You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com> on 2005/02/17 12:11:45 UTC

[VOTE] Incubate lucene4c?

The Incubator requires the Lucene PMC vote on whether to accept the 
lucene4c codebase.

+1 from me.

Other Lucene PMC members - please cast your vote on this thread.

	Erik


Begin forwarded message:

> From: "Cliff Schmidt" <cl...@bea.com>
> Date: February 17, 2005 5:12:36 AM EST
> To: <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Lucene4c
> Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
>
> Garrett,
>
> You're right that all new code bases should come through the Incubator.
> However, the appropriate PMC to vote on whether it should be accepted
> into the incubator is the sponsoring PMC, which in this case appears to
> be the Lucene PMC.  (The Incubator PMC does sponsor some projects,
> usually the ones that are expected to eventually be their own TLP.)
>
> The Incubator PMC is responsible for supporting what comes in and 
> voting
> whether it is ready to graduate.  So, once the Lucene PMC votes to
> incubate it, the Incubator PMC will help you figure out exactly what
> needs to be done and will then vote on graduation.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Cliff
>
> On Monday, February 14, 2005 10:58 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
>> On Feb 14, 2005, at 12:36 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>>>
>>> On Feb 14, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>>> All donated code should really go through the Incubator, even if
>>>> only to do the required IP checklist.
>>>
>>> Right.
>>>
>>> By my question is why doesn't this go through the Lucene project?
>>> The Lucene PMC could bring the codebase into their project and
>>> register the IP stuff here w/ the incubator.
>>
>> Is there some precedent for this?  I'm not sure what is meant by
>> "register the IP stuff here".  Could you elaborate on what this
>> entails.
>>
>> I'd gladly bring the codebase into Lucene's repository if that is the
>> consensus.  It was created entirely by Garrett and he's agreed to
>> donate it, so the IP should be pretty clear cut.
>>
>> 	Erik
>>
>>
>>>
>>> I hope I'm just misunderstanding, but this appears to be a proposal
>>> to create a new project at the ASF called "Lucene4c"
>>>
>>> geir
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 14, 2005, at 8:59 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I presume this codebase is substantial enough that it requires
>>>>> incubation?  Or because it was a single developer, could he
>>>>> contribute it directly to the Lucene project and bypass
>>>>> incubation?
>>>>>
>>>>> 	Erik
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 14, 2005, at 8:35 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd like to propose the Lucene4c project for incubation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lucene4c is a port of the Lucene search engine from Java to C,
>>>>>> using the Apache Portable Runtime library for portability.
>>>>>> The project is far from complete, and code to date is
>>>>>> primarily concerned with reading an existing Lucene index,
>>>>>> which must be created with another Lucene implementation
>>>>>> (currently only Java Lucene has been tested).  The plan is to
>>>>>> complete support for the rest of the index format and then
>>>>>> move on to implementing search functionality (beyond the
>>>>>> current proof of concept code anyway). Once we've reached
>>>>>> that point work will begin on actual indexing functionality
>>>>>> so that Lucene4c can stand alone, without the use of another
>>>>>> Lucene implementation for bootstrapping.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The project would be part of the new Lucene top leve project,
>>>>>> and Erik Hatcher has offerred to serve as a sponsor.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> While I have yet to expand the community of developers
>>>>>> further than myself, I am anxious to do so, and I expect to
>>>>>> be able to draw both from people as of yet unassociated with
>>>>>> Lucene who have expressed interest in such a project and from
>>>>>> existing Lucene developers who have expressed interest in
>>>>>> establishing cross-language compatibility tests for the
>>>>>> various Lucene ports.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lucene4c already has ties to existing ASF projects,
>>>>>> particularly Lucene itself and APR.  Bringing it into the ASF
>>>>>> would only strengthen those ties.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> More details, including where to get the current release or
>>>>>> development versions of the code can be found at the Lucene4c
>>>>>> web site at http://electricjellyfish.net/garrett/lucene4c/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -garrett
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> - -
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional
>>>>>> commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional
>>>>> commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
> =====================================================================
>>>> = =
>>>>  Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]
>>>>   http://www.jaguNET.com/ "There 10 types of people: those who
>>>> read binary and everyone else."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
>>> geir@gluecode.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] Incubate lucene4c?

Posted by Doug Cutting <cu...@apache.org>.
+1

Doug

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] Incubate lucene4c?

Posted by Daniel Naber <da...@t-online.de>.
On Thursday 17 February 2005 12:11, Erik Hatcher wrote:

> The Incubator requires the Lucene PMC vote on whether to accept the
> lucene4c codebase.
>
> +1 from me.

