You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jmeter.apache.org by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com> on 2016/03/11 23:46:33 UTC
[VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Hello,
Felix has created a new set of Logos for JMeter 3.0.
All variants can be seen on http://home.apache.org/~fschumacher/
Please start voting.
The vote is open for 72 hours.
Regards
Philippe M.
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de>.
Am 01.04.2016 um 22:00 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> Hi Felix,
> I applied the changes I mentioned.
Thanks for doing that.
Felix
> Regards
> Philippe
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Felix.
>> Regarding the social media links the are located at the bottom and not
>> really visible as not above the floating line.
>> I would prefer them to be visible without scrolling.
>> Maybe it could be in About section which we could change :
>>
>> - to remove "JMeter on Twitter <http://twitter.com/ApacheJMeter>" as
>> it's already in the other links,
>> - Put issues section in Community
>> - Put "Project info at Apache
>> <https://projects.apache.org/project.html?jmeter>" section in Community
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Felix Schumacher <
>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Am 30.03.2016 um 20:04 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
>>>
>>>> Am 30.03.2016 um 08:25 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Felix,
>>>>> When do you plan to commit the new logo so that it's used by JMeter site
>>>>> and application ?
>>>>>
>>>> I hope to do so tomorrow.
>>>>
>>> I have committed the changes for the logo.
>>>
>>> The social media links are placed inside a div in nav. I am not sure,
>>> whether it should stay there, or not. Any ideas?
>>>
>>> Felix
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Felix
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:10 AM, Milamber <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes that's would be a good choice for update/refresh the JMeter identity
>>>>>> design.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 23/03/2016 22:31, sebb wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Agreed, let's just go with 6.
>>>>>>> Most people seem happy with it; I don't think anyone is against it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 23 March 2016 at 19:36, Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks Felix.
>>>>>>>> Looks fair to me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, March 23, 2016, Felix Schumacher <
>>>>>>>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 23.03.2016 um 15:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Anybody computed the results ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If every mail counts as a vote (NaveenKumar sent his vote twice
>>>>>>>>>> and I
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> counted it only once, sebb gave two votes with no preference, so I
>>>>>>>>> counted
>>>>>>>>> both :) then we have two winners 3 and 6.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If I take the preferences into account (first counts as two votes,
>>>>>>>>> second
>>>>>>>>> as one (again sebb counts both times as two)) 6 wins.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The same is true if I take the first three preferences into account
>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>> 3, 2 and 1 as a factor.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So I guess it is 6.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Does anyone else wants to give a formula to calculate a winner?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As per the vote through modernballots, logo 6 seems to be the
>>>>>>>>> winner:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://modernballots.com/elections/frmtk7nk/view/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But as sebb wrote it is not controlled and people can vote as many
>>>>>>>>>> times
>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>> they want.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, March 14, 2016, NaveenKumar Namachivayam <
>>>>>>>>>> catchnaveen.psgtech@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 for Number 3
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Marko Vlahovic <
>>>>>>>>>>> vlahovic74@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for number 3 too.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Nachiket Kate <
>>>>>>>>>>>> nachiket.kate@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for number 3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 11.03.2016 um 23:46 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Felix has created a new set of Logos for JMeter 3.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All variants can be seen on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://home.apache.org/~fschumacher/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please start voting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jmeter6, jmeter4, jmeter3 (in 3 I would colour TM grey).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 72 hours.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe M.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> NaveenKumar N
>>>>>>>>>>> Visit www.QAInsights.com and www.Testifications.com and
>>>>>>>>>>> www.MyTechCube.com
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Cordialement.
>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
Hi Felix,
I applied the changes I mentioned.
Regards
Philippe
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Felix.
> Regarding the social media links the are located at the bottom and not
> really visible as not above the floating line.
> I would prefer them to be visible without scrolling.
> Maybe it could be in About section which we could change :
>
> - to remove "JMeter on Twitter <http://twitter.com/ApacheJMeter>" as
> it's already in the other links,
> - Put issues section in Community
> - Put "Project info at Apache
> <https://projects.apache.org/project.html?jmeter>" section in Community
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Felix Schumacher <
> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>
>> Am 30.03.2016 um 20:04 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
>>
>>> Am 30.03.2016 um 08:25 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>
>>>> Hi Felix,
>>>> When do you plan to commit the new logo so that it's used by JMeter site
>>>> and application ?
>>>>
>>> I hope to do so tomorrow.
>>>
>> I have committed the changes for the logo.
>>
>> The social media links are placed inside a div in nav. I am not sure,
>> whether it should stay there, or not. Any ideas?
>>
>> Felix
>>
>>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Felix
>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:10 AM, Milamber <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yes that's would be a good choice for update/refresh the JMeter identity
>>>>> design.
>>>>>
>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 23/03/2016 22:31, sebb wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Agreed, let's just go with 6.
>>>>>> Most people seem happy with it; I don't think anyone is against it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 23 March 2016 at 19:36, Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Felix.
