You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-user@axis.apache.org by Anil <vv...@yahoo.com> on 2007/03/25 22:37:16 UTC
[Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
Hi,
I'm new to Axis2, what is the criteria to choose
between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans. How do we
decide architecture wise.
My second question is, is wsdl file mandatory to
create stub and skeleton interfaces or can we use just
skeleton file to create wsdl file.
Thanks.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Bored stiff? Loosen up...
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
http://games.yahoo.com/games/front
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-user-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
Posted by Martin Gainty <mg...@hotmail.com>.
Anil-
I found this whitepaper quite informative
SAX2 processes fastest..with DOM bein
http://www.mail-archive.com/jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01044.html
FWIW,
M--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Le présent message électronique (y compris les pièces qui y sont annexées, le cas échéant) s'adresse au destinataire indiqué et peut contenir des renseignements de caractère privé ou confidentiel. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire de ce document, nous vous signalons qu'il est strictement interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de le reproduire.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anil" <vv...@yahoo.com>
To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 4:37 PM
Subject: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to Axis2, what is the criteria to choose
> between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans. How do we
> decide architecture wise.
>
> My second question is, is wsdl file mandatory to
> create stub and skeleton interfaces or can we use just
> skeleton file to create wsdl file.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Bored stiff? Loosen up...
> Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
> http://games.yahoo.com/games/front
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-user-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
Posted by Anil VVNN <vv...@yahoo.com>.
Hi Niles,
Thanks for answering my questions. As I said I'm a beginner, I have few more
questions related to previous one.
(1) When exactly do we use Binding frameworks (JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans) ?
For instance, the examples given in Axis2 website (i.e. StockQuoteService)
referring to simple method call, client calling WS for "getPrice/update"
operations but there's no XSD involved, I think this kind of operations can
be easily accomplished using POJO option. But I'm confused when to use POJO
or anyother Binding framework(JIBX).
(2) What is the difference between "XML Processing Model" and "SOAP
Processing Model", when do we use these models independently.
To my understanding, this is the typical flow of Axis2 services,
Client ----calls---> Stub (generated by wsdl2java) ----calls[SOAP
request]---> Skeleton Interface (generated by wsdl2java) -->Business Logic
And this SOAP request can be handled using any transport (eg. TCP, JMS etc.)
Please correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks.
- Anil
Nilesh Ghorpade wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As per my understanding AXIS 2 uses AXIOM API's internally for any XML
> related activities. Hence as you have mentioned that you are confused to
> choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans, the AXIOM is an invalid
> option here.
>
> Secondly in AXIS 2 you can create web services using either the Spring
> Framework or POJO.
>
> JiBX, XMLBeans and ADB are more related to the data binding frameworks
> which AXIS 2 supports. Hence it depends on your schema on which data
> binding framework you would want to select. As per my knowledge XMLBeans
> is the best when it comes to complex schemas. This is because XMLBeans
> implementation can understand all the XSD (i.e. schema) constructs.
>
> To answer your second question, the answer is YES. If you want to use the
> wsdl2java command from AXIS2 for generating your stubs and skeletons you
> will need the WSDL. Generating a WSDL is also not a diccficult task. YOu
> can have your SEI defined i.e. the Service Endpoint Interface with all the
> method signatures which you want to expose as web service operations. On
> executing the java2wsdl command from AXIS2 you would be able to get the
> WSDL. And using this WSDL you can generate the remaining artifacts of your
> web service. WSDL is nothing but an interface and hence even if you have
> defined an interface in Java, you can generate a WSDL from it.
>
>
> Hope that answers your queries.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Niles
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Martin Gainty <mg...@hotmail.com>
> To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 3:15:01 AM
> Subject: Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
>
>
> Anil-
>
> I found this whitepaper quite informative
> SAX2 processes fastest..with DOM bein
> http://www.mail-archive.com/jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01044.html
>
> FWIW,
> M--
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the
> use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
> information that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt from
> disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that
> any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
> strictly prohibited.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Le présent message électronique (y compris les pièces qui y sont annexées,
> le cas échéant) s'adresse au destinataire indiqué et peut contenir des
> renseignements de caractère privé ou confidentiel. Si vous n'êtes pas le
> destinataire de ce document, nous vous signalons qu'il est strictement
> interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de le reproduire.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anil" <vv...@yahoo.com>
> To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>
> Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 4:37 PM
> Subject: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm new to Axis2, what is the criteria to choose
>> between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans. How do we
>> decide architecture wise.
