You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tomee.apache.org by tibor17 <ti...@lycos.com> on 2014/11/02 21:11:05 UTC
TomEE plans for Java EE 7
See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0.
I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the tomee
zip).
This decision would speedup the release.
--
View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html
Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Thanks! I'll have a look.
From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@tomitribe.com>
To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>; Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
On CDI entry points are:
1) AnnotationDeployer#getBeanClasses
2) CdiScanner
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-11-06 10:40 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
> Great!
> Kicking out new builds.
> Anyway, I'm very interested in contributing with this effort. Maybe you can help / guide me on something?
> Cheers,Roberto
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>; Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 10:32 AM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> pushed few things about it this morning, not sure it will help these
> particular tests but hopefully it will
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
>
> 2014-11-06 9:52 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
>> Hi,
>> Thank you John!
>> I just added the dependencies for batch as well in https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/, so that took care of a few missing tests.
>> Now it seems that a lot of tests are failing because there is no beans.xml, since on Java EE 7 the description it's optional.
>> Cheers,Roberto
>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 8:37 AM
>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>
>> Hi
>> Will not be enough cause of descriptor part but this one is easier to dev
>> now
>>
>> Le jeudi 6 novembre 2014, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> First, cudos to Roberto for taking on the TomEE support!
>>>
>>> It came to my mind after speaking w/ David @ JavaOne about EE7 status.
>>>
>>> So quick question. If we put in hibernate in the TomEE profile, that
>>> should deploy fine right? I'm not saying for you guys to put it in, but
>>> for the sake of the EE sample tests that might help with the JPA 2.1
>> tests.
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Roberto Cortez
>> <radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Great! Thanks, I'll add it in the next run :)
>>>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>> To: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
>>>> Cc: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>; David Blevins <
>>>> david.blevins@gmail.com>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:01 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>>>
>>>> seems tomee embedded profile misses at least (tomee-embedded doesn't
>>>> provide it by default, tomee-plus should if you want to use
>>>> tomee-remote with plus classifier configured):
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <dependency>
>>>> <groupId>org.apache.batchee</groupId>
>>>> <artifactId>batchee-jbatch</artifactId>
>>>> <version>0.2-incubating</version>
>>>> </dependency>
>>>> <dependency>
>>>> <groupId>org.apache.johnzon</groupId>
>>>> <artifactId>johnzon-core</artifactId>
>>>> <version>0.1-incubating</version>
>>>> </dependency>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> @rmannibucau
>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2014-11-05 16:55 GMT+00:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>>> > great, thks
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> > @rmannibucau
>>>> > http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>>> > https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > 2014-11-05 16:51 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>:
>>>> >> Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to
>>>> delete
>>>> >> and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the
>>>> same
>>>> >> url:
>>>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>>>> >>
>>>> >> ________________________________
>>>> >> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
>>>> >> To: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>; "
>> users@tomee.apache.org
>>>> "
>>>> >> <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>>>> >> Cc: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>>> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>; Roberto Cortez
>>>> >> <ra...@yahoo.com>
>>>> >> Cc: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>>> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM
>>>> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Hello Roberto,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> is it broken again? I get 404
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> >> @rmannibucau
>>>> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>>> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid
>>>> >:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Hi,
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the
>>>> >>> latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Cheers,
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Roberto
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
>>>> >>> To: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org
>> "
>>>> >>> <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>>>> >>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM
>>>> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Hi David,
>>>> >>> Thanks for a warm welcome :)
>>>> >>> The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using
>>>> the
>>>> >>> Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They
>>>> are
>>>> >>> looking into it.
>>>> >>> Cheers,Roberto
>>>> >>> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>>> >>> To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
>>>> >>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM
>>>> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :)
>>>> >>> We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to
>>>> track
>>>> >>> these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the
>>>> Apache side
>>>> >>> if needed.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> -David
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez
>>>> >>> <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Hi guys,
>>>> >>> I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here.
>>>> >>> I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here:
>>>> >>> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added
>>>> profiles
>>>> >>> to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples /
>>>> tests
>>>> >>> we got the following results:
>>>> >>> batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are
>>>> >>> related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few
>>>> tests.
>>>> >>> DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI
>>>> >>> comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel -
>>>> Missing
>>>> >>> Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic
>>>> - No
>>>> >>> Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests.
>>>> Related
>>>> >>> with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test
>>>> >>> Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p -
>>>> OKjta -
>>>> >>> Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet -
>>>> Failing a
>>>> >>> few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test
>>>> Failureswebsocket -
>>>> >>> OK
>>>> >>> These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more
>> detail
>>>> >>> into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side.
>>>> >>> Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also
>>>> missing
>>>> >>> a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI
>>>> environment,
>>>> >>> but it will be there.
>>>> >>> Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :)
>>>> >>> Cheers,Roberto
>>>> >>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>> >>> To: users@tomee.apache.org
>>>> >>> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
>>>> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>>
>> http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE
>>>> 7.0.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the
>>>> >>>> tomee
>>>> >>>> zip).
>>>> >>>> This decision would speedup the release.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since
>> it
>>>> >>> usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to
>>>> stay
>>>> >>> apache.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Well stay openjpa i think.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had
>>>> the
>>>> >>> same about bval...one week of work and we got it.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> --
>>>> >>>> View this message in context:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>>
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html
>>>> >>>> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>
>
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@tomitribe.com>.
On CDI entry points are:
1) AnnotationDeployer#getBeanClasses
2) CdiScanner
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-11-06 10:40 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
> Great!
> Kicking out new builds.
> Anyway, I'm very interested in contributing with this effort. Maybe you can help / guide me on something?
> Cheers,Roberto
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>; Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 10:32 AM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> pushed few things about it this morning, not sure it will help these
> particular tests but hopefully it will
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
>
> 2014-11-06 9:52 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
>> Hi,
>> Thank you John!
>> I just added the dependencies for batch as well in https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/, so that took care of a few missing tests.
>> Now it seems that a lot of tests are failing because there is no beans.xml, since on Java EE 7 the description it's optional.
>> Cheers,Roberto
>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 8:37 AM
>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>
>> Hi
>> Will not be enough cause of descriptor part but this one is easier to dev
>> now
>>
>> Le jeudi 6 novembre 2014, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> First, cudos to Roberto for taking on the TomEE support!
>>>
>>> It came to my mind after speaking w/ David @ JavaOne about EE7 status.
>>>
>>> So quick question. If we put in hibernate in the TomEE profile, that
>>> should deploy fine right? I'm not saying for you guys to put it in, but
>>> for the sake of the EE sample tests that might help with the JPA 2.1
>> tests.
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Roberto Cortez
>> <radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Great! Thanks, I'll add it in the next run :)
>>>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>> To: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
>>>> Cc: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>; David Blevins <
>>>> david.blevins@gmail.com>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:01 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>>>
>>>> seems tomee embedded profile misses at least (tomee-embedded doesn't
>>>> provide it by default, tomee-plus should if you want to use
>>>> tomee-remote with plus classifier configured):
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <dependency>
>>>> <groupId>org.apache.batchee</groupId>
>>>> <artifactId>batchee-jbatch</artifactId>
>>>> <version>0.2-incubating</version>
>>>> </dependency>
>>>> <dependency>
>>>> <groupId>org.apache.johnzon</groupId>
>>>> <artifactId>johnzon-core</artifactId>
>>>> <version>0.1-incubating</version>
>>>> </dependency>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> @rmannibucau
>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2014-11-05 16:55 GMT+00:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>>> > great, thks
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> > @rmannibucau
>>>> > http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>>> > https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > 2014-11-05 16:51 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>:
>>>> >> Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to
>>>> delete
>>>> >> and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the
>>>> same
>>>> >> url:
>>>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>>>> >>
>>>> >> ________________________________
>>>> >> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
>>>> >> To: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>; "
>> users@tomee.apache.org
>>>> "
>>>> >> <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>>>> >> Cc: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>>> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>; Roberto Cortez
>>>> >> <ra...@yahoo.com>
>>>> >> Cc: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>>> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM
>>>> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Hello Roberto,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> is it broken again? I get 404
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> >> @rmannibucau
>>>> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>>> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid
>>>> >:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Hi,
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the
>>>> >>> latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Cheers,
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Roberto
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
>>>> >>> To: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org
>> "
>>>> >>> <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>>>> >>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM
>>>> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Hi David,
>>>> >>> Thanks for a warm welcome :)
>>>> >>> The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using
>>>> the
>>>> >>> Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They
>>>> are
>>>> >>> looking into it.
>>>> >>> Cheers,Roberto
>>>> >>> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>>> >>> To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
>>>> >>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM
>>>> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :)
>>>> >>> We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to
>>>> track
>>>> >>> these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the
>>>> Apache side
>>>> >>> if needed.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> -David
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez
>>>> >>> <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Hi guys,
>>>> >>> I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here.