>>>>>>> Looks fair to me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wednesday, March 23, 2016, Felix Schumacher <
>>>>>>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 23.03.2016 um 15:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Anybody computed the results ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If every mail counts as a vote (NaveenKumar sent his vote twice
>>>>>>>>> and I
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> counted it only once, sebb gave two votes with no preference, so I
>>>>>>>> counted
>>>>>>>> both :) then we have two winners 3 and 6.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If I take the preferences into account (first counts as two votes,
>>>>>>>> second
>>>>>>>> as one (again sebb counts both times as two)) 6 wins.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The same is true if I take the first three preferences into account
>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>> 3, 2 and 1 as a factor.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So I guess it is 6.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does anyone else wants to give a formula to calculate a winner?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As per the vote through modernballots, logo 6 seems to be the
>>>>>>>> winner:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://modernballots.com/elections/frmtk7nk/view/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But as sebb wrote it is not controlled and people can vote as many
>>>>>>>>> times
>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>> they want.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Monday, March 14, 2016, NaveenKumar Namachivayam <
>>>>>>>>> catchnaveen.psgtech@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 for Number 3
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Marko Vlahovic <
>>>>>>>>>> vlahovic74@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 for number 3 too.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Nachiket Kate <
>>>>>>>>>>> nachiket.kate@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for number 3.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Am 11.03.2016 um 23:46 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Felix has created a new set of Logos for JMeter 3.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> All variants can be seen on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://home.apache.org/~fschumacher/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please start voting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> jmeter6, jmeter4, jmeter3 (in 3 I would colour TM grey).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 72 hours.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe M.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> NaveenKumar N
>>>>>>>>>> Visit www.QAInsights.com and www.Testifications.com and
>>>>>>>>>> www.MyTechCube.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>
>
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Felix.
Regarding the social media links the are located at the bottom and not
really visible as not above the floating line.
I would prefer them to be visible without scrolling.
Maybe it could be in About section which we could change :
- to remove "JMeter on Twitter <http://twitter.com/ApacheJMeter>" as
it's already in the other links,
- Put issues section in Community
- Put "Project info at Apache
<https://projects.apache.org/project.html?jmeter>" section in Community
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Felix Schumacher <
felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
> Am 30.03.2016 um 20:04 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
>
>> Am 30.03.2016 um 08:25 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>
>>> Hi Felix,
>>> When do you plan to commit the new logo so that it's used by JMeter site
>>> and application ?
>>>
>> I hope to do so tomorrow.
>>
> I have committed the changes for the logo.
>
> The social media links are placed inside a div in nav. I am not sure,
> whether it should stay there, or not. Any ideas?
>
> Felix
>
>
>
>> Regards,
>> Felix
>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:10 AM, Milamber <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes that's would be a good choice for update/refresh the JMeter identity
>>>> design.
>>>>
>>>> Milamber
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 23/03/2016 22:31, sebb wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Agreed, let's just go with 6.
>>>>> Most people seem happy with it; I don't think anyone is against it.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 23 March 2016 at 19:36, Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Felix.
>>>>>> Looks fair to me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wednesday, March 23, 2016, Felix Schumacher <
>>>>>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 23.03.2016 um 15:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Anybody computed the results ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If every mail counts as a vote (NaveenKumar sent his vote twice and
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> counted it only once, sebb gave two votes with no preference, so I
>>>>>>> counted
>>>>>>> both :) then we have two winners 3 and 6.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If I take the preferences into account (first counts as two votes,
>>>>>>> second
>>>>>>> as one (again sebb counts both times as two)) 6 wins.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The same is true if I take the first three preferences into account
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> 3, 2 and 1 as a factor.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So I guess it is 6.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does anyone else wants to give a formula to calculate a winner?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As per the vote through modernballots, logo 6 seems to be the winner:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://modernballots.com/elections/frmtk7nk/view/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But as sebb wrote it is not controlled and people can vote as many
>>>>>>>> times
>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>> they want.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Monday, March 14, 2016, NaveenKumar Namachivayam <
>>>>>>>> catchnaveen.psgtech@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 for Number 3
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Marko Vlahovic <
>>>>>>>>> vlahovic74@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 for number 3 too.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Nachiket Kate <
>>>>>>>>>> nachiket.kate@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 for number 3.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 11.03.2016 um 23:46 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Felix has created a new set of Logos for JMeter 3.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>> All variants can be seen on
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://home.apache.org/~fschumacher/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please start voting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> jmeter6, jmeter4, jmeter3 (in 3 I would colour TM grey).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 72 hours.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe M.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> NaveenKumar N
>>>>>>>>> Visit www.QAInsights.com and www.Testifications.com and
>>>>>>>>> www.MyTechCube.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de>.
Am 30.03.2016 um 20:04 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
> Am 30.03.2016 um 08:25 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>> Hi Felix,
>> When do you plan to commit the new logo so that it's used by JMeter site
>> and application ?
> I hope to do so tomorrow.
I have committed the changes for the logo.
The social media links are placed inside a div in nav. I am not sure,
whether it should stay there, or not. Any ideas?
Felix
>
> Regards,
> Felix
>> Thanks
>> Regards
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:10 AM, Milamber <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes that's would be a good choice for update/refresh the JMeter
>>> identity
>>> design.
>>>
>>> Milamber
>>>
>>>
>>> On 23/03/2016 22:31, sebb wrote:
>>>
>>>> Agreed, let's just go with 6.
>>>> Most people seem happy with it; I don't think anyone is against it.
>>>>
>>>> On 23 March 2016 at 19:36, Philippe Mouawad
>>>> <ph...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Felix.
>>>>> Looks fair to me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, March 23, 2016, Felix Schumacher <
>>>>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 23.03.2016 um 15:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>> Anybody computed the results ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If every mail counts as a vote (NaveenKumar sent his vote twice
>>>>>>> and I
>>>>>> counted it only once, sebb gave two votes with no preference, so I
>>>>>> counted
>>>>>> both :) then we have two winners 3 and 6.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If I take the preferences into account (first counts as two votes,
>>>>>> second
>>>>>> as one (again sebb counts both times as two)) 6 wins.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The same is true if I take the first three preferences into
>>>>>> account with
>>>>>> 3, 2 and 1 as a factor.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So I guess it is 6.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does anyone else wants to give a formula to calculate a winner?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As per the vote through modernballots, logo 6 seems to be the
>>>>>> winner:
>>>>>>> https://modernballots.com/elections/frmtk7nk/view/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But as sebb wrote it is not controlled and people can vote as many
>>>>>>> times
>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>> they want.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Monday, March 14, 2016, NaveenKumar Namachivayam <
>>>>>>> catchnaveen.psgtech@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 for Number 3
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Marko Vlahovic
>>>>>>>> <vlahovic74@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 for number 3 too.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Nachiket Kate <
>>>>>>>>> nachiket.kate@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 for number 3.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 11.03.2016 um 23:46 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Felix has created a new set of Logos for JMeter 3.0.
>>>>>>>>>>> All variants can be seen on
>>>>>>>>>>> http://home.apache.org/~fschumacher/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please start voting.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> jmeter6, jmeter4, jmeter3 (in 3 I would colour TM grey).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 72 hours.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe M.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> NaveenKumar N
>>>>>>>> Visit www.QAInsights.com and www.Testifications.com and
>>>>>>>> www.MyTechCube.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de>.
Am 30.03.2016 um 08:25 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> Hi Felix,
> When do you plan to commit the new logo so that it's used by JMeter site
> and application ?
I hope to do so tomorrow.
Regards,
Felix
> Thanks
> Regards
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:10 AM, Milamber <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Yes that's would be a good choice for update/refresh the JMeter identity
>> design.
>>
>> Milamber
>>
>>
>> On 23/03/2016 22:31, sebb wrote:
>>
>>> Agreed, let's just go with 6.
>>> Most people seem happy with it; I don't think anyone is against it.
>>>
>>> On 23 March 2016 at 19:36, Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Felix.
>>>> Looks fair to me.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, March 23, 2016, Felix Schumacher <
>>>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Am 23.03.2016 um 15:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>> Anybody computed the results ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If every mail counts as a vote (NaveenKumar sent his vote twice and I
>>>>> counted it only once, sebb gave two votes with no preference, so I
>>>>> counted
>>>>> both :) then we have two winners 3 and 6.
>>>>>
>>>>> If I take the preferences into account (first counts as two votes,
>>>>> second
>>>>> as one (again sebb counts both times as two)) 6 wins.
>>>>>
>>>>> The same is true if I take the first three preferences into account with
>>>>> 3, 2 and 1 as a factor.
>>>>>
>>>>> So I guess it is 6.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone else wants to give a formula to calculate a winner?
>>>>>
>>>>> Felix
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As per the vote through modernballots, logo 6 seems to be the winner:
>>>>>> https://modernballots.com/elections/frmtk7nk/view/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But as sebb wrote it is not controlled and people can vote as many
>>>>>> times
>>>>>> as
>>>>>> they want.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Monday, March 14, 2016, NaveenKumar Namachivayam <
>>>>>> catchnaveen.psgtech@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 for Number 3
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Marko Vlahovic <vlahovic74@gmail.com
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 for number 3 too.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Nachiket Kate <
>>>>>>>> nachiket.kate@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 for number 3.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am 11.03.2016 um 23:46 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Felix has created a new set of Logos for JMeter 3.0.
>>>>>>>>>> All variants can be seen on http://home.apache.org/~fschumacher/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please start voting.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> jmeter6, jmeter4, jmeter3 (in 3 I would colour TM grey).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 72 hours.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>> Philippe M.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> NaveenKumar N
>>>>>>> Visit www.QAInsights.com and www.Testifications.com and
>>>>>>> www.MyTechCube.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>> Cordialement.
