You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@iceberg.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/06/07 03:38:41 UTC

[GitHub] [iceberg] uncleGen commented on pull request #4596: Use bounded queue to avoid consuming too much memory

uncleGen commented on PR #4596:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/4596#issuecomment-1148158612

   > IMHO, if a blocking queue blocks the producers, it usually means the consumer is not fast enough, in which case the bottleneck is the consumer, rather than the queue itself.
   
   > Does the blocking queue approach introduce any substantial performance bottleneck ? If we think the default blocking queue size is a bit small, then we can increase this default blocking queue size to 10000. 
   
   IIUC, `blocking queue` should not introduce any bottleneck. Besides, if `blocking queue` can resolve OOM issue, it will be better and easier than doing additional tuning works for dev


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@iceberg.apache.org