>>>> >>> I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here:
>>>> >>> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added
>>>> profiles
>>>> >>> to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples /
>>>> tests
>>>> >>> we got the following results:
>>>> >>> batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are
>>>> >>> related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few
>>>> tests.
>>>> >>> DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI
>>>> >>> comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel -
>>>> Missing
>>>> >>> Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic
>>>> - No
>>>> >>> Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests.
>>>> Related
>>>> >>> with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test
>>>> >>> Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p -
>>>> OKjta -
>>>> >>> Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet -
>>>> Failing a
>>>> >>> few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test
>>>> Failureswebsocket -
>>>> >>> OK
>>>> >>> These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more
>> detail
>>>> >>> into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side.
>>>> >>> Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also
>>>> missing
>>>> >>> a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI
>>>> environment,
>>>> >>> but it will be there.
>>>> >>> Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :)
>>>> >>> Cheers,Roberto
>>>> >>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>> >>> To: users@tomee.apache.org
>>>> >>> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
>>>> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>>
>> http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE
>>>> 7.0.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the
>>>> >>>> tomee
>>>> >>>> zip).
>>>> >>>> This decision would speedup the release.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since
>> it
>>>> >>> usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to
>>>> stay
>>>> >>> apache.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Well stay openjpa i think.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had
>>>> the
>>>> >>> same about bval...one week of work and we got it.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> --
>>>> >>>> View this message in context:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>>
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html
>>>> >>>> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>
>
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Great!
Kicking out new builds.
Anyway, I'm very interested in contributing with this effort. Maybe you can help / guide me on something?
Cheers,Roberto
From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>; Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
pushed few things about it this morning, not sure it will help these
particular tests but hopefully it will
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-11-06 9:52 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
> Hi,
> Thank you John!
> I just added the dependencies for batch as well in https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/, so that took care of a few missing tests.
> Now it seems that a lot of tests are failing because there is no beans.xml, since on Java EE 7 the description it's optional.
> Cheers,Roberto
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 8:37 AM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> Hi
> Will not be enough cause of descriptor part but this one is easier to dev
> now
>
> Le jeudi 6 novembre 2014, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>> Hey all,
>>
>> First, cudos to Roberto for taking on the TomEE support!
>>
>> It came to my mind after speaking w/ David @ JavaOne about EE7 status.
>>
>> So quick question. If we put in hibernate in the TomEE profile, that
>> should deploy fine right? I'm not saying for you guys to put it in, but
>> for the sake of the EE sample tests that might help with the JPA 2.1
> tests.
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Roberto Cortez
> <radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> Great! Thanks, I'll add it in the next run :)
>>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>> To: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
>>> Cc: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>; David Blevins <
>>> david.blevins@gmail.com>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:01 PM
>>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>>
>>> seems tomee embedded profile misses at least (tomee-embedded doesn't
>>> provide it by default, tomee-plus should if you want to use
>>> tomee-remote with plus classifier configured):
>>>
>>>
>>> <dependency>
>>> <groupId>org.apache.batchee</groupId>
>>> <artifactId>batchee-jbatch</artifactId>
>>> <version>0.2-incubating</version>
>>> </dependency>
>>> <dependency>
>>> <groupId>org.apache.johnzon</groupId>
>>> <artifactId>johnzon-core</artifactId>
>>> <version>0.1-incubating</version>
>>> </dependency>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau
>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-11-05 16:55 GMT+00:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>> > great, thks
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> > @rmannibucau
>>> > http://www.tomitribe.com
>>> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>> > https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 2014-11-05 16:51 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>:
>>> >> Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to
>>> delete
>>> >> and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the
>>> same
>>> >> url:
>>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>>> >>
>>> >> ________________________________
>>> >> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
>>> >> To: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>; "
> users@tomee.apache.org
>>> "
>>> >> <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>>> >> Cc: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM
>>> >>
>>> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>> >>
>>> >> Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>; Roberto Cortez
>>> >> <ra...@yahoo.com>
>>> >> Cc: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM
>>> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>> >>
>>> >> Hello Roberto,
>>> >>
>>> >> is it broken again? I get 404
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> >> @rmannibucau
>>> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid
>>> >:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hi,
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the
>>> >>> latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Cheers,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Roberto
>>> >>>
>>> >>> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
>>> >>> To: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org
> "
>>> >>> <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>>> >>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM
>>> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hi David,
>>> >>> Thanks for a warm welcome :)
>>> >>> The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using
>>> the
>>> >>> Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They
>>> are
>>> >>> looking into it.
>>> >>> Cheers,Roberto
>>> >>> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>> >>> To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
>>> >>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM
>>> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>> >>>
>>> >>> First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :)
>>> >>> We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to
>>> track
>>> >>> these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the
>>> Apache side
>>> >>> if needed.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -David
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez
>>> >>> <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hi guys,
>>> >>> I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here.
>>> >>> I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here:
>>> >>> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added
>>> profiles
>>> >>> to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples /
>>> tests
>>> >>> we got the following results:
>>> >>> batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are
>>> >>> related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few
>>> tests.
>>> >>> DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI
>>> >>> comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel -
>>> Missing
>>> >>> Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic
>>> - No
>>> >>> Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests.
>>> Related
>>> >>> with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test
>>> >>> Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p -
>>> OKjta -
>>> >>> Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet -
>>> Failing a
>>> >>> few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test
>>> Failureswebsocket -
>>> >>> OK
>>> >>> These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more
> detail
>>> >>> into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side.
>>> >>> Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also
>>> missing
>>> >>> a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI
>>> environment,
>>> >>> but it will be there.
>>> >>> Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :)
>>> >>> Cheers,Roberto
>>> >>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>> >>> To: users@tomee.apache.org
>>> >>> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
>>> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>>
> http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE
>>> 7.0.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the
>>> >>>> tomee
>>> >>>> zip).
>>> >>>> This decision would speedup the release.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since
> it
>>> >>> usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to
>>> stay
>>> >>> apache.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Well stay openjpa i think.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had
>>> the
>>> >>> same about bval...one week of work and we got it.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> --
>>> >>>> View this message in context:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>>
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html
>>> >>>> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
pushed few things about it this morning, not sure it will help these
particular tests but hopefully it will
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-11-06 9:52 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
> Hi,
> Thank you John!
> I just added the dependencies for batch as well in https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/, so that took care of a few missing tests.
> Now it seems that a lot of tests are failing because there is no beans.xml, since on Java EE 7 the description it's optional.
> Cheers,Roberto
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 8:37 AM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> Hi
> Will not be enough cause of descriptor part but this one is easier to dev
> now
>
> Le jeudi 6 novembre 2014, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>> Hey all,
>>
>> First, cudos to Roberto for taking on the TomEE support!
>>
>> It came to my mind after speaking w/ David @ JavaOne about EE7 status.
>>
>> So quick question. If we put in hibernate in the TomEE profile, that
>> should deploy fine right? I'm not saying for you guys to put it in, but
>> for the sake of the EE sample tests that might help with the JPA 2.1
> tests.
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Roberto Cortez
> <radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> Great! Thanks, I'll add it in the next run :)
>>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>> To: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
>>> Cc: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>; David Blevins <
>>> david.blevins@gmail.com>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:01 PM
>>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>>
>>> seems tomee embedded profile misses at least (tomee-embedded doesn't
>>> provide it by default, tomee-plus should if you want to use
>>> tomee-remote with plus classifier configured):
>>>
>>>
>>> <dependency>
>>> <groupId>org.apache.batchee</groupId>
>>> <artifactId>batchee-jbatch</artifactId>
>>> <version>0.2-incubating</version>
>>> </dependency>
>>> <dependency>
>>> <groupId>org.apache.johnzon</groupId>
>>> <artifactId>johnzon-core</artifactId>
>>> <version>0.1-incubating</version>
>>> </dependency>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau
>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-11-05 16:55 GMT+00:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>> > great, thks
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> > @rmannibucau
>>> > http://www.tomitribe.com
>>> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>> > https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 2014-11-05 16:51 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>:
>>> >> Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to
>>> delete
>>> >> and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the
>>> same
>>> >> url:
>>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>>> >>
>>> >> ________________________________
>>> >> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
>>> >> To: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>; "
> users@tomee.apache.org
>>> "
>>> >> <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>>> >> Cc: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM
>>> >>
>>> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>> >>
>>> >> Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>; Roberto Cortez
>>> >> <ra...@yahoo.com>
>>> >> Cc: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM
>>> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>> >>
>>> >> Hello Roberto,
>>> >>
>>> >> is it broken again? I get 404
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> >> @rmannibucau
>>> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid
>>> >:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hi,
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the
>>> >>> latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Cheers,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Roberto
>>> >>>
>>> >>> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
>>> >>> To: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org
> "
>>> >>> <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>>> >>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM
>>> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hi David,
>>> >>> Thanks for a warm welcome :)
>>> >>> The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using
>>> the
>>> >>> Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They
>>> are
>>> >>> looking into it.