>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
Hi Felix,
When do you plan to commit the new logo so that it's used by JMeter site
and application ?
Thanks
Regards
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:10 AM, Milamber <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Yes that's would be a good choice for update/refresh the JMeter identity
> design.
>
> Milamber
>
>
> On 23/03/2016 22:31, sebb wrote:
>
>> Agreed, let's just go with 6.
>> Most people seem happy with it; I don't think anyone is against it.
>>
>> On 23 March 2016 at 19:36, Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Felix.
>>> Looks fair to me.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, March 23, 2016, Felix Schumacher <
>>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 23.03.2016 um 15:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>> Anybody computed the results ?
>>>>>
>>>>> If every mail counts as a vote (NaveenKumar sent his vote twice and I
>>>> counted it only once, sebb gave two votes with no preference, so I
>>>> counted
>>>> both :) then we have two winners 3 and 6.
>>>>
>>>> If I take the preferences into account (first counts as two votes,
>>>> second
>>>> as one (again sebb counts both times as two)) 6 wins.
>>>>
>>>> The same is true if I take the first three preferences into account with
>>>> 3, 2 and 1 as a factor.
>>>>
>>>> So I guess it is 6.
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone else wants to give a formula to calculate a winner?
>>>>
>>>> Felix
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As per the vote through modernballots, logo 6 seems to be the winner:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://modernballots.com/elections/frmtk7nk/view/
>>>>>
>>>>> But as sebb wrote it is not controlled and people can vote as many
>>>>> times
>>>>> as
>>>>> they want.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Monday, March 14, 2016, NaveenKumar Namachivayam <
>>>>> catchnaveen.psgtech@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 for Number 3
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Marko Vlahovic <vlahovic74@gmail.com
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 for number 3 too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Nachiket Kate <
>>>>>>> nachiket.kate@gmail.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 for number 3.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 11.03.2016 um 23:46 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Felix has created a new set of Logos for JMeter 3.0.
>>>>>>>>> All variants can be seen on http://home.apache.org/~fschumacher/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please start voting.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> jmeter6, jmeter4, jmeter3 (in 3 I would colour TM grey).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 72 hours.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> Philippe M.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> NaveenKumar N
>>>>>> Visit www.QAInsights.com and www.Testifications.com and
>>>>>> www.MyTechCube.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>> Cordialement.
>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>
>>
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by Milamber <mi...@apache.org>.
Yes that's would be a good choice for update/refresh the JMeter identity
design.
Milamber
On 23/03/2016 22:31, sebb wrote:
> Agreed, let's just go with 6.
> Most people seem happy with it; I don't think anyone is against it.
>
> On 23 March 2016 at 19:36, Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks Felix.
>> Looks fair to me.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> On Wednesday, March 23, 2016, Felix Schumacher <
>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Am 23.03.2016 um 15:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>> Anybody computed the results ?
>>>>
>>> If every mail counts as a vote (NaveenKumar sent his vote twice and I
>>> counted it only once, sebb gave two votes with no preference, so I counted
>>> both :) then we have two winners 3 and 6.
>>>
>>> If I take the preferences into account (first counts as two votes, second
>>> as one (again sebb counts both times as two)) 6 wins.
>>>
>>> The same is true if I take the first three preferences into account with
>>> 3, 2 and 1 as a factor.
>>>
>>> So I guess it is 6.
>>>
>>> Does anyone else wants to give a formula to calculate a winner?
>>>
>>> Felix
>>>
>>>
>>>> As per the vote through modernballots, logo 6 seems to be the winner:
>>>>
>>>> https://modernballots.com/elections/frmtk7nk/view/
>>>>
>>>> But as sebb wrote it is not controlled and people can vote as many times
>>>> as
>>>> they want.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, March 14, 2016, NaveenKumar Namachivayam <
>>>> catchnaveen.psgtech@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1 for Number 3
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Marko Vlahovic <vl...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 for number 3 too.
>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Nachiket Kate <
>>>>>> nachiket.kate@gmail.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 for number 3.
>>>>>>> Am 11.03.2016 um 23:46 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>> Felix has created a new set of Logos for JMeter 3.0.
>>>>>>>> All variants can be seen on http://home.apache.org/~fschumacher/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please start voting.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> jmeter6, jmeter4, jmeter3 (in 3 I would colour TM grey).
>>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The vote is open for 72 hours.
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> Philippe M.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> NaveenKumar N
>>>>> Visit www.QAInsights.com and www.Testifications.com and
>>>>> www.MyTechCube.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> --
>> Cordialement.
>> Philippe Mouawad.
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
Agreed, let's just go with 6.
Most people seem happy with it; I don't think anyone is against it.
On 23 March 2016 at 19:36, Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Felix.
> Looks fair to me.
>
> Regards
>
> On Wednesday, March 23, 2016, Felix Schumacher <
> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>
>> Am 23.03.2016 um 15:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> Anybody computed the results ?