>>
>> My second question is, is wsdl file mandatory to
>> create stub and skeleton interfaces or can we use just
>> skeleton file to create wsdl file.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________________________________
>> Bored stiff? Loosen up...
>> Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
>> http://games.yahoo.com/games/front
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-user-help@ws.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> The fish are biting.
> Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
> http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Axis2--AXIOM-or-JBIX-tf3463792.html#a9674209
Sent from the Axis - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-user-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
Posted by Nilesh Ghorpade <ni...@yahoo.com>.
Hi Anil,
The JiBX XML file which I had mentioned contains the mapping between XML and the Java classes. You can generate this file using the jibx commands. Please refer the JiBX documentation for more details.
Secondly your question related to sending a SOAP request. We always send a SOAP request to a Web Service. I mean even if we have a Java client written what we do is create a SOAP request and then send the same over HTTP or any other transport protocol to the Web Service endpoint. So the Client request would always be in SOAP whether you have a java/.NET/C/C++ client accessing the web service.
Regards
Nilesh
Anil VVNN <vv...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi Nilesh,
Thanks for detailed response.
So, the AddressBookService example (at
http://people.apache.org/~thilina/axis2/docs/jibx/jibx-unwrapped-example.html)
which uses POJO as a data transfer object, can be implemented using any Data
binding framework (JIBX or ADB) to create Java classes.
What is JiBX binding definition, is this property only applicable to JiBX
framework
-EbindingFile /resources/jibxbindingFile.xml
And also, can we send the client request using SOAP (instead of writing Java
Client) and get the response back in SOAP? In which case, this type of
scenario comes in.
Thanks,
Anil
Nilesh Ghorpade wrote:
>
> Hi Anil,
>
> The Data binding frameworks come into picture when you are generating the
> Java code artifacts from WSDL. If you observe the "wsdl2java" command
> there is a command line argument namely "-d" with which you can specify
> the Data binding framework which you want to use. In case u want to use
> JiBX you would be specifying something like
>
> $> wsdl2java -o /outputDir -d jibx -EbindingFile
> /resources/jibxbindingFile.xml -uri MyWebService.wsdl
>
> The above command is just for making things more simpler. Also if there
> are no schema references in the WSDL or if the WSDL is not having any
> schema types then the Data binding framework would not be coming into
> picture. (Others Please correct me if I am wrong.)
>
> You would just be deciding which Data binding framework you should be
> using. AXIS 2 would internally be using the same and generating the Java
> classes for you. Do not get confused by the approach which you are
> choosing to build the web service and the data binding framework. The data
> binding framework is just to map the schema which is defined in the WSDL
> to Java classes. Thats the only purpose of the data binding framework.
>
> Using POJO's for web services means you would be writing a POJO class
> which would be capturing all the information you need for invoking the
> particular web service operation. For example if you see the
> AddressBookService in the AXIS 2 samples you can see that the addEntry
> method takes in a POJO as its input parameter namely Entry.
>
>
> Regarding your second question I am not able to understand it correctly.
>
> Also the flow which you have mentioned from the Client to the Service is
> correct and it would remain the same for any Web service for that matter
> i.e. not only AXIS 2 but any web service which is developed using any
> other framework.
>
> Hope that answers your queries.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Nilesh
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Anil VVNN
> To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 7:56:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
>
>
> Hi Niles,
>
> Thanks for answering my questions. As I said I'm a beginner, I have few
> more
> questions related to previous one.
>
> (1) When exactly do we use Binding frameworks (JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans) ?
> For instance, the examples given in Axis2 website (i.e. StockQuoteService)
> referring to simple method call, client calling WS for "getPrice/update"
> operations but there's no XSD involved, I think this kind of operations
> can
> be easily accomplished using POJO option. But I'm confused when to use
> POJO
> or anyother Binding framework(JIBX).