>>> >>> Cheers,Roberto
>>> >>> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>> >>> To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
>>> >>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM
>>> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>> >>>
>>> >>> First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :)
>>> >>> We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to
>>> track
>>> >>> these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the
>>> Apache side
>>> >>> if needed.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -David
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez
>>> >>> <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hi guys,
>>> >>> I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here.
>>> >>> I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here:
>>> >>> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added
>>> profiles
>>> >>> to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples /
>>> tests
>>> >>> we got the following results:
>>> >>> batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are
>>> >>> related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few
>>> tests.
>>> >>> DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI
>>> >>> comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel -
>>> Missing
>>> >>> Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic
>>> - No
>>> >>> Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests.
>>> Related
>>> >>> with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test
>>> >>> Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p -
>>> OKjta -
>>> >>> Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet -
>>> Failing a
>>> >>> few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test
>>> Failureswebsocket -
>>> >>> OK
>>> >>> These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more
> detail
>>> >>> into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side.
>>> >>> Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also
>>> missing
>>> >>> a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI
>>> environment,
>>> >>> but it will be there.
>>> >>> Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :)
>>> >>> Cheers,Roberto
>>> >>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>> >>> To: users@tomee.apache.org
>>> >>> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
>>> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>>
> http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE
>>> 7.0.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the
>>> >>>> tomee
>>> >>>> zip).
>>> >>>> This decision would speedup the release.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since
> it
>>> >>> usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to
>>> stay
>>> >>> apache.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Well stay openjpa i think.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had
>>> the
>>> >>> same about bval...one week of work and we got it.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> --
>>> >>>> View this message in context:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>>
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html
>>> >>>> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Hi,
Thank you John!
I just added the dependencies for batch as well in https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/, so that took care of a few missing tests.
Now it seems that a lot of tests are failing because there is no beans.xml, since on Java EE 7 the description it's optional.
Cheers,Roberto
From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Hi
Will not be enough cause of descriptor part but this one is easier to dev
now
Le jeudi 6 novembre 2014, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hey all,
>
> First, cudos to Roberto for taking on the TomEE support!
>
> It came to my mind after speaking w/ David @ JavaOne about EE7 status.
>
> So quick question. If we put in hibernate in the TomEE profile, that
> should deploy fine right? I'm not saying for you guys to put it in, but
> for the sake of the EE sample tests that might help with the JPA 2.1
tests.
>
> John
>
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Roberto Cortez
<radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid
>> wrote:
>
>> Great! Thanks, I'll add it in the next run :)
>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> To: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
>> Cc: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>; David Blevins <
>> david.blevins@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:01 PM
>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>
>> seems tomee embedded profile misses at least (tomee-embedded doesn't
>> provide it by default, tomee-plus should if you want to use
>> tomee-remote with plus classifier configured):
>>
>>
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.apache.batchee</groupId>
>> <artifactId>batchee-jbatch</artifactId>
>> <version>0.2-incubating</version>
>> </dependency>
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.apache.johnzon</groupId>
>> <artifactId>johnzon-core</artifactId>
>> <version>0.1-incubating</version>
>> </dependency>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-11-05 16:55 GMT+00:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>> > great, thks
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > @rmannibucau
>> > http://www.tomitribe.com
>> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> > https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >
>> >
>> > 2014-11-05 16:51 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>:
>> >> Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to
>> delete
>> >> and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the
>> same
>> >> url:
>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>> >>
>> >> ________________________________
>> >> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
>> >> To: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>; "
users@tomee.apache.org
>> "
>> >> <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>> >> Cc: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM
>> >>
>> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>> >>
>> >> Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>; Roberto Cortez
>> >> <ra...@yahoo.com>
>> >> Cc: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM
>> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>> >>
>> >> Hello Roberto,
>> >>
>> >> is it broken again? I get 404
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >> @rmannibucau
>> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid
>> >:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the
>> >>> latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>>
>> >>> Roberto
>> >>>
>> >>> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
>> >>> To: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org
"
>> >>> <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>> >>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM
>> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi David,
>> >>> Thanks for a warm welcome :)
>> >>> The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using
>> the
>> >>> Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They
>> are
>> >>> looking into it.
>> >>> Cheers,Roberto
>> >>> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>> >>> To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
>> >>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM
>> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>> >>>
>> >>> First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :)
>> >>> We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to
>> track
>> >>> these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the
>> Apache side
>> >>> if needed.
>> >>>
>> >>> -David
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez
>> >>> <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi guys,
>> >>> I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here.
>> >>> I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here:
>> >>> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added
>> profiles
>> >>> to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples /
>> tests
>> >>> we got the following results:
>> >>> batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are
>> >>> related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few
>> tests.
>> >>> DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI
>> >>> comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel -
>> Missing
>> >>> Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic
>> - No
>> >>> Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests.
>> Related
>> >>> with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test
>> >>> Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p -
>> OKjta -
>> >>> Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet -
>> Failing a
>> >>> few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test
>> Failureswebsocket -
>> >>> OK
>> >>> These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more
detail
>> >>> into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side.
>> >>> Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also
>> missing
>> >>> a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI
>> environment,
>> >>> but it will be there.
>> >>> Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :)
>> >>> Cheers,Roberto
>> >>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> >>> To: users@tomee.apache.org
>> >>> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
>> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>> >>>
>> >>> Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>> >>>>
>> >>>> See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>>
http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
>> >>>>
>> >>>> It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE
>> 7.0.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the
>> >>>> tomee
>> >>>> zip).
>> >>>> This decision would speedup the release.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since
it
>> >>> usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to
>> stay
>> >>> apache.
>> >>>
>> >>> Well stay openjpa i think.
>> >>>
>> >>> Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had
>> the
>> >>> same about bval...one week of work and we got it.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> View this message in context:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>>
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html
>> >>>> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Hi
Will not be enough cause of descriptor part but this one is easier to dev
now
Le jeudi 6 novembre 2014, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hey all,
>
> First, cudos to Roberto for taking on the TomEE support!
>
> It came to my mind after speaking w/ David @ JavaOne about EE7 status.
>
> So quick question. If we put in hibernate in the TomEE profile, that
> should deploy fine right? I'm not saying for you guys to put it in, but
> for the sake of the EE sample tests that might help with the JPA 2.1
tests.
>
> John
>
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Roberto Cortez
<radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid
>> wrote:
>
>> Great! Thanks, I'll add it in the next run :)
>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> To: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
>> Cc: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>; David Blevins <
>> david.blevins@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:01 PM
>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>
>> seems tomee embedded profile misses at least (tomee-embedded doesn't
>> provide it by default, tomee-plus should if you want to use
>> tomee-remote with plus classifier configured):
>>
>>
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.apache.batchee</groupId>
>> <artifactId>batchee-jbatch</artifactId>
>> <version>0.2-incubating</version>
>> </dependency>
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.apache.johnzon</groupId>
>> <artifactId>johnzon-core</artifactId>
>> <version>0.1-incubating</version>
>> </dependency>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-11-05 16:55 GMT+00:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>> > great, thks
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > @rmannibucau
>> > http://www.tomitribe.com
>> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> > https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >
>> >
>> > 2014-11-05 16:51 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>:
>> >> Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to
>> delete
>> >> and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the
>> same
>> >> url:
>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>> >>
>> >> ________________________________
>> >> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
>> >> To: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>; "
users@tomee.apache.org
>> "
>> >> <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>> >> Cc: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM
>> >>
>> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>> >>
>> >> Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>; Roberto Cortez
>> >> <ra...@yahoo.com>
>> >> Cc: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM
>> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>> >>
>> >> Hello Roberto,
>> >>
>> >> is it broken again? I get 404
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >> @rmannibucau
>> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid
>> >:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the
>> >>> latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>>
>> >>> Roberto
>> >>>
>> >>> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
>> >>> To: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org
"
>> >>> <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>> >>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM
>> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi David,
>> >>> Thanks for a warm welcome :)
>> >>> The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using
>> the
>> >>> Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They
>> are
>> >>> looking into it.
>> >>> Cheers,Roberto
>> >>> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>> >>> To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
>> >>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM
>> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>> >>>
>> >>> First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :)
>> >>> We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to
>> track
>> >>> these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the
>> Apache side
>> >>> if needed.
>> >>>
>> >>> -David
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez
>> >>> <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi guys,
>> >>> I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here.
>> >>> I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here:
>> >>> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added
>> profiles
>> >>> to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples /
>> tests
>> >>> we got the following results:
>> >>> batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are
>> >>> related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few
>> tests.
