You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by "Peter B. West" <pb...@powerup.com.au> on 2003/07/11 12:03:14 UTC
Naming of jars in lib
Fopdevs,
It might make life a little easier if library jars retained common names
as we upgraded; ant.jar, for instance. We have a many version-numbered
jars in lib, the most particular of which is
commons-io-dev-20030703.jar. As we are all getting our libraries
updated through CVS anyway, would it not be better to name them
consistently, and include a text file detailing the current versions?
Peter
--
Peter B. West http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/resume.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org
Re: Naming of jars in lib
Posted by Clay Leeds <cl...@medata.com>.
On 7/11/2003 6:49 AM, Glen Mazza wrote:
> I don't think so--it is helpful to immediately see the
> version of the libraries when viewing the files. I
> suspect that text file you're mentioning will out fall
> out of date--and users may be unaware of it.
I should preface this with: I've used CVS to submit *1* change, so I'm
not exactly an expert here... ;-p
but...
Is it not possible to display the 'modified date' and/or 'version' in a
separate column in CVS? I thought that was what 'Rev.' was for... I
guess the 'Timestamp' relates to the time the item was added to the
library, and not necessarily the file's 'modification date'. Hope this
helps in some way...
> However, there *may* be an issue (I don't know, I
> haven't researched the matter) of the team not relying
> on production releases of other jars, but interim
> releases where unwarranted, nightly builds, etc.,
> which I would assume would make a mess in CVS due to
> the different file names, constant atticking, etc.
> *That* might be something to work on: attempting to
> rely on more production-release jars in the future.
...sounds messy... Don't forget to wash your hands afterwards...
--
Clay Leeds - cleeds@medata.com
Web Developer - Medata, Inc. - http://www.medata.com
PGP Public Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/cleeds.asc
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org
Re: Naming of jars in lib
Posted by Glen Mazza <gr...@yahoo.com>.
> As we are all getting
> our libraries
> updated through CVS anyway, would it not be better
> to name them
> consistently, and include a text file detailing the
> current versions?
>
> Peter
> --
I don't think so--it is helpful to immediately see the
version of the libraries when viewing the files. I
suspect that text file you're mentioning will out fall
out of date--and users may be unaware of it.
However, there *may* be an issue (I don't know, I
haven't researched the matter) of the team not relying
on production releases of other jars, but interim
releases where unwarranted, nightly builds, etc.,
which I would assume would make a mess in CVS due to
the different file names, constant atticking, etc.
*That* might be something to work on: attempting to
rely on more production-release jars in the future.
Glen
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org