You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@zookeeper.apache.org by Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com> on 2012/09/30 20:15:54 UTC
[VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Hi all,
I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2 JIRAs are
addressed in this release. This includes the critical bugfix ZOOKEEPER-1550
which address the client connection issue.
*** Please download, test and VOTE before the
*** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
Note that I am extending the vote period for a little longer so that
folks get time to test this out.
http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
Should we release this?
thanks
mahadev
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
Not sure if it's a blocker or some intermittent test issue, but I just
filed this. Jenkins sasl test failure on jdk7:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1557
Patrick
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the unit
> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also ran
> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to be
> working.
>
> Patrick
>
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2 JIRAs are
>> addressed in this release. This includes the critical bugfix ZOOKEEPER-1550
>> which address the client connection issue.
>>
>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>> *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
>>
>> Note that I am extending the vote period for a little longer so that
>> folks get time to test this out.
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
>>
>> Should we release this?
>>
>> thanks
>> mahadev
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
Seems reasonable. I just got builds@ to add openjdk6/7 support to
jenkins, I plan to add jobs for those as well.
Patrick
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I noticed that the following build is using jdk 1.6:
> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34
>
> Since a lot of people would be using 3.4.5 on top of jdk 1.7, should we
> create a build against jdk 1.7 ?
>
> My two cents.
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
>
>> Good point Ted.
>> Eugene,
>> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat level? :)
>>
>> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not.
>>
>> thanks
>> mahadev
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down root
>> cause ?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the unit
>> >> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also ran
>> >> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to be
>> >> working.
>> >>
>> >> Patrick
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <
>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Hi all,
>> >> >
>> >> > I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2 JIRAs are
>> >> > addressed in this release. This includes the critical bugfix
>> >> ZOOKEEPER-1550
>> >> > which address the client connection issue.
>> >> >
>> >> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>> >> > *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
>> >> >
>> >> > Note that I am extending the vote period for a little longer so that
>> >> > folks get time to test this out.
>> >> >
>> >> > http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
>> >> >
>> >> > Should we release this?
>> >> >
>> >> > thanks
>> >> > mahadev
>> >>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
I noticed that the following build is using jdk 1.6:
https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34
Since a lot of people would be using 3.4.5 on top of jdk 1.7, should we
create a build against jdk 1.7 ?
My two cents.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
> Good point Ted.
> Eugene,
> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat level? :)
>
> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not.
>
> thanks
> mahadev
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down root
> cause ?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the unit
> >> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also ran
> >> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to be
> >> working.
> >>
> >> Patrick
> >>
> >> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <
> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2 JIRAs are
> >> > addressed in this release. This includes the critical bugfix
> >> ZOOKEEPER-1550
> >> > which address the client connection issue.
> >> >
> >> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
> >> > *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
> >> >
> >> > Note that I am extending the vote period for a little longer so that
> >> > folks get time to test this out.
> >> >
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
> >> >
> >> > Should we release this?
> >> >
> >> > thanks
> >> > mahadev
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
I spoke too soon, it seems the correct jdk version is not being used,
I'm looking into it.
Patrick
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> fwiw: I setup jdk7 and openjdk7 jobs last night for branch34 on
> jenkins and they are looking good so far:
>
> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/
> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/
>
> Patrick
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Doesn't look good, failed a second time:
>>
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/
>>
>> java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect
>> at org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129)
>> at org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199)
>>
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>> Good point Ted.
>>> Eugene,
>>> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat level? :)
>>>
>>> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not.
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> mahadev
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down root cause ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the unit
>>>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also ran
>>>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to be
>>>>> working.
>>>>>
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > Hi all,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2 JIRAs are
>>>>> > addressed in this release. This includes the critical bugfix
>>>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550
>>>>> > which address the client connection issue.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>>>> > *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Note that I am extending the vote period for a little longer so that
>>>>> > folks get time to test this out.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Should we release this?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > thanks
>>>>> > mahadev
>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
The INFRA jira was resolved and I updated the jenkins jobs related to
this issue.
Patrick
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>> I used zk-solaris for the time being. We'll have to have something
>> added for ubuntu, must be a jenkins admin only operation.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5366
>
>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Currently ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 are using
>>> lock ZooKeeper-solaris.
>>> I think ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 should use
>>> a separate lock since they wouldn't run on a Solaris machine.
>>> I didn't seem to find how a new lock name can be added.
>>>
>>> Recent builds for ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7
>>> have been green.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've seen that before, it's a flakey test that's unrelated to the sasl
>>>> stuff.
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > I saw one test failure:
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/9/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum/QuorumPeerMainTest/testHighestZxidJoinLate/
>>>> >
>>>> > FYI
>>>> >
>>>> > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> Up in ZOOKEEPER-1557, Eugene separated one test out and test failure
>>>> seems
>>>> >> to be gone.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> For ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7, the two failed builds:
>>>> >> #10 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #7,
>>>> >> #8 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #5
>>>> >> where tests failed due to BindException
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Cheers
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> Yes. Those ubuntu machines have two slots each. If both tests run at
>>>> >>> the same time... bam.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> I just added exclusion locks to the configuration of these two jobs,
>>>> >>> that should help.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Patrick
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >>> > I think that was due to the following running on the same machine at
>>>> the
>>>> >>> > same time:
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > Building remotely on ubuntu4
>>>> >>> > <https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu4> in workspace
>>>> >>> > /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > We should introduce randomized port so that test suite can execute in
>>>> >>> > parallel.
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > Cheers
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >> Some tests failed in build 8 due to (See
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>>
>>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/8/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server/ZxidRolloverTest/testRolloverThenRestart/
>>>> >>> ):
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException: Address already
>>>> in
>>>> >>> use
>>>> >>> >> at
>>>> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:118)
>>>> >>> >> at
>>>> >>>
>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZxidRolloverTest.setUp(ZxidRolloverTest.java:63)
>>>> >>> >> Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
>>>> >>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
>>>> >>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:344)
>>>> >>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:336)
>>>> >>> >> at
>>>> >>>
>>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:199)
>>>> >>> >> at
>>>> >>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
>>>> >>> >> at
>>>> >>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:67)
>>>> >>> >> at
>>>> >>>
>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.configure(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:95)
>>>> >>> >> at
>>>> >>>
>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ServerCnxnFactory.createFactory(ServerCnxnFactory.java:125)
>>>> >>> >> at
>>>> >>>
>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.<init>(QuorumPeer.java:517)
>>>> >>> >> at
>>>> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:113)
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >>> fwiw: I setup jdk7 and openjdk7 jobs last night for branch34 on
>>>> >>> >>> jenkins and they are looking good so far:
>>>> >>> >>>
>>>> >>> >>>
>>>> >>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/
>>>> >>> >>>
>>>> >>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/
>>>> >>> >>>
>>>> >>> >>> Patrick
>>>> >>> >>>
>>>> >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>>> >>> wrote:
>>>> >>> >>> > Doesn't look good, failed a second time:
>>>> >>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/
>>>> >>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >>> > java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect
>>>> >>> >>> > at
>>>> >>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129)
>>>> >>> >>> > at
>>>> >>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199)
>>>> >>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >>> > Patrick
>>>> >>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >>> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar <
>>>> >>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>>>> >>> >>> wrote:
>>>> >>> >>> >> Good point Ted.
>>>> >>> >>> >> Eugene,
>>>> >>> >>> >> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat
>>>> >>> >>> level? :)
>>>> >>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >>> >> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not.
>>>> >>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >>> >> thanks
>>>> >>> >>> >> mahadev
>>>> >>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >>> >> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
>>>> >>> wrote:
>>>> >>> >>> >>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down
>>>> >>> root
>>>> >>> >>> cause ?
>>>> >>> >>> >>>
>>>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks
>>>> >>> >>> >>>
>>>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <
>>>> phunt@apache.org>
>>>> >>> >>> wrote:
>>>> >>> >>> >>>
>>>> >>> >>> >>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the
>>>> >>> unit
>>>> >>> >>> >>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also
>>>> ran
>>>> >>> >>> >>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to
>>>> be
>>>> >>> >>> >>>> working.
>>>> >>> >>> >>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >>>> Patrick
>>>> >>> >>> >>>>
>>>> >>> >>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <
>>>> >>> >>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>>>> >>> >>> >>>> wrote:
>>>> >>> >>> >>>> > Hi all,
>>>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>>>> >>> >>> >>>> > I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2
>>>> >>> JIRAs are
>>>> >>> >>> >>>> > addressed in this release. This includes the critical
>>>> bugfix
>>>> >>> >>> >>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550
>>>> >>> >>> >>>> > which address the client connection issue.
>>>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>>>> >>> >>> >>>> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>>> >>> >>> >>>> > *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
>>>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>>>> >>> >>> >>>> > Note that I am extending the vote period for a little
>>>> longer so
>>>> >>> >>> that
>>>> >>> >>> >>>> > folks get time to test this out.
>>>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>>>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>>>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
>>>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>>>> >>> >>> >>>> > Should we release this?
>>>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>>>> >>> >>> >>>> > thanks
>>>> >>> >>> >>>> > mahadev
>>>> >>> >>> >>>>
>>>> >>> >>>
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> I used zk-solaris for the time being. We'll have to have something
> added for ubuntu, must be a jenkins admin only operation.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5366
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Currently ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 are using
>> lock ZooKeeper-solaris.
>> I think ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 should use
>> a separate lock since they wouldn't run on a Solaris machine.
>> I didn't seem to find how a new lock name can be added.
>>
>> Recent builds for ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7
>> have been green.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I've seen that before, it's a flakey test that's unrelated to the sasl
>>> stuff.
