You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@servicemix.apache.org by Ephemeris Lappis <ep...@gmail.com> on 2012/07/26 14:58:45 UTC
Blueprint and xpath
Hello.
I've just read a bug report about a bad namespace handling in xpath
expressions in blueprint DSL :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4913
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4913
The default seems to be fixed in versions 2.0.x an 2.10, but as I'm
currently working with ServiceMix 4.4.2 and on its embedded 2.8.5 version, I
can't upgrade easily...
Is there any workaround ?
Thanks.
--
View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/Blueprint-and-xpath-tp5714000.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Blueprint and xpath
Posted by "ajs6f@virginia.edu" <aj...@virginia.edu>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I ran into the same issues, and my first move was to replace XPath expressions with (verbose and clunky) XQuery expressions in which the namespace declarations were repeated in each expression. This solved most of my problems. Eventually, however, I took a different road: instead of using the prepackaged SMX features, I stepped back to using Camel, ActiveMQ, etc. directly in Karaf (using component-supplied Karaf features), which allowed me to use whatever version of Camel I liked. I did give up using the ServiceMix NMR, but that wasn't a technical requirement for my project.
- ---
A. Soroka
Software & Systems Engineering :: Online Library Environment
the University of Virginia Library
On Jul 26, 2012, at 8:58 AM, Ephemeris Lappis wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I've just read a bug report about a bad namespace handling in xpath
> expressions in blueprint DSL :
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4913
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4913
>
> The default seems to be fixed in versions 2.0.x an 2.10, but as I'm
> currently working with ServiceMix 4.4.2 and on its embedded 2.8.5 version, I
> can't upgrade easily...
>
> Is there any workaround ?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/Blueprint-and-xpath-tp5714000.html
> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQFoHbAAoJEATpPYSyaoIk4JkH+wa9otuYKp9vu4EHF2Y9vAyJ
B7mzOyR+RIFjv+HBIhI6HjOOjS5eaRerg19DTHxeRx286hHpDhkK+DFK7KioVflr
tM+4TEXN8TMGiA7tn0MJHlMhEv6ujmNzxSY+g5zwSXzpe9MBuUweqq3b3516QquN
ROhxHPhoXSbkybW+FMfvvXFzrGq+H5Jf6U3/Tw0taoX770v9W5wUe4Q7Bh8NZu5h
eLaP404IJV2tZZy34w5mSzW2m9VpEFuoymTAt2bv81H5KPpYifGJZZOG6znT1zRG
O/5kV/GypmZPLrFQa2jFMgmxmhATvGFhFyHjzAQWYRYpDPOmdjauqEgIrE/+LvE=
=icC8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----