+1

-- 
http://www.danielnaber.de

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] Incubate lucene4c?

Posted by Scott Ganyo <sc...@ganyo.com>.
+1

On Feb 17, 2005, at 6:11 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:

> The Incubator requires the Lucene PMC vote on whether to accept the 
> lucene4c codebase.
>
> +1 from me.
>
> Other Lucene PMC members - please cast your vote on this thread.
>
> 	Erik
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: "Cliff Schmidt" <cl...@bea.com>
>> Date: February 17, 2005 5:12:36 AM EST
>> To: <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Lucene4c
>> Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>
>> Garrett,
>>
>> You're right that all new code bases should come through the 
>> Incubator.
>> However, the appropriate PMC to vote on whether it should be accepted
>> into the incubator is the sponsoring PMC, which in this case appears 
>> to
>> be the Lucene PMC.  (The Incubator PMC does sponsor some projects,
>> usually the ones that are expected to eventually be their own TLP.)
>>
>> The Incubator PMC is responsible for supporting what comes in and 
>> voting
>> whether it is ready to graduate.  So, once the Lucene PMC votes to
>> incubate it, the Incubator PMC will help you figure out exactly what
>> needs to be done and will then vote on graduation.
>>
>> Hope that helps.
>>
>> Cliff
>>
>> On Monday, February 14, 2005 10:58 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 14, 2005, at 12:36 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 14, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> All donated code should really go through the Incubator, even if
>>>>> only to do the required IP checklist.
>>>>
>>>> Right.
>>>>
>>>> By my question is why doesn't this go through the Lucene project?
>>>> The Lucene PMC could bring the codebase into their project and
>>>> register the IP stuff here w/ the incubator.
>>>
>>> Is there some precedent for this?  I'm not sure what is meant by
>>> "register the IP stuff here".  Could you elaborate on what this
>>> entails.
>>>
>>> I'd gladly bring the codebase into Lucene's repository if that is the
>>> consensus.  It was created entirely by Garrett and he's agreed to
>>> donate it, so the IP should be pretty clear cut.
>>>
>>> 	Erik
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I hope I'm just misunderstanding, but this appears to be a proposal
>>>> to create a new project at the ASF called "Lucene4c"
>>>>
>>>> geir
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 14, 2005, at 8:59 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I presume this codebase is substantial enough that it requires
>>>>>> incubation?  Or because it was a single developer, could he
>>>>>> contribute it directly to the Lucene project and bypass
>>>>>> incubation?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 	Erik
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Feb 14, 2005, at 8:35 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd like to propose the Lucene4c project for incubation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lucene4c is a port of the Lucene search engine from Java to C,
>>>>>>> using the Apache Portable Runtime library for portability.
>>>>>>> The project is far from complete, and code to date is
>>>>>>> primarily concerned with reading an existing Lucene index,
>>>>>>> which must be created with another Lucene implementation
>>>>>>> (currently only Java Lucene has been tested).  The plan is to
>>>>>>> complete support for the rest of the index format and then
>>>>>>> move on to implementing search functionality (beyond the
>>>>>>> current proof of concept code anyway). Once we've reached
>>>>>>> that point work will begin on actual indexing functionality
>>>>>>> so that Lucene4c can stand alone, without the use of another
>>>>>>> Lucene implementation for bootstrapping.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The project would be part of the new Lucene top leve project,
>>>>>>> and Erik Hatcher has offerred to serve as a sponsor.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> While I have yet to expand the community of developers
>>>>>>> further than myself, I am anxious to do so, and I expect to
>>>>>>> be able to draw both from people as of yet unassociated with
>>>>>>> Lucene who have expressed interest in such a project and from
>>>>>>> existing Lucene developers who have expressed interest in
>>>>>>> establishing cross-language compatibility tests for the
>>>>>>> various Lucene ports.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lucene4c already has ties to existing ASF projects,
>>>>>>> particularly Lucene itself and APR.  Bringing it into the ASF
>>>>>>> would only strengthen those ties.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> More details, including where to get the current release or
>>>>>>> development versions of the code can be found at the Lucene4c
>>>>>>> web site at http://electricjellyfish.net/garrett/lucene4c/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -garrett
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> - -
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>>> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional
>>>>>>> commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional
>>>>>> commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>> =====================================================================
>>>>> = =
>>>>>  Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]
>>>>>   http://www.jaguNET.com/ "There 10 types of people: those who
>>>>> read binary and everyone else."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
>>>> geir@gluecode.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>

Re: [VOTE] Incubate lucene4c?

