1.22.0. Let me know if
> there is
> > > anything else that we should include in this release.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Stamatis
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019, 11:04 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > I’ve poked Khai Tran re. 3122 (Pig).
> > > >
> > > > > On Aug 16, 2019, at 11:20 PM, Stamatis Zampetakis <
> zabetak@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > The release is advancing quite well, yet we have 22 issues marked
> for
> > > > > 1.21.0 [1].
> > > > >
> > > > > From those, the following 5 seem to be the most important:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1581
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3224
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3228
> > > > >
> > > > > I will try to have an RC for the 26th of August so let's try to
> get them
> > > > in.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > > >
> > > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:51 AM Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Let’s get the CALCITE-2302[1]: the full implicit type cast
> support into
> > > > > > 1.21 !
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/706
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Danny Chan
> > > > > > 在 2019年7月21日 +0800 PM3:28，Stamatis Zampetakis <zabetak@gmail.com
> >，写道：
> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Approximately one month has passed from the previous release
> (Calcite
> > > > > > > 1.20.0) and I was thinking that it would be nice to have the
> next
> > > > release
> > > > > > > out by the end of August. To do this I think we should try to
> have an
> > > > RC
> > > > > > > around the 20 of August.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The progress towards the next release can be seen in [1]. As
> you can
> > > > > > > observe we do not have many issues marked for fixing for
> 1.21.0 but we
> > > > do
> > > > > > > have many pull requests.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I would like to invite committers to go over the existing PRs
> and for
> > > > > > those
> > > > > > > that we plan to review and finalize in the next month or so
> set the fix
> > > > > > > version to 1.21.0 adding an appropriate comment.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In term of priorities, I think we should emphasize on
> finalizing and
> > > > > > > merging PRs that are blocking other open source projects and
> commercial
> > > > > > > products from upgrading to the latest release. If it is not
> already
> > > > done
> > > > > > > please assign this issues the highest priority (blocker) and
> set the
> > > > fix
> > > > > > > version to 1.21.0.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs
> in FIFO
> > > > > > order.
> > > > > > > Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get
> discouraged to
> > > > > > > contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Don't hesitate to reply to this thread if the plan above is not
> > > > > > convenient
> > > > > > > for you!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > Stamatis
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the review for CALCITE-2302, Julian.
Best,
Danny Chan
在 2019年8月26日 +0800 PM12:27，Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>，写道：
> Sounds good.
> * I am reviewing 3122 and will commit shortly.
> * I see Danny has asked me to final review 2302. I'll do that tomorrow.
> * Who owns 1581?
>
> Julian
>
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 1:28 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > According to the discussion in JIRA the following issues seem to be very
> > close to been resolved:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1581
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122
> >
> > I will wait for those to be merged and then I will start the release
> > process. I would like to kindly ask the reviewers involved to check that
> > there is nothing more left to do.
> >
> > I will start moving the remaining issues to 1.22.0. Let me know if there is
> > anything else that we should include in this release.
> >
> > Best,
> > Stamatis
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019, 11:04 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > I’ve poked Khai Tran re. 3122 (Pig).
> > >
> > > > On Aug 16, 2019, at 11:20 PM, Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > The release is advancing quite well, yet we have 22 issues marked for
> > > > 1.21.0 [1].
> > > >
> > > > From those, the following 5 seem to be the most important:
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1581
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3224
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3228
> > > >
> > > > I will try to have an RC for the 26th of August so let's try to get them
> > > in.
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:51 AM Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Let’s get the CALCITE-2302[1]: the full implicit type cast support into
> > > > > 1.21 !