>
> (2) What is the difference between "XML Processing Model" and "SOAP
> Processing Model", when do we use these models independently.
>
> To my understanding, this is the typical flow of Axis2 services,
>
> Client ----calls---> Stub (generated by wsdl2java) ----calls[SOAP
> request]---> Skeleton Interface (generated by wsdl2java) -->Business Logic
>
> And this SOAP request can be handled using any transport (eg. TCP, JMS
> etc.)
>
> Please correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks.
>
> - Anil
>
>
> Nilesh Ghorpade wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As per my understanding AXIS 2 uses AXIOM API's internally for any XML
>> related activities. Hence as you have mentioned that you are confused to
>> choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans, the AXIOM is an
>> invalid
>> option here.
>>
>> Secondly in AXIS 2 you can create web services using either the Spring
>> Framework or POJO.
>>
>> JiBX, XMLBeans and ADB are more related to the data binding frameworks
>> which AXIS 2 supports. Hence it depends on your schema on which data
>> binding framework you would want to select. As per my knowledge XMLBeans
>> is the best when it comes to complex schemas. This is because XMLBeans
>> implementation can understand all the XSD (i.e. schema) constructs.
>>
>> To answer your second question, the answer is YES. If you want to use the
>> wsdl2java command from AXIS2 for generating your stubs and skeletons you
>> will need the WSDL. Generating a WSDL is also not a diccficult task. YOu
>> can have your SEI defined i.e. the Service Endpoint Interface with all
>> the
>> method signatures which you want to expose as web service operations. On
>> executing the java2wsdl command from AXIS2 you would be able to get the
>> WSDL. And using this WSDL you can generate the remaining artifacts of
>> your
>> web service. WSDL is nothing but an interface and hence even if you have
>> defined an interface in Java, you can generate a WSDL from it.
>>
>>
>> Hope that answers your queries.
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Niles
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Martin Gainty
>> To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
>> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 3:15:01 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
>>
>>
>> Anil-
>>
>> I found this whitepaper quite informative
>> SAX2 processes fastest..with DOM bein
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01044.html
>>
>> FWIW,
>> M--
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the
>> use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
>> information that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt
>> from
>> disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that
>> any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
>> strictly prohibited.
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Le présent message électronique (y compris les pièces qui y sont
>> annexées,
>> le cas échéant) s'adresse au destinataire indiqué et peut contenir des
>> renseignements de caractère privé ou confidentiel. Si vous n'êtes pas le
>> destinataire de ce document, nous vous signalons qu'il est strictement
>> interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de le reproduire.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Anil"
>> To:
>> Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 4:37 PM
>> Subject: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm new to Axis2, what is the criteria to choose
>>> between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans. How do we
>>> decide architecture wise.
>>>
>>> My second question is, is wsdl file mandatory to
>>> create stub and skeleton interfaces or can we use just
>>> skeleton file to create wsdl file.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________________________________________
>>> Bored stiff? Loosen up...
>>> Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
>>> http://games.yahoo.com/games/front
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-user-help@ws.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________________________________
>> The fish are biting.
>> Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
>> http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/-Axis2--AXIOM-or-JBIX-tf3463792.html#a9674209
> Sent from the Axis - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-user-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Never miss an email again!
> Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives.
> http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Axis2--AXIOM-or-JBIX-tf3463792.html#a9701446
Sent from the Axis - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-user-help@ws.apache.org
---------------------------------
No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go
with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
Posted by Nilesh Ghorpade <ni...@yahoo.com>.
Hi Anil,
The JiBX XML file which I had mentioned contains the mapping between XML and the Java classes. You can generate this file using the jibx commands. Please refer the JiBX documentation for more details.
Secondly your question related to sending a SOAP request. We always send a SOAP request to a Web Service. I mean even if we have a Java client written what we do is create a SOAP request and then send the same over HTTP or any other transport protocol to the Web Service endpoint. So the Client request would always be in SOAP whether you have a java/.NET/C/C++ client accessing the web service.
Regards
Nilesh
Anil VVNN <vv...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi Nilesh,
Thanks for detailed response.
