You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@uima.apache.org by ch...@apache.org on 2013/11/13 18:10:18 UTC

svn commit: r1541617 - /uima/sandbox/uima-ducc/trunk/README

Author: challngr
Date: Wed Nov 13 17:10:17 2013
New Revision: 1541617

URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1541617
Log:
UIMA-3293 Document restriction of FIXED jobs sometims spilling into subpools.

Modified:
    uima/sandbox/uima-ducc/trunk/README

Modified: uima/sandbox/uima-ducc/trunk/README
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/uima/sandbox/uima-ducc/trunk/README?rev=1541617&r1=1541616&r2=1541617&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- uima/sandbox/uima-ducc/trunk/README (original)
+++ uima/sandbox/uima-ducc/trunk/README Wed Nov 13 17:10:17 2013
@@ -110,9 +110,17 @@ and with IBM Java 6 on Linux. 
 6. Known problems/limitations with Release 1.0.0
 ================================================
 
-  
-     
-  
+a) Chapter 13.3 States: "Because non-preemptable allocations can’t be
+   preempeted, work submitted to a class implementing one of the non-
+   preemptable policies (FIXED or RESERVE) are never allowed to “squat” in other
+   nodepools and are only scheduled on nodes in their proper nodepool."
+
+   There are some situations where in fact, FIXED jobs can be scheduled into
+   nodepools which are subsets of the nodepool the FIXED class is defined over.
+   While technically a bug, there are also use cases for this behavior,
+   especially on large systems.  If this causes problems, usually classes
+   can be reconfigured to bypass the issue  The behavior is to be 
+   addressed in a future release.
 
 Crypto Notice
 -------------
@@ -141,4 +149,4 @@ Crypto Notice
    
    This distribution includes portions of Apache ActiveMQ, which, in
    turn, is classified as being controlled under ECCN 5D002.
- 
\ No newline at end of file
+