You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by Du Jing <bj...@gmail.com> on 2012/06/26 11:07:05 UTC
[regression]the three basic slide transition effect:wipe up,wipe down
and box out lost
the three slide transition effect can't preview,and set on slide,no any
play effect.but in OO3.4,it is ok.
suggest fix it as soon as possible.
I have submitted a bug in bugzilla to track the defect:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120096
Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]:propose bug 120096 (wipe up and wipe down effect works fail in Aoo 3.4,but ok in OO3.3) as release blocker
Posted by Andre Fischer <af...@a-w-f.de>.
Fixed on trunk and the AOO34 branch.
-Andre
On 29.06.2012 13:27, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 6/26/12 11:17 AM, YangTerry wrote:
>>
>> Change the mail title
>>
>> Regression issue, and the slide transition is basic transition.
>> +1
>
> +1 because of regression. Do we have somebody working on it already?
>
> Can we assign issues when somebody takes care of an issue, that makes
> the tracking easier.
>
> Juergen
>
>>
>>> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 17:07:34 +0800
>>> Subject: Re: [regression]the three basic slide transition effect:wipe up,wipe down and box out lost
>>> From: bjdujing@gmail.com
>>> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>> sorry,in OO3.3,it is ok
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Du Jing <bj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> the three slide transition effect can't preview,and set on slide,no any
>>>> play effect.but in OO3.4,it is ok.
>>>> suggest fix it as soon as possible.
>>>>
>>>> I have submitted a bug in bugzilla to track the defect:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120096
>>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]:propose bug 120096 (wipe up and wipe down effect works fail in Aoo 3.4,but ok in OO3.3) as release blocker
Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>.
On 6/26/12 11:17 AM, YangTerry wrote:
>
> Change the mail title
>
> Regression issue, and the slide transition is basic transition.
> +1
+1 because of regression. Do we have somebody working on it already?
Can we assign issues when somebody takes care of an issue, that makes
the tracking easier.
Juergen
>
>> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 17:07:34 +0800
>> Subject: Re: [regression]the three basic slide transition effect:wipe up,wipe down and box out lost
>> From: bjdujing@gmail.com
>> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>
>> sorry,in OO3.3,it is ok
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Du Jing <bj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> the three slide transition effect can't preview,and set on slide,no any
>>> play effect.but in OO3.4,it is ok.
>>> suggest fix it as soon as possible.
>>>
>>> I have submitted a bug in bugzilla to track the defect:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120096
>>>
>
>
Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]:propose bug 120096 (wipe up and wipe down effect works fail in Aoo 3.4,but ok in OO3.3) as release blocker
Posted by YangTerry <po...@hotmail.com>.
Change the mail title
Regression issue, and the slide transition is basic transition.
+1
> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 17:07:34 +0800
> Subject: Re: [regression]the three basic slide transition effect:wipe up,wipe down and box out lost
> From: bjdujing@gmail.com
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
> sorry,in OO3.3,it is ok
>
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Du Jing <bj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > the three slide transition effect can't preview,and set on slide,no any
> > play effect.but in OO3.4,it is ok.
> > suggest fix it as soon as possible.
> >
> > I have submitted a bug in bugzilla to track the defect:
> > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120096
> >
Re: [regression]the three basic slide transition effect:wipe up,wipe
down and box out lost
Posted by Du Jing <bj...@gmail.com>.
sorry,in OO3.3,it is ok
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Du Jing <bj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> the three slide transition effect can't preview,and set on slide,no any
> play effect.but in OO3.4,it is ok.
> suggest fix it as soon as possible.
>
> I have submitted a bug in bugzilla to track the defect:
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120096
>