You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pulsar.apache.org by PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org> on 2019/09/06 09:19:32 UTC
[DISCUSS] PIP-44: Separate schema compatibility checker for producer
and consumer
Hi all;
Bo Cong and i are drafting a proposal to separate schema compatibility
checker for producer and consumer
Here is the link of PIP-44
<https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-44%3A-Separate-schema-compatibility-checker-for-producer-and-consumer>
Looking forward feedbacks.
Thanks,
Penghui
Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-44: Separate schema compatibility checker for
producer and consumer
Posted by PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org>.
Hi Yuva,
This is a cool feature. We can create a new PIP to discuss and support it.
Thanks.
Penghui
Yuva raj <uv...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月9日周一 下午2:22写道：
> Hi PengHui ,
> Can we add support for this also
> https://github.com/confluentinc/schema-registry/pull/680 .
> Compatibility resolution strategy is right now at per topic level. For
> Event sourcing, we would like to have different types of event in the same
> topic with an AVRO name to each of the record. So compatibility can be
> enforced between identically named events in the same topic, not between
> differently named events. For more details
> https://martin.kleppmann.com/2018/01/18/event-types-in-kafka-topic.html
> `Schema
> Management Section`.
>
> On Sat, 7 Sep 2019 at 03:17, Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Penghui,
> >
> > Thank you for sharing this proposal. I agreed that the compatibility
> check
> > strategy is different between producers and consumers.
> > We should separate them and make it more clearly. The proposal overall
> > looks good. +1
> >
> > Thank you and your team for driving this!
> >
> > -Sijie
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 2:19 AM PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all;
> > >
> > > Bo Cong and i are drafting a proposal to separate schema compatibility
> > > checker for producer and consumer
> > >
> > > Here is the link of PIP-44
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-44%3A-Separate-schema-compatibility-checker-for-producer-and-consumer
> > > >
> > >
> > > Looking forward feedbacks.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Penghui
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> *Thanks*
>
> *Yuvaraj L*
>
Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-44: Separate schema compatibility checker for
producer and consumer
Posted by Yuva raj <uv...@gmail.com>.
Hi PengHui ,
Can we add support for this also
https://github.com/confluentinc/schema-registry/pull/680 .
Compatibility resolution strategy is right now at per topic level. For
Event sourcing, we would like to have different types of event in the same
topic with an AVRO name to each of the record. So compatibility can be
enforced between identically named events in the same topic, not between
differently named events. For more details
https://martin.kleppmann.com/2018/01/18/event-types-in-kafka-topic.html `Schema
Management Section`.
On Sat, 7 Sep 2019 at 03:17, Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Penghui,
>
> Thank you for sharing this proposal. I agreed that the compatibility check
> strategy is different between producers and consumers.
> We should separate them and make it more clearly. The proposal overall
> looks good. +1
>
> Thank you and your team for driving this!
>
> -Sijie
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 2:19 AM PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi all;
> >
> > Bo Cong and i are drafting a proposal to separate schema compatibility
> > checker for producer and consumer
> >
> > Here is the link of PIP-44
> > <
> >
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-44%3A-Separate-schema-compatibility-checker-for-producer-and-consumer
> > >
> >
> > Looking forward feedbacks.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Penghui
> >
>
--
*Thanks*
*Yuvaraj L*
Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-44: Separate schema compatibility checker for
producer and consumer
Posted by Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>.
Penghui,
Thank you for sharing this proposal. I agreed that the compatibility check
strategy is different between producers and consumers.
We should separate them and make it more clearly. The proposal overall
looks good. +1
Thank you and your team for driving this!
-Sijie
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 2:19 AM PengHui Li <pe...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> Bo Cong and i are drafting a proposal to separate schema compatibility
> checker for producer and consumer
>
> Here is the link of PIP-44
> <
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-44%3A-Separate-schema-compatibility-checker-for-producer-and-consumer
> >
>
> Looking forward feedbacks.
>
> Thanks,
> Penghui
>