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/706
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Danny Chan
> > > > > 在 2019年7月21日 +0800 PM3:28，Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>，写道：
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Approximately one month has passed from the previous release (Calcite
> > > > > > 1.20.0) and I was thinking that it would be nice to have the next
> > > release
> > > > > > out by the end of August. To do this I think we should try to have an
> > > RC
> > > > > > around the 20 of August.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The progress towards the next release can be seen in [1]. As you can
> > > > > > observe we do not have many issues marked for fixing for 1.21.0 but we
> > > do
> > > > > > have many pull requests.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would like to invite committers to go over the existing PRs and for
> > > > > those
> > > > > > that we plan to review and finalize in the next month or so set the fix
> > > > > > version to 1.21.0 adding an appropriate comment.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In term of priorities, I think we should emphasize on finalizing and
> > > > > > merging PRs that are blocking other open source projects and commercial
> > > > > > products from upgrading to the latest release. If it is not already
> > > done
> > > > > > please assign this issues the highest priority (blocker) and set the
> > > fix
> > > > > > version to 1.21.0.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in FIFO
> > > > > order.
> > > > > > Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged to
> > > > > > contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Don't hesitate to reply to this thread if the plan above is not
> > > > > convenient
> > > > > > for you!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Stamatis
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
Regarding 3122. The fix looks good to me, but one test is broken when I merge in the fix to [CALCITE-3138] "RelStructuredTypeFlattener doesn't restructure ROW type fields”.
So, we are holding until I figure with Khai Tran (author of 3122) and Igor Guzenko (author or 3138) out how to combine the two fixes, or if we decide to just disable that test.
Follow the discussion here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122?focusedCommentId=16916028&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-16916028 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122?focusedCommentId=16916028&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16916028>
Julian
> On Aug 26, 2019, at 4:48 AM, Chunwei Lei <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for your work, Stamatis.
>
> As for 1581, I have reviewed it and it looks good to me. So I am +1 for the
> change.
>
>
>
> Best,
> Chunwei
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 1:39 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I see that Chunwei has reviewed 1581 and he gave a +1 so I suppose it is
>> ready to go.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019, 7:27 AM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Sounds good.
>>> * I am reviewing 3122 and will commit shortly.
>>> * I see Danny has asked me to final review 2302. I'll do that tomorrow.
>>> * Who owns 1581?
>>>
>>> Julian
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 1:28 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> According to the discussion in JIRA the following issues seem to be
>> very
>>>> close to been resolved:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1581
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122
>>>>
>>>> I will wait for those to be merged and then I will start the release
>>>> process. I would like to kindly ask the reviewers involved to check
>> that
>>>> there is nothing more left to do.
>>>>
>>>> I will start moving the remaining issues to 1.22.0. Let me know if
>> there
>>> is
>>>> anything else that we should include in this release.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Stamatis
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019, 11:04 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> I’ve poked Khai Tran re. 3122 (Pig).
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 16, 2019, at 11:20 PM, Stamatis Zampetakis <
>> zabetak@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The release is advancing quite well, yet we have 22 issues marked
>> for
>>>>>> 1.21.0 [1].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From those, the following 5 seem to be the most important:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1581
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3224
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3228
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will try to have an RC for the 26th of August so let's try to get
>>> them
>>>>> in.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:51 AM Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let’s get the CALCITE-2302[1]: the full implicit type cast support
>>> into
>>>>>>> 1.21 !
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/706
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Danny Chan
>>>>>>> 在 2019年7月21日 +0800 PM3:28，Stamatis Zampetakis <zabetak@gmail.com
>>>> ，写道：
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Approximately one month has passed from the previous release
>>> (Calcite
>>>>>>>> 1.20.0) and I was thinking that it would be nice to have the next
>>>>> release
>>>>>>>> out by the end of August. To do this I think we should try to
>> have
>>> an
>>>>> RC
>>>>>>>> around the 20 of August.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The progress towards the next release can be seen in [1]. As you
>>> can
>>>>>>>> observe we do not have many issues marked for fixing for 1.21.0
>>> but we
>>>>> do
>>>>>>>> have many pull requests.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would like to invite committers to go over the existing PRs and
>>> for
>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>> that we plan to review and finalize in the next month or so set
>>> the fix
>>>>>>>> version to 1.21.0 adding an appropriate comment.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In term of priorities, I think we should emphasize on finalizing
>>> and
>>>>>>>> merging PRs that are blocking other open source projects and
>>> commercial
>>>>>>>> products from upgrading to the latest release. If it is not
>> already
>>>>> done
>>>>>>>> please assign this issues the highest priority (blocker) and set
>>> the
>>>>> fix
>>>>>>>> version to 1.21.0.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in
>>> FIFO
>>>>>>> order.
