You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to legal-discuss@apache.org by Ceki Gulcu <ce...@qos.ch> on 2009/08/13 17:54:51 UTC
[private] Re: In a different universe [WAS: Move log4cplus' license
to ASL 2.0.]
Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> Actually, if log4j 2.0 could get moving and if it contained similar
> features it would win hands down. I have developers all the time
> questioning me about why I recommend logback for use within our datacenter.
Because logback is not working as intended, because of LGPL or because of name
recognition issues?
> Ralph
--
Ceki Gülcü
Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java.
http://logback.qos.ch
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
Re: [private] Re: In a different universe [WAS: Move log4cplus'
license to ASL 2.0.]
Posted by Ceki Gulcu <ce...@qos.ch>.
The intent of [private] was to avoid spamming this list but my execution
was below par.
Ceki Gulcu wrote:
> Ralph Goers wrote:
>>
>> Actually, if log4j 2.0 could get moving and if it contained similar
>> features it would win hands down. I have developers all the time
>> questioning me about why I recommend logback for use within our
>> datacenter.
>
> Because logback is not working as intended, because of LGPL or because
> of name recognition issues?
--
Ceki Gülcü
Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java.
http://logback.qos.ch
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org