You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-dev@hadoop.apache.org by "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/10/10 00:24:50 UTC
[jira] Commented: (HADOOP-2018) Broken pipe SocketException in
DataNode$DataXceiver
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12533533 ]
Hairong Kuang commented on HADOOP-2018:
---------------------------------------
yes, the bug is fixed in /HADOOP-1912. But since /HADOOP-1912 is not in release 15, I will submit a seprate patch for this.
> Broken pipe SocketException in DataNode$DataXceiver
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-2018
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2018
> Project: Hadoop
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: dfs
> Affects Versions: 0.15.0
> Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko
> Assignee: Hairong Kuang
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 0.15.0
>
>
> I have 2 data-nodes, one of which is trying to replicate blocks to another.
> The second data-node throws the following excpetion for every replicated block.
> {code}
> 07/10/09 20:36:39 INFO dfs.DataNode: Received block blk_-8942388986043611634 from /a.d.d.r:43159
> 07/10/09 20:36:39 WARN dfs.DataNode: Error writing reply back to /a.d.d.r:43159for writing block blk_-8942388986043611634
> 07/10/09 20:36:39 WARN dfs.DataNode: java.net.SocketException: Broken pipe
> at java.net.SocketOutputStream.socketWrite0(Native Method)
> at java.net.SocketOutputStream.socketWrite(SocketOutputStream.java:92)
> at java.net.SocketOutputStream.write(SocketOutputStream.java:115)
> at java.io.DataOutputStream.writeShort(DataOutputStream.java:151)
> at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode$DataXceiver.writeBlock(DataNode.java:939)
> at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode$DataXceiver.run(DataNode.java:763)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
> {code}
> # It looks like that the first data-node does not expect to receive anything from the second one and closes the connection.
> # There should be a space in front of
> {code}
> + "for writing block " + block );
> {code}
> # The port number is misleading in these messages. DataXceivers open sockets on different ports every time, which is
> different from the data-node's main port. So we should rather print here the main port in order to be able to recognize
> wich data-node the block was sent from.
> Is this related to HADOOP-1908?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.