You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> on 2012/05/15 04:58:31 UTC
Publishing 2.0-Beta4 RC1, was Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release 2.0-Beta4 RC1
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 1:44 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Passed with four +1 votes from Luciano, Nirmal, Raymond and me.
>
> ...ant
>
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:48 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Here's the release vote for RC1 of the 2.0-Beta4 artifacts, please
>> review and vote.
>>
>> You can find the staged artifacts at:
>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-Beta4-RC1/
>>
>> and the SVN tag for the release at:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-Beta4-RC1/
>>
>> ...ant
I noticed that
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-Beta4-RC1/ has been
moved.
Ant, are you planning to publish this while we wait for 2.0 ?
Otherwise, would you give me permission to copy it from your folder at
p.a.o and working on publishing it ?
Thanks
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: Publishing 2.0-Beta4 RC1, was Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release
2.0-Beta4 RC1
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:58 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 1:44 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Passed with four +1 votes from Luciano, Nirmal, Raymond and me.
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:48 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Here's the release vote for RC1 of the 2.0-Beta4 artifacts, please
>>> review and vote.
>>>
>>> You can find the staged artifacts at:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-Beta4-RC1/
>>>
>>> and the SVN tag for the release at:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-Beta4-RC1/
>>>
>>> ...ant
>
> I noticed that
> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-Beta4-RC1/ has been
> moved.
>
> Ant, are you planning to publish this while we wait for 2.0 ?
> Otherwise, would you give me permission to copy it from your folder at
> p.a.o and working on publishing it ?
>
As you know we said we'd instead go to 2.0, those artifacts are months
old now and i've cleaned the RC from my p.a.o space. Why not just
review and vote on 2.0?
...ant