You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by "David E. Jones (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2006/08/11 08:15:15 UTC
[jira] Assigned: (OFBIZ-149) Better describe complex party
relationships
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-149?page=all ]
David E. Jones reassigned OFBIZ-149:
------------------------------------
Assignee: David E. Jones
> Better describe complex party relationships
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-149
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-149
> Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project)
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: party
> Reporter: Chris Howe
> Assigned To: David E. Jones
> Attachments: PartyRelationship.patch
>
>
> Change to the party data model to support relationships where parties act in several capacities (roles) and allowing polynary relationships.
> If someone could describe a situation where the direcition of the role matters (partyIdTo/partyIdFrom) and where the roleType is insuficient to understand the direction I will try to come up with a solution. I'm trying to understand if simply better role designations would alleviate ambiguity or if there is a real need to support direction.
> I began a discussion on this topic, there has yet to be any response
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ofbiz-dev/200608.mbox/%3c20060809155147.18528.qmail@web80615.mail.yahoo.com%3e
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira