You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by Fabio Gomes dos Santos <su...@gmail.com> on 2016/12/08 12:15:15 UTC
[DISCUSS] distribute binary in .deb and .rpm
Hi!
We have two ways to do that:
1 - Using a plugin on maven:
http://www.mojohaus.org/rpm-maven-plugin/
http://mojo.codehaus.org/deb-maven-plugin
2 - Using the default way of each distribution (using .spec)
Fedora/RHEL: https://fedora-java.github.io/howto/latest/
Debian: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Packaging
The packagecloud.io has plans to opensource project, but a simple s3 can
provide a mirror for distribution.
what you think about?
I think this will provide more visibility to the project
--
Fábio Santos
supergrilo@gmail.com
<http://br.linkedin.com/pub/f%C3%A1bio-santos/1b/20/422>
Re: [DISCUSS] distribute binary in .deb and .rpm
Posted by Fabio Gomes dos Santos <su...@gmail.com>.
Hi Clebert,
I'm in vacation period, i will do that when i'm back to work...
[]'s
2017-01-10 9:29 GMT-02:00 Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>:
> Hi Fabio,
>
> did you manage to make any progress on this? I’d be interested to help out.
>
> Regards
> --
> Dejan Bosanac
> http://sensatic.net/about
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I have asked the apache infra how we could make rpm and .deb releases
> > (As Robbie pointed out).
> >
> > I don't really mind which way we choose. as long it's easier to maintain.
> >
> >
> > It sounds the standard way would be the second option as you suggest.
> > why don't you start with that? keep the scripts on a directory such
> > artemis-linux-distros.. and I will wait input from infra on how to
> > release and sign those.. we can then make more changes.
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Fabio Gomes dos Santos
> > <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > About the packaging method...
> > >
> > > If the second way are chosen, i can contribute with the project.
> Putting
> > > the hands-on...
> > > For the first, all i can do, is write the test for the binary and help
> > with
> > > the patterns.
> > >
> > > if we want to see Artemis officially on debian or centos, the second
> one
> > is
> > > the best choose.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2016-12-12 18:04 GMT-02:00 Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > >> I know the infra team and some projects have some hosting on bintray
> > >> (https://bintray.com/apache/), and that can host .deb and .rpm.
> > >> Whether its used by projects to do that, and what any process around
> > >> that would be if they do, I'm not sure. Perhaps worth asking infra.
> > >>
> > >> On 12 December 2016 at 17:03, Clebert Suconic <
> > clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > I couldn't find any information about rpms on apache.org
> > >> >
> > >> > Anyone have any information?
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Clebert Suconic
> > >> > <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >> Having a rpm and .deb is a great idea.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Anyone knows how the release and distribution process would work
> for
> > >> those
> > >> >> including signing?
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I will do some research on Apache website later today.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 7:16 AM Fabio Gomes dos Santos <
> > >> supergrilo@gmail.com>
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Hi!
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> We have two ways to do that:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> 1 - Using a plugin on maven:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> http://www.mojohaus.org/rpm-maven-plugin/
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/deb-maven-plugin
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> 2 - Using the default way of each distribution (using .spec)
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Fedora/RHEL: https://fedora-java.github.io/howto/latest/
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Debian: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Packaging
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> The packagecloud.io has plans to opensource project, but a simple
> > s3
> > >> can
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> provide a mirror for distribution.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> what you think about?
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> I think this will provide more visibility to the project
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> --
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Fábio Santos
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> supergrilo@gmail.com
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> <http://br.linkedin.com/pub/f%C3%A1bio-santos/1b/20/422>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Clebert Suconic
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Fábio Santos
> > > supergrilo@gmail.com
> > > <http://br.linkedin.com/pub/f%C3%A1bio-santos/1b/20/422>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
> >
>
--
Fábio Santos
supergrilo@gmail.com
<http://br.linkedin.com/pub/f%C3%A1bio-santos/1b/20/422>
Re: [DISCUSS] distribute binary in .deb and .rpm
Posted by Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>.
Hi Fabio,
did you manage to make any progress on this? I’d be interested to help out.
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
http://sensatic.net/about
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I have asked the apache infra how we could make rpm and .deb releases
> (As Robbie pointed out).
>
> I don't really mind which way we choose. as long it's easier to maintain.
>
>
> It sounds the standard way would be the second option as you suggest.
> why don't you start with that? keep the scripts on a directory such
> artemis-linux-distros.. and I will wait input from infra on how to
> release and sign those.. we can then make more changes.
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Fabio Gomes dos Santos
> <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > About the packaging method...
> >
> > If the second way are chosen, i can contribute with the project. Putting
> > the hands-on...
> > For the first, all i can do, is write the test for the binary and help
> with
> > the patterns.
> >
> > if we want to see Artemis officially on debian or centos, the second one
> is
> > the best choose.
> >
> >
> >
> > 2016-12-12 18:04 GMT-02:00 Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> I know the infra team and some projects have some hosting on bintray
> >> (https://bintray.com/apache/), and that can host .deb and .rpm.
> >> Whether its used by projects to do that, and what any process around
> >> that would be if they do, I'm not sure. Perhaps worth asking infra.
> >>
> >> On 12 December 2016 at 17:03, Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > I couldn't find any information about rpms on apache.org
> >> >
> >> > Anyone have any information?
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Clebert Suconic
> >> > <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Having a rpm and .deb is a great idea.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Anyone knows how the release and distribution process would work for
> >> those
> >> >> including signing?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> I will do some research on Apache website later today.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 7:16 AM Fabio Gomes dos Santos <
> >> supergrilo@gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Hi!
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> We have two ways to do that:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> 1 - Using a plugin on maven:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> http://www.mojohaus.org/rpm-maven-plugin/
> >> >>>
> >> >>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/deb-maven-plugin
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> 2 - Using the default way of each distribution (using .spec)
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Fedora/RHEL: https://fedora-java.github.io/howto/latest/
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Debian: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Packaging
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The packagecloud.io has plans to opensource project, but a simple
> s3
> >> can
> >> >>>
> >> >>> provide a mirror for distribution.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> what you think about?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I think this will provide more visibility to the project
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Fábio Santos
> >> >>>
> >> >>> supergrilo@gmail.com
> >> >>>
> >> >>> <http://br.linkedin.com/pub/f%C3%A1bio-santos/1b/20/422>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Clebert Suconic
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Fábio Santos
> > supergrilo@gmail.com
> > <http://br.linkedin.com/pub/f%C3%A1bio-santos/1b/20/422>
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>
Re: [DISCUSS] distribute binary in .deb and .rpm
Posted by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>.
I have asked the apache infra how we could make rpm and .deb releases
(As Robbie pointed out).
I don't really mind which way we choose. as long it's easier to maintain.
It sounds the standard way would be the second option as you suggest.
why don't you start with that? keep the scripts on a directory such
artemis-linux-distros.. and I will wait input from infra on how to
release and sign those.. we can then make more changes.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Fabio Gomes dos Santos
<su...@gmail.com> wrote:
> About the packaging method...
>
> If the second way are chosen, i can contribute with the project. Putting
> the hands-on...
> For the first, all i can do, is write the test for the binary and help with
> the patterns.
>
> if we want to see Artemis officially on debian or centos, the second one is
> the best choose.
>
>
>
> 2016-12-12 18:04 GMT-02:00 Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>:
>
>> I know the infra team and some projects have some hosting on bintray
>> (https://bintray.com/apache/), and that can host .deb and .rpm.
>> Whether its used by projects to do that, and what any process around
>> that would be if they do, I'm not sure. Perhaps worth asking infra.
>>
>> On 12 December 2016 at 17:03, Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I couldn't find any information about rpms on apache.org
>> >
>> > Anyone have any information?
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Clebert Suconic
>> > <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Having a rpm and .deb is a great idea.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Anyone knows how the release and distribution process would work for
>> those
>> >> including signing?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I will do some research on Apache website later today.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 7:16 AM Fabio Gomes dos Santos <
>> supergrilo@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi!
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> We have two ways to do that:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 1 - Using a plugin on maven:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> http://www.mojohaus.org/rpm-maven-plugin/
>> >>>
>> >>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/deb-maven-plugin
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 2 - Using the default way of each distribution (using .spec)
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Fedora/RHEL: https://fedora-java.github.io/howto/latest/
>> >>>
>> >>> Debian: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Packaging
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> The packagecloud.io has plans to opensource project, but a simple s3
>> can
>> >>>
>> >>> provide a mirror for distribution.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> what you think about?
>> >>>
>> >>> I think this will provide more visibility to the project
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>>
>> >>> Fábio Santos
>> >>>
>> >>> supergrilo@gmail.com
>> >>>
>> >>> <http://br.linkedin.com/pub/f%C3%A1bio-santos/1b/20/422>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Clebert Suconic
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Fábio Santos
> supergrilo@gmail.com
> <http://br.linkedin.com/pub/f%C3%A1bio-santos/1b/20/422>
--
Clebert Suconic
Re: [DISCUSS] distribute binary in .deb and .rpm
Posted by Fabio Gomes dos Santos <su...@gmail.com>.
About the packaging method...
If the second way are chosen, i can contribute with the project. Putting
the hands-on...
For the first, all i can do, is write the test for the binary and help with
the patterns.
if we want to see Artemis officially on debian or centos, the second one is
the best choose.
2016-12-12 18:04 GMT-02:00 Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>:
> I know the infra team and some projects have some hosting on bintray
> (https://bintray.com/apache/), and that can host .deb and .rpm.
> Whether its used by projects to do that, and what any process around
> that would be if they do, I'm not sure. Perhaps worth asking infra.
>
> On 12 December 2016 at 17:03, Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I couldn't find any information about rpms on apache.org
> >
> > Anyone have any information?