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > I saw one test failure:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/9/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum/QuorumPeerMainTest/testHighestZxidJoinLate/
>>> >
>>> > FYI
>>> >
>>> > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Up in ZOOKEEPER-1557, Eugene separated one test out and test failure
>>> seems
>>> >> to be gone.
>>> >>
>>> >> For ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7, the two failed builds:
>>> >> #10 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #7,
>>> >> #8 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #5
>>> >> where tests failed due to BindException
>>> >>
>>> >> Cheers
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Yes. Those ubuntu machines have two slots each. If both tests run at
>>> >>> the same time... bam.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I just added exclusion locks to the configuration of these two jobs,
>>> >>> that should help.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Patrick
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>> > I think that was due to the following running on the same machine at
>>> the
>>> >>> > same time:
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > Building remotely on ubuntu4
>>> >>> > <https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu4> in workspace
>>> >>> > /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > We should introduce randomized port so that test suite can execute in
>>> >>> > parallel.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > Cheers
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >> Some tests failed in build 8 due to (See
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/8/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server/ZxidRolloverTest/testRolloverThenRestart/
>>> >>> ):
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException: Address already
>>> in
>>> >>> use
>>> >>> >> at
>>> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:118)
>>> >>> >> at
>>> >>>
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZxidRolloverTest.setUp(ZxidRolloverTest.java:63)
>>> >>> >> Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
>>> >>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
>>> >>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:344)
>>> >>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:336)
>>> >>> >> at
>>> >>>
>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:199)
>>> >>> >> at
>>> >>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
>>> >>> >> at
>>> >>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:67)
>>> >>> >> at
>>> >>>
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.configure(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:95)
>>> >>> >> at
>>> >>>
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ServerCnxnFactory.createFactory(ServerCnxnFactory.java:125)
>>> >>> >> at
>>> >>>
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.<init>(QuorumPeer.java:517)
>>> >>> >> at
>>> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:113)
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>> fwiw: I setup jdk7 and openjdk7 jobs last night for branch34 on
>>> >>> >>> jenkins and they are looking good so far:
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>> Patrick
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>> >>> > Doesn't look good, failed a second time:
>>> >>> >>> >
>>> >>> >>> >
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/
>>> >>> >>> >
>>> >>> >>> > java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect
>>> >>> >>> > at
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129)
>>> >>> >>> > at
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199)
>>> >>> >>> >
>>> >>> >>> >
>>> >>> >>> > Patrick
>>> >>> >>> >
>>> >>> >>> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar <
>>> >>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>>> >>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>> >>> >> Good point Ted.
>>> >>> >>> >> Eugene,
>>> >>> >>> >> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat
>>> >>> >>> level? :)
>>> >>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>> >> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not.
>>> >>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>> >> thanks
>>> >>> >>> >> mahadev
>>> >>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>> >> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>> >>> >>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down
>>> >>> root
>>> >>> >>> cause ?
>>> >>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks
>>> >>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <
>>> phunt@apache.org>
>>> >>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>> >>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the
>>> >>> unit
>>> >>> >>> >>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also
>>> ran
>>> >>> >>> >>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to
>>> be
>>> >>> >>> >>>> working.
>>> >>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>> >>>> Patrick
>>> >>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <
>>> >>> >>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>>> >>> >>> >>>> wrote:
>>> >>> >>> >>>> > Hi all,
>>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>>> >>> >>> >>>> > I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2
>>> >>> JIRAs are
>>> >>> >>> >>>> > addressed in this release. This includes the critical
>>> bugfix
>>> >>> >>> >>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550
>>> >>> >>> >>>> > which address the client connection issue.
>>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>>> >>> >>> >>>> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>> >>> >>> >>>> > *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
>>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>>> >>> >>> >>>> > Note that I am extending the vote period for a little
>>> longer so
>>> >>> >>> that
>>> >>> >>> >>>> > folks get time to test this out.
>>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
>>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>>> >>> >>> >>>> > Should we release this?
>>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>>> >>> >>> >>>> > thanks
>>> >>> >>> >>>> > mahadev
>>> >>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
I used zk-solaris for the time being. We'll have to have something
added for ubuntu, must be a jenkins admin only operation.
Patrick
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Currently ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 are using
> lock ZooKeeper-solaris.
> I think ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 should use
> a separate lock since they wouldn't run on a Solaris machine.
> I didn't seem to find how a new lock name can be added.
>
> Recent builds for ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7
> have been green.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I've seen that before, it's a flakey test that's unrelated to the sasl
>> stuff.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I saw one test failure:
>> >
>> >
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/9/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum/QuorumPeerMainTest/testHighestZxidJoinLate/
>> >
>> > FYI
>> >
>> > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Up in ZOOKEEPER-1557, Eugene separated one test out and test failure
>> seems
>> >> to be gone.
>> >>
>> >> For ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7, the two failed builds:
>> >> #10 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #7,
>> >> #8 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #5
>> >> where tests failed due to BindException
>> >>
>> >> Cheers
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Yes. Those ubuntu machines have two slots each. If both tests run at
>> >>> the same time... bam.
>> >>>
>> >>> I just added exclusion locks to the configuration of these two jobs,
>> >>> that should help.
>> >>>
>> >>> Patrick
>> >>>
>> >>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > I think that was due to the following running on the same machine at
>> the
>> >>> > same time:
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Building remotely on ubuntu4
>> >>> > <https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu4> in workspace
>> >>> > /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7
>> >>> >
>> >>> > We should introduce randomized port so that test suite can execute in
>> >>> > parallel.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Cheers
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> Some tests failed in build 8 due to (See
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/8/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server/ZxidRolloverTest/testRolloverThenRestart/
>> >>> ):
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException: Address already
>> in
>> >>> use
>> >>> >> at
>> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:118)
>> >>> >> at
>> >>>
>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZxidRolloverTest.setUp(ZxidRolloverTest.java:63)
>> >>> >> Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
>> >>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
>> >>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:344)
>> >>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:336)
>> >>> >> at
>> >>>
>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:199)
>> >>> >> at
>> >>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
>> >>> >> at
>> >>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:67)
>> >>> >> at
>> >>>
>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.configure(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:95)
>> >>> >> at
>> >>>
>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ServerCnxnFactory.createFactory(ServerCnxnFactory.java:125)
>> >>> >> at
>> >>>
>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.<init>(QuorumPeer.java:517)
>> >>> >> at
>> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:113)
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> fwiw: I setup jdk7 and openjdk7 jobs last night for branch34 on
>> >>> >>> jenkins and they are looking good so far:
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>>
>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>>
>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> Patrick
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >>> > Doesn't look good, failed a second time:
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>>
>> >>>
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect
>> >>> >>> > at
>> >>> >>>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129)
>> >>> >>> > at
>> >>> >>>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199)
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > Patrick
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar <
>> >>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>> >>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >>> >> Good point Ted.
>> >>> >>> >> Eugene,
>> >>> >>> >> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat
>> >>> >>> level? :)
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not.
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> thanks
>> >>> >>> >> mahadev
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >>> >>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down
>> >>> root
>> >>> >>> cause ?
>> >>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks
>> >>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <
>> phunt@apache.org>
>> >>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the
>> >>> unit
>> >>> >>> >>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also
>> ran
>> >>> >>> >>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to
>> be
>> >>> >>> >>>> working.
>> >>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>> >>>> Patrick
>> >>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <
>> >>> >>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>> >>> >>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>> >>> >>>> > Hi all,
>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>> >>> >>> >>>> > I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2
>> >>> JIRAs are
>> >>> >>> >>>> > addressed in this release. This includes the critical
>> bugfix
>> >>> >>> >>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550
>> >>> >>> >>>> > which address the client connection issue.
>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>> >>> >>> >>>> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>> >>> >>> >>>> > *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>> >>> >>> >>>> > Note that I am extending the vote period for a little
>> longer so
>> >>> >>> that
>> >>> >>> >>>> > folks get time to test this out.
>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>> >>> >>> >>>> > Should we release this?
>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>> >>> >>> >>>> > thanks
>> >>> >>> >>>> > mahadev
>> >>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
I used jdk6 and jdk7 and it was fine. Based on Eugene's findings I
don't see any reason not to continue, I'm still +1.
Patrick
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Given Eugene's findings on ZOOKEEPER-1557, I think we can continue
> rolling the current RC out. Others please vote on the thread if you
> see any issues with that. Folks who have already voted, please re vote
> in case you have a change of opinion.
>
> As for myself, I ran a couple of tests with the RC using open jdk 7
> and things seem to work.
>
> +1 from my side. Pat/Ben/Flavio/others what do you guys think?
>
> thanks
> mahadev
>
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Currently ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 are using
>> lock ZooKeeper-solaris.
>> I think ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 should use
>> a separate lock since they wouldn't run on a Solaris machine.
>> I didn't seem to find how a new lock name can be added.
>>
>> Recent builds for ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7
>> have been green.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I've seen that before, it's a flakey test that's unrelated to the sasl
>>> stuff.
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > I saw one test failure:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/9/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum/QuorumPeerMainTest/testHighestZxidJoinLate/
>>> >
>>> > FYI
>>> >
>>> > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Up in ZOOKEEPER-1557, Eugene separated one test out and test failure
>>> seems
>>> >> to be gone.
