You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Robert Stupp (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/11/17 19:10:10 UTC
[jira] [Created] (CASSANDRA-10723) Rewrite INITCOND after renames
and alters of UDT fields
Robert Stupp created CASSANDRA-10723:
----------------------------------------
Summary: Rewrite INITCOND after renames and alters of UDT fields
Key: CASSANDRA-10723
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10723
Project: Cassandra
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Robert Stupp
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 3.x
(Follow-up to CASSANDRA-10721)
In order to re-write an INITCOND value when a UDT is changed (component renamed or type altered), we will have to check for broken aggregates first (as we do not know why _exactly_ these are broken; CASSANDRA-10721 added {{Function.isBroken()}}).
If one of the affected aggregates is broken, the request *must fail*.
If none of the affected aggregates is broken, we can re-write the binary representation of the INITCOND and push schema migrations for these aggregates.
Still unclear, if the user needs permissions on both the UDT _and_ the affected UDAs for that.
Further, the UDT change and all UDA changes should be migrated in a single mutation, which feels to be the biggest change. This is not a strict requirement but would keep that schema change atomic.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)