>> >>> DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI
>> >>> comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel -
>> Missing
>> >>> Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic
>> - No
>> >>> Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests.
>> Related
>> >>> with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test
>> >>> Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p -
>> OKjta -
>> >>> Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet -
>> Failing a
>> >>> few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test
>> Failureswebsocket -
>> >>> OK
>> >>> These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more
detail
>> >>> into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side.
>> >>> Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also
>> missing
>> >>> a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI
>> environment,
>> >>> but it will be there.
>> >>> Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :)
>> >>> Cheers,Roberto
>> >>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> >>> To: users@tomee.apache.org
>> >>> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
>> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>> >>>
>> >>> Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>> >>>>
>> >>>> See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>>
http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
>> >>>>
>> >>>> It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE
>> 7.0.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the
>> >>>> tomee
>> >>>> zip).
>> >>>> This decision would speedup the release.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since
it
>> >>> usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to
>> stay
>> >>> apache.
>> >>>
>> >>> Well stay openjpa i think.
>> >>>
>> >>> Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had
>> the
>> >>> same about bval...one week of work and we got it.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> View this message in context:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>>
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html
>> >>>> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@gmail.com>.
Hey all,
First, cudos to Roberto for taking on the TomEE support!
It came to my mind after speaking w/ David @ JavaOne about EE7 status.
So quick question. If we put in hibernate in the TomEE profile, that
should deploy fine right? I'm not saying for you guys to put it in, but
for the sake of the EE sample tests that might help with the JPA 2.1 tests.
John
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Roberto Cortez <radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid
> wrote:
> Great! Thanks, I'll add it in the next run :)
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> To: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
> Cc: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>; David Blevins <
> david.blevins@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:01 PM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> seems tomee embedded profile misses at least (tomee-embedded doesn't
> provide it by default, tomee-plus should if you want to use
> tomee-remote with plus classifier configured):
>
>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.apache.batchee</groupId>
> <artifactId>batchee-jbatch</artifactId>
> <version>0.2-incubating</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.apache.johnzon</groupId>
> <artifactId>johnzon-core</artifactId>
> <version>0.1-incubating</version>
> </dependency>
>
>
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
>
> 2014-11-05 16:55 GMT+00:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> > great, thks
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >
> >
> > 2014-11-05 16:51 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>:
> >> Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to
> delete
> >> and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the
> same
> >> url:
> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> >> To: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org
> "
> >> <us...@tomee.apache.org>
> >> Cc: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM
> >>
> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
> >>
> >> Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space
> >>
> >>
> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>; Roberto Cortez
> >> <ra...@yahoo.com>
> >> Cc: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM
> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
> >>
> >> Hello Roberto,
> >>
> >> is it broken again? I get 404
> >>
> >>
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> @rmannibucau
> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid
> >:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the
> >>> latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Roberto
> >>>
> >>> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
> >>> To: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org"
> >>> <us...@tomee.apache.org>
> >>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM
> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
> >>>
> >>> Hi David,
> >>> Thanks for a warm welcome :)
> >>> The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using
> the
> >>> Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They
> are
> >>> looking into it.
> >>> Cheers,Roberto
> >>> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> >>> To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
> >>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM
> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
> >>>
> >>> First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :)
> >>> We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to
> track
> >>> these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the
> Apache side
> >>> if needed.
> >>>
> >>> -David
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez
> >>> <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi guys,
> >>> I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here.
> >>> I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here:
> >>> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added
> profiles
> >>> to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples /
> tests
> >>> we got the following results:
> >>> batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are
> >>> related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few
> tests.
> >>> DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI
> >>> comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel -
> Missing
> >>> Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic
> - No
> >>> Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests.
> Related
> >>> with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test
> >>> Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p -
> OKjta -
> >>> Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet -
> Failing a
> >>> few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test
> Failureswebsocket -
> >>> OK
> >>> These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail
> >>> into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side.
> >>> Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also
> missing
> >>> a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI
> environment,
> >>> but it will be there.
> >>> Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :)
> >>> Cheers,Roberto
> >>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >>> To: users@tomee.apache.org
> >>> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
> >>>
> >>> Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
> >>>>
> >>>> See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
> >>>>
> >>>> It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE
> 7.0.
> >>>>
> >>>> I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the
> >>>> tomee
> >>>> zip).
> >>>> This decision would speedup the release.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it
> >>> usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to
> stay
> >>> apache.
> >>>
> >>> Well stay openjpa i think.
> >>>
> >>> Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had
> the
> >>> same about bval...one week of work and we got it.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> View this message in context:
> >>>
> >>>
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html
> >>>> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Great! Thanks, I'll add it in the next run :)
From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
To: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
Cc: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>; David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
seems tomee embedded profile misses at least (tomee-embedded doesn't
provide it by default, tomee-plus should if you want to use
tomee-remote with plus classifier configured):
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.batchee</groupId>
<artifactId>batchee-jbatch</artifactId>
<version>0.2-incubating</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.johnzon</groupId>
<artifactId>johnzon-core</artifactId>
<version>0.1-incubating</version>
</dependency>
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-11-05 16:55 GMT+00:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> great, thks
>
>
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2014-11-05 16:51 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>:
>> Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to delete
>> and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the same
>> url: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
>> To: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org"
>> <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>> Cc: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM
>>
>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>
>> Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space
>>
>>
>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>; Roberto Cortez
>> <ra...@yahoo.com>
>> Cc: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM
>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>
>> Hello Roberto,
>>
>> is it broken again? I get 404
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the
>>> latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Roberto
>>>
>>> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
>>> To: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org"
>>> <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM
>>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>>
>>> Hi David,
>>> Thanks for a warm welcome :)
>>> The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the
>>> Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They are
>>> looking into it.
>>> Cheers,Roberto
>>> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>> To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
>>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM
>>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>>
>>> First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :)
>>> We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track
>>> these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache side
>>> if needed.
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez
>>> <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>> I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here.
>>> I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here:
>>> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles
>>> to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests
>>> we got the following results:
>>> batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are
>>> related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests.
>>> DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI
>>> comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing
>>> Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No
>>> Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related
>>> with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test
>>> Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta -
>>> Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing a
>>> few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket -
>>> OK
>>> These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail
>>> into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side.
>>> Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also missing
>>> a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI environment,
>>> but it will be there.
>>> Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :)
>>> Cheers,Roberto
>>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>> To: users@tomee.apache.org
>>> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
>>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>>
>>> Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
>>>>
>>>> It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0.
>>>>
>>>> I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the
>>>> tomee
>>>> zip).
>>>> This decision would speedup the release.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it
>>> usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay
>>> apache.
>>>
>>> Well stay openjpa i think.
>>>
>>> Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the
>>> same about bval...one week of work and we got it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>
>>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html
>>>> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
seems tomee embedded profile misses at least (tomee-embedded doesn't
provide it by default, tomee-plus should if you want to use
tomee-remote with plus classifier configured):
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.batchee</groupId>
<artifactId>batchee-jbatch</artifactId>
<version>0.2-incubating</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.johnzon</groupId>
<artifactId>johnzon-core</artifactId>
<version>0.1-incubating</version>
</dependency>
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-11-05 16:55 GMT+00:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> great, thks
>
>
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2014-11-05 16:51 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>:
>> Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to delete
>> and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the same
>> url: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
>> To: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org"
>> <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>> Cc: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM
>>
>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>
>> Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space
>>
>>
>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>; Roberto Cortez
>> <ra...@yahoo.com>
>> Cc: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM
>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>
>> Hello Roberto,
>>
>> is it broken again? I get 404
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the
>>> latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Roberto
>>>
>>> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
>>> To: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org"
>>> <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM
>>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>>
>>> Hi David,
>>> Thanks for a warm welcome :)
>>> The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the
>>> Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They are
>>> looking into it.
>>> Cheers,Roberto
>>> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>> To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
>>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM
>>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>>
>>> First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :)
>>> We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track
>>> these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache side
>>> if needed.
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez
>>> <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>> I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here.
>>> I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here:
>>> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles
>>> to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests
>>> we got the following results:
>>> batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are
>>> related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests.
>>> DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI
>>> comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing
>>> Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No
>>> Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related
>>> with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test
>>> Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta -
>>> Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing a
>>> few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket -
>>> OK
>>> These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail
>>> into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side.
>>> Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also missing
>>> a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI environment,
>>> but it will be there.
>>> Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :)
>>> Cheers,Roberto
>>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>> To: users@tomee.apache.org
>>> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
>>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>>
>>> Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
>>>>
>>>> It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0.
>>>>
>>>> I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the
>>>> tomee
>>>> zip).
>>>> This decision would speedup the release.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it
>>> usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay
>>> apache.
>>>
>>> Well stay openjpa i think.