>>>>>>>> Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged
>>> to
>>>>>>>> contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Don't hesitate to reply to this thread if the plan above is not
>>>>>>> convenient
>>>>>>>> for you!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> Stamatis
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Chunwei Lei <ch...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for your work, Stamatis.
As for 1581, I have reviewed it and it looks good to me. So I am +1 for the
change.
Best,
Chunwei
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 1:39 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I see that Chunwei has reviewed 1581 and he gave a +1 so I suppose it is
> ready to go.
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019, 7:27 AM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Sounds good.
> > * I am reviewing 3122 and will commit shortly.
> > * I see Danny has asked me to final review 2302. I'll do that tomorrow.
> > * Who owns 1581?
> >
> > Julian
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 1:28 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > According to the discussion in JIRA the following issues seem to be
> very
> > > close to been resolved:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1581
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122
> > >
> > > I will wait for those to be merged and then I will start the release
> > > process. I would like to kindly ask the reviewers involved to check
> that
> > > there is nothing more left to do.
> > >
> > > I will start moving the remaining issues to 1.22.0. Let me know if
> there
> > is
> > > anything else that we should include in this release.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Stamatis
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019, 11:04 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > I’ve poked Khai Tran re. 3122 (Pig).
> > > >
> > > > > On Aug 16, 2019, at 11:20 PM, Stamatis Zampetakis <
> zabetak@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > The release is advancing quite well, yet we have 22 issues marked
> for
> > > > > 1.21.0 [1].
> > > > >
> > > > > From those, the following 5 seem to be the most important:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1581
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3224
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3228
> > > > >
> > > > > I will try to have an RC for the 26th of August so let's try to get
> > them
> > > > in.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:51 AM Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Let’s get the CALCITE-2302[1]: the full implicit type cast support
> > into
> > > > >> 1.21 !
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/706
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Best,
> > > > >> Danny Chan
> > > > >> 在 2019年7月21日 +0800 PM3:28，Stamatis Zampetakis <zabetak@gmail.com
> > >，写道：
> > > > >>> Hi all,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Approximately one month has passed from the previous release
> > (Calcite
> > > > >>> 1.20.0) and I was thinking that it would be nice to have the next
> > > > release
> > > > >>> out by the end of August. To do this I think we should try to
> have
> > an
> > > > RC
> > > > >>> around the 20 of August.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> The progress towards the next release can be seen in [1]. As you
> > can
> > > > >>> observe we do not have many issues marked for fixing for 1.21.0
> > but we
> > > > do
> > > > >>> have many pull requests.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I would like to invite committers to go over the existing PRs and
> > for
> > > > >> those
> > > > >>> that we plan to review and finalize in the next month or so set
> > the fix
> > > > >>> version to 1.21.0 adding an appropriate comment.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> In term of priorities, I think we should emphasize on finalizing
> > and
> > > > >>> merging PRs that are blocking other open source projects and
> > commercial
> > > > >>> products from upgrading to the latest release. If it is not
> already
> > > > done
> > > > >>> please assign this issues the highest priority (blocker) and set
> > the
> > > > fix
> > > > >>> version to 1.21.0.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in
> > FIFO
> > > > >> order.
> > > > >>> Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged
> > to
> > > > >>> contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Don't hesitate to reply to this thread if the plan above is not
> > > > >> convenient
> > > > >>> for you!
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Best,
> > > > >>> Stamatis
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> [1]
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>.
I see that Chunwei has reviewed 1581 and he gave a +1 so I suppose it is
ready to go.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019, 7:27 AM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> Sounds good.
> * I am reviewing 3122 and will commit shortly.
> * I see Danny has asked me to final review 2302. I'll do that tomorrow.