So, the AddressBookService example (at
http://people.apache.org/~thilina/axis2/docs/jibx/jibx-unwrapped-example.html)
which uses POJO as a data transfer object, can be implemented using any Data
binding framework (JIBX or ADB) to create Java classes.
What is JiBX binding definition, is this property only applicable to JiBX
framework
-EbindingFile /resources/jibxbindingFile.xml
And also, can we send the client request using SOAP (instead of writing Java
Client) and get the response back in SOAP? In which case, this type of
scenario comes in.
Thanks,
Anil
Nilesh Ghorpade wrote:
>
> Hi Anil,
>
> The Data binding frameworks come into picture when you are generating the
> Java code artifacts from WSDL. If you observe the "wsdl2java" command
> there is a command line argument namely "-d" with which you can specify
> the Data binding framework which you want to use. In case u want to use
> JiBX you would be specifying something like
>
> $> wsdl2java -o /outputDir -d jibx -EbindingFile
> /resources/jibxbindingFile.xml -uri MyWebService.wsdl
>
> The above command is just for making things more simpler. Also if there
> are no schema references in the WSDL or if the WSDL is not having any
> schema types then the Data binding framework would not be coming into
> picture. (Others Please correct me if I am wrong.)
>
> You would just be deciding which Data binding framework you should be
> using. AXIS 2 would internally be using the same and generating the Java
> classes for you. Do not get confused by the approach which you are
> choosing to build the web service and the data binding framework. The data
> binding framework is just to map the schema which is defined in the WSDL
> to Java classes. Thats the only purpose of the data binding framework.
>
> Using POJO's for web services means you would be writing a POJO class
> which would be capturing all the information you need for invoking the
> particular web service operation. For example if you see the
> AddressBookService in the AXIS 2 samples you can see that the addEntry
> method takes in a POJO as its input parameter namely Entry.
>
>
> Regarding your second question I am not able to understand it correctly.
>
> Also the flow which you have mentioned from the Client to the Service is
> correct and it would remain the same for any Web service for that matter
> i.e. not only AXIS 2 but any web service which is developed using any
> other framework.
>
> Hope that answers your queries.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Nilesh
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Anil VVNN
> To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 7:56:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
>
>
> Hi Niles,
>
> Thanks for answering my questions. As I said I'm a beginner, I have few
> more
> questions related to previous one.
>
> (1) When exactly do we use Binding frameworks (JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans) ?
> For instance, the examples given in Axis2 website (i.e. StockQuoteService)
> referring to simple method call, client calling WS for "getPrice/update"
> operations but there's no XSD involved, I think this kind of operations
> can
> be easily accomplished using POJO option. But I'm confused when to use
> POJO
> or anyother Binding framework(JIBX).
>
> (2) What is the difference between "XML Processing Model" and "SOAP
> Processing Model", when do we use these models independently.
>
> To my understanding, this is the typical flow of Axis2 services,
>
> Client ----calls---> Stub (generated by wsdl2java) ----calls[SOAP
> request]---> Skeleton Interface (generated by wsdl2java) -->Business Logic
>
> And this SOAP request can be handled using any transport (eg. TCP, JMS
> etc.)
>
> Please correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks.
>
> - Anil
>
>
> Nilesh Ghorpade wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As per my understanding AXIS 2 uses AXIOM API's internally for any XML
>> related activities. Hence as you have mentioned that you are confused to
>> choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans, the AXIOM is an
>> invalid
>> option here.
>>
>> Secondly in AXIS 2 you can create web services using either the Spring
>> Framework or POJO.
>>
>> JiBX, XMLBeans and ADB are more related to the data binding frameworks
>> which AXIS 2 supports. Hence it depends on your schema on which data
>> binding framework you would want to select. As per my knowledge XMLBeans
>> is the best when it comes to complex schemas. This is because XMLBeans
>> implementation can understand all the XSD (i.e. schema) constructs.
>>
>> To answer your second question, the answer is YES. If you want to use the
>> wsdl2java command from AXIS2 for generating your stubs and skeletons you
>> will need the WSDL. Generating a WSDL is also not a diccficult task. YOu
>> can have your SEI defined i.e. the Service Endpoint Interface with all
>> the
>> method signatures which you want to expose as web service operations. On
>> executing the java2wsdl command from AXIS2 you would be able to get the
>> WSDL. And using this WSDL you can generate the remaining artifacts of
>> your
>> web service. WSDL is nothing but an interface and hence even if you have
>> defined an interface in Java, you can generate a WSDL from it.
