You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to sysadmins@spamassassin.apache.org by "Kevin A. McGrail" <km...@apache.org> on 2018/09/01 15:24:00 UTC
AutoMC vs BuildBot Question
Hi all,
Q: is http://automc.spamassassin.org/updates/ the replacement for
http://buildbot.spamassassin.org/updatestage/?
I'm working to update some scripts.
Regards,
KAM
--
Kevin A. McGrail
VP Fundraising, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
Re: AutoMC vs BuildBot Question
Posted by "Kevin A. McGrail" <km...@apache.org>.
On 9/1/2018 1:03 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On 09/01/2018 10:24 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Q: is http://automc.spamassassin.org/updates/ the replacement for
>> http://buildbot.spamassassin.org/updatestage/?
>>
>> I'm working to update some scripts.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> KAM
>>
>
> I believe this is correct. When I went through the previous Apache
> httpd configs, it seemed to be a symlink or something similar so I
> just combined them in the scripts I updated and committed.
Thanks. I had to use bbmass for wget to work because of redirects but
thanks, I have the rules repackage working now.
--
Kevin A. McGrail
VP Fundraising, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
Re: AutoMC vs BuildBot Question
Posted by Dave Jones <da...@apache.org>.
On 09/01/2018 10:24 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Q: is http://automc.spamassassin.org/updates/ the replacement for
> http://buildbot.spamassassin.org/updatestage/?
>
> I'm working to update some scripts.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> KAM
>
I believe this is correct. When I went through the previous Apache
httpd configs, it seemed to be a symlink or something similar so I just
combined them in the scripts I updated and committed.
Dave