>>> >>
>>> >> For ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7, the two failed builds:
>>> >> #10 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #7,
>>> >> #8 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #5
>>> >> where tests failed due to BindException
>>> >>
>>> >> Cheers
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Yes. Those ubuntu machines have two slots each. If both tests run at
>>> >>> the same time... bam.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I just added exclusion locks to the configuration of these two jobs,
>>> >>> that should help.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Patrick
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>> > I think that was due to the following running on the same machine at
>>> the
>>> >>> > same time:
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > Building remotely on ubuntu4
>>> >>> > <https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu4> in workspace
>>> >>> > /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > We should introduce randomized port so that test suite can execute in
>>> >>> > parallel.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > Cheers
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >> Some tests failed in build 8 due to (See
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/8/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server/ZxidRolloverTest/testRolloverThenRestart/
>>> >>> ):
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException: Address already
>>> in
>>> >>> use
>>> >>> >> at
>>> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:118)
>>> >>> >> at
>>> >>>
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZxidRolloverTest.setUp(ZxidRolloverTest.java:63)
>>> >>> >> Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
>>> >>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
>>> >>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:344)
>>> >>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:336)
>>> >>> >> at
>>> >>>
>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:199)
>>> >>> >> at
>>> >>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
>>> >>> >> at
>>> >>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:67)
>>> >>> >> at
>>> >>>
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.configure(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:95)
>>> >>> >> at
>>> >>>
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ServerCnxnFactory.createFactory(ServerCnxnFactory.java:125)
>>> >>> >> at
>>> >>>
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.<init>(QuorumPeer.java:517)
>>> >>> >> at
>>> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:113)
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>> fwiw: I setup jdk7 and openjdk7 jobs last night for branch34 on
>>> >>> >>> jenkins and they are looking good so far:
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>> Patrick
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>> >>> > Doesn't look good, failed a second time:
>>> >>> >>> >
>>> >>> >>> >
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/
>>> >>> >>> >
>>> >>> >>> > java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect
>>> >>> >>> > at
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129)
>>> >>> >>> > at
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199)
>>> >>> >>> >
>>> >>> >>> >
>>> >>> >>> > Patrick
>>> >>> >>> >
>>> >>> >>> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar <
>>> >>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>>> >>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>> >>> >> Good point Ted.
>>> >>> >>> >> Eugene,
>>> >>> >>> >> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat
>>> >>> >>> level? :)
>>> >>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>> >> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not.
>>> >>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>> >> thanks
>>> >>> >>> >> mahadev
>>> >>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>> >> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>> >>> >>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down
>>> >>> root
>>> >>> >>> cause ?
>>> >>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks
>>> >>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <
>>> phunt@apache.org>
>>> >>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>> >>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the
>>> >>> unit
>>> >>> >>> >>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also
>>> ran
>>> >>> >>> >>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to
>>> be
>>> >>> >>> >>>> working.
>>> >>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>> >>>> Patrick
>>> >>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <
>>> >>> >>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>>> >>> >>> >>>> wrote:
>>> >>> >>> >>>> > Hi all,
>>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>>> >>> >>> >>>> > I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2
>>> >>> JIRAs are
>>> >>> >>> >>>> > addressed in this release. This includes the critical
>>> bugfix
>>> >>> >>> >>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550
>>> >>> >>> >>>> > which address the client connection issue.
>>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>>> >>> >>> >>>> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>> >>> >>> >>>> > *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
>>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>>> >>> >>> >>>> > Note that I am extending the vote period for a little
>>> longer so
>>> >>> >>> that
>>> >>> >>> >>>> > folks get time to test this out.
>>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
>>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>>> >>> >>> >>>> > Should we release this?
>>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>>> >>> >>> >>>> > thanks
>>> >>> >>> >>>> > mahadev
>>> >>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Alexander Shraer <sh...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Mahadev. It looks like the patch on 1560 is not a fix - its a
test that reproduces the bug.
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Thanks Alex for bringing it up. Ill hold the release for now. I see a
> patch on 1560. Ill take a look and we'll see how to roll this into
> 3.4.5.
>
> thanks
> mahadev
>
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Alexander Shraer <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Mahadev,
>>
>> ZOOKEEPER-1560 and ZOOKEEPER-1561 indicate a potentially serious issue,
>> introduced recently in ZOOKEEPER-1437. Please consider this w.r.t. the
>> 3.4.5 release.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Alex
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>> I think we have waited enough. Closing the vote now.
>>>
>>> With 5 +1's (3 binding) the vote passes. I will do the needful for
>>> getting the release out.
>>>
>>> Thanks for voting folks.
>>>
>>> mahadev
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> -Flavio
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 8, 2012, at 7:05 AM, Mahadev Konar wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Given Eugene's findings on ZOOKEEPER-1557, I think we can continue
>>>>> rolling the current RC out. Others please vote on the thread if you
>>>>> see any issues with that. Folks who have already voted, please re vote
>>>>> in case you have a change of opinion.
>>>>>
>>>>> As for myself, I ran a couple of tests with the RC using open jdk 7
>>>>> and things seem to work.
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 from my side. Pat/Ben/Flavio/others what do you guys think?
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>> mahadev
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Currently ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 are using
>>>>>> lock ZooKeeper-solaris.
>>>>>> I think ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 should use
>>>>>> a separate lock since they wouldn't run on a Solaris machine.
>>>>>> I didn't seem to find how a new lock name can be added.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Recent builds for ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7
>>>>>> have been green.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've seen that before, it's a flakey test that's unrelated to the sasl
>>>>>>> stuff.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> I saw one test failure:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/9/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum/QuorumPeerMainTest/testHighestZxidJoinLate/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> FYI
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Up in ZOOKEEPER-1557, Eugene separated one test out and test failure
>>>>>>> seems
>>>>>>>>> to be gone.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7, the two failed builds:
>>>>>>>>> #10 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #7,
>>>>>>>>> #8 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #5
>>>>>>>>> where tests failed due to BindException
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes. Those ubuntu machines have two slots each. If both tests run at
>>>>>>>>>> the same time... bam.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I just added exclusion locks to the configuration of these two jobs,
>>>>>>>>>> that should help.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> I think that was due to the following running on the same machine at
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> same time:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Building remotely on ubuntu4
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu4> in workspace
>>>>>>>>>>> /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We should introduce randomized port so that test suite can execute in
>>>>>>>>>>> parallel.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Some tests failed in build 8 due to (See
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/8/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server/ZxidRolloverTest/testRolloverThenRestart/
>>>>>>>>>> ):
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException: Address already
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:118)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZxidRolloverTest.setUp(ZxidRolloverTest.java:63)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
>>>>>>>>>>>> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:344)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:336)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:199)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:67)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.configure(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:95)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ServerCnxnFactory.createFactory(ServerCnxnFactory.java:125)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.<init>(QuorumPeer.java:517)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:113)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fwiw: I setup jdk7 and openjdk7 jobs last night for branch34 on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> jenkins and they are looking good so far:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doesn't look good, failed a second time:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar <
>>>>>>>>>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good point Ted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eugene,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat
>>>>>>>>>>>>> level? :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mahadev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down
>>>>>>>>>> root
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cause ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <
>>>>>>> phunt@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the
>>>>>>>>>> unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also
>>>>>>> ran
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to
>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2
>>>>>>>>>> JIRAs are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressed in this release. This includes the critical
>>>>>>> bugfix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which address the client connection issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note that I am extending the vote period for a little
>>>>>>> longer so
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folks get time to test this out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should we release this?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mahadev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com>.
Thanks Ted. Will review the changes over the weekend.
Thanks again
mahadev
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Patch v7 for ZOOKEEPER-1560 passes test suite.
>
> Please take a look.
>
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
>
>> Thanks Alex for bringing it up. Ill hold the release for now. I see a
>> patch on 1560. Ill take a look and we'll see how to roll this into
>> 3.4.5.
>>
>> thanks
>> mahadev
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Alexander Shraer <sh...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Mahadev,
>> >
>> > ZOOKEEPER-1560 and ZOOKEEPER-1561 indicate a potentially serious issue,
>> > introduced recently in ZOOKEEPER-1437. Please consider this w.r.t. the
>> > 3.4.5 release.
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Alex
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> I think we have waited enough. Closing the vote now.
>> >>
>> >> With 5 +1's (3 binding) the vote passes. I will do the needful for
>> >> getting the release out.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for voting folks.
>> >>
>> >> mahadev
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo-inc.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>> +1
>> >>>
>> >>> -Flavio
>> >>>
>> >>> On Oct 8, 2012, at 7:05 AM, Mahadev Konar wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Given Eugene's findings on ZOOKEEPER-1557, I think we can continue
>> >>>> rolling the current RC out. Others please vote on the thread if you
>> >>>> see any issues with that. Folks who have already voted, please re vote
>> >>>> in case you have a change of opinion.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> As for myself, I ran a couple of tests with the RC using open jdk 7
>> >>>> and things seem to work.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> +1 from my side. Pat/Ben/Flavio/others what do you guys think?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> thanks
>> >>>> mahadev
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>> Currently ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7
>> are using
>> >>>>> lock ZooKeeper-solaris.
>> >>>>> I think ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7
>> should use
>> >>>>> a separate lock since they wouldn't run on a Solaris machine.