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Clebert Suconic
> > <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Having a rpm and .deb is a great idea.
> >>
> >>
> >> Anyone knows how the release and distribution process would work for
> those
> >> including signing?
> >>
> >>
> >> I will do some research on Apache website later today.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 7:16 AM Fabio Gomes dos Santos <
> supergrilo@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> We have two ways to do that:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 1 - Using a plugin on maven:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> http://www.mojohaus.org/rpm-maven-plugin/
> >>>
> >>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/deb-maven-plugin
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2 - Using the default way of each distribution (using .spec)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Fedora/RHEL: https://fedora-java.github.io/howto/latest/
> >>>
> >>> Debian: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Packaging
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The packagecloud.io has plans to opensource project, but a simple s3
> can
> >>>
> >>> provide a mirror for distribution.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> what you think about?
> >>>
> >>> I think this will provide more visibility to the project
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> Fábio Santos
> >>>
> >>> supergrilo@gmail.com
> >>>
> >>> <http://br.linkedin.com/pub/f%C3%A1bio-santos/1b/20/422>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
>
--
Fábio Santos
supergrilo@gmail.com
<http://br.linkedin.com/pub/f%C3%A1bio-santos/1b/20/422>
Re: [DISCUSS] distribute binary in .deb and .rpm
Posted by Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>.
I know the infra team and some projects have some hosting on bintray
(https://bintray.com/apache/), and that can host .deb and .rpm.
Whether its used by projects to do that, and what any process around
that would be if they do, I'm not sure. Perhaps worth asking infra.
On 12 December 2016 at 17:03, Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I couldn't find any information about rpms on apache.org
>
> Anyone have any information?
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Clebert Suconic
> <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Having a rpm and .deb is a great idea.
>>
>>
>> Anyone knows how the release and distribution process would work for those
>> including signing?
>>
>>
>> I will do some research on Apache website later today.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 7:16 AM Fabio Gomes dos Santos <su...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We have two ways to do that:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 1 - Using a plugin on maven:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.mojohaus.org/rpm-maven-plugin/
>>>
>>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/deb-maven-plugin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2 - Using the default way of each distribution (using .spec)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Fedora/RHEL: https://fedora-java.github.io/howto/latest/
>>>
>>> Debian: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Packaging
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The packagecloud.io has plans to opensource project, but a simple s3 can
>>>
>>> provide a mirror for distribution.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> what you think about?
>>>
>>> I think this will provide more visibility to the project
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Fábio Santos
>>>
>>> supergrilo@gmail.com
>>>
>>> <http://br.linkedin.com/pub/f%C3%A1bio-santos/1b/20/422>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
Re: [DISCUSS] distribute binary in .deb and .rpm
Posted by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>.
I couldn't find any information about rpms on apache.org
Anyone have any information?
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Clebert Suconic
<cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Having a rpm and .deb is a great idea.
>
>
> Anyone knows how the release and distribution process would work for those
> including signing?
>
>
> I will do some research on Apache website later today.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 7:16 AM Fabio Gomes dos Santos <su...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>>
>>
>> We have two ways to do that:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 1 - Using a plugin on maven:
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.mojohaus.org/rpm-maven-plugin/
>>
>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/deb-maven-plugin
>>
>>
>>
>> 2 - Using the default way of each distribution (using .spec)
>>
>>
>>
>> Fedora/RHEL: https://fedora-java.github.io/howto/latest/
>>
>> Debian: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Packaging
>>
>>
>>
>> The packagecloud.io has plans to opensource project, but a simple s3 can
>>
>> provide a mirror for distribution.
>>
>>
>>
>> what you think about?
>>
>> I think this will provide more visibility to the project
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Fábio Santos
>>
>> supergrilo@gmail.com
>>
>> <http://br.linkedin.com/pub/f%C3%A1bio-santos/1b/20/422>
>>
>
--
Clebert Suconic
Re: [DISCUSS] distribute binary in .deb and .rpm
Posted by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>.
Having a rpm and .deb is a great idea.
Anyone knows how the release and distribution process would work for those
including signing?
I will do some research on Apache website later today.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 7:16 AM Fabio Gomes dos Santos <su...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
>
> We have two ways to do that:
>
>
>
>
>
> 1 - Using a plugin on maven:
>
>
>
> http://www.mojohaus.org/rpm-maven-plugin/
>
> http://mojo.codehaus.org/deb-maven-plugin
>
>
>
> 2 - Using the default way of each distribution (using .spec)
>
>
>
> Fedora/RHEL: https://fedora-java.github.io/howto/latest/
>
> Debian: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Packaging
>
>
>
> The packagecloud.io has plans to opensource project, but a simple s3 can
>
> provide a mirror for distribution.
>
>
>
> what you think about?
>
> I think this will provide more visibility to the project
>
>
>
> --
>
> Fábio Santos
>
> supergrilo@gmail.com
>
> <http://br.linkedin.com/pub/f%C3%A1bio-santos/1b/20/422>
>
>