You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ant.apache.org by Kevin Jackson <fo...@gmail.com> on 2007/02/12 12:56:38 UTC
Playing with annotations for Ant - Sandboxable or not?
Hi all,
I had an idea to try out using annotations in Ant - starting with a
simple @Validation for fields.
I know this can't be put in trunk for bwc reasons, but is it the sort
of thing that should be considered for the sandbox?
Kev
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: Playing with annotations for Ant - Sandboxable or not?
Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@apache.org>.
Kevin Jackson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I had an idea to try out using annotations in Ant - starting with a
> simple @Validation for fields.
>
> I know this can't be put in trunk for bwc reasons, but is it the sort
> of thing that should be considered for the sandbox?
1. yes, for the sandbox
2. Testng uses some javadoc annotation library for pre-1.5 stuff, so you
could get away with annotations and be BWC
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: Playing with annotations for Ant - Sandboxable or not?
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Kevin Jackson <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I had an idea to try out using annotations in Ant - starting with a
> simple @Validation for fields.
>
> I know this can't be put in trunk for bwc reasons, but is it the
> sort of thing that should be considered for the sandbox?
Absolutely. If only to show us what we are missing - this assumes we
are missing something right now ;-)
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org