>> >>>>> I didn't seem to find how a new lock name can be added.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Recent builds for ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and
>> ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7
>> >>>>> have been green.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Cheers
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> I've seen that before, it's a flakey test that's unrelated to the
>> sasl
>> >>>>>> stuff.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Patrick
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>> I saw one test failure:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/9/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum/QuorumPeerMainTest/testHighestZxidJoinLate/
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> FYI
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Up in ZOOKEEPER-1557, Eugene separated one test out and test
>> failure
>> >>>>>> seems
>> >>>>>>>> to be gone.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> For ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7, the two failed builds:
>> >>>>>>>> #10 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #7,
>> >>>>>>>> #8 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #5
>> >>>>>>>> where tests failed due to BindException
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Cheers
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Yes. Those ubuntu machines have two slots each. If both tests
>> run at
>> >>>>>>>>> the same time... bam.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> I just added exclusion locks to the configuration of these two
>> jobs,
>> >>>>>>>>> that should help.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Patrick
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>> I think that was due to the following running on the same
>> machine at
>> >>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>>> same time:
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Building remotely on ubuntu4
>> >>>>>>>>>> <https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu4> in workspace
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> We should introduce randomized port so that test suite can
>> execute in
>> >>>>>>>>>> parallel.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Some tests failed in build 8 due to (See
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/8/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server/ZxidRolloverTest/testRolloverThenRestart/
>> >>>>>>>>> ):
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException: Address
>> already
>> >>>>>> in
>> >>>>>>>>> use
>> >>>>>>>>>>> at
>> >>>>>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:118)
>> >>>>>>>>>>> at
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZxidRolloverTest.setUp(ZxidRolloverTest.java:63)
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
>> >>>>>>>>>>> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
>> >>>>>>>>>>> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:344)
>> >>>>>>>>>>> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:336)
>> >>>>>>>>>>> at
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:199)
>> >>>>>>>>>>> at
>> >>>>>>>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
>> >>>>>>>>>>> at
>> >>>>>>>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:67)
>> >>>>>>>>>>> at
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.configure(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:95)
>> >>>>>>>>>>> at
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ServerCnxnFactory.createFactory(ServerCnxnFactory.java:125)
>> >>>>>>>>>>> at
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.<init>(QuorumPeer.java:517)
>> >>>>>>>>>>> at
>> >>>>>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:113)
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org
>> >
>> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> fwiw: I setup jdk7 and openjdk7 jobs last night for branch34
>> on
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> jenkins and they are looking good so far:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <
>> phunt@apache.org>
>> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Doesn't look good, failed a second time:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129)
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199)
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar <
>> >>>>>>>>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good point Ted.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eugene,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the
>> threat
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> level? :)
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or
>> not.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> mahadev
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com
>> >
>> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track
>> down
>> >>>>>>>>> root
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> cause ?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <
>> >>>>>> phunt@apache.org>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good.
>> All the
>> >>>>>>>>> unit
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04).
>> Also
>> >>>>>> ran
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems
>> to
>> >>>>>> be
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2
>> >>>>>>>>> JIRAs are
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressed in this release. This includes the critical
>> >>>>>> bugfix
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which address the client connection issue.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct
>> 5th.***
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note that I am extending the vote period for a little
>> >>>>>> longer so
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> that
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folks get time to test this out.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should we release this?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mahadev
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Patch v7 for ZOOKEEPER-1560 passes test suite.
Please take a look.
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
> Thanks Alex for bringing it up. Ill hold the release for now. I see a
> patch on 1560. Ill take a look and we'll see how to roll this into
> 3.4.5.
>
> thanks
> mahadev
>
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Alexander Shraer <sh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi Mahadev,
> >
> > ZOOKEEPER-1560 and ZOOKEEPER-1561 indicate a potentially serious issue,
> > introduced recently in ZOOKEEPER-1437. Please consider this w.r.t. the
> > 3.4.5 release.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Alex
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com>
> wrote:
> >> I think we have waited enough. Closing the vote now.
> >>
> >> With 5 +1's (3 binding) the vote passes. I will do the needful for
> >> getting the release out.
> >>
> >> Thanks for voting folks.
> >>
> >> mahadev
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo-inc.com>
> wrote:
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> -Flavio
> >>>
> >>> On Oct 8, 2012, at 7:05 AM, Mahadev Konar wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Given Eugene's findings on ZOOKEEPER-1557, I think we can continue
> >>>> rolling the current RC out. Others please vote on the thread if you
> >>>> see any issues with that. Folks who have already voted, please re vote
> >>>> in case you have a change of opinion.
> >>>>
> >>>> As for myself, I ran a couple of tests with the RC using open jdk 7
> >>>> and things seem to work.
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 from my side. Pat/Ben/Flavio/others what do you guys think?
> >>>>
> >>>> thanks
> >>>> mahadev
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> Currently ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7
> are using
> >>>>> lock ZooKeeper-solaris.
> >>>>> I think ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7
> should use
> >>>>> a separate lock since they wouldn't run on a Solaris machine.
> >>>>> I didn't seem to find how a new lock name can be added.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Recent builds for ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and
> ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7
> >>>>> have been green.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I've seen that before, it's a flakey test that's unrelated to the
> sasl
> >>>>>> stuff.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Patrick
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> I saw one test failure:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/9/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum/QuorumPeerMainTest/testHighestZxidJoinLate/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> FYI
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Up in ZOOKEEPER-1557, Eugene separated one test out and test
> failure
> >>>>>> seems
> >>>>>>>> to be gone.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> For ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7, the two failed builds:
> >>>>>>>> #10 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #7,
> >>>>>>>> #8 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #5
> >>>>>>>> where tests failed due to BindException
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Yes. Those ubuntu machines have two slots each. If both tests
> run at
> >>>>>>>>> the same time... bam.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I just added exclusion locks to the configuration of these two
> jobs,
> >>>>>>>>> that should help.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Patrick
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> I think that was due to the following running on the same
> machine at
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> same time:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Building remotely on ubuntu4
> >>>>>>>>>> <https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu4> in workspace
> >>>>>>>>>>
> /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> We should introduce randomized port so that test suite can
> execute in
> >>>>>>>>>> parallel.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Some tests failed in build 8 due to (See
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/8/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server/ZxidRolloverTest/testRolloverThenRestart/
> >>>>>>>>> ):
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException: Address
> already
> >>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>> use
> >>>>>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:118)
> >>>>>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZxidRolloverTest.setUp(ZxidRolloverTest.java:63)
> >>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
> >>>>>>>>>>> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
> >>>>>>>>>>> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:344)
> >>>>>>>>>>> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:336)
> >>>>>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:199)
> >>>>>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
> >>>>>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:67)
> >>>>>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.configure(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:95)
> >>>>>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ServerCnxnFactory.createFactory(ServerCnxnFactory.java:125)
> >>>>>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.<init>(QuorumPeer.java:517)
> >>>>>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:113)
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org
> >
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> fwiw: I setup jdk7 and openjdk7 jobs last night for branch34
> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>> jenkins and they are looking good so far:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <
> phunt@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Doesn't look good, failed a second time:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar <
> >>>>>>>>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good point Ted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eugene,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the
> threat
> >>>>>>>>>>>> level? :)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or
> not.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> mahadev
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com
> >
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track
> down
> >>>>>>>>> root
> >>>>>>>>>>>> cause ?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <
> >>>>>> phunt@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good.
> All the
> >>>>>>>>> unit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04).
> Also
> >>>>>> ran
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems
> to
> >>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <
> >>>>>>>>>>>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2
> >>>>>>>>> JIRAs are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressed in this release. This includes the critical
> >>>>>> bugfix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which address the client connection issue.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct
> 5th.***
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note that I am extending the vote period for a little
> >>>>>> longer so
> >>>>>>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folks get time to test this out.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should we release this?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mahadev
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com>.
Thanks Alex for bringing it up. Ill hold the release for now. I see a
patch on 1560. Ill take a look and we'll see how to roll this into
3.4.5.
thanks
mahadev
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Alexander Shraer <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Mahadev,
>
> ZOOKEEPER-1560 and ZOOKEEPER-1561 indicate a potentially serious issue,
> introduced recently in ZOOKEEPER-1437. Please consider this w.r.t. the
> 3.4.5 release.
>
> Best Regards,
> Alex
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> I think we have waited enough. Closing the vote now.
>>
>> With 5 +1's (3 binding) the vote passes. I will do the needful for
>> getting the release out.
>>
>> Thanks for voting folks.
>>
>> mahadev
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> -Flavio
>>>
>>> On Oct 8, 2012, at 7:05 AM, Mahadev Konar wrote:
>>>
>>>> Given Eugene's findings on ZOOKEEPER-1557, I think we can continue
>>>> rolling the current RC out. Others please vote on the thread if you
>>>> see any issues with that. Folks who have already voted, please re vote
>>>> in case you have a change of opinion.
>>>>
>>>> As for myself, I ran a couple of tests with the RC using open jdk 7
>>>> and things seem to work.
>>>>
>>>> +1 from my side. Pat/Ben/Flavio/others what do you guys think?
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>> mahadev
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Currently ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 are using
>>>>> lock ZooKeeper-solaris.
>>>>> I think ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 should use
>>>>> a separate lock since they wouldn't run on a Solaris machine.
>>>>> I didn't seem to find how a new lock name can be added.