>>>
>>> Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the
>>> same about bval...one week of work and we got it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>
>>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html
>>>> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
great, thks
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-11-05 16:51 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>:
> Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to delete
> and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the same
> url: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>
> ________________________________
> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> To: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org"
> <us...@tomee.apache.org>
> Cc: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM
>
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space
>
>
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>
>
>
> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>; Roberto Cortez
> <ra...@yahoo.com>
> Cc: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> Hello Roberto,
>
> is it broken again? I get 404
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
>
> 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the
>> latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Roberto
>>
>> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
>> To: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org"
>> <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM
>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>
>> Hi David,
>> Thanks for a warm welcome :)
>> The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the
>> Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They are
>> looking into it.
>> Cheers,Roberto
>> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>> To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
>> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM
>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>
>> First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :)
>> We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track
>> these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache side
>> if needed.
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez
>> <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>> I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here.
>> I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here:
>> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles
>> to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests
>> we got the following results:
>> batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are
>> related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests.
>> DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI
>> comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing
>> Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No
>> Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related
>> with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test
>> Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta -
>> Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing a
>> few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket -
>> OK
>> These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail
>> into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side.
>> Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also missing
>> a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI environment,
>> but it will be there.
>> Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :)
>> Cheers,Roberto
>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> To: users@tomee.apache.org
>> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>
>> Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>>>
>>> See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
>>>
>>>
>>
>> http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
>>>
>>> It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0.
>>>
>>> I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the
>>> tomee
>>> zip).
>>> This decision would speedup the release.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it
>> usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay
>> apache.
>>
>> Well stay openjpa i think.
>>
>> Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the
>> same about bval...one week of work and we got it.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html
>>> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to delete and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the same url: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
To: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
Cc: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space
From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>; Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
Cc: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Hello Roberto,
is it broken again? I get 404
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
>
> We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT:
>
>
>
>
> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Roberto
>
> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
> To: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> Hi David,
> Thanks for a warm welcome :)
> The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They are looking into it.
> Cheers,Roberto
> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :)
> We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache side if needed.
>
> -David
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
> I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here.
> I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here: https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests we got the following results:
> batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests. DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing a few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket - OK
> These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side. Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also missing a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI environment, but it will be there.
> Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :)
> Cheers,Roberto
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> To: users@tomee.apache.org
> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>>
>> See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
>>
>>
> http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
>>
>> It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0.
>>
>> I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the tomee
>> zip).
>> This decision would speedup the release.
>>
>>
>
> Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it
> usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay
> apache.
>
> Well stay openjpa i think.
>
> Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the
> same about bval...one week of work and we got it.
>
>
>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html
>> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space
From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>; Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
Cc: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Hello Roberto,
is it broken again? I get 404
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
>
> We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT:
>
>
>
>
> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Roberto
>
> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
> To: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> Hi David,
> Thanks for a warm welcome :)
> The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They are looking into it.
> Cheers,Roberto
> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :)
> We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache side if needed.
>
> -David
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
> I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here.
> I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here: https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests we got the following results:
> batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests. DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing a few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket - OK
> These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side. Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also missing a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI environment, but it will be there.
> Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :)
> Cheers,Roberto
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> To: users@tomee.apache.org
> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>>
>> See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
>>
>>
> http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
>>
>> It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0.
>>
>> I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the tomee
>> zip).
>> This decision would speedup the release.
>>
>>
>
> Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it
> usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay
> apache.
>
> Well stay openjpa i think.
>
> Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the
> same about bval...one week of work and we got it.
>
>
>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html
>> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Hello Roberto,
is it broken again? I get 404
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
>
> We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT:
>
>
>
>
> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Roberto
>
> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
> To: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> Hi David,
> Thanks for a warm welcome :)
> The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They are looking into it.
> Cheers,Roberto
> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :)
> We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache side if needed.
>
> -David
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
> I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here.
> I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here: https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests we got the following results:
> batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests. DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing a few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket - OK
> These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side. Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also missing a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI environment, but it will be there.
> Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :)
> Cheers,Roberto
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> To: users@tomee.apache.org
> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>>
>> See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
>>
>>
> http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
>>
>> It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0.
>>
>> I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the tomee
>> zip).
>> This decision would speedup the release.
>>
>>
>
> Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it
> usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay
> apache.
>
> Well stay openjpa i think.
>
> Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the
> same about bval...one week of work and we got it.
>
>
>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html
>> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Hi,
We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
Cheers,
Roberto
From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
To: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Hi David,
Thanks for a warm welcome :)
The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They are looking into it.
Cheers,Roberto
From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :)
We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache side if needed.
-David
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
Hi guys,
I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here.
I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here: https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests we got the following results:
batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests. DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing a few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket - OK
These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side. Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also missing a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI environment, but it will be there.
Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :)
Cheers,Roberto
From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
To: users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>
> See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
>
>
http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
>
> It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0.
>
> I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the tomee
> zip).
> This decision would speedup the release.
>
>
Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it
usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay
apache.
Well stay openjpa i think.
Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the
same about bval...one week of work and we got it.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html
> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Hi David,
Thanks for a warm welcome :)
The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They are looking into it.
Cheers,Roberto
From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :)
We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache side if needed.
-David
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
Hi guys,
I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here.
I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here: https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests we got the following results:
batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests. DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing a few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket - OK
These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side. Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also missing a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI environment, but it will be there.
Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :)
Cheers,Roberto
From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
To: users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>
> See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
>
>
http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
>
> It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0.
>
> I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the tomee
> zip).
> This decision would speedup the release.
>
>
Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it
usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay
apache.
Well stay openjpa i think.
Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the
same about bval...one week of work and we got it.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html
> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Hi Romain,
Yes, Travis was also setup as a backup plan. Let's see what's going to happen with Cloudbees.
Cheers,Roberto
From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
Cc: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:41 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
travis I guess?
https://travis-ci.org/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples/jobs/39782388
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-11-03 9:24 GMT+01:00 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>:
> First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :)
>
> We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track
> these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache
> side if needed.
>
>
> -David
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>> I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here.
>> I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here:
>> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added
>> profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the
>> samples / tests we got the following results:
>> batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are
>> related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests.
>> DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI
>> comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing
>> Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No
>> Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related
>> with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test
>> Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta
>> - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing
>> a few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket
>> - OK
>> These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail
>> into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side.
>> Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also
>> missing a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI
>> environment, but it will be there.
>> Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :)
>> Cheers,Roberto
>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> To: users@tomee.apache.org
>> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>
>> Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>> >
>> > See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
>> >
>> >
>>
>> http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
>> >
>> > It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0.
>> >
>> > I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the
>> tomee
>> > zip).
>> > This decision would speedup the release.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it
>> usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay
>> apache.
>>
>> Well stay openjpa i think.
>>
>> Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the
>> same about bval...one week of work and we got it.
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> > --
>> > View this message in context:
>>
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html
>> > Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>>
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
travis I guess?
https://travis-ci.org/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples/jobs/39782388
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-11-03 9:24 GMT+01:00 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>:
> First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :)
>
> We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track
> these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache
> side if needed.
>
>
> -David
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>> I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here.
>> I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here:
>> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added
>> profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the
>> samples / tests we got the following results:
>> batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are
>> related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests.
>> DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI
>> comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing
>> Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No
>> Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related
>> with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test
>> Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta
>> - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing
>> a few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket
>> - OK
>> These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail
>> into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side.
>> Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also
>> missing a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI
>> environment, but it will be there.
>> Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :)
>> Cheers,Roberto
>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> To: users@tomee.apache.org
>> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>
>> Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>> >
>> > See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
>> >
>> >
>>
>> http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
>> >
>> > It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0.
>> >
>> > I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the
>> tomee
>> > zip).
>> > This decision would speedup the release.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it
>> usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay
>> apache.
>>
>> Well stay openjpa i think.
>>
>> Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the
>> same about bval...one week of work and we got it.
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> > --
>> > View this message in context:
>>
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html
>> > Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>>
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Daniel Cunha <da...@gmail.com>.
Thank you Romain. :)
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> if you need help just ask, once set up it is just adding few missing
> code (basically EE-CDI integration as far as i saw)
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2014-12-11 17:58 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha <da...@gmail.com>:
> > I try. But, it doesn't like me. :(
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> CDI TCKs are just waiting few love ;)
> >>
> >>
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> @rmannibucau
> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>
> >>
> >> 2014-12-11 16:55 GMT+01:00 Roberto Cortez <radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid
> >:
> >> > You need to leave something for the rest of us to contribute :)
> >> > From: Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>
> >> > To: users@tomee.apache.org
> >> > Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:41 AM
> >> > Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
> >> >
> >> > Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list
> and
> >> > probably another one for source code.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> >> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> >> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >> rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> >> @rmannibucau
> >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> >> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> 2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha <da...@gmail.com>:
> >> >> > Roberto,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez
> >> >> <radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
> >> >> >> Building now...
