You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-dev@logging.apache.org by mw...@apache.org on 2003/03/20 08:23:09 UTC
checkstyle in log4j-sandbox
I moved over the checkstyle 3.0 build changes into log4j-sandbox. The only
difference is that I turned on javadoc checking. We should turn this on in
the log4j cvs as well. I know it seems like busy work to fix all the
complaints, but it will be better in the long run.
-Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: checkstyle in log4j-sandbox
Posted by Ceki Gülcü <ce...@qos.ch>.
At 11:23 PM 3/19/2003 -0800, you wrote:
>I moved over the checkstyle 3.0 build changes into log4j-sandbox. The only
>difference is that I turned on javadoc checking. We should turn this on in
>the log4j cvs as well. I know it seems like busy work to fix all the
>complaints, but it will be better in the long run.
Why? What is the value of javadoc comments which simply state the *really*
obvious? Why make stating the obvious mandatory?
>-Mark
--
Ceki
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org