You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jclouds.apache.org by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> on 2013/05/28 18:54:08 UTC

1.6.x branches "locked" for RCs

FYI - I'm going to be cutting the first RC for 1.6.1-incubating today, so
please consider the 1.6.x branches to be "locked" until we've released
(barring fixes we need to put in after evaluating RCs, etc).

A.

Re: 1.6.x branches "locked" for RCs

Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
...oh, that's me typoing. ha.

A.

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Aaaand a test failure:
>
> [INFO] Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Version
> '1.6.1-incuabting' did not match expected pattern
> '(\d+)\.(\d+)\.(\d+)(?:-(alpha|beta|rc)\.(\d+)|-incubating|-SNAPSHOT)?'
>
> =)
>
> A.
>
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Andrew Phillips <ap...@qrmedia.com>wrote:
>
>> FYI - I'm going to be cutting the first RC for 1.6.1-incubating today, so
>>> please consider the 1.6.x branches to be "locked" until we've released
>>> (barring fixes we need to put in after evaluating RCs, etc).
>>>
>>
>> Here goes ;-) Good luck!!
>>
>> ap
>>
>
>

Re: 1.6.x branches "locked" for RCs

Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
Aaaand a test failure:

[INFO] Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Version
'1.6.1-incuabting' did not match expected pattern
'(\d+)\.(\d+)\.(\d+)(?:-(alpha|beta|rc)\.(\d+)|-incubating|-SNAPSHOT)?'

=)

A.

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Andrew Phillips <ap...@qrmedia.com>wrote:

> FYI - I'm going to be cutting the first RC for 1.6.1-incubating today, so
>> please consider the 1.6.x branches to be "locked" until we've released
>> (barring fixes we need to put in after evaluating RCs, etc).
>>
>
> Here goes ;-) Good luck!!
>
> ap
>

Re: 1.6.x branches "locked" for RCs

Posted by Andrew Phillips <ap...@qrmedia.com>.
> FYI - I'm going to be cutting the first RC for 1.6.1-incubating today, so
> please consider the 1.6.x branches to be "locked" until we've released
> (barring fixes we need to put in after evaluating RCs, etc).

Here goes ;-) Good luck!!

ap