You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Simon Pepping <sp...@leverkruid.eu> on 2010/07/11 11:54:14 UTC

Re: Include all files in lib/build? [was: [VOTE] Release of FOP 1.0]

After some thought I decided that it will be quite acceptable to
include all files in lib/build in the source distribution. After all,
the source distribution is for people who undertake to build FOP
themselves, so a larger download and more tools should not be a
problem for them.

Simon

On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 03:37:57PM +0200, Simon Pepping wrote:
> I am not in favor of including all jar files in lib/build in the
> source distribution. Do we use retroweaver? I seem to recall that that
> was a plan on which we did not execute. Do we need to include tools
> for PMD and Findbugs reports? Or for doing XMLUnit tests? They are not
> essential build tools, they are tools for advanced building with
> diagnostics.
> 
> I found that it i can compile when I include qdox only.
> 

-- 
Simon Pepping
home page: http://www.leverkruid.eu

Re: Include all files in lib/build? [was: [VOTE] Release of FOP 1.0]

Posted by Chris Bowditch <bo...@hotmail.com>.
Simon Pepping wrote:

Hi Simon,

> After some thought I decided that it will be quite acceptable to
> include all files in lib/build in the source distribution. After all,
> the source distribution is for people who undertake to build FOP
> themselves, so a larger download and more tools should not be a
> problem for them.

I concur with this thinking. It is perfectly reasonable for the source 
distribution to be larger than the binary distribution. It would be very 
annoying if in order to build FOP I had to download several 3rd party 
JAR files before I could do that.

Thanks,

Chris

> 
> Simon
> 
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 03:37:57PM +0200, Simon Pepping wrote:
>> I am not in favor of including all jar files in lib/build in the
>> source distribution. Do we use retroweaver? I seem to recall that that
>> was a plan on which we did not execute. Do we need to include tools
>> for PMD and Findbugs reports? Or for doing XMLUnit tests? They are not
>> essential build tools, they are tools for advanced building with
>> diagnostics.
>>
>> I found that it i can compile when I include qdox only.
>>
>