> * Who owns 1581?
>
> Julian
>
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 1:28 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > According to the discussion in JIRA the following issues seem to be very
> > close to been resolved:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1581
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122
> >
> > I will wait for those to be merged and then I will start the release
> > process. I would like to kindly ask the reviewers involved to check that
> > there is nothing more left to do.
> >
> > I will start moving the remaining issues to 1.22.0. Let me know if there
> is
> > anything else that we should include in this release.
> >
> > Best,
> > Stamatis
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019, 11:04 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > I’ve poked Khai Tran re. 3122 (Pig).
> > >
> > > > On Aug 16, 2019, at 11:20 PM, Stamatis Zampetakis <zabetak@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > The release is advancing quite well, yet we have 22 issues marked for
> > > > 1.21.0 [1].
> > > >
> > > > From those, the following 5 seem to be the most important:
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1581
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3224
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3228
> > > >
> > > > I will try to have an RC for the 26th of August so let's try to get
> them
> > > in.
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:51 AM Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Let’s get the CALCITE-2302[1]: the full implicit type cast support
> into
> > > >> 1.21 !
> > > >>
> > > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/706
> > > >>
> > > >> Best,
> > > >> Danny Chan
> > > >> 在 2019年7月21日 +0800 PM3:28，Stamatis Zampetakis <zabetak@gmail.com
> >，写道：
> > > >>> Hi all,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Approximately one month has passed from the previous release
> (Calcite
> > > >>> 1.20.0) and I was thinking that it would be nice to have the next
> > > release
> > > >>> out by the end of August. To do this I think we should try to have
> an
> > > RC
> > > >>> around the 20 of August.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The progress towards the next release can be seen in [1]. As you
> can
> > > >>> observe we do not have many issues marked for fixing for 1.21.0
> but we
> > > do
> > > >>> have many pull requests.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I would like to invite committers to go over the existing PRs and
> for
> > > >> those
> > > >>> that we plan to review and finalize in the next month or so set
> the fix
> > > >>> version to 1.21.0 adding an appropriate comment.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> In term of priorities, I think we should emphasize on finalizing
> and
> > > >>> merging PRs that are blocking other open source projects and
> commercial
> > > >>> products from upgrading to the latest release. If it is not already
> > > done
> > > >>> please assign this issues the highest priority (blocker) and set
> the
> > > fix
> > > >>> version to 1.21.0.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in
> FIFO
> > > >> order.
> > > >>> Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged
> to
> > > >>> contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Don't hesitate to reply to this thread if the plan above is not
> > > >> convenient
> > > >>> for you!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Best,
> > > >>> Stamatis
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [1]
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
Sounds good.
* I am reviewing 3122 and will commit shortly.
* I see Danny has asked me to final review 2302. I'll do that tomorrow.
* Who owns 1581?
Julian
On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 1:28 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> According to the discussion in JIRA the following issues seem to be very
> close to been resolved:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1581
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122
>
> I will wait for those to be merged and then I will start the release
> process. I would like to kindly ask the reviewers involved to check that
> there is nothing more left to do.
>
> I will start moving the remaining issues to 1.22.0. Let me know if there is
> anything else that we should include in this release.
>
> Best,
> Stamatis
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019, 11:04 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > I’ve poked Khai Tran re. 3122 (Pig).
> >
> > > On Aug 16, 2019, at 11:20 PM, Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > The release is advancing quite well, yet we have 22 issues marked for
> > > 1.21.0 [1].
> > >
> > > From those, the following 5 seem to be the most important:
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1581
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3224
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3228
> > >
> > > I will try to have an RC for the 26th of August so let's try to get them
> > in.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:51 AM Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Let’s get the CALCITE-2302[1]: the full implicit type cast support into
> > >> 1.21 !
> > >>
> > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/706
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Danny Chan
> > >> 在 2019年7月21日 +0800 PM3:28，Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>，写道：
> > >>> Hi all,
> > >>>
> > >>> Approximately one month has passed from the previous release (Calcite
> > >>> 1.20.0) and I was thinking that it would be nice to have the next
> > release
> > >>> out by the end of August. To do this I think we should try to have an
> > RC
> > >>> around the 20 of August.
