Re: archival files, not ALv2

[Fantri Fitriani <fa...@gmail.com>]

Pada tanggal Jum, 24 Jan 2020 03.20, Roy T. Fielding <fi...@gbiv.com>
menulis:

> > On Jan 22, 2020, at 7:10 PM, Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Legal,
> >
> > I believe the Foundation should allow archival/legacy files that are
> *not* ALv2 to be hosted on our systems/channels.
>
> AFAIK, the only impediment, assuming we have at least one valid license
> under which to redistribute them, is how to distinguish these packages from
> the ALv2 packages.
>
> Do you have a suggestion for that? Different names? directories? hosts?
>
> Perhaps
>
>    package_name_1.1.tgz
>    package_name_1.1.asc
>    package_name_1.1_IS_GPL_LICENSE.txt
>
> or something like that?
>
> I suggest that the fast way forward is to propose a mechanism and have
> either the
> Legal committee (not this list) or the Board (also not this list) vote to
> approve it.
> It's just a policy.
>
> ....Roy (not on either committee)
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
>