>>>>>
>>>>> Recent builds for ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7
>>>>> have been green.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I've seen that before, it's a flakey test that's unrelated to the sasl
>>>>>> stuff.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> I saw one test failure:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/9/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum/QuorumPeerMainTest/testHighestZxidJoinLate/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FYI
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Up in ZOOKEEPER-1557, Eugene separated one test out and test failure
>>>>>> seems
>>>>>>>> to be gone.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7, the two failed builds:
>>>>>>>> #10 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #7,
>>>>>>>> #8 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #5
>>>>>>>> where tests failed due to BindException
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes. Those ubuntu machines have two slots each. If both tests run at
>>>>>>>>> the same time... bam.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I just added exclusion locks to the configuration of these two jobs,
>>>>>>>>> that should help.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> I think that was due to the following running on the same machine at
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> same time:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Building remotely on ubuntu4
>>>>>>>>>> <https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu4> in workspace
>>>>>>>>>> /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We should introduce randomized port so that test suite can execute in
>>>>>>>>>> parallel.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Some tests failed in build 8 due to (See
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/8/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server/ZxidRolloverTest/testRolloverThenRestart/
>>>>>>>>> ):
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException: Address already
>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:118)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZxidRolloverTest.setUp(ZxidRolloverTest.java:63)
>>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
>>>>>>>>>>> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
>>>>>>>>>>> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:344)
>>>>>>>>>>> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:336)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:199)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:67)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.configure(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:95)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ServerCnxnFactory.createFactory(ServerCnxnFactory.java:125)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.<init>(QuorumPeer.java:517)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:113)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> fwiw: I setup jdk7 and openjdk7 jobs last night for branch34 on
>>>>>>>>>>>> jenkins and they are looking good so far:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doesn't look good, failed a second time:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar <
>>>>>>>>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good point Ted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eugene,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat
>>>>>>>>>>>> level? :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mahadev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down
>>>>>>>>> root
>>>>>>>>>>>> cause ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <
>>>>>> phunt@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the
>>>>>>>>> unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also
>>>>>> ran
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to
>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <
>>>>>>>>>>>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2
>>>>>>>>> JIRAs are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressed in this release. This includes the critical
>>>>>> bugfix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which address the client connection issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note that I am extending the vote period for a little
>>>>>> longer so
>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folks get time to test this out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should we release this?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mahadev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Alexander Shraer <sh...@gmail.com>.
Hi Mahadev,
ZOOKEEPER-1560 and ZOOKEEPER-1561 indicate a potentially serious issue,
introduced recently in ZOOKEEPER-1437. Please consider this w.r.t. the
3.4.5 release.
Best Regards,
Alex
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> I think we have waited enough. Closing the vote now.
>
> With 5 +1's (3 binding) the vote passes. I will do the needful for
> getting the release out.
>
> Thanks for voting folks.
>
> mahadev
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> -Flavio
>>
>> On Oct 8, 2012, at 7:05 AM, Mahadev Konar wrote:
>>
>>> Given Eugene's findings on ZOOKEEPER-1557, I think we can continue
>>> rolling the current RC out. Others please vote on the thread if you
>>> see any issues with that. Folks who have already voted, please re vote
>>> in case you have a change of opinion.
>>>
>>> As for myself, I ran a couple of tests with the RC using open jdk 7
>>> and things seem to work.
>>>
>>> +1 from my side. Pat/Ben/Flavio/others what do you guys think?
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> mahadev
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Currently ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 are using
>>>> lock ZooKeeper-solaris.
>>>> I think ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 should use
>>>> a separate lock since they wouldn't run on a Solaris machine.
>>>> I didn't seem to find how a new lock name can be added.
>>>>
>>>> Recent builds for ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7
>>>> have been green.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've seen that before, it's a flakey test that's unrelated to the sasl
>>>>> stuff.
>>>>>
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> I saw one test failure:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/9/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum/QuorumPeerMainTest/testHighestZxidJoinLate/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FYI
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Up in ZOOKEEPER-1557, Eugene separated one test out and test failure
>>>>> seems
>>>>>>> to be gone.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7, the two failed builds:
>>>>>>> #10 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #7,
>>>>>>> #8 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #5
>>>>>>> where tests failed due to BindException
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes. Those ubuntu machines have two slots each. If both tests run at
>>>>>>>> the same time... bam.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I just added exclusion locks to the configuration of these two jobs,
>>>>>>>> that should help.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I think that was due to the following running on the same machine at
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> same time:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Building remotely on ubuntu4
>>>>>>>>> <https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu4> in workspace
>>>>>>>>> /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We should introduce randomized port so that test suite can execute in
>>>>>>>>> parallel.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Some tests failed in build 8 due to (See
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/8/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server/ZxidRolloverTest/testRolloverThenRestart/
>>>>>>>> ):
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException: Address already
>>>>> in
>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:118)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZxidRolloverTest.setUp(ZxidRolloverTest.java:63)
>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
>>>>>>>>>> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
>>>>>>>>>> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:344)
>>>>>>>>>> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:336)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:199)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:67)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.configure(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:95)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ServerCnxnFactory.createFactory(ServerCnxnFactory.java:125)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.<init>(QuorumPeer.java:517)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:113)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> fwiw: I setup jdk7 and openjdk7 jobs last night for branch34 on
>>>>>>>>>>> jenkins and they are looking good so far:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Doesn't look good, failed a second time:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar <
>>>>>>>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good point Ted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eugene,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat
>>>>>>>>>>> level? :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mahadev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down
>>>>>>>> root
>>>>>>>>>>> cause ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <
>>>>> phunt@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the
>>>>>>>> unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also
>>>>> ran
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to
>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <
>>>>>>>>>>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2
>>>>>>>> JIRAs are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressed in this release. This includes the critical
>>>>> bugfix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which address the client connection issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note that I am extending the vote period for a little
>>>>> longer so
>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folks get time to test this out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should we release this?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mahadev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com>.
I think we have waited enough. Closing the vote now.
With 5 +1's (3 binding) the vote passes. I will do the needful for
getting the release out.
Thanks for voting folks.
mahadev
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> -Flavio
>
> On Oct 8, 2012, at 7:05 AM, Mahadev Konar wrote:
>
>> Given Eugene's findings on ZOOKEEPER-1557, I think we can continue
>> rolling the current RC out. Others please vote on the thread if you
>> see any issues with that. Folks who have already voted, please re vote
>> in case you have a change of opinion.
>>
>> As for myself, I ran a couple of tests with the RC using open jdk 7
>> and things seem to work.
>>
>> +1 from my side. Pat/Ben/Flavio/others what do you guys think?
>>
>> thanks
>> mahadev
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Currently ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 are using
>>> lock ZooKeeper-solaris.
>>> I think ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 should use
>>> a separate lock since they wouldn't run on a Solaris machine.
>>> I didn't seem to find how a new lock name can be added.
>>>
>>> Recent builds for ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7
>>> have been green.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've seen that before, it's a flakey test that's unrelated to the sasl
>>>> stuff.
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> I saw one test failure:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/9/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum/QuorumPeerMainTest/testHighestZxidJoinLate/
>>>>>
>>>>> FYI
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Up in ZOOKEEPER-1557, Eugene separated one test out and test failure
>>>> seems
>>>>>> to be gone.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7, the two failed builds:
>>>>>> #10 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #7,
>>>>>> #8 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #5
>>>>>> where tests failed due to BindException
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes. Those ubuntu machines have two slots each. If both tests run at
>>>>>>> the same time... bam.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just added exclusion locks to the configuration of these two jobs,
>>>>>>> that should help.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> I think that was due to the following running on the same machine at
>>>> the
>>>>>>>> same time:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Building remotely on ubuntu4
>>>>>>>> <https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu4> in workspace
>>>>>>>> /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We should introduce randomized port so that test suite can execute in
>>>>>>>> parallel.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Some tests failed in build 8 due to (See
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/8/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server/ZxidRolloverTest/testRolloverThenRestart/
>>>>>>> ):
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException: Address already
>>>> in
>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:118)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>
>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZxidRolloverTest.setUp(ZxidRolloverTest.java:63)
>>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
>>>>>>>>> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
>>>>>>>>> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:344)
>>>>>>>>> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:336)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>
>>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:199)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:67)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>
>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.configure(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:95)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>
>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ServerCnxnFactory.createFactory(ServerCnxnFactory.java:125)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>
>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.<init>(QuorumPeer.java:517)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:113)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> fwiw: I setup jdk7 and openjdk7 jobs last night for branch34 on
>>>>>>>>>> jenkins and they are looking good so far:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Doesn't look good, failed a second time:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar <
>>>>>>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Good point Ted.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Eugene,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat
>>>>>>>>>> level? :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>> mahadev
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down
>>>>>>> root
>>>>>>>>>> cause ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <
>>>> phunt@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the
>>>>>>> unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also
>>>> ran
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to
>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <
>>>>>>>>>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2
>>>>>>> JIRAs are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressed in this release. This includes the critical
>>>> bugfix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which address the client connection issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note that I am extending the vote period for a little
>>>> longer so
>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folks get time to test this out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should we release this?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mahadev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo-inc.com>.
+1
-Flavio
On Oct 8, 2012, at 7:05 AM, Mahadev Konar wrote:
> Given Eugene's findings on ZOOKEEPER-1557, I think we can continue
> rolling the current RC out. Others please vote on the thread if you
> see any issues with that. Folks who have already voted, please re vote
> in case you have a change of opinion.
>
> As for myself, I ran a couple of tests with the RC using open jdk 7
> and things seem to work.
>
> +1 from my side. Pat/Ben/Flavio/others what do you guys think?
>
> thanks
> mahadev
>
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Currently ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 are using
>> lock ZooKeeper-solaris.
>> I think ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 should use
>> a separate lock since they wouldn't run on a Solaris machine.
>> I didn't seem to find how a new lock name can be added.
>>
>> Recent builds for ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7
>> have been green.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I've seen that before, it's a flakey test that's unrelated to the sasl
>>> stuff.
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I saw one test failure:
>>>>
>>>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/9/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum/QuorumPeerMainTest/testHighestZxidJoinLate/
>>>>
>>>> FYI
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Up in ZOOKEEPER-1557, Eugene separated one test out and test failure
>>> seems
>>>>> to be gone.