Posted by Otis Gospodnetic <ot...@yahoo.com>.
+1

--- Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com> wrote:

> The Incubator requires the Lucene PMC vote on whether to accept the 
> lucene4c codebase.
> 
> +1 from me.
> 
> Other Lucene PMC members - please cast your vote on this thread.
> 
> 	Erik
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> > From: "Cliff Schmidt" <cl...@bea.com>
> > Date: February 17, 2005 5:12:36 AM EST
> > To: <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
> > Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Lucene4c
> > Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
> >
> > Garrett,
> >
> > You're right that all new code bases should come through the
> Incubator.
> > However, the appropriate PMC to vote on whether it should be
> accepted
> > into the incubator is the sponsoring PMC, which in this case
> appears to
> > be the Lucene PMC.  (The Incubator PMC does sponsor some projects,
> > usually the ones that are expected to eventually be their own TLP.)
> >
> > The Incubator PMC is responsible for supporting what comes in and 
> > voting
> > whether it is ready to graduate.  So, once the Lucene PMC votes to
> > incubate it, the Incubator PMC will help you figure out exactly
> what
> > needs to be done and will then vote on graduation.
> >
> > Hope that helps.
> >
> > Cliff
> >
> > On Monday, February 14, 2005 10:58 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> >
> >> On Feb 14, 2005, at 12:36 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Feb 14, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> All donated code should really go through the Incubator, even if
> >>>> only to do the required IP checklist.
> >>>
> >>> Right.
> >>>
> >>> By my question is why doesn't this go through the Lucene project?
> >>> The Lucene PMC could bring the codebase into their project and
> >>> register the IP stuff here w/ the incubator.
> >>
> >> Is there some precedent for this?  I'm not sure what is meant by
> >> "register the IP stuff here".  Could you elaborate on what this
> >> entails.
> >>
> >> I'd gladly bring the codebase into Lucene's repository if that is
> the
> >> consensus.  It was created entirely by Garrett and he's agreed to
> >> donate it, so the IP should be pretty clear cut.
> >>
> >> 	Erik
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> I hope I'm just misunderstanding, but this appears to be a
> proposal
> >>> to create a new project at the ASF called "Lucene4c"
> >>>
> >>> geir
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Feb 14, 2005, at 8:59 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I presume this codebase is substantial enough that it requires
> >>>>> incubation?  Or because it was a single developer, could he
> >>>>> contribute it directly to the Lucene project and bypass
> >>>>> incubation?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 	Erik
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Feb 14, 2005, at 8:35 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I'd like to propose the Lucene4c project for incubation.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Lucene4c is a port of the Lucene search engine from Java to C,
> >>>>>> using the Apache Portable Runtime library for portability.
> >>>>>> The project is far from complete, and code to date is
> >>>>>> primarily concerned with reading an existing Lucene index,
> >>>>>> which must be created with another Lucene implementation
> >>>>>> (currently only Java Lucene has been tested).  The plan is to
> >>>>>> complete support for the rest of the index format and then
> >>>>>> move on to implementing search functionality (beyond the
> >>>>>> current proof of concept code anyway). Once we've reached
> >>>>>> that point work will begin on actual indexing functionality
> >>>>>> so that Lucene4c can stand alone, without the use of another
> >>>>>> Lucene implementation for bootstrapping.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The project would be part of the new Lucene top leve project,
> >>>>>> and Erik Hatcher has offerred to serve as a sponsor.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> While I have yet to expand the community of developers
> >>>>>> further than myself, I am anxious to do so, and I expect to
> >>>>>> be able to draw both from people as of yet unassociated with
> >>>>>> Lucene who have expressed interest in such a project and from
> >>>>>> existing Lucene developers who have expressed interest in
> >>>>>> establishing cross-language compatibility tests for the
> >>>>>> various Lucene ports.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Lucene4c already has ties to existing ASF projects,
> >>>>>> particularly Lucene itself and APR.  Bringing it into the ASF
> >>>>>> would only strengthen those ties.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> More details, including where to get the current release or
> >>>>>> development versions of the code can be found at the Lucene4c
> >>>>>> web site at http://electricjellyfish.net/garrett/lucene4c/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -garrett
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>> - -
> >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >>>>>> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional
> >>>>>> commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >>>>> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional
> >>>>> commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>>
> >
> =====================================================================
> >>>> = =
> >>>>  Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]
> >>>>   http://www.jaguNET.com/ "There 10 types of people: those who
> >>>> read binary and everyone else."
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> --
> >>> Geir Magnusson Jr                                 
> +1-203-665-6437
> >>> geir@gluecode.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org