> >> >> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> To: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>; "
> users@tomee.apache.org"
> >> <
> >> >> >> users@tomee.apache.org>
> >> >> >> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
> >> >> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> should be ok now
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> >> >> @rmannibucau
> >> >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> >> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> >> >> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> 2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >> >:
> >> >> >> > Hi Roberto.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > you are right, will fix it quickly
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, "Roberto Cortez"
> >> <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid>
> >> >> a
> >> >> >> > écrit :
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> This one is fixed :)
> >> >> >> >> I was looking into some other errors, namely:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton
> Resources.
> >> >> For
> >> >> >> >> what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
> >> >> >> >> OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
> >> >> >> >> org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
> >> >> >> >> Is this correct?
> >> >> >> >> Cheers,Roberto
> >> >> >> >> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> >> >> >> >> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
> >> >> >> >> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
> >> >> >> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Yeah we need to do something about it :)
> >> >> >> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
> >> >> >> >> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
> >> >> >> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> hehe love this error:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> expected:<[{"[name":"Penny","age":1},{"name":"Leonard","age":2},{"name":"Sheldon","age":3]}]>
> >> >> >> >> but
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> was:<[{"[age":1,"name":"Penny"},{"age":2,"name":"Leonard"},{"age":3,"name":"Sheldon"]}]>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> >> >> >> @rmannibucau
> >> >> >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> >> >> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> >> >> >> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >> rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >> >> >:
> >> >> >> >> > It does yes
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit
> :
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> There is only one failing bug with transactions in
> >> >> >> >> >> CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
> >> >> >> >> >> Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional
> >> would
> >> >> >> work
> >> >> >> >> >> now
> >> >> >> >> >> with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> >> >> View this message in context:
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
> >> >> >> >> >> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net>
> >> >> > Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
> >> >> > Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> >> >> > GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
> >> >> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net>
> > Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
> > Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> > GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
>
--
Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net>
Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
if you need help just ask, once set up it is just adding few missing
code (basically EE-CDI integration as far as i saw)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 17:58 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha <da...@gmail.com>:
> I try. But, it doesn't like me. :(
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> CDI TCKs are just waiting few love ;)
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>> 2014-12-11 16:55 GMT+01:00 Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
>> > You need to leave something for the rest of us to contribute :)
>> > From: Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>
>> > To: users@tomee.apache.org
>> > Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:41 AM
>> > Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>> >
>> > Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list and
>> > probably another one for source code.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
>> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>> > http://www.tomitribe.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> rmannibucau@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >> @rmannibucau
>> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha <da...@gmail.com>:
>> >> > Roberto,
>> >> >
>> >> > sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez
>> >> <radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
>> >> >> Building now...
>> >> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> To: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org"
>> <
>> >> >> users@tomee.apache.org>
>> >> >> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
>> >> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>> >> >>
>> >> >> should be ok now
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >> >> @rmannibucau
>> >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> >> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> >> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
>> >:
>> >> >> > Hi Roberto.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > you are right, will fix it quickly
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, "Roberto Cortez"
>> <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid>
>> >> a
>> >> >> > écrit :
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> This one is fixed :)
>> >> >> >> I was looking into some other errors, namely:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources.
>> >> For
>> >> >> >> what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
>> >> >> >> OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
>> >> >> >> org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
>> >> >> >> Is this correct?
>> >> >> >> Cheers,Roberto
>> >> >> >> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
>> >> >> >> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>> >> >> >> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
>> >> >> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Yeah we need to do something about it :)
>> >> >> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>> >> >> >> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
>> >> >> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> hehe love this error:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> expected:<[{"[name":"Penny","age":1},{"name":"Leonard","age":2},{"name":"Sheldon","age":3]}]>
>> >> >> >> but
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> was:<[{"[age":1,"name":"Penny"},{"age":2,"name":"Leonard"},{"age":3,"name":"Sheldon"]}]>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >> >> >> @rmannibucau
>> >> >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> >> >> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> >> >> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>> >> >:
>> >> >> >> > It does yes
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> There is only one failing bug with transactions in
>> >> >> >> >> CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
>> >> >> >> >> Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional
>> would
>> >> >> work
>> >> >> >> >> now
>> >> >> >> >> with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> >> View this message in context:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
>> >> >> >> >> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net>
>> >> > Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
>> >> > Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>> >> > GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
>> >> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net>
> Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Daniel Cunha <da...@gmail.com>.
I try. But, it doesn't like me. :(
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> CDI TCKs are just waiting few love ;)
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2014-12-11 16:55 GMT+01:00 Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
> > You need to leave something for the rest of us to contribute :)
> > From: Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>
> > To: users@tomee.apache.org
> > Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:41 AM
> > Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
> >
> > Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list and
> > probably another one for source code.
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p
> >>
> >>
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> @rmannibucau
> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>
> >>
> >> 2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha <da...@gmail.com>:
> >> > Roberto,
> >> >
> >> > sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human.
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez
> >> <radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
> >> >> Building now...
> >> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >> >> To: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org"
> <
> >> >> users@tomee.apache.org>
> >> >> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
> >> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
> >> >>
> >> >> should be ok now
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> >> @rmannibucau
> >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> >> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> 2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >:
> >> >> > Hi Roberto.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > you are right, will fix it quickly
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, "Roberto Cortez"
> <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid>
> >> a
> >> >> > écrit :
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> This one is fixed :)
> >> >> >> I was looking into some other errors, namely:
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources.
> >> For
> >> >> >> what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
> >> >> >> OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
> >> >> >> org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
> >> >> >> Is this correct?
> >> >> >> Cheers,Roberto
> >> >> >> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> >> >> >> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
> >> >> >> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
> >> >> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Yeah we need to do something about it :)
> >> >> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
> >> >> >> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
> >> >> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> hehe love this error:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> expected:<[{"[name":"Penny","age":1},{"name":"Leonard","age":2},{"name":"Sheldon","age":3]}]>
> >> >> >> but
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> was:<[{"[age":1,"name":"Penny"},{"age":2,"name":"Leonard"},{"age":3,"name":"Sheldon"]}]>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> >> >> @rmannibucau
> >> >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> >> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> >> >> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >> >:
> >> >> >> > It does yes
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> There is only one failing bug with transactions in
> >> >> >> >> CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
> >> >> >> >> Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional
> would
> >> >> work
> >> >> >> >> now
> >> >> >> >> with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> >> View this message in context:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
> >> >> >> >> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net>
> >> > Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
> >> > Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> >> > GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
> >> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
> >>
> >
> >
>
--
Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net>
Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
CDI TCKs are just waiting few love ;)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 16:55 GMT+01:00 Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
> You need to leave something for the rest of us to contribute :)
> From: Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>
> To: users@tomee.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:41 AM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list and
> probably another one for source code.
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>> 2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha <da...@gmail.com>:
>> > Roberto,
>> >
>> > sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez
>> <radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid
>> >> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
>> >> Building now...
>> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> >> To: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org" <
>> >> users@tomee.apache.org>
>> >> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
>> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>> >>
>> >> should be ok now
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >> @rmannibucau
>> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>> >> > Hi Roberto.
>> >> >
>> >> > you are right, will fix it quickly
>> >> >
>> >> > Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, "Roberto Cortez" <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid>
>> a
>> >> > écrit :
>> >> >
>> >> >> This one is fixed :)
>> >> >> I was looking into some other errors, namely:
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
>> >> >>
>> >> >> And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources.
>> For
>> >> >> what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
>> >> >> OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
>> >> >> org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
>> >> >> Is this correct?
>> >> >> Cheers,Roberto
>> >> >> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
>> >> >> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>> >> >> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
>> >> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Yeah we need to do something about it :)
>> >> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>> >> >> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
>> >> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>> >> >>
>> >> >> hehe love this error:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> expected:<[{"[name":"Penny","age":1},{"name":"Leonard","age":2},{"name":"Sheldon","age":3]}]>
>> >> >> but
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> was:<[{"[age":1,"name":"Penny"},{"age":2,"name":"Leonard"},{"age":3,"name":"Sheldon"]}]>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >> >> @rmannibucau
>> >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> >> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> >> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
>> >:
>> >> >> > It does yes
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> There is only one failing bug with transactions in
>> >> >> >> CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
>> >> >> >> Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would
>> >> work
>> >> >> >> now
>> >> >> >> with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> View this message in context:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
>> >> >> >> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net>
>> > Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
>> > Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>> > GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
>> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
>>
>
>
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
You need to leave something for the rest of us to contribute :)
From: Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>
To: users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list and
probably another one for source code.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha <da...@gmail.com>:
> > Roberto,
> >
> > sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human.
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez
> <radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
> >> Building now...
> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >> To: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org" <
> >> users@tomee.apache.org>
> >> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
> >>
> >> should be ok now
> >>
> >>
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> @rmannibucau
> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> >> > Hi Roberto.
> >> >
> >> > you are right, will fix it quickly
> >> >
> >> > Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, "Roberto Cortez" <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid>
> a
> >> > écrit :
> >> >
> >> >> This one is fixed :)
> >> >> I was looking into some other errors, namely:
> >> >>
> >>
> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
> >> >>
> >> >> And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources.
> For
> >> >> what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
> >> >> OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
> >> >> org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
> >> >> Is this correct?
> >> >> Cheers,Roberto
> >> >> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> >> >> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
> >> >> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
> >> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
> >> >>
> >> >> Yeah we need to do something about it :)
> >> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
> >> >> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
> >> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
> >> >>
> >> >> hehe love this error:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> expected:<[{"[name":"Penny","age":1},{"name":"Leonard","age":2},{"name":"Sheldon","age":3]}]>
> >> >> but
> >> >>
> >>
> was:<[{"[age":1,"name":"Penny"},{"age":2,"name":"Leonard"},{"age":3,"name":"Sheldon"]}]>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> >> @rmannibucau
> >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> >> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >:
> >> >> > It does yes
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> There is only one failing bug with transactions in
> >> >> >> CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
> >> >> >> Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would
> >> work
> >> >> >> now
> >> >> >> with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> View this message in context:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >>
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
> >> >> >> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net>
> > Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
> > Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> > GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
>
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>.
Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list and
probably another one for source code.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha <da...@gmail.com>:
> > Roberto,
> >
> > sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human.
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez
> <radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
> >> Building now...
> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >> To: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org" <
> >> users@tomee.apache.org>
> >> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
> >>
> >> should be ok now
> >>
> >>
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> @rmannibucau
> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> >> > Hi Roberto.
> >> >
> >> > you are right, will fix it quickly
> >> >
> >> > Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, "Roberto Cortez" <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid>
> a
> >> > écrit :
> >> >
> >> >> This one is fixed :)
> >> >> I was looking into some other errors, namely:
> >> >>
> >>
> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
> >> >>
> >> >> And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources.
> For
> >> >> what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
> >> >> OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
> >> >> org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
> >> >> Is this correct?
> >> >> Cheers,Roberto
> >> >> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> >> >> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
> >> >> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
> >> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
> >> >>
> >> >> Yeah we need to do something about it :)
> >> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
> >> >> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
> >> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
> >> >>
> >> >> hehe love this error:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> expected:<[{"[name":"Penny","age":1},{"name":"Leonard","age":2},{"name":"Sheldon","age":3]}]>
> >> >> but
> >> >>
> >>
> was:<[{"[age":1,"name":"Penny"},{"age":2,"name":"Leonard"},{"age":3,"name":"Sheldon"]}]>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> >> @rmannibucau
> >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> >> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >:
> >> >> > It does yes
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> There is only one failing bug with transactions in
> >> >> >> CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
> >> >> >> Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would
> >> work
> >> >> >> now
> >> >> >> with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> View this message in context:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >>
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
> >> >> >> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net>
> > Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
> > Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> > GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
>
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha <da...@gmail.com>:
> Roberto,
>
> sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human.
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez <radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid
>> wrote:
>
>> Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
>> Building now...
>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> To: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org" <
>> users@tomee.apache.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>
>> should be ok now
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>> > Hi Roberto.
>> >
>> > you are right, will fix it quickly
>> >
>> > Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, "Roberto Cortez" <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid> a
>> > écrit :
>> >
>> >> This one is fixed :)
>> >> I was looking into some other errors, namely:
>> >>
>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
>> >>
>> >> And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For
>> >> what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
>> >> OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
>> >> org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
>> >> Is this correct?
>> >> Cheers,Roberto
>> >> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
>> >> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>> >> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
>> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>> >>
>> >> Yeah we need to do something about it :)
>> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>> >> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
>> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>> >>
>> >> hehe love this error:
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
>> >>
>> >>
>> expected:<[{"[name":"Penny","age":1},{"name":"Leonard","age":2},{"name":"Sheldon","age":3]}]>
>> >> but
>> >>
>> was:<[{"[age":1,"name":"Penny"},{"age":2,"name":"Leonard"},{"age":3,"name":"Sheldon"]}]>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >> @rmannibucau
>> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>> >> > It does yes
>> >> >
>> >> > Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>> >> >
>> >> >> There is only one failing bug with transactions in
>> >> >> CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
>> >> >> Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would
>> work
>> >> >> now
>> >> >> with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> View this message in context:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
>> >> >> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net>
> Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Daniel Cunha <da...@gmail.com>.
Roberto,
sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez <radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid
> wrote:
> Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
> Building now...
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> To: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org" <
> users@tomee.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> should be ok now
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
>
> 2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> > Hi Roberto.
> >
> > you are right, will fix it quickly
> >
> > Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, "Roberto Cortez" <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid> a
> > écrit :
> >
> >> This one is fixed :)
> >> I was looking into some other errors, namely:
> >>
> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
> >>
> >> And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For
> >> what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
> >> OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
> >> org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
> >> Is this correct?
> >> Cheers,Roberto
> >> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> >> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
> >> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
> >>
> >> Yeah we need to do something about it :)
> >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >>
> >>
> >> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
> >> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
> >>
> >> hehe love this error:
> >>
> >>
> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
> >>
> >>
> expected:<[{"[name":"Penny","age":1},{"name":"Leonard","age":2},{"name":"Sheldon","age":3]}]>
> >> but
> >>
> was:<[{"[age":1,"name":"Penny"},{"age":2,"name":"Leonard"},{"age":3,"name":"Sheldon"]}]>
> >>
> >>
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> @rmannibucau
> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>
> >>
> >> 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> >> > It does yes
> >> >
> >> > Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
> >> >
> >> >> There is only one failing bug with transactions in
> >> >> CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
> >> >> Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would
> work
> >> >> now
> >> >> with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> View this message in context:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
> >> >> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
--
Daniel Cunha (soro) <http://www.cejug.net>
Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
Building now...
From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
To: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
should be ok now
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Roberto.
>
> you are right, will fix it quickly
>
> Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, "Roberto Cortez" <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid> a
> écrit :
>
>> This one is fixed :)
>> I was looking into some other errors, namely:
>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
>>
>> And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For
>> what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
>> OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
>> org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
>> Is this correct?
>> Cheers,Roberto
>> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
>> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>
>> Yeah we need to do something about it :)
>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>
>> hehe love this error:
>>
>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
>>
>> expected:<[{"[name":"Penny","age":1},{"name":"Leonard","age":2},{"name":"Sheldon","age":3]}]>
>> but
>> was:<[{"[age":1,"name":"Penny"},{"age":2,"name":"Leonard"},{"age":3,"name":"Sheldon"]}]>
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>> 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>> > It does yes
>> >
>> > Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>> >
>> >> There is only one failing bug with transactions in
>> >> CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
>> >> Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work
>> >> now
>> >> with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >>
>> >> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
>> >> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
should be ok now
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Roberto.
>
> you are right, will fix it quickly
>
> Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, "Roberto Cortez" <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid> a
> écrit :
>
>> This one is fixed :)
>> I was looking into some other errors, namely:
>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
>>
>> And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For
>> what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
>> OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
>> org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
>> Is this correct?
>> Cheers,Roberto
>> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
>> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>
>> Yeah we need to do something about it :)
>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
>> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>
>> hehe love this error:
>>
>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
>>
>> expected:<[{"[name":"Penny","age":1},{"name":"Leonard","age":2},{"name":"Sheldon","age":3]}]>
>> but
>> was:<[{"[age":1,"name":"Penny"},{"age":2,"name":"Leonard"},{"age":3,"name":"Sheldon"]}]>
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>> 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>> > It does yes
>> >
>> > Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>> >
>> >> There is only one failing bug with transactions in
>> >> CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
>> >> Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work
>> >> now
>> >> with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >>
>> >> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
>> >> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Hi Roberto.
you are right, will fix it quickly
Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, "Roberto Cortez" <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid> a
écrit :
> This one is fixed :)
> I was looking into some other errors, namely:
> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
>
> And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For
> what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
> OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
> org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
> Is this correct?
> Cheers,Roberto
> From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> Yeah we need to do something about it :)
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>
>
> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> hehe love this error:
>
> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
>
> expected:<[{"[name":"Penny","age":1},{"name":"Leonard","age":2},{"name":"Sheldon","age":3]}]>
> but
> was:<[{"[age":1,"name":"Penny"},{"age":2,"name":"Leonard"},{"age":3,"name":"Sheldon"]}]>
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> > It does yes
> >
> > Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
> >
> >> There is only one failing bug with transactions in
> >> CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
> >> Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work
> >> now
> >> with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
> >> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
>
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
This one is fixed :)
I was looking into some other errors, namely: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation: OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
Is this correct?
