You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@beam.apache.org by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> on 2016/03/21 10:33:10 UTC
[PROPOSAL] Create new Jira IO component
Hi beamers !
I started to work on the directories re-organization, and especially,
I'm moving the different IOs in their own folder.
As we can bet on contribution on IO, maybe it would make sense to create
the IO component in Jira.
Thoughts ?
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Create new Jira IO component
Posted by Frances Perry <fj...@google.com.INVALID>.
We'll like have some other extensions (statistical libraries, etc). But I
agree that it's confusing people as it is. +1 to creating java-sdk-io and
renaming java-sdk-gcp to java-sdk-io-gcp.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:
> Good point Dan: if sdk-java-extension component actually contains only IO
> related, why not rename it (it could be easier for users ;)).
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 03/21/2016 06:04 PM, Dan Halperin wrote:
>
>> I currently only own "sdk-java-gcp", which does not give me great
>> visibility into the bugs that are not Google Cloud-specific. I would like
>> to see more of the IO-related issues earlier, so in that sense it makes
>> sense to me to have a broader IO component.
>>
>> I looked at "sdk-java-extensions" and everything in there right now is IO.
>> Maybe we should rename -extensions to -io and then rename sdk-java-gcp to
>> sdk-java-io-gcp?
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Frances Perry <fj...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> The original plan was that IOs would just be in the library extensions
>>> (e.g. sdk-java-extensions). It'd fine to subdivide that further if
>>> needed,
>>> but maybe we should wait until it gets a bit bigger? Dan, what do you
>>> think, as component owner?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi beamers !
>>>>
>>>> I started to work on the directories re-organization, and especially,
>>>> I'm
>>>> moving the different IOs in their own folder.
>>>>
>>>> As we can bet on contribution on IO, maybe it would make sense to create
>>>> the IO component in Jira.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts ?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>> --
>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Create new Jira IO component
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Good point Dan: if sdk-java-extension component actually contains only
IO related, why not rename it (it could be easier for users ;)).
Regards
JB
On 03/21/2016 06:04 PM, Dan Halperin wrote:
> I currently only own "sdk-java-gcp", which does not give me great
> visibility into the bugs that are not Google Cloud-specific. I would like
> to see more of the IO-related issues earlier, so in that sense it makes
> sense to me to have a broader IO component.
>
> I looked at "sdk-java-extensions" and everything in there right now is IO.
> Maybe we should rename -extensions to -io and then rename sdk-java-gcp to
> sdk-java-io-gcp?
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Frances Perry <fj...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> The original plan was that IOs would just be in the library extensions
>> (e.g. sdk-java-extensions). It'd fine to subdivide that further if needed,
>> but maybe we should wait until it gets a bit bigger? Dan, what do you
>> think, as component owner?
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi beamers !
>>>
>>> I started to work on the directories re-organization, and especially, I'm
>>> moving the different IOs in their own folder.
>>>
>>> As we can bet on contribution on IO, maybe it would make sense to create
>>> the IO component in Jira.
>>>
>>> Thoughts ?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Create new Jira IO component
Posted by Dan Halperin <dh...@google.com.INVALID>.
I currently only own "sdk-java-gcp", which does not give me great
visibility into the bugs that are not Google Cloud-specific. I would like
to see more of the IO-related issues earlier, so in that sense it makes
sense to me to have a broader IO component.
I looked at "sdk-java-extensions" and everything in there right now is IO.
Maybe we should rename -extensions to -io and then rename sdk-java-gcp to
sdk-java-io-gcp?
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Frances Perry <fj...@google.com> wrote:
> The original plan was that IOs would just be in the library extensions
> (e.g. sdk-java-extensions). It'd fine to subdivide that further if needed,
> but maybe we should wait until it gets a bit bigger? Dan, what do you
> think, as component owner?
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi beamers !
>>
>> I started to work on the directories re-organization, and especially, I'm
>> moving the different IOs in their own folder.
>>
>> As we can bet on contribution on IO, maybe it would make sense to create
>> the IO component in Jira.
>>
>> Thoughts ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>
>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Create new Jira IO component
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Yes, it's what I used for now (sdk-java-extensions). And you are right,
it's enough for now.
We will create a dedicated component when the number of IOs (and
different extensions) will come.
Regards
JB
On 03/21/2016 05:57 PM, Frances Perry wrote:
> The original plan was that IOs would just be in the library extensions
> (e.g. sdk-java-extensions). It'd fine to subdivide that further if needed,
> but maybe we should wait until it gets a bit bigger? Dan, what do you
> think, as component owner?
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi beamers !
>>
>> I started to work on the directories re-organization, and especially, I'm
>> moving the different IOs in their own folder.
>>
>> As we can bet on contribution on IO, maybe it would make sense to create
>> the IO component in Jira.
>>
>> Thoughts ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Create new Jira IO component
Posted by Frances Perry <fj...@google.com.INVALID>.
The original plan was that IOs would just be in the library extensions
(e.g. sdk-java-extensions). It'd fine to subdivide that further if needed,
but maybe we should wait until it gets a bit bigger? Dan, what do you
think, as component owner?
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:
> Hi beamers !
>
> I started to work on the directories re-organization, and especially, I'm
> moving the different IOs in their own folder.
>
> As we can bet on contribution on IO, maybe it would make sense to create
> the IO component in Jira.
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>