[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-15619) Performance regression observed: Empty random read(get) performance of branch-1 worse than 0.98

["Yu Li (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Yu Li resolved HBASE-15619.
---------------------------
    Resolution: Duplicate

Confirmed the issue got resolved in HBASE-15971 so resolving this JIRA as duplicated.

Still a special note on HDFS-10690 for those using or planing to use PCIe-SSD though (smile).

> Performance regression observed: Empty random read(get) performance of branch-1 worse than 0.98
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-15619
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15619
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Yu Li
>            Assignee: Yu Li
>         Attachments: compare.png, flamegraph-108588.098.svg, flamegraph-1221.branch-1.svg, flamegraph-135684.1.1.svg
>
>
> As titled, I observed the perf regression in the final stress testing before upgrading our online cluster to 1.x. More details as follows:
> 1. HBase version in the comparison test:
>   * 0.98: based on 0.98.12 with some backports, among which HBASE-11297 is the most important perf-related one (especially under high stress)
>   * 1.x: checked 3 releases in total
>      1) 1.1.2 with important perf fixes/improvements including HBASE-15031 and HBASE-14465
>      2) 1.1.4 release
>      3) 1.2.1RC1
> 2. Test environment
>     * YCSB: 0.7.0 with [YCSB-651|https://github.com/brianfrankcooper/YCSB/pull/651] applied
>     * Client: 4 physical nodes, each with 8 YCSB instance, each instance with 100 threads
>     * Server: 1 Master with 3 RS, each RS with 256 handlers and 64G heap
>     * Hardware: 64-core CPU, 256GB Mem, 10Gb Net, 1 PCIe-SSD and 11 HDD, same hardware for client and server
> 3. Test cases
>     * -p fieldcount=1 -p fieldlength=128 -p readproportion=1
>     * case #1: read against empty table
>     * -case #2: lrucache 100% hit-
>     * -case #3: BLOCKCACHE=>false-
> 4. Test result
> * 1.1.4 and 1.2.1 have a similar perf (less than 2% deviation) as 1.1.2+, so will only paste comparison data of 0.98.12+ and 1.1.2+
> * per-RS Throughput(ops/s)
> ||HBaseVersion||case#1||-case#2-||-case#3-||
> |0.98.12+|383562|-257493-|-47594-|
> |1.1.2+|363050|-232757-|-35872-|
> * AverageLatency(us)
> ||HBaseVersion||case#1||-case#2-||-case#3-||
> |0.98.12+|2774|-4134-|-22371-|
> |1.1.2+|2930|-4572-|-29690-|
> It seems there's perf regression on RPCServer (we tried 0.98 client against 1.x server and observed a similar perf to 1.x client)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)