>>
>>
>> Hope that answers your queries.
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Niles
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Martin Gainty
>> To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
>> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 3:15:01 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
>>
>>
>> Anil-
>>
>> I found this whitepaper quite informative
>> SAX2 processes fastest..with DOM bein
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01044.html
>>
>> FWIW,
>> M--
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the
>> use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
>> information that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt
>> from
>> disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that
>> any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
>> strictly prohibited.
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Le présent message électronique (y compris les pièces qui y sont
>> annexées,
>> le cas échéant) s'adresse au destinataire indiqué et peut contenir des
>> renseignements de caractère privé ou confidentiel. Si vous n'êtes pas le
>> destinataire de ce document, nous vous signalons qu'il est strictement
>> interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de le reproduire.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Anil"
>> To:
>> Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 4:37 PM
>> Subject: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm new to Axis2, what is the criteria to choose
>>> between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans. How do we
>>> decide architecture wise.
>>>
>>> My second question is, is wsdl file mandatory to
>>> create stub and skeleton interfaces or can we use just
>>> skeleton file to create wsdl file.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________________________________________
>>> Bored stiff? Loosen up...
>>> Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
>>> http://games.yahoo.com/games/front
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-user-help@ws.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________________________________
>> The fish are biting.
>> Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
>> http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/-Axis2--AXIOM-or-JBIX-tf3463792.html#a9674209
> Sent from the Axis - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-user-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Never miss an email again!
> Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives.
> http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Axis2--AXIOM-or-JBIX-tf3463792.html#a9701446
Sent from the Axis - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-user-help@ws.apache.org
---------------------------------
Bored stiff? Loosen up...
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
Posted by Anil VVNN <vv...@yahoo.com>.
Hi Nilesh,
Thanks for detailed response.
So, the AddressBookService example (at
http://people.apache.org/~thilina/axis2/docs/jibx/jibx-unwrapped-example.html)
which uses POJO as a data transfer object, can be implemented using any Data
binding framework (JIBX or ADB) to create Java classes.
What is JiBX binding definition, is this property only applicable to JiBX
framework
-EbindingFile /resources/jibxbindingFile.xml
And also, can we send the client request using SOAP (instead of writing Java
Client) and get the response back in SOAP? In which case, this type of
scenario comes in.
Thanks,
Anil
Nilesh Ghorpade wrote:
>
> Hi Anil,
>
> The Data binding frameworks come into picture when you are generating the
> Java code artifacts from WSDL. If you observe the "wsdl2java" command
> there is a command line argument namely "-d" with which you can specify
> the Data binding framework which you want to use. In case u want to use
> JiBX you would be specifying something like
>
> $> wsdl2java -o /outputDir -d jibx -EbindingFile
> /resources/jibxbindingFile.xml -uri MyWebService.wsdl
>
> The above command is just for making things more simpler. Also if there
> are no schema references in the WSDL or if the WSDL is not having any
> schema types then the Data binding framework would not be coming into
> picture. (Others Please correct me if I am wrong.)
>
> You would just be deciding which Data binding framework you should be
> using. AXIS 2 would internally be using the same and generating the Java
> classes for you. Do not get confused by the approach which you are
> choosing to build the web service and the data binding framework. The data
> binding framework is just to map the schema which is defined in the WSDL
> to Java classes. Thats the only purpose of the data binding framework.
>
> Using POJO's for web services means you would be writing a POJO class
> which would be capturing all the information you need for invoking the
> particular web service operation. For example if you see the
> AddressBookService in the AXIS 2 samples you can see that the addEntry
> method takes in a POJO as its input parameter namely Entry.
>
>
> Regarding your second question I am not able to understand it correctly.
>
> Also the flow which you have mentioned from the Client to the Service is
> correct and it would remain the same for any Web service for that matter
> i.e. not only AXIS 2 but any web service which is developed using any
> other framework.
