You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/06/22 17:37:07 UTC

[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-1708) Improve the use of isDeleted in the indexing code

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1708:
------------------------------------------

    Assignee: Michael McCandless

> Improve the use of isDeleted in the indexing code
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1708
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1708
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Index
>            Reporter: Shai Erera
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1708.patch
>
>
> A spin off from here: http://www.nabble.com/Some-thoughts-around-the-use-of-reader.isDeleted-and-hasDeletions-td23931216.html.
> Two changes:
> # Optimize SegmentMerger work when a reader has no deletions.
> # IndexReader.document() will no longer check if the document is deleted.
> Will post a patch shortly

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org