>>>
>> If every mail counts as a vote (NaveenKumar sent his vote twice and I
>> counted it only once, sebb gave two votes with no preference, so I counted
>> both :) then we have two winners 3 and 6.
>>
>> If I take the preferences into account (first counts as two votes, second
>> as one (again sebb counts both times as two)) 6 wins.
>>
>> The same is true if I take the first three preferences into account with
>> 3, 2 and 1 as a factor.
>>
>> So I guess it is 6.
>>
>> Does anyone else wants to give a formula to calculate a winner?
>>
>> Felix
>>
>>
>>> As per the vote through modernballots, logo 6 seems to be the winner:
>>>
>>> https://modernballots.com/elections/frmtk7nk/view/
>>>
>>> But as sebb wrote it is not controlled and people can vote as many times
>>> as
>>> they want.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>> On Monday, March 14, 2016, NaveenKumar Namachivayam <
>>> catchnaveen.psgtech@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 for Number 3
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Marko Vlahovic <vl...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1 for number 3 too.
>>>>> thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Nachiket Kate <
>>>>> nachiket.kate@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 for number 3.
>>>>>> Am 11.03.2016 um 23:46 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>> Felix has created a new set of Logos for JMeter 3.0.
>>>>>>> All variants can be seen on http://home.apache.org/~fschumacher/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please start voting.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> jmeter6, jmeter4, jmeter3 (in 3 I would colour TM grey).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote is open for 72 hours.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Philippe M.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thank you,
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> NaveenKumar N
>>>> Visit www.QAInsights.com and www.Testifications.com and
>>>> www.MyTechCube.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Felix.
Looks fair to me.
Regards
On Wednesday, March 23, 2016, Felix Schumacher <
felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
> Am 23.03.2016 um 15:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>
>> Hello,
>> Anybody computed the results ?
>>
> If every mail counts as a vote (NaveenKumar sent his vote twice and I
> counted it only once, sebb gave two votes with no preference, so I counted
> both :) then we have two winners 3 and 6.
>
> If I take the preferences into account (first counts as two votes, second
> as one (again sebb counts both times as two)) 6 wins.
>
> The same is true if I take the first three preferences into account with
> 3, 2 and 1 as a factor.
>
> So I guess it is 6.
>
> Does anyone else wants to give a formula to calculate a winner?
>
> Felix
>
>
>> As per the vote through modernballots, logo 6 seems to be the winner:
>>
>> https://modernballots.com/elections/frmtk7nk/view/
>>
>> But as sebb wrote it is not controlled and people can vote as many times
>> as
>> they want.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> On Monday, March 14, 2016, NaveenKumar Namachivayam <
>> catchnaveen.psgtech@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1 for Number 3
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Marko Vlahovic <vl...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 for number 3 too.
>>>> thanks
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Nachiket Kate <
>>>> nachiket.kate@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1 for number 3.
>>>>> Am 11.03.2016 um 23:46 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>> Felix has created a new set of Logos for JMeter 3.0.
>>>>>> All variants can be seen on http://home.apache.org/~fschumacher/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please start voting.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> jmeter6, jmeter4, jmeter3 (in 3 I would colour TM grey).
>>>>>
>>>>> Felix
>>>>>
>>>>> The vote is open for 72 hours.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Philippe M.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> NaveenKumar N
>>> Visit www.QAInsights.com and www.Testifications.com and
>>> www.MyTechCube.com
>>>
>>>
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de>.
Am 23.03.2016 um 15:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> Hello,
> Anybody computed the results ?
If every mail counts as a vote (NaveenKumar sent his vote twice and I
counted it only once, sebb gave two votes with no preference, so I
counted both :) then we have two winners 3 and 6.
If I take the preferences into account (first counts as two votes,
second as one (again sebb counts both times as two)) 6 wins.
The same is true if I take the first three preferences into account with
3, 2 and 1 as a factor.
So I guess it is 6.
Does anyone else wants to give a formula to calculate a winner?
Felix
>
> As per the vote through modernballots, logo 6 seems to be the winner:
>
> https://modernballots.com/elections/frmtk7nk/view/
>
> But as sebb wrote it is not controlled and people can vote as many times as
> they want.
>
> Regards
>
>
> On Monday, March 14, 2016, NaveenKumar Namachivayam <
> catchnaveen.psgtech@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 for Number 3
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Marko Vlahovic <vl...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for number 3 too.
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Nachiket Kate <nachiket.kate@gmail.com
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 for number 3.
>>>> Am 11.03.2016 um 23:46 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> Felix has created a new set of Logos for JMeter 3.0.
>>>>> All variants can be seen on http://home.apache.org/~fschumacher/
>>>>>
>>>>> Please start voting.
>>>>>
>>>> jmeter6, jmeter4, jmeter3 (in 3 I would colour TM grey).
>>>>
>>>> Felix
>>>>
>>>>> The vote is open for 72 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Philippe M.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Regards,
>> NaveenKumar N
>> Visit www.QAInsights.com and www.Testifications.com and www.MyTechCube.com
>>
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
Anybody computed the results ?
