You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@qpid.apache.org by "Rajith Attapattu (JIRA)" <qp...@incubator.apache.org> on 2010/01/12 22:45:56 UTC
[jira] Resolved: (QPID-1640) Improve existing/add more failover
tests
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Rajith Attapattu resolved QPID-1640.
------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
A modified version of this patch was committed at rev 750203 in Qpid trunk.
There were several updates to the test after that by me and Martin.
I have also added python based test framework that could test failover more thoroughly using the brokertest.py (multi broker framework introduced by alan conway).
These tests use the failover exchange and also test failover while producer and consumer are in progress.
This improvement was added in rev 834724 in Qpid trunk with subsequent improvements.
> Improve existing/add more failover tests
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-1640
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1640
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Java Client
> Affects Versions: 0.5
> Reporter: Rajith Attapattu
> Assignee: Rajith Attapattu
> Attachments: QPID_1640.patch
>
>
> It would be good to build a few more tests on top of the current FailoverTests.
> One idea is to send/receive a certain amount of messages then failover and then send/receive the rest of the messages and verify the order of messages and the count.
> Another idea is to failover in loop between two brokers while maintaining the same session while doing the above in each iteration.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org