>>>>>
>>>>> For ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7, the two failed builds:
>>>>> #10 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #7,
>>>>> #8 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #5
>>>>> where tests failed due to BindException
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes. Those ubuntu machines have two slots each. If both tests run at
>>>>>> the same time... bam.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just added exclusion locks to the configuration of these two jobs,
>>>>>> that should help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> I think that was due to the following running on the same machine at
>>> the
>>>>>>> same time:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Building remotely on ubuntu4
>>>>>>> <https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu4> in workspace
>>>>>>> /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We should introduce randomized port so that test suite can execute in
>>>>>>> parallel.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Some tests failed in build 8 due to (See
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/8/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server/ZxidRolloverTest/testRolloverThenRestart/
>>>>>> ):
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException: Address already
>>> in
>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:118)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZxidRolloverTest.setUp(ZxidRolloverTest.java:63)
>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
>>>>>>>> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
>>>>>>>> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:344)
>>>>>>>> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:336)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>
>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:199)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:67)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.configure(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:95)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ServerCnxnFactory.createFactory(ServerCnxnFactory.java:125)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.<init>(QuorumPeer.java:517)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:113)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> fwiw: I setup jdk7 and openjdk7 jobs last night for branch34 on
>>>>>>>>> jenkins and they are looking good so far:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Doesn't look good, failed a second time:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar <
>>>>>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Good point Ted.
>>>>>>>>>>> Eugene,
>>>>>>>>>>> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat
>>>>>>>>> level? :)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>>>> mahadev
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down
>>>>>> root
>>>>>>>>> cause ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <
>>> phunt@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the
>>>>>> unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also
>>> ran
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to
>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> working.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <
>>>>>>>>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2
>>>>>> JIRAs are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressed in this release. This includes the critical
>>> bugfix
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which address the client connection issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note that I am extending the vote period for a little
>>> longer so
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folks get time to test this out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should we release this?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mahadev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com>.
Given Eugene's findings on ZOOKEEPER-1557, I think we can continue
rolling the current RC out. Others please vote on the thread if you
see any issues with that. Folks who have already voted, please re vote
in case you have a change of opinion.
As for myself, I ran a couple of tests with the RC using open jdk 7
and things seem to work.
+1 from my side. Pat/Ben/Flavio/others what do you guys think?
thanks
mahadev
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Currently ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 are using
> lock ZooKeeper-solaris.
> I think ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 should use
> a separate lock since they wouldn't run on a Solaris machine.
> I didn't seem to find how a new lock name can be added.
>
> Recent builds for ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7
> have been green.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I've seen that before, it's a flakey test that's unrelated to the sasl
>> stuff.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I saw one test failure:
>> >
>> >
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/9/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum/QuorumPeerMainTest/testHighestZxidJoinLate/
>> >
>> > FYI
>> >
>> > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Up in ZOOKEEPER-1557, Eugene separated one test out and test failure
>> seems
>> >> to be gone.
>> >>
>> >> For ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7, the two failed builds:
>> >> #10 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #7,
>> >> #8 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #5
>> >> where tests failed due to BindException
>> >>
>> >> Cheers
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Yes. Those ubuntu machines have two slots each. If both tests run at
>> >>> the same time... bam.
>> >>>
>> >>> I just added exclusion locks to the configuration of these two jobs,
>> >>> that should help.
>> >>>
>> >>> Patrick
>> >>>
>> >>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > I think that was due to the following running on the same machine at
>> the
>> >>> > same time:
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Building remotely on ubuntu4
>> >>> > <https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu4> in workspace
>> >>> > /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7
>> >>> >
>> >>> > We should introduce randomized port so that test suite can execute in
>> >>> > parallel.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Cheers
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> Some tests failed in build 8 due to (See
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/8/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server/ZxidRolloverTest/testRolloverThenRestart/
>> >>> ):
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException: Address already
>> in
>> >>> use
>> >>> >> at
>> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:118)
>> >>> >> at
>> >>>
>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZxidRolloverTest.setUp(ZxidRolloverTest.java:63)
>> >>> >> Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
>> >>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
>> >>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:344)
>> >>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:336)
>> >>> >> at
>> >>>
>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:199)
>> >>> >> at
>> >>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
>> >>> >> at
>> >>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:67)
>> >>> >> at
>> >>>
>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.configure(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:95)
>> >>> >> at
>> >>>
>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ServerCnxnFactory.createFactory(ServerCnxnFactory.java:125)
>> >>> >> at
>> >>>
>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.<init>(QuorumPeer.java:517)
>> >>> >> at
>> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:113)
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> fwiw: I setup jdk7 and openjdk7 jobs last night for branch34 on
>> >>> >>> jenkins and they are looking good so far:
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>>
>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>>
>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> Patrick
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >>> > Doesn't look good, failed a second time:
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>>
>> >>>
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect
>> >>> >>> > at
>> >>> >>>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129)
>> >>> >>> > at
>> >>> >>>
>> >>>
>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199)
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > Patrick
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar <
>> >>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>> >>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >>> >> Good point Ted.
>> >>> >>> >> Eugene,
>> >>> >>> >> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat
>> >>> >>> level? :)
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not.
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> thanks
>> >>> >>> >> mahadev
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >>> >>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down
>> >>> root
>> >>> >>> cause ?
>> >>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks
>> >>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <
>> phunt@apache.org>
>> >>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the
>> >>> unit
>> >>> >>> >>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also
>> ran
>> >>> >>> >>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to
>> be
>> >>> >>> >>>> working.
>> >>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>> >>>> Patrick
>> >>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <
>> >>> >>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>> >>> >>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>> >>> >>>> > Hi all,
>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>> >>> >>> >>>> > I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2
>> >>> JIRAs are
>> >>> >>> >>>> > addressed in this release. This includes the critical
>> bugfix
>> >>> >>> >>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550
>> >>> >>> >>>> > which address the client connection issue.
>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>> >>> >>> >>>> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>> >>> >>> >>>> > *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>> >>> >>> >>>> > Note that I am extending the vote period for a little
>> longer so
>> >>> >>> that
>> >>> >>> >>>> > folks get time to test this out.
>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>> >>> >>> >>>> > Should we release this?
>> >>> >>> >>>> >
>> >>> >>> >>>> > thanks
>> >>> >>> >>>> > mahadev
>> >>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Currently ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 are using
lock ZooKeeper-solaris.
I think ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 should use
a separate lock since they wouldn't run on a Solaris machine.
I didn't seem to find how a new lock name can be added.
Recent builds for ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7
have been green.
Cheers
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> I've seen that before, it's a flakey test that's unrelated to the sasl
> stuff.
>
> Patrick
>
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I saw one test failure:
> >
> >
> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/9/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum/QuorumPeerMainTest/testHighestZxidJoinLate/
> >
> > FYI
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Up in ZOOKEEPER-1557, Eugene separated one test out and test failure
> seems
> >> to be gone.
> >>
> >> For ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7, the two failed builds:
> >> #10 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #7,
> >> #8 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #5
> >> where tests failed due to BindException
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yes. Those ubuntu machines have two slots each. If both tests run at
> >>> the same time... bam.
> >>>
> >>> I just added exclusion locks to the configuration of these two jobs,
> >>> that should help.
> >>>
> >>> Patrick
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > I think that was due to the following running on the same machine at
> the
> >>> > same time:
> >>> >
> >>> > Building remotely on ubuntu4
> >>> > <https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu4> in workspace
> >>> > /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7
> >>> >
> >>> > We should introduce randomized port so that test suite can execute in
> >>> > parallel.
> >>> >
> >>> > Cheers
> >>> >
> >>> > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> Some tests failed in build 8 due to (See
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/8/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server/ZxidRolloverTest/testRolloverThenRestart/
> >>> ):
> >>> >>
> >>> >> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException: Address already
> in
> >>> use
> >>> >> at
> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:118)
> >>> >> at
> >>>
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZxidRolloverTest.setUp(ZxidRolloverTest.java:63)
> >>> >> Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
> >>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
> >>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:344)
> >>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:336)
> >>> >> at
> >>>
> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:199)
> >>> >> at
> >>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
> >>> >> at
> >>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:67)
> >>> >> at
> >>>
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.configure(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:95)
> >>> >> at
> >>>
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ServerCnxnFactory.createFactory(ServerCnxnFactory.java:125)
> >>> >> at
> >>>
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.<init>(QuorumPeer.java:517)
> >>> >> at
> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:113)
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> fwiw: I setup jdk7 and openjdk7 jobs last night for branch34 on
> >>> >>> jenkins and they are looking good so far:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>>
> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>>
> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Patrick
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>> > Doesn't look good, failed a second time:
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>>
> >>>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect
> >>> >>> > at
> >>> >>>
> >>>
> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129)
> >>> >>> > at
> >>> >>>
> >>>
> org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199)
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > Patrick
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar <
> >>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
> >>> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>> >> Good point Ted.
> >>> >>> >> Eugene,
> >>> >>> >> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat
> >>> >>> level? :)
> >>> >>> >>
> >>> >>> >> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not.
> >>> >>> >>
> >>> >>> >> thanks
> >>> >>> >> mahadev
> >>> >>> >>
> >>> >>> >> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>> >>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down
> >>> root
> >>> >>> cause ?
> >>> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> >>> Thanks
> >>> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <
> phunt@apache.org>
> >>> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> >>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the
> >>> unit
> >>> >>> >>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also
> ran
> >>> >>> >>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to
> be
> >>> >>> >>>> working.
