You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Matthias Pohl (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/03/17 07:59:00 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (FLINK-26695) Fabric8FlinkKubeClient.deleteConfigMap doesn't necessarily fail if the deletion didn't succeed

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-26695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17508030#comment-17508030 ] 

Matthias Pohl edited comment on FLINK-26695 at 3/17/22, 7:58 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

{quote}Matthias Pohl, does the Fabric8FlinkKubeClient.deleteConfigMapsByLabels have the same problem?{quote}

Yeah, the same applies to the deleteConfigMapsByLabels. Thanks for the pointer. I'm gonna update the issue description


was (Author: mapohl):
> Matthias Pohl, does the Fabric8FlinkKubeClient.deleteConfigMapsByLabels have the same problem?

Yeah, the same applies to the deleteConfigMapsByLabels. Thanks for the pointer. I'm gonna update the issue description

> Fabric8FlinkKubeClient.deleteConfigMap doesn't necessarily fail if the deletion didn't succeed
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-26695
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-26695
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Deployment / Kubernetes, Runtime / Coordination
>    Affects Versions: 1.15.0, 1.16.0
>            Reporter: Matthias Pohl
>            Priority: Major
>
> {{Fabric8FlinkKubeClient.deleteConfigMap}} does not evaluate the return value and, therefore, might miss an error during deletion.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)