As per the vote through modernballots, logo 6 seems to be the winner:
https://modernballots.com/elections/frmtk7nk/view/
But as sebb wrote it is not controlled and people can vote as many times as
they want.
Regards
On Monday, March 14, 2016, NaveenKumar Namachivayam <
catchnaveen.psgtech@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for Number 3
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Marko Vlahovic <vl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for number 3 too.
> > thanks
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Nachiket Kate <nachiket.kate@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for number 3.
> > > Am 11.03.2016 um 23:46 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > > Felix has created a new set of Logos for JMeter 3.0.
> > > > All variants can be seen on http://home.apache.org/~fschumacher/
> > > >
> > > > Please start voting.
> > > >
> > > jmeter6, jmeter4, jmeter3 (in 3 I would colour TM grey).
> > >
> > > Felix
> > >
> > > >
> > > > The vote is open for 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > Philippe M.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thank you,
>
> Regards,
> NaveenKumar N
> Visit www.QAInsights.com and www.Testifications.com and www.MyTechCube.com
>
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by NaveenKumar Namachivayam <ca...@gmail.com>.
+1 for Number 3
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Marko Vlahovic <vl...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 for number 3 too.
> thanks
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Nachiket Kate <na...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for number 3.
> > Am 11.03.2016 um 23:46 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > > Felix has created a new set of Logos for JMeter 3.0.
> > > All variants can be seen on http://home.apache.org/~fschumacher/
> > >
> > > Please start voting.
> > >
> > jmeter6, jmeter4, jmeter3 (in 3 I would colour TM grey).
> >
> > Felix
> >
> > >
> > > The vote is open for 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Philippe M.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Thank you,
Regards,
NaveenKumar N
Visit www.QAInsights.com and www.Testifications.com and www.MyTechCube.com
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by Marko Vlahovic <vl...@gmail.com>.
+1 for number 3 too.
thanks
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Nachiket Kate <na...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 for number 3.
> Am 11.03.2016 um 23:46 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>
> > Hello,
> > Felix has created a new set of Logos for JMeter 3.0.
> > All variants can be seen on http://home.apache.org/~fschumacher/
> >
> > Please start voting.
> >
> jmeter6, jmeter4, jmeter3 (in 3 I would colour TM grey).
>
> Felix
>
> >
> > The vote is open for 72 hours.
> >
> > Regards
> > Philippe M.
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by Nachiket Kate <na...@gmail.com>.
+1 for number 3.
Am 11.03.2016 um 23:46 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> Hello,
> Felix has created a new set of Logos for JMeter 3.0.
> All variants can be seen on http://home.apache.org/~fschumacher/
>
> Please start voting.
>
jmeter6, jmeter4, jmeter3 (in 3 I would colour TM grey).
Felix
>
> The vote is open for 72 hours.
>
> Regards
> Philippe M.
>
>
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de>.
Am 11.03.2016 um 23:46 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> Hello,
> Felix has created a new set of Logos for JMeter 3.0.
> All variants can be seen on http://home.apache.org/~fschumacher/
>
> Please start voting.
jmeter6, jmeter4, jmeter3 (in 3 I would colour TM grey).
Felix
>
> The vote is open for 72 hours.
>
> Regards
> Philippe M.
>
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by NaveenKumar Namachivayam <ca...@gmail.com>.
I love JMeter3 :)
Sent from Outlook Mobile
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 2:48 PM -0800, "Philippe Mouawad" <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
Felix has created a new set of Logos for JMeter 3.0.
All variants can be seen on http://home.apache.org/~fschumacher/
Please start voting.
The vote is open for 72 hours.
Regards
Philippe M.
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by Refael Botbol <re...@blazemeter.com>.
+1 for number 7
On Sat, 12 Mar 2016 14:52 Milamber, <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1 for number 4.
>
> On 11/03/2016 22:46, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Felix has created a new set of Logos for JMeter 3.0.
> > All variants can be seen on http://home.apache.org/~fschumacher/
> >
> > Please start voting.
> >
> > The vote is open for 72 hours.
> >
> > Regards
> > Philippe M.
> >
>
> --
Refael Botbol, BlazeMeter.
Director of Professional Services
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by Milamber <mi...@apache.org>.
+1 for number 4.
On 11/03/2016 22:46, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
> Hello,
> Felix has created a new set of Logos for JMeter 3.0.
> All variants can be seen on http://home.apache.org/~fschumacher/
>
> Please start voting.
>
> The vote is open for 72 hours.
>
> Regards
> Philippe M.
>
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by Vladimir Sitnikov <si...@gmail.com>.
Here's the updated link: https://modernballots.com/elections/frmtk7nk/vote/
Vladimir
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by Vladimir Sitnikov <si...@gmail.com>.
Please, disregard https://modernballots.com/elections/jmesjcgi/vote/.