Cheers,Roberto
From: Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Yeah we need to do something about it :)
From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
hehe love this error:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
expected:<[{"[name":"Penny","age":1},{"name":"Leonard","age":2},{"name":"Sheldon","age":3]}]>
but was:<[{"[age":1,"name":"Penny"},{"age":2,"name":"Leonard"},{"age":3,"name":"Sheldon"]}]>
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> It does yes
>
> Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>
>> There is only one failing bug with transactions in
>> CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
>> Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work
>> now
>> with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
>> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Yeah we need to do something about it :)
From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <us...@tomee.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
hehe love this error:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
expected:<[{"[name":"Penny","age":1},{"name":"Leonard","age":2},{"name":"Sheldon","age":3]}]>
but was:<[{"[age":1,"name":"Penny"},{"age":2,"name":"Leonard"},{"age":3,"name":"Sheldon"]}]>
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> It does yes
>
> Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>
>> There is only one failing bug with transactions in
>> CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
>> Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work
>> now
>> with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
>> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
about @Transactional can be linked to the test:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=blob;f=container/openejb-core/src/test/java/org/apache/openejb/cdi/transactional/TransactionScopeTest.java;h=d7f27c072ca1e4e99e418794b238dc7f3e0a871e;hb=ae8f512c5655dfd9024353c5a46340c6de07edf3
ensure the id is static and it should work, otherwise you surely just
read OWB proxy field (instance itself is destroyed).
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-04 22:25 GMT+01:00 Alex Soto <as...@gmail.com>:
> it can help a bit
> https://github.com/jayway/JsonPath/tree/master/json-path-assert
>
> El Thu Dec 04 2014 at 10:21:53 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau (<
> rmannibucau@gmail.com>) va escriure:
>
>> hehe love this error:
>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-
>> samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
>> expected:<[{"[name":"Penny","age":1},{"name":"Leonard","
>> age":2},{"name":"Sheldon","age":3]}]>
>> but was:<[{"[age":1,"name":"Penny"},{"age":2,"name":"Leonard"},{
>> "age":3,"name":"Sheldon"]}]>
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>> 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>> > It does yes
>> >
>> > Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>> >
>> >> There is only one failing bug with transactions in
>> >> CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
>> >> Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work
>> >> now
>> >> with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-
>> Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
>> >> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Alex Soto <as...@gmail.com>.
it can help a bit
https://github.com/jayway/JsonPath/tree/master/json-path-assert
El Thu Dec 04 2014 at 10:21:53 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau (<
rmannibucau@gmail.com>) va escriure:
> hehe love this error:
> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-
> samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
> expected:<[{"[name":"Penny","age":1},{"name":"Leonard","
> age":2},{"name":"Sheldon","age":3]}]>
> but was:<[{"[age":1,"name":"Penny"},{"age":2,"name":"Leonard"},{
> "age":3,"name":"Sheldon"]}]>
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> > It does yes
> >
> > Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
> >
> >> There is only one failing bug with transactions in
> >> CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
> >> Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work
> >> now
> >> with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-
> Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
> >> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
hehe love this error:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
expected:<[{"[name":"Penny","age":1},{"name":"Leonard","age":2},{"name":"Sheldon","age":3]}]>
but was:<[{"[age":1,"name":"Penny"},{"age":2,"name":"Leonard"},{"age":3,"name":"Sheldon"]}]>
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> It does yes
>
> Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>
>> There is only one failing bug with transactions in
>> CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
>> Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work
>> now
>> with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
>> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
It does yes
Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
> There is only one failing bug with transactions in
> CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
> Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work now
> with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by tibor17 <ti...@lycos.com>.
There is only one failing bug with transactions in CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work now
with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
--
View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :)
We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track
these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache
side if needed.
-David
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here.
> I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here:
> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added
> profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the
> samples / tests we got the following results:
> batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are
> related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests.
> DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI
> comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing
> Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No
> Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related
> with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test
> Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta
> - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing
> a few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket
> - OK
> These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail
> into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side.
> Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also
> missing a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI
> environment, but it will be there.
> Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :)
> Cheers,Roberto
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> To: users@tomee.apache.org
> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
> >
> > See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
> >
> >
>
> http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
> >
> > It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0.
> >
> > I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the
> tomee
> > zip).
> > This decision would speedup the release.
> >
> >
>
> Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it
> usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay
> apache.
>
> Well stay openjpa i think.
>
> Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the
> same about bval...one week of work and we got it.
>
>
>
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
>
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html
> > Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Hi
While nit running the 2.0 I dont expect them to work.
Le 2 nov. 2014 21:39, "Roberto Cortez" <ra...@yahoo.com.invalid> a
écrit :
> Hi guys,
> I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here.
> I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here:
> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added
> profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the
> samples / tests we got the following results:
> batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are
> related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests.
> DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI
> comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing
> Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No
> Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related
> with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test
> Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta
> - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing
> a few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket
> - OK
> These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail
> into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side.
> Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also
> missing a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI
> environment, but it will be there.
> Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :)
> Cheers,Roberto
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> To: users@tomee.apache.org
> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>
> Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
> >
> > See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
> >
> >
>
> http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
> >
> > It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0.
> >
> > I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the
> tomee
> > zip).
> > This decision would speedup the release.
> >
> >
>
> Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it
> usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay
> apache.
>
> Well stay openjpa i think.
>
> Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the
> same about bval...one week of work and we got it.
>
>
>
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
>
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html
> > Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Roberto Cortez <ra...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Hi guys,
I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here.
I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here: https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests we got the following results:
batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests. DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing a few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket - OK
These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side. Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also missing a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI environment, but it will be there.
Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :)
Cheers,Roberto
From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
To: users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>
> See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
>
>
http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
>
> It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0.
>
> I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the tomee
> zip).
> This decision would speedup the release.
>
>
Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it
usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay
apache.
Well stay openjpa i think.
Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the
same about bval...one week of work and we got it.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html
> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by "Leonardo K. Shikida" <sh...@gmail.com>.
Hi David
Thanks for the useful info about IBM decision on switching form OpenJPA to
Eclipselink from JPA 2.1. I think that's exactly the point.
I myself also prefer OpenJPA, but I can understand why IBM wants to stick
with eclipselink from now on.
[]
Leo
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 6:13 AM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Nov 2, 2014, at 12:30 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it
> > usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay
> > apache.
> >
> > Well stay openjpa i think.
> >
> > Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the
> > same about bval...one week of work and we got it.
>
> Definitely a useful discussion as people are going on what's been
> documented, which is nothing in this area.
>
> For other readers, Romain is correct, we can't ship Hibernate due to
> licensing restrictions documented here:
>
> - http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x
> see "Which licenses may NOT be included within Apache products?"
>
> We already support/ship EclipseLink, so the question is really about what
> will happen with OpenJPA.
>
> I certainly hope OpenJPA can be brought up to JPA 2.1 compliance.
> Challenge for the readers is IBM was the main contributor and has simply
> tired of carrying the load alone:
>
> -
> https://developer.ibm.com/wasdev/2014/05/28/eclipselink-jpa-provider-liberty-profile
>
> "we agreed it was better to join forces with the EclipseLink open
> source
> community than to be the primary (sole) developer in the OpenJPA
> community."
>
> This doesn't mean OpenJPA has to die, it just means if you believe in open
> source, now is the time to act on those beliefs.
>
> Three people in their spare time can do amazing things.
>
>
> -David
>
>
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
On Nov 2, 2014, at 12:30 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it
> usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay
> apache.
>
> Well stay openjpa i think.
>
> Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the
> same about bval...one week of work and we got it.
Definitely a useful discussion as people are going on what's been documented, which is nothing in this area.
For other readers, Romain is correct, we can't ship Hibernate due to licensing restrictions documented here:
- http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x
see "Which licenses may NOT be included within Apache products?"
We already support/ship EclipseLink, so the question is really about what will happen with OpenJPA.
I certainly hope OpenJPA can be brought up to JPA 2.1 compliance. Challenge for the readers is IBM was the main contributor and has simply tired of carrying the load alone:
- https://developer.ibm.com/wasdev/2014/05/28/eclipselink-jpa-provider-liberty-profile
"we agreed it was better to join forces with the EclipseLink open source
community than to be the primary (sole) developer in the OpenJPA community."
This doesn't mean OpenJPA has to die, it just means if you believe in open source, now is the time to act on those beliefs.
Three people in their spare time can do amazing things.
-David
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <ti...@lycos.com> a écrit :
>
> See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
>
>
http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
>
> It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0.
>
> I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the tomee
> zip).
> This decision would speedup the release.
>
>
Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it
usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay
apache.
Well stay openjpa i think.
Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the
same about bval...one week of work and we got it.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html
> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.