You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Stack <st...@duboce.net> on 2010/12/21 06:36:28 UTC
0.90.0RC2 tomorrow?
We should be able to post our third release candidate tomorrow (Our
RCs are zero-based). All current blockers and criticals have been
cleared. Speak up if there is anything you want to get into 0.90.0RC2
or if there is a good reason for not cutting the RC now.
Thanks,
St.Ack
Re: RE: 0.90.0RC2 tomorrow?
Posted by Lars George <la...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hooray!
> On Dec 20, 2010 10:08 PM, "Jonathan Gray" <jg...@fb.com> wrote:
>> +1 on RC
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: saint.ack@gmail.com [mailto:saint.ack@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Stack
>>> Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 9:36 PM
>>> To: HBase Dev List
>>> Subject: 0.90.0RC2 tomorrow?
>>>
>>> We should be able to post our third release candidate tomorrow (Our RCs
> are
>>> zero-based). All current blockers and criticals have been cleared. Speak
> up if
>>> there is anything you want to get into 0.90.0RC2 or if there is a good
> reason
>>> for not cutting the RC now.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> St.Ack
>
RE: RE: 0.90.0RC2 tomorrow?
Posted by "Abinash Karana (Bizosys)" <ab...@bizosys.com>.
Wow!! We are now 10 releases away from 1.0 :)
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Rawson [mailto:ryanobjc@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 12:39 PM
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Subject: Re: RE: 0.90.0RC2 tomorrow?
Hooray!
On Dec 20, 2010 10:08 PM, "Jonathan Gray" <jg...@fb.com> wrote:
> +1 on RC
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: saint.ack@gmail.com [mailto:saint.ack@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Stack
>> Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 9:36 PM
>> To: HBase Dev List
>> Subject: 0.90.0RC2 tomorrow?
>>
>> We should be able to post our third release candidate tomorrow (Our RCs
are
>> zero-based). All current blockers and criticals have been cleared. Speak
up if
>> there is anything you want to get into 0.90.0RC2 or if there is a good
reason
>> for not cutting the RC now.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> St.Ack
Re: RE: 0.90.0RC2 tomorrow?
Posted by Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com>.
Hooray!
On Dec 20, 2010 10:08 PM, "Jonathan Gray" <jg...@fb.com> wrote:
> +1 on RC
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: saint.ack@gmail.com [mailto:saint.ack@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Stack
>> Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 9:36 PM
>> To: HBase Dev List
>> Subject: 0.90.0RC2 tomorrow?
>>
>> We should be able to post our third release candidate tomorrow (Our RCs
are
>> zero-based). All current blockers and criticals have been cleared. Speak
up if
>> there is anything you want to get into 0.90.0RC2 or if there is a good
reason
>> for not cutting the RC now.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> St.Ack
RE: 0.90.0RC2 tomorrow?
Posted by Jonathan Gray <jg...@fb.com>.
+1 on RC
> -----Original Message-----
> From: saint.ack@gmail.com [mailto:saint.ack@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Stack
> Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 9:36 PM
> To: HBase Dev List
> Subject: 0.90.0RC2 tomorrow?
>
> We should be able to post our third release candidate tomorrow (Our RCs are
> zero-based). All current blockers and criticals have been cleared. Speak up if
> there is anything you want to get into 0.90.0RC2 or if there is a good reason
> for not cutting the RC now.
>
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
Re: 0.90.0RC2 tomorrow?
Posted by Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>.
/me not speaking up
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> We should be able to post our third release candidate tomorrow (Our
> RCs are zero-based). All current blockers and criticals have been
> cleared. Speak up if there is anything you want to get into 0.90.0RC2
> or if there is a good reason for not cutting the RC now.
>
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
>
Re: 0.90.0RC2 tomorrow?
Posted by Tatsuya Kawano <ta...@gmail.com>.
Hi Ryan,
Sure! I just filed HBASE-3383.
Thanks,
Tatsuya
On Dec 22, 2010, at 1:24 PM, Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The default xml is in the jar and is intended to be that way. Thee other is
> a bug. Can you file a jira? Thanks!
> On Dec 21, 2010 7:18 PM, "Tatsuya Kawano" <ta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just noticed a couple of things in the last candidate (rc1).
>>
>> 1. conf/hbase-default.xml is missing.
>>
>> 2. bin/start-hbase.sh displays the following warning.
>>
>> cat: ... /hbase-0.90.0/bin/../target/cached_classpath.txt: No such file or
> directory
>>
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Tatsuya
>>
>> --
>> Tatsuya Kawano
>> Tokyo, Japan
>>
>>
>> On Dec 21, 2010, at 2:36 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>
>>> We should be able to post our third release candidate tomorrow (Our
>>> RCs are zero-based). All current blockers and criticals have been
>>> cleared. Speak up if there is anything you want to get into 0.90.0RC2
>>> or if there is a good reason for not cutting the RC now.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> St.Ack
>>
Re: 0.90.0RC2 tomorrow?
Posted by Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com>.
The default xml is in the jar and is intended to be that way. Thee other is
a bug. Can you file a jira? Thanks!
On Dec 21, 2010 7:18 PM, "Tatsuya Kawano" <ta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just noticed a couple of things in the last candidate (rc1).
>
> 1. conf/hbase-default.xml is missing.
>
> 2. bin/start-hbase.sh displays the following warning.
>
> cat: ... /hbase-0.90.0/bin/../target/cached_classpath.txt: No such file or
directory
>
>
> Thank you,
> Tatsuya
>
> --
> Tatsuya Kawano
> Tokyo, Japan
>
>
> On Dec 21, 2010, at 2:36 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
>> We should be able to post our third release candidate tomorrow (Our
>> RCs are zero-based). All current blockers and criticals have been
>> cleared. Speak up if there is anything you want to get into 0.90.0RC2
>> or if there is a good reason for not cutting the RC now.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> St.Ack
>
Re: 0.90.0RC2 tomorrow?
Posted by Tatsuya Kawano <ta...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Just noticed a couple of things in the last candidate (rc1).
1. conf/hbase-default.xml is missing.
2. bin/start-hbase.sh displays the following warning.
cat: ... /hbase-0.90.0/bin/../target/cached_classpath.txt: No such file or directory
Thank you,
Tatsuya
--
Tatsuya Kawano
Tokyo, Japan
On Dