You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ant.apache.org by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> on 2006/12/20 21:02:41 UTC

AntUnit (was Re: [ANN] Ant 1.7.0 Released)

On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Steve Loughran <st...@apache.org> wrote:

> Does this also means we can go to 1.0 with <antunit>?

Do we want to?

I haven't seen anybody complain about missing features in beta2, is
AntUnit ready for a 1.0 release?

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org

Re: AntUnit

Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Martijn Kruithof <jm...@kruithof.xs4all.nl> wrote:

> Not only that our testsuite of 1.7.0 final relies on it so
> definetely +1 here.

OK, that have been +1s by plenty of people by now.  I'll build release
tarballs sometime latr this week/early next week so that we can vote
on them and have a release in the second week of 2007.

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org

Re: AntUnit

Posted by Martijn Kruithof <jm...@kruithof.xs4all.nl>.
Antoine Levy-Lambert schreef:
> Hi,
>
> I have not done anything much with antunit yet, but I am also +1.
> It is a cool way of testing ant tasks.
>
> Regards,
>
> Antoine
>   
Not only that our testsuite of 1.7.0 final relies on it so definetely +1 
here.
Martijn

> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:27:08 +0000
> Von: "Peter Reilly" <pe...@gmail.com>
> An: "Ant Developers List" <de...@ant.apache.org>
> Betreff: Re: AntUnit
>
>   
>> On 12/22/06, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>     
>>> On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Peter Reilly <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>>>> I haven't seen anybody complain about missing
>>>>>> features in beta2, is
>>>>>> AntUnit ready for a 1.0 release?
>>>>>>             
>>>> Does it work with ant 1.6.5?
>>>>         
>>> Not at all.  Apart from relying on ResourceCollections it uses a bunch
>>> of other API changes or the new backtrace attribute on macrodef.
>>>       
>> I just had a vague memory of a request to make antunit ant 1.6 compatible,
>> but I am cool with making it depend on ant 1.7.
>>
>> So +1 for releasing antunit 1.0.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>     
>>> Stefan
>>>
>>>       
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>
>   


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org

Re: AntUnit

Posted by Antoine Levy-Lambert <an...@gmx.de>.
Hi,

I have not done anything much with antunit yet, but I am also +1.
It is a cool way of testing ant tasks.

Regards,

Antoine
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:27:08 +0000
Von: "Peter Reilly" <pe...@gmail.com>
An: "Ant Developers List" <de...@ant.apache.org>
Betreff: Re: AntUnit

> On 12/22/06, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Peter Reilly <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >> > I haven't seen anybody complain about missing
> > >> > features in beta2, is
> > >> > AntUnit ready for a 1.0 release?
> > >
> > > Does it work with ant 1.6.5?
> >
> > Not at all.  Apart from relying on ResourceCollections it uses a bunch
> > of other API changes or the new backtrace attribute on macrodef.
> I just had a vague memory of a request to make antunit ant 1.6 compatible,
> but I am cool with making it depend on ant 1.7.
> 
> So +1 for releasing antunit 1.0.
> 
> Peter
> 
> >
> > Stefan
> >

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org

Re: AntUnit

Posted by Peter Reilly <pe...@gmail.com>.
On 12/22/06, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Peter Reilly <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > I haven't seen anybody complain about missing
> >> > features in beta2, is
> >> > AntUnit ready for a 1.0 release?
> >
> > Does it work with ant 1.6.5?
>
> Not at all.  Apart from relying on ResourceCollections it uses a bunch
> of other API changes or the new backtrace attribute on macrodef.
I just had a vague memory of a request to make antunit ant 1.6 compatible,
but I am cool with making it depend on ant 1.7.

So +1 for releasing antunit 1.0.

Peter

>
> Stefan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org

Re: AntUnit

Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Peter Reilly <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> > I haven't seen anybody complain about missing
>> > features in beta2, is
>> > AntUnit ready for a 1.0 release?
> 
> Does it work with ant 1.6.5?

Not at all.  Apart from relying on ResourceCollections it uses a bunch
of other API changes or the new backtrace attribute on macrodef.

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org

Re: AntUnit (was Re: [ANN] Ant 1.7.0 Released)

Posted by Peter Reilly <pe...@gmail.com>.
On 12/20/06, Matt Benson <gu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Steve Loughran
> > <st...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Does this also means we can go to 1.0 with
> > <antunit>?
> >
> > Do we want to?
> >
> > I haven't seen anybody complain about missing
> > features in beta2, is
> > AntUnit ready for a 1.0 release?

Does it work with ant 1.6.5?
I cannot remember status.
Peter

>
> I was thinking of adding beforetests/aftertests, but
> that can wait for 1.0.1 IMHO.
>
> -Matt
>
> >
> > Stefan
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > dev-help@ant.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org

Re: AntUnit (was Re: [ANN] Ant 1.7.0 Released)

Posted by Matt Benson <gu...@yahoo.com>.
--- Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Steve Loughran
> <st...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> > Does this also means we can go to 1.0 with
> <antunit>?
> 
> Do we want to?
> 
> I haven't seen anybody complain about missing
> features in beta2, is
> AntUnit ready for a 1.0 release?

I was thinking of adding beforetests/aftertests, but
that can wait for 1.0.1 IMHO.

-Matt

> 
> Stefan
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@ant.apache.org
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org