#2 links to image #3, so I would have to recreate the vote.
Vladimir
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 12 March 2016 at 17:59, Vladimir Sitnikov
<si...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1) What if try online voting?
>
> For instance, here: https://modernballots.com/elections/jmesjcgi/vote/
> The idea behind that vote is "Schulze method", so it properly accounts
> for preferences (see [1])
>
> 2) Should we ask users@jmeter / Twitter users to vote as well?
Let's see what happens here first.
AFAICT there is no check to see if a single user submits multiple
votes, so the result should not be relied on much.
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schulze_method
>
> Vladimir
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by Vladimir Sitnikov <si...@gmail.com>.
1) What if try online voting?
For instance, here: https://modernballots.com/elections/jmesjcgi/vote/
The idea behind that vote is "Schulze method", so it properly accounts
for preferences (see [1])
2) Should we ask users@jmeter / Twitter users to vote as well?
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schulze_method
Vladimir
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by Krishna Kanth <pu...@gmail.com>.
I like Jmeter6
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Andrey Pokhilko <ap...@ya.ru> wrote:
> jmeter2
>
> Andrey Pokhilko
>
> On 03/12/2016 01:46 AM, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Felix has created a new set of Logos for JMeter 3.0.
> > All variants can be seen on http://home.apache.org/~fschumacher/
> >
> > Please start voting.
> >
> > The vote is open for 72 hours.
> >
> > Regards
> > Philippe M.
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by Andrey Pokhilko <ap...@ya.ru>.
jmeter2
Andrey Pokhilko
On 03/12/2016 01:46 AM, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
> Hello,
> Felix has created a new set of Logos for JMeter 3.0.
> All variants can be seen on http://home.apache.org/~fschumacher/
>
> Please start voting.
>
> The vote is open for 72 hours.
>
> Regards
> Philippe M.
>
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
Order:
1 , 7 , 6 , 4 ,3
It is hard to choose as many are nice.
Thanks Felix
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 2:08 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12 March 2016 at 12:50, Felix Schumacher
> <fe...@internetallee.de> wrote:
> > Am 12.03.2016 um 13:42 schrieb sebb:
> >>
> >> Would it be possible to add another page showing the logos at normal
> size?
> >
> > I have added a link to a page with them at normal size (which I
> interpreted
> > as 88px height).
>
> Thanks!
> The existing logo is 182x88; the new ones are scaled to 259x88, which
> should fit OK in existing layouts (the height is generally more
> critical).
>
> I think they all look good; much cleaner than the previous logo.
>
> I prefer the ones with black or grey TM; the red TM stands out too
> much for me and unbalances the look slightly
> In jmeter5.svg the TM is too much in the background.
>
> I cannot decide between
>
> jmeter.svg, 4 or 6.
>
> Thanks very much for doing this.
>
> > I also added a note, that I converted the TM to path, so that missing
> fonts
> > didn't change the image.
> >
> > Felix
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12 March 2016 at 10:41, Felix Schumacher
> >> <fe...@internetallee.de> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Am 12.03.2016 um 11:05 schrieb Vladimir Sitnikov:
> >>>>
> >>>> Assuming all the TMs are san-serif, my order of preference is #1 (with
> >>>> J fully red like in #6), #6, #3 (with regular letter thickness like in
> >>>> #1)
> >>>>
> >>>> Felix, was the kerning fully automated? Have you adjusted it?
> >>>> The distance between J and M varies from logo to logo. It looks a bit
> >>>> odd.
> >>>> I wonder what is the "proper" distance. I think smaller gap would do
> >>>> better.
> >>>
> >>> The kerning was done manually. All logos are basically the same except
> >>> the
> >>> colors. The first one (jmeter.svg) has no border, which makes the
> letters
> >>> a
> >>> bit more apart from each other. All the other ones should be the same
> >>> (border width of 3).
> >>>
> >>> Felix
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Vladimir
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 12 March 2016 at 12:50, Felix Schumacher
<fe...@internetallee.de> wrote:
> Am 12.03.2016 um 13:42 schrieb sebb:
>>
>> Would it be possible to add another page showing the logos at normal size?
>
> I have added a link to a page with them at normal size (which I interpreted
> as 88px height).
Thanks!
The existing logo is 182x88; the new ones are scaled to 259x88, which
should fit OK in existing layouts (the height is generally more
critical).
I think they all look good; much cleaner than the previous logo.
I prefer the ones with black or grey TM; the red TM stands out too
much for me and unbalances the look slightly
In jmeter5.svg the TM is too much in the background.
I cannot decide between
jmeter.svg, 4 or 6.
Thanks very much for doing this.
> I also added a note, that I converted the TM to path, so that missing fonts
> didn't change the image.
