WOODY FREEZE! Was: From Woody to CocoonForms

[Vadim Gritsenko <va...@reverycodes.com>]

Reinhard Pötz wrote:

> In the next few days I want (no promise ;-) to start with renaming 
> Woody to CocoonForms. First I want to move the _core_ which means that 
> I want to make one simple example run.


First of all, let's freeze cocoon woody - so we do not loose any patches 
in the process, and it is easier to operate frozen woody... I propose to 
start WOODY FREEZE tomorrow morning - if you have good patches lying on 
your drive - commit them now :-)


Before renaming namespaces. This should be a new block:
woody block --> forms block


> Of course, this renaming has impact on many names and in order to 
> avoid doing the same thing twice I want to here other opinions on this:
>
> namespaces:
> http://apache.org/cocoon/woody/definition/1.0
> -->
> http://apache.org/cocoon/forms/definition/1.0


+1


> packages:
> org.apache.cocoon.woody.transformation
> -->
> org.apache.cocoon.forms.transformation


+1


> classnames:
> AbstractWoodyAction
> -->
> AbstractCocoonFormsAction


I suggest AbstractFormsAction. It's already in Cocoon, so no reason to 
mention it.



> xconf:
> <woody-datatype logger="woody">
> -->
> <forms-datatype logger="forms">


+1

Vadim

Re: WOODY FREEZE! Was: From Woody to CocoonForms

[Reinhard Pötz <re...@apache.org>]

Vadim Gritsenko wrote:

> Reinhard Pötz wrote:
>
>> In the next few days I want (no promise ;-) to start with renaming 
>> Woody to CocoonForms. First I want to move the _core_ which means 
>> that I want to make one simple example run.
>
>
>
> First of all, let's freeze cocoon woody - so we do not loose any 
> patches in the process, and it is easier to operate frozen woody... I 
> propose to start WOODY FREEZE tomorrow morning - if you have good 
> patches lying on your drive - commit them now :-)

Yes please. I don't start the tranformation before tomorrow afternoon.

>
>
> Before renaming namespaces. This should be a new block:
> woody block --> forms block

yes.

>
>
>> Of course, this renaming has impact on many names and in order to 
>> avoid doing the same thing twice I want to here other opinions on this:
>>
>> namespaces:
>> http://apache.org/cocoon/woody/definition/1.0
>> -->
>> http://apache.org/cocoon/forms/definition/1.0
>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>> packages:
>> org.apache.cocoon.woody.transformation
>> -->
>> org.apache.cocoon.forms.transformation
>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>> classnames:
>> AbstractWoodyAction
>> -->
>> AbstractCocoonFormsAction
>
>
>
> I suggest AbstractFormsAction. It's already in Cocoon, so no reason to 
> mention it.

ok

>
>
>
>> xconf:
>> <woody-datatype logger="woody">
>> -->
>> <forms-datatype logger="forms">
>
thanks Vadim!

-- 
Reinhard