> >>> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>> >>>> Patrick
> >>> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <
> >>> >>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
> >>> >>> >>>> wrote:
> >>> >>> >>>> > Hi all,
> >>> >>> >>>> >
> >>> >>> >>>> > I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2
> >>> JIRAs are
> >>> >>> >>>> > addressed in this release. This includes the critical
> bugfix
> >>> >>> >>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550
> >>> >>> >>>> > which address the client connection issue.
> >>> >>> >>>> >
> >>> >>> >>>> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
> >>> >>> >>>> > *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
> >>> >>> >>>> >
> >>> >>> >>>> > Note that I am extending the vote period for a little
> longer so
> >>> >>> that
> >>> >>> >>>> > folks get time to test this out.
> >>> >>> >>>> >
> >>> >>> >>>> >
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
> >>> >>> >>>> >
> >>> >>> >>>> > Should we release this?
> >>> >>> >>>> >
> >>> >>> >>>> > thanks
> >>> >>> >>>> > mahadev
> >>> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
I've seen that before, it's a flakey test that's unrelated to the sasl stuff.
Patrick
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I saw one test failure:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/9/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum/QuorumPeerMainTest/testHighestZxidJoinLate/
>
> FYI
>
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Up in ZOOKEEPER-1557, Eugene separated one test out and test failure seems
>> to be gone.
>>
>> For ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7, the two failed builds:
>> #10 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #7,
>> #8 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #5
>> where tests failed due to BindException
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes. Those ubuntu machines have two slots each. If both tests run at
>>> the same time... bam.
>>>
>>> I just added exclusion locks to the configuration of these two jobs,
>>> that should help.
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > I think that was due to the following running on the same machine at the
>>> > same time:
>>> >
>>> > Building remotely on ubuntu4
>>> > <https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu4> in workspace
>>> > /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7
>>> >
>>> > We should introduce randomized port so that test suite can execute in
>>> > parallel.
>>> >
>>> > Cheers
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Some tests failed in build 8 due to (See
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/8/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server/ZxidRolloverTest/testRolloverThenRestart/
>>> ):
>>> >>
>>> >> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException: Address already in
>>> use
>>> >> at
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:118)
>>> >> at
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZxidRolloverTest.setUp(ZxidRolloverTest.java:63)
>>> >> Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
>>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
>>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:344)
>>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:336)
>>> >> at
>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:199)
>>> >> at
>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
>>> >> at
>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:67)
>>> >> at
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.configure(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:95)
>>> >> at
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ServerCnxnFactory.createFactory(ServerCnxnFactory.java:125)
>>> >> at
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.<init>(QuorumPeer.java:517)
>>> >> at
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:113)
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> fwiw: I setup jdk7 and openjdk7 jobs last night for branch34 on
>>> >>> jenkins and they are looking good so far:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Patrick
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>> > Doesn't look good, failed a second time:
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect
>>> >>> > at
>>> >>>
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129)
>>> >>> > at
>>> >>>
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199)
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > Patrick
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar <
>>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>> >> Good point Ted.
>>> >>> >> Eugene,
>>> >>> >> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat
>>> >>> level? :)
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not.
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> thanks
>>> >>> >> mahadev
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>> >>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down
>>> root
>>> >>> cause ?
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>> Thanks
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the
>>> unit
>>> >>> >>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also ran
>>> >>> >>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to be
>>> >>> >>>> working.
>>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>>> Patrick
>>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <
>>> >>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>>> >>> >>>> wrote:
>>> >>> >>>> > Hi all,
>>> >>> >>>> >
>>> >>> >>>> > I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2
>>> JIRAs are
>>> >>> >>>> > addressed in this release. This includes the critical bugfix
>>> >>> >>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550
>>> >>> >>>> > which address the client connection issue.
>>> >>> >>>> >
>>> >>> >>>> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>> >>> >>>> > *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
>>> >>> >>>> >
>>> >>> >>>> > Note that I am extending the vote period for a little longer so
>>> >>> that
>>> >>> >>>> > folks get time to test this out.
>>> >>> >>>> >
>>> >>> >>>> >
>>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
>>> >>> >>>> >
>>> >>> >>>> > Should we release this?
>>> >>> >>>> >
>>> >>> >>>> > thanks
>>> >>> >>>> > mahadev
>>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
I saw one test failure:
https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/9/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum/QuorumPeerMainTest/testHighestZxidJoinLate/
FYI
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Up in ZOOKEEPER-1557, Eugene separated one test out and test failure seems
> to be gone.
>
> For ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7, the two failed builds:
> #10 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #7,
> #8 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #5
> where tests failed due to BindException
>
> Cheers
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Yes. Those ubuntu machines have two slots each. If both tests run at
>> the same time... bam.
>>
>> I just added exclusion locks to the configuration of these two jobs,
>> that should help.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I think that was due to the following running on the same machine at the
>> > same time:
>> >
>> > Building remotely on ubuntu4
>> > <https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu4> in workspace
>> > /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7
>> >
>> > We should introduce randomized port so that test suite can execute in
>> > parallel.
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> >
>> > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Some tests failed in build 8 due to (See
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/8/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server/ZxidRolloverTest/testRolloverThenRestart/
>> ):
>> >>
>> >> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException: Address already in
>> use
>> >> at
>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:118)
>> >> at
>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZxidRolloverTest.setUp(ZxidRolloverTest.java:63)
>> >> Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:344)
>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:336)
>> >> at
>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:199)
>> >> at
>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
>> >> at
>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:67)
>> >> at
>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.configure(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:95)
>> >> at
>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ServerCnxnFactory.createFactory(ServerCnxnFactory.java:125)
>> >> at
>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.<init>(QuorumPeer.java:517)
>> >> at
>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:113)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> fwiw: I setup jdk7 and openjdk7 jobs last night for branch34 on
>> >>> jenkins and they are looking good so far:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/
>> >>>
>> >>> Patrick
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>> > Doesn't look good, failed a second time:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/
>> >>> >
>> >>> > java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect
>> >>> > at
>> >>>
>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129)
>> >>> > at
>> >>>
>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199)
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Patrick
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar <
>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >> Good point Ted.
>> >>> >> Eugene,
>> >>> >> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat
>> >>> level? :)
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> thanks
>> >>> >> mahadev
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>> >>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down
>> root
>> >>> cause ?
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> Thanks
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the
>> unit
>> >>> >>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also ran
>> >>> >>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to be
>> >>> >>>> working.
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> Patrick
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <
>> >>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>> >>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>> >>>> > Hi all,
>> >>> >>>> >
>> >>> >>>> > I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2
>> JIRAs are
>> >>> >>>> > addressed in this release. This includes the critical bugfix
>> >>> >>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550
>> >>> >>>> > which address the client connection issue.
>> >>> >>>> >
>> >>> >>>> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>> >>> >>>> > *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
>> >>> >>>> >
>> >>> >>>> > Note that I am extending the vote period for a little longer so
>> >>> that
>> >>> >>>> > folks get time to test this out.
>> >>> >>>> >
>> >>> >>>> >
>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
>> >>> >>>> >
>> >>> >>>> > Should we release this?
>> >>> >>>> >
>> >>> >>>> > thanks
>> >>> >>>> > mahadev
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Up in ZOOKEEPER-1557, Eugene separated one test out and test failure seems
to be gone.
For ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7, the two failed builds:
#10 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #7,
#8 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #5
where tests failed due to BindException
Cheers
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yes. Those ubuntu machines have two slots each. If both tests run at
> the same time... bam.
>
> I just added exclusion locks to the configuration of these two jobs,
> that should help.
>
> Patrick
>
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think that was due to the following running on the same machine at the
> > same time:
> >
> > Building remotely on ubuntu4
> > <https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu4> in workspace
> > /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7
> >
> > We should introduce randomized port so that test suite can execute in
> > parallel.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Some tests failed in build 8 due to (See
> >>
> >>
> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/8/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server/ZxidRolloverTest/testRolloverThenRestart/
> ):
> >>
> >> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException: Address already in
> use
> >> at
> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:118)
> >> at
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZxidRolloverTest.setUp(ZxidRolloverTest.java:63)
> >> Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:344)
> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:336)
> >> at
> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:199)
> >> at
> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
> >> at
> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:67)
> >> at
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.configure(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:95)
> >> at
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ServerCnxnFactory.createFactory(ServerCnxnFactory.java:125)
> >> at
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.<init>(QuorumPeer.java:517)
> >> at
> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:113)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> fwiw: I setup jdk7 and openjdk7 jobs last night for branch34 on
> >>> jenkins and they are looking good so far:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/
> >>>
> >>>
> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/
> >>>
> >>> Patrick
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>> > Doesn't look good, failed a second time:
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/
> >>> >
> >>> > java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect
> >>> > at
> >>>
> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129)
> >>> > at
> >>>
> org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199)
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Patrick
> >>> >
> >>> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar <
> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >> Good point Ted.
> >>> >> Eugene,
> >>> >> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat
> >>> level? :)
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> thanks
> >>> >> mahadev
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down root
> >>> cause ?
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Thanks
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the
> unit
> >>> >>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also ran
> >>> >>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to be
> >>> >>>> working.
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> Patrick
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <
> >>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
> >>> >>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>> > Hi all,
> >>> >>>> >
> >>> >>>> > I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2 JIRAs
> are
> >>> >>>> > addressed in this release. This includes the critical bugfix
> >>> >>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550
> >>> >>>> > which address the client connection issue.
> >>> >>>> >
> >>> >>>> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
> >>> >>>> > *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
> >>> >>>> >
> >>> >>>> > Note that I am extending the vote period for a little longer so
> >>> that
> >>> >>>> > folks get time to test this out.