>
> Felix
>
>
>>
>>
>> On 12 March 2016 at 10:41, Felix Schumacher
>> <fe...@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 12.03.2016 um 11:05 schrieb Vladimir Sitnikov:
>>>>
>>>> Assuming all the TMs are san-serif, my order of preference is #1 (with
>>>> J fully red like in #6), #6, #3 (with regular letter thickness like in
>>>> #1)
>>>>
>>>> Felix, was the kerning fully automated? Have you adjusted it?
>>>> The distance between J and M varies from logo to logo. It looks a bit
>>>> odd.
>>>> I wonder what is the "proper" distance. I think smaller gap would do
>>>> better.
>>>
>>> The kerning was done manually. All logos are basically the same except
>>> the
>>> colors. The first one (jmeter.svg) has no border, which makes the letters
>>> a
>>> bit more apart from each other. All the other ones should be the same
>>> (border width of 3).
>>>
>>> Felix
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Vladimir
>>>
>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de>.
Am 12.03.2016 um 13:42 schrieb sebb:
> Would it be possible to add another page showing the logos at normal size?
I have added a link to a page with them at normal size (which I
interpreted as 88px height).
I also added a note, that I converted the TM to path, so that missing
fonts didn't change the image.
Felix
>
>
> On 12 March 2016 at 10:41, Felix Schumacher
> <fe...@internetallee.de> wrote:
>> Am 12.03.2016 um 11:05 schrieb Vladimir Sitnikov:
>>> Assuming all the TMs are san-serif, my order of preference is #1 (with
>>> J fully red like in #6), #6, #3 (with regular letter thickness like in
>>> #1)
>>>
>>> Felix, was the kerning fully automated? Have you adjusted it?
>>> The distance between J and M varies from logo to logo. It looks a bit odd.
>>> I wonder what is the "proper" distance. I think smaller gap would do
>>> better.
>> The kerning was done manually. All logos are basically the same except the
>> colors. The first one (jmeter.svg) has no border, which makes the letters a
>> bit more apart from each other. All the other ones should be the same
>> (border width of 3).
>>
>> Felix
>>>
>>> Vladimir
>>
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
Would it be possible to add another page showing the logos at normal size?
On 12 March 2016 at 10:41, Felix Schumacher
<fe...@internetallee.de> wrote:
> Am 12.03.2016 um 11:05 schrieb Vladimir Sitnikov:
>>
>> Assuming all the TMs are san-serif, my order of preference is #1 (with
>> J fully red like in #6), #6, #3 (with regular letter thickness like in
>> #1)
>>
>> Felix, was the kerning fully automated? Have you adjusted it?
>> The distance between J and M varies from logo to logo. It looks a bit odd.
>> I wonder what is the "proper" distance. I think smaller gap would do
>> better.
>
> The kerning was done manually. All logos are basically the same except the
> colors. The first one (jmeter.svg) has no border, which makes the letters a
> bit more apart from each other. All the other ones should be the same
> (border width of 3).
>
> Felix
>>
>>
>> Vladimir
>
>
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de>.
Am 12.03.2016 um 11:05 schrieb Vladimir Sitnikov:
> Assuming all the TMs are san-serif, my order of preference is #1 (with
> J fully red like in #6), #6, #3 (with regular letter thickness like in
> #1)
>
> Felix, was the kerning fully automated? Have you adjusted it?
> The distance between J and M varies from logo to logo. It looks a bit odd.
> I wonder what is the "proper" distance. I think smaller gap would do better.
The kerning was done manually. All logos are basically the same except
the colors. The first one (jmeter.svg) has no border, which makes the
letters a bit more apart from each other. All the other ones should be
the same (border width of 3).
Felix
>
> Vladimir
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by Vladimir Sitnikov <si...@gmail.com>.
Assuming all the TMs are san-serif, my order of preference is #1 (with
J fully red like in #6), #6, #3 (with regular letter thickness like in
#1)
Felix, was the kerning fully automated? Have you adjusted it?
The distance between J and M varies from logo to logo. It looks a bit odd.
I wonder what is the "proper" distance. I think smaller gap would do better.
Vladimir
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de>.
Am 12. März 2016 01:34:48 MEZ, schrieb Steven Swor <sw...@gmail.com>:
>I like jmeter7.svg (it's the only one with the sans-serif TM)
All the TM should have the font of jmeter7.svg. In the previous ones I forgot to convert the letters to path and so the appearance depends on the installs fonts of the viewer.
Regards,
Felix
>
>On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Philippe Mouawad <
>philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> Felix has created a new set of Logos for JMeter 3.0.
>> All variants can be seen on http://home.apache.org/~fschumacher/
>>
>> Please start voting.
>>
>> The vote is open for 72 hours.
>>
>> Regards
>> Philippe M.
>>
Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Posted by Steven Swor <sw...@gmail.com>.
I like jmeter7.svg (it's the only one with the sans-serif TM)
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Philippe Mouawad <
philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> Felix has created a new set of Logos for JMeter 3.0.
> All variants can be seen on http://home.apache.org/~fschumacher/
>
> Please start voting.
>
> The vote is open for 72 hours.
>
> Regards
> Philippe M.
>