>
> Hope that answers your queries.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Nilesh
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Anil VVNN <vv...@yahoo.com>
> To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 7:56:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
>
>
> Hi Niles,
>
> Thanks for answering my questions. As I said I'm a beginner, I have few
> more
> questions related to previous one.
>
> (1) When exactly do we use Binding frameworks (JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans) ?
> For instance, the examples given in Axis2 website (i.e. StockQuoteService)
> referring to simple method call, client calling WS for "getPrice/update"
> operations but there's no XSD involved, I think this kind of operations
> can
> be easily accomplished using POJO option. But I'm confused when to use
> POJO
> or anyother Binding framework(JIBX).
>
> (2) What is the difference between "XML Processing Model" and "SOAP
> Processing Model", when do we use these models independently.
>
> To my understanding, this is the typical flow of Axis2 services,
>
> Client ----calls---> Stub (generated by wsdl2java) ----calls[SOAP
> request]---> Skeleton Interface (generated by wsdl2java) -->Business Logic
>
> And this SOAP request can be handled using any transport (eg. TCP, JMS
> etc.)
>
> Please correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks.
>
> - Anil
>
>
> Nilesh Ghorpade wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As per my understanding AXIS 2 uses AXIOM API's internally for any XML
>> related activities. Hence as you have mentioned that you are confused to
>> choose between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans, the AXIOM is an
>> invalid
>> option here.
>>
>> Secondly in AXIS 2 you can create web services using either the Spring
>> Framework or POJO.
>>
>> JiBX, XMLBeans and ADB are more related to the data binding frameworks
>> which AXIS 2 supports. Hence it depends on your schema on which data
>> binding framework you would want to select. As per my knowledge XMLBeans
>> is the best when it comes to complex schemas. This is because XMLBeans
>> implementation can understand all the XSD (i.e. schema) constructs.
>>
>> To answer your second question, the answer is YES. If you want to use the
>> wsdl2java command from AXIS2 for generating your stubs and skeletons you
>> will need the WSDL. Generating a WSDL is also not a diccficult task. YOu
>> can have your SEI defined i.e. the Service Endpoint Interface with all
>> the
>> method signatures which you want to expose as web service operations. On
>> executing the java2wsdl command from AXIS2 you would be able to get the
>> WSDL. And using this WSDL you can generate the remaining artifacts of
>> your
>> web service. WSDL is nothing but an interface and hence even if you have
>> defined an interface in Java, you can generate a WSDL from it.
>>
>>
>> Hope that answers your queries.
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Niles
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Martin Gainty <mg...@hotmail.com>
>> To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
>> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 3:15:01 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
>>
>>
>> Anil-
>>
>> I found this whitepaper quite informative
>> SAX2 processes fastest..with DOM bein
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01044.html
>>
>> FWIW,
>> M--
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the
>> use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
>> information that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt
>> from
>> disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that
>> any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
>> strictly prohibited.
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Le présent message électronique (y compris les pièces qui y sont
>> annexées,
>> le cas échéant) s'adresse au destinataire indiqué et peut contenir des
>> renseignements de caractère privé ou confidentiel. Si vous n'êtes pas le
>> destinataire de ce document, nous vous signalons qu'il est strictement
>> interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de le reproduire.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Anil" <vv...@yahoo.com>
>> To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 4:37 PM
>> Subject: [Axis2] AXIOM or JBIX
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm new to Axis2, what is the criteria to choose
>>> between POJO, AXIOM, JIBX, ADB or XMLBeans. How do we
>>> decide architecture wise.
>>>
>>> My second question is, is wsdl file mandatory to
>>> create stub and skeleton interfaces or can we use just
>>> skeleton file to create wsdl file.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________________________________________
>>> Bored stiff? Loosen up...
>>> Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
>>> http://games.yahoo.com/games/front
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-user-help@ws.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________________________________
>> The fish are biting.
>> Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
>> http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/-Axis2--AXIOM-or-JBIX-tf3463792.html#a9674209
> Sent from the Axis - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-user-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Never miss an email again!
> Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives.
> http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Axis2--AXIOM-or-JBIX-tf3463792.html#a9701446
Sent from the Axis - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-user-help@ws.apache.org