> > >>>
> > >>> The progress towards the next release can be seen in [1]. As you can
> > >>> observe we do not have many issues marked for fixing for 1.21.0 but we
> > do
> > >>> have many pull requests.
> > >>>
> > >>> I would like to invite committers to go over the existing PRs and for
> > >> those
> > >>> that we plan to review and finalize in the next month or so set the fix
> > >>> version to 1.21.0 adding an appropriate comment.
> > >>>
> > >>> In term of priorities, I think we should emphasize on finalizing and
> > >>> merging PRs that are blocking other open source projects and commercial
> > >>> products from upgrading to the latest release. If it is not already
> > done
> > >>> please assign this issues the highest priority (blocker) and set the
> > fix
> > >>> version to 1.21.0.
> > >>>
> > >>> Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in FIFO
> > >> order.
> > >>> Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged to
> > >>> contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
> > >>>
> > >>> Don't hesitate to reply to this thread if the plan above is not
> > >> convenient
> > >>> for you!
> > >>>
> > >>> Best,
> > >>> Stamatis
> > >>>
> > >>> [1]
> > >>>
> > >>
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > >>
> >
> >
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
According to the discussion in JIRA the following issues seem to be very
close to been resolved:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1581
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122
I will wait for those to be merged and then I will start the release
process. I would like to kindly ask the reviewers involved to check that
there is nothing more left to do.
I will start moving the remaining issues to 1.22.0. Let me know if there is
anything else that we should include in this release.
Best,
Stamatis
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019, 11:04 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> I’ve poked Khai Tran re. 3122 (Pig).
>
> > On Aug 16, 2019, at 11:20 PM, Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The release is advancing quite well, yet we have 22 issues marked for
> > 1.21.0 [1].
> >
> > From those, the following 5 seem to be the most important:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1581
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3224
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3228
> >
> > I will try to have an RC for the 26th of August so let's try to get them
> in.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:51 AM Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Let’s get the CALCITE-2302[1]: the full implicit type cast support into
> >> 1.21 !
> >>
> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/706
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Danny Chan
> >> 在 2019年7月21日 +0800 PM3:28，Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>，写道：
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Approximately one month has passed from the previous release (Calcite
> >>> 1.20.0) and I was thinking that it would be nice to have the next
> release
> >>> out by the end of August. To do this I think we should try to have an
> RC
> >>> around the 20 of August.
> >>>
> >>> The progress towards the next release can be seen in [1]. As you can
> >>> observe we do not have many issues marked for fixing for 1.21.0 but we
> do
> >>> have many pull requests.
> >>>
> >>> I would like to invite committers to go over the existing PRs and for
> >> those
> >>> that we plan to review and finalize in the next month or so set the fix
> >>> version to 1.21.0 adding an appropriate comment.
> >>>
> >>> In term of priorities, I think we should emphasize on finalizing and
> >>> merging PRs that are blocking other open source projects and commercial
> >>> products from upgrading to the latest release. If it is not already
> done
> >>> please assign this issues the highest priority (blocker) and set the
> fix
> >>> version to 1.21.0.
> >>>
> >>> Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in FIFO
> >> order.
> >>> Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged to
> >>> contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
> >>>
> >>> Don't hesitate to reply to this thread if the plan above is not
> >> convenient
> >>> for you!
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Stamatis
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> >>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> >>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
+1
I’ve poked Khai Tran re. 3122 (Pig).
> On Aug 16, 2019, at 11:20 PM, Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> The release is advancing quite well, yet we have 22 issues marked for
> 1.21.0 [1].
>
> From those, the following 5 seem to be the most important:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1581
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3224
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3228
>
> I will try to have an RC for the 26th of August so let's try to get them in.
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:51 AM Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Let’s get the CALCITE-2302[1]: the full implicit type cast support into
>> 1.21 !
