You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Stack <st...@duboce.net> on 2010/05/05 01:52:42 UTC
[VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 6 as
hbase-0.20.4?
I've posted an hbase 0.20.4 release candidate 6 here:
http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-6/
Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.4?
It includes some critical fixes and some performance enhancements (See
CHANGES.txt or the release notes in the docs [1] for issues addressed
by this candidate).
Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
Thursday, the 6th of May. RC6 has one fix over RC5 (hbase-2509),
hence the short vote period.
Yours,
Your HBase Team
1. http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-6/hbase-0.20.4/docs/releasenotes.html
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 6 as
hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Lars George <la...@gmail.com>.
All test pass for me, no real load test though.
+1
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org> wrote:
> Did some more random read-oriented testing and everything is fine. +1
>
> J-D
>
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>> I've posted an hbase 0.20.4 release candidate 6 here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-6/
>>
>> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.4?
>>
>> It includes some critical fixes and some performance enhancements (See
>> CHANGES.txt or the release notes in the docs [1] for issues addressed
>> by this candidate).
>>
>> Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
>> Thursday, the 6th of May. RC6 has one fix over RC5 (hbase-2509),
>> hence the short vote period.
>>
>> Yours,
>> Your HBase Team
>>
>> 1. http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-6/hbase-0.20.4/docs/releasenotes.html
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 6 as
hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
I'm +1 too. Ran YCSB w/ mixed loading over night. Found hbase-2516
but thats an old issue made a little more acute now Gets are Scans.
Let me push out the release. 4+1s.
St.Ack
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org> wrote:
> Did some more random read-oriented testing and everything is fine. +1
>
> J-D
>
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>> I've posted an hbase 0.20.4 release candidate 6 here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-6/
>>
>> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.4?
>>
>> It includes some critical fixes and some performance enhancements (See
>> CHANGES.txt or the release notes in the docs [1] for issues addressed
>> by this candidate).
>>
>> Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
>> Thursday, the 6th of May. RC6 has one fix over RC5 (hbase-2509),
>> hence the short vote period.
>>
>> Yours,
>> Your HBase Team
>>
>> 1. http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-6/hbase-0.20.4/docs/releasenotes.html
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 6 as
hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>.
Did some more random read-oriented testing and everything is fine. +1
J-D
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> I've posted an hbase 0.20.4 release candidate 6 here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-6/
>
> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.4?
>
> It includes some critical fixes and some performance enhancements (See
> CHANGES.txt or the release notes in the docs [1] for issues addressed
> by this candidate).
>
> Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
> Thursday, the 6th of May. RC6 has one fix over RC5 (hbase-2509),
> hence the short vote period.
>
> Yours,
> Your HBase Team
>
> 1. http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-6/hbase-0.20.4/docs/releasenotes.html
>
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 6 as
hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com>.
I am +1, as the person who authored the fix (but not the test, thanks stack!).
It's a very small fix for a rare, but annoying condition.
-ryan
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> I've posted an hbase 0.20.4 release candidate 6 here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-6/
>
> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.4?
>
> It includes some critical fixes and some performance enhancements (See
> CHANGES.txt or the release notes in the docs [1] for issues addressed
> by this candidate).
>
> Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
> Thursday, the 6th of May. RC6 has one fix over RC5 (hbase-2509),
> hence the short vote period.
>
> Yours,
> Your HBase Team
>
> 1. http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-6/hbase-0.20.4/docs/releasenotes.html
>
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 6 as
hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>.
About the issue you were raising, it's a bit different than what you described.
If you try disabling a table that still has split parents in .META.,
those parents will be put in the regionsInTransitions list and marked
as closing... but they won't be closed since they are offline already.
It's when you re-enable that table that it may mess things up a bit,
nothing a restart can't fix (I didn't dig that far in my testing).
J-D
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> I missed that the vote closed early. Disregard the -1 as it came too late.
>
> - Andy
>
>> From: Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 6 as hbase-0.20.4?
>> To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
>> Date: Wednesday, May 5, 2010, 12:55 PM
>> Do I understand correctly that
>> HBASE-2515 means we will lose regions (stuck in transition)
>> if a table is disabled at an inopportune time after a split?
>> If so, -1, let's pull HBASE-2515 into 0.20.4. This may have
>> been there for a while but now it's a known problem. It's
>> still necessary to disable tables to make schema changes.
>>
>> - Andy
>>
>> > From: Stack <st...@duboce.net>
>> > Subject: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release
>> Candidate 6 as hbase-0.20.4?
>> > To: "HBase Dev List" <hb...@hadoop.apache.org>
>> > Date: Tuesday, May 4, 2010, 4:52 PM
>> > I've posted an hbase 0.20.4 release
>> > candidate 6 here:
>> >
>> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-6/
>> >
>> > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.4?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 6 as hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
I missed that the vote closed early. Disregard the -1 as it came too late.
- Andy
> From: Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 6 as hbase-0.20.4?
> To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Date: Wednesday, May 5, 2010, 12:55 PM
> Do I understand correctly that
> HBASE-2515 means we will lose regions (stuck in transition)
> if a table is disabled at an inopportune time after a split?
> If so, -1, let's pull HBASE-2515 into 0.20.4. This may have
> been there for a while but now it's a known problem. It's
> still necessary to disable tables to make schema changes.
>
> - Andy
>
> > From: Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> > Subject: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release
> Candidate 6 as hbase-0.20.4?
> > To: "HBase Dev List" <hb...@hadoop.apache.org>
> > Date: Tuesday, May 4, 2010, 4:52 PM
> > I've posted an hbase 0.20.4 release
> > candidate 6 here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-6/
> >
> > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.4?
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 6 as hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
Do I understand correctly that HBASE-2515 means we will lose regions (stuck in transition) if a table is disabled at an inopportune time after a split? If so, -1, let's pull HBASE-2515 into 0.20.4. This may have been there for a while but now it's a known problem. It's still necessary to disable tables to make schema changes.
- Andy
> From: Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> Subject: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 6 as hbase-0.20.4?
> To: "HBase Dev List" <hb...@hadoop.apache.org>
> Date: Tuesday, May 4, 2010, 4:52 PM
> I've posted an hbase 0.20.4 release
> candidate 6 here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-6/
>
> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.4?