> >>> >>>> >
> >>> >>>> > http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
> >>> >>>> >
> >>> >>>> > Should we release this?
> >>> >>>> >
> >>> >>>> > thanks
> >>> >>>> > mahadev
> >>> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
Yes. Those ubuntu machines have two slots each. If both tests run at
the same time... bam.
I just added exclusion locks to the configuration of these two jobs,
that should help.
Patrick
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that was due to the following running on the same machine at the
> same time:
>
> Building remotely on ubuntu4
> <https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu4> in workspace
> /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7
>
> We should introduce randomized port so that test suite can execute in
> parallel.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Some tests failed in build 8 due to (See
>>
>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/8/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server/ZxidRolloverTest/testRolloverThenRestart/):
>>
>> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
>> at org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:118)
>> at org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZxidRolloverTest.setUp(ZxidRolloverTest.java:63)
>> Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
>> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
>> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:344)
>> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:336)
>> at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:199)
>> at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
>> at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:67)
>> at org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.configure(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:95)
>> at org.apache.zookeeper.server.ServerCnxnFactory.createFactory(ServerCnxnFactory.java:125)
>> at org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.<init>(QuorumPeer.java:517)
>> at org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:113)
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> fwiw: I setup jdk7 and openjdk7 jobs last night for branch34 on
>>> jenkins and they are looking good so far:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/
>>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> > Doesn't look good, failed a second time:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/
>>> >
>>> > java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect
>>> > at
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129)
>>> > at
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Patrick
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> Good point Ted.
>>> >> Eugene,
>>> >> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat
>>> level? :)
>>> >>
>>> >> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not.
>>> >>
>>> >> thanks
>>> >> mahadev
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down root
>>> cause ?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thanks
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the unit
>>> >>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also ran
>>> >>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to be
>>> >>>> working.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Patrick
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <
>>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>>> >>>> wrote:
>>> >>>> > Hi all,
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2 JIRAs are
>>> >>>> > addressed in this release. This includes the critical bugfix
>>> >>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550
>>> >>>> > which address the client connection issue.
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>> >>>> > *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > Note that I am extending the vote period for a little longer so
>>> that
>>> >>>> > folks get time to test this out.
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > Should we release this?
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > thanks
>>> >>>> > mahadev
>>> >>>>
>>>
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
I think that was due to the following running on the same machine at the
same time:
Building remotely on ubuntu4
<https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu4> in workspace
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7
We should introduce randomized port so that test suite can execute in
parallel.
Cheers
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Some tests failed in build 8 due to (See
>
> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/8/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server/ZxidRolloverTest/testRolloverThenRestart/):
>
> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
> at org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:118)
> at org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZxidRolloverTest.setUp(ZxidRolloverTest.java:63)
> Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:344)
> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:336)
> at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:199)
> at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
> at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:67)
> at org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.configure(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:95)
> at org.apache.zookeeper.server.ServerCnxnFactory.createFactory(ServerCnxnFactory.java:125)
> at org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.<init>(QuorumPeer.java:517)
> at org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:113)
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> fwiw: I setup jdk7 and openjdk7 jobs last night for branch34 on
>> jenkins and they are looking good so far:
>>
>>
>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/
>>
>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > Doesn't look good, failed a second time:
>> >
>> >
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/
>> >
>> > java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect
>> > at
>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129)
>> > at
>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199)
>> >
>> >
>> > Patrick
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> Good point Ted.
>> >> Eugene,
>> >> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat
>> level? :)
>> >>
>> >> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not.
>> >>
>> >> thanks
>> >> mahadev
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down root
>> cause ?
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the unit
>> >>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also ran
>> >>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to be
>> >>>> working.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Patrick
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <
>> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>> > Hi all,
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2 JIRAs are
>> >>>> > addressed in this release. This includes the critical bugfix
>> >>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550
>> >>>> > which address the client connection issue.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>> >>>> > *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Note that I am extending the vote period for a little longer so
>> that
>> >>>> > folks get time to test this out.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Should we release this?
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > thanks
>> >>>> > mahadev
>> >>>>
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Some tests failed in build 8 due to (See
https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/8/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server/ZxidRolloverTest/testRolloverThenRestart/):
java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
at org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:118)
at org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZxidRolloverTest.setUp(ZxidRolloverTest.java:63)
Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:344)
at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:336)
at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:199)
at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:67)
at org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.configure(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:95)
at org.apache.zookeeper.server.ServerCnxnFactory.createFactory(ServerCnxnFactory.java:125)
at org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.<init>(QuorumPeer.java:517)
at org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:113)
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> fwiw: I setup jdk7 and openjdk7 jobs last night for branch34 on
> jenkins and they are looking good so far:
>
>
> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/
>
> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/
>
> Patrick
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Doesn't look good, failed a second time:
> >
> >
> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/
> >
> > java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect
> > at
> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129)
> > at
> org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199)
> >
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com>
> wrote:
> >> Good point Ted.
> >> Eugene,
> >> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat level?
> :)
> >>
> >> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not.
> >>
> >> thanks
> >> mahadev
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down root
> cause ?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the unit
> >>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also ran
> >>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to be
> >>>> working.
> >>>>
> >>>> Patrick
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <
> mahadev@hortonworks.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> > Hi all,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2 JIRAs are
> >>>> > addressed in this release. This includes the critical bugfix
> >>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550
> >>>> > which address the client connection issue.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
> >>>> > *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Note that I am extending the vote period for a little longer so that
> >>>> > folks get time to test this out.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Should we release this?
> >>>> >
> >>>> > thanks
> >>>> > mahadev
> >>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
fwiw: I setup jdk7 and openjdk7 jobs last night for branch34 on
jenkins and they are looking good so far:
https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/
https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/
Patrick
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> Doesn't look good, failed a second time:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/
>
> java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect
> at org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129)
> at org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199)
>
>
> Patrick
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> Good point Ted.
>> Eugene,
>> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat level? :)
>>
>> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not.
>>
>> thanks
>> mahadev
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down root cause ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the unit
>>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also ran
>>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to be
>>>> working.
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > Hi all,
>>>> >
>>>> > I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2 JIRAs are
>>>> > addressed in this release. This includes the critical bugfix
>>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550
>>>> > which address the client connection issue.
>>>> >
>>>> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>>> > *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
>>>> >
>>>> > Note that I am extending the vote period for a little longer so that
>>>> > folks get time to test this out.
>>>> >
>>>> > http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
>>>> >
>>>> > Should we release this?
>>>> >
>>>> > thanks
>>>> > mahadev
>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
Doesn't look good, failed a second time:
https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/
java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect
at org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129)
at org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199)
Patrick
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Good point Ted.
> Eugene,
> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat level? :)
>
> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not.
>
> thanks
> mahadev
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down root cause ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the unit
>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also ran
>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to be
>>> working.
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >
>>> > I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2 JIRAs are
>>> > addressed in this release. This includes the critical bugfix
>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550
>>> > which address the client connection issue.
>>> >
>>> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>> > *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
>>> >
>>> > Note that I am extending the vote period for a little longer so that
>>> > folks get time to test this out.
>>> >
>>> > http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
>>> >
>>> > Should we release this?
>>> >
>>> > thanks
>>> > mahadev
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com>.
Good point Ted.
Eugene,
Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat level? :)
I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not.
thanks
mahadev
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down root cause ?
>
> Thanks
>
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the unit
>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also ran
>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to be
>> working.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2 JIRAs are
>> > addressed in this release. This includes the critical bugfix
>> ZOOKEEPER-1550
>> > which address the client connection issue.
>> >
>> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>> > *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
>> >
>> > Note that I am extending the vote period for a little longer so that
>> > folks get time to test this out.
>> >
>> > http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
>> >
>> > Should we release this?
>> >
>> > thanks
>> > mahadev
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down root cause ?
Thanks
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the unit
> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also ran
> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to be
> working.
>
> Patrick
>
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2 JIRAs are
> > addressed in this release. This includes the critical bugfix
> ZOOKEEPER-1550
> > which address the client connection issue.
> >
> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
> > *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
> >
> > Note that I am extending the vote period for a little longer so that
> > folks get time to test this out.
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
> >
> > Should we release this?
> >
> > thanks
> > mahadev
>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
+1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the unit
tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also ran
1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to be
working.
Patrick
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2 JIRAs are
> addressed in this release. This includes the critical bugfix ZOOKEEPER-1550
> which address the client connection issue.
>
> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
> *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
>
> Note that I am extending the vote period for a little longer so that
> folks get time to test this out.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
>
> Should we release this?
>
> thanks
> mahadev
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu>.
+1
I tested using zkServer.sh to start the server and zkCli.sh to run
some queries. The issue reported in 3.4.4 seems to be gone now.
Thanks Mahadev!
--Michi
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Hanno Schlichting <ha...@hannosch.eu> wrote:
> Mahadev Konar <ma...@...> writes:
>> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2 JIRAs are
>> addressed in this release. This includes the critical bugfix ZOOKEEPER-1550
>> which address the client connection issue.
>
> I ran the kazoo Python client library tests against this.
>
> All tests pass with JDK 7, though they also did for 3.4.4.
>
> So no complains here :)
>
> Hanno
>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Posted by Hanno Schlichting <ha...@hannosch.eu>.
Mahadev Konar <ma...@...> writes:
> I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2 JIRAs are
> addressed in this release. This includes the critical bugfix ZOOKEEPER-1550
> which address the client connection issue.
I ran the kazoo Python client library tests against this.
All tests pass with JDK 7, though they also did for 3.4.4.
So no complains here :)
Hanno