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/706
>>
>> Best,
>> Danny Chan
>> 在 2019年7月21日 +0800 PM3:28，Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>，写道：
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Approximately one month has passed from the previous release (Calcite
>>> 1.20.0) and I was thinking that it would be nice to have the next release
>>> out by the end of August. To do this I think we should try to have an RC
>>> around the 20 of August.
>>>
>>> The progress towards the next release can be seen in [1]. As you can
>>> observe we do not have many issues marked for fixing for 1.21.0 but we do
>>> have many pull requests.
>>>
>>> I would like to invite committers to go over the existing PRs and for
>> those
>>> that we plan to review and finalize in the next month or so set the fix
>>> version to 1.21.0 adding an appropriate comment.
>>>
>>> In term of priorities, I think we should emphasize on finalizing and
>>> merging PRs that are blocking other open source projects and commercial
>>> products from upgrading to the latest release. If it is not already done
>>> please assign this issues the highest priority (blocker) and set the fix
>>> version to 1.21.0.
>>>
>>> Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in FIFO
>> order.
>>> Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged to
>>> contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
>>>
>>> Don't hesitate to reply to this thread if the plan above is not
>> convenient
>>> for you!
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Stamatis
>>>
>>> [1]
>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
The release is advancing quite well, yet we have 22 issues marked for
1.21.0 [1].
From those, the following 5 seem to be the most important:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1581
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3224
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3228
I will try to have an RC for the 26th of August so let's try to get them in.
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:51 AM Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Let’s get the CALCITE-2302[1]: the full implicit type cast support into
> 1.21 !
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/706
>
> Best,
> Danny Chan
> 在 2019年7月21日 +0800 PM3:28，Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>，写道：
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Approximately one month has passed from the previous release (Calcite
> > 1.20.0) and I was thinking that it would be nice to have the next release
> > out by the end of August. To do this I think we should try to have an RC
> > around the 20 of August.
> >
> > The progress towards the next release can be seen in [1]. As you can
> > observe we do not have many issues marked for fixing for 1.21.0 but we do
> > have many pull requests.
> >
> > I would like to invite committers to go over the existing PRs and for
> those
> > that we plan to review and finalize in the next month or so set the fix
> > version to 1.21.0 adding an appropriate comment.
> >
> > In term of priorities, I think we should emphasize on finalizing and
> > merging PRs that are blocking other open source projects and commercial
> > products from upgrading to the latest release. If it is not already done
> > please assign this issues the highest priority (blocker) and set the fix
> > version to 1.21.0.
> >
> > Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in FIFO
> order.
> > Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged to
> > contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
> >
> > Don't hesitate to reply to this thread if the plan above is not
> convenient
> > for you!
> >
> > Best,
> > Stamatis
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.21.0
Posted by Danny Chan <yu...@gmail.com>.
Let’s get the CALCITE-2302[1]: the full implicit type cast support into 1.21 !
[1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/706
Best,
Danny Chan
在 2019年7月21日 +0800 PM3:28，Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>，写道：
> Hi all,
>
> Approximately one month has passed from the previous release (Calcite
> 1.20.0) and I was thinking that it would be nice to have the next release
> out by the end of August. To do this I think we should try to have an RC
> around the 20 of August.
>
> The progress towards the next release can be seen in [1]. As you can
> observe we do not have many issues marked for fixing for 1.21.0 but we do
> have many pull requests.
>
> I would like to invite committers to go over the existing PRs and for those
> that we plan to review and finalize in the next month or so set the fix
> version to 1.21.0 adding an appropriate comment.
>
> In term of priorities, I think we should emphasize on finalizing and
> merging PRs that are blocking other open source projects and commercial
> products from upgrading to the latest release. If it is not already done
> please assign this issues the highest priority (blocker) and set the fix
> version to 1.21.0.
>
> Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in FIFO order.
> Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged to
> contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
>
> Don't hesitate to reply to this thread if the plan above is not convenient
> for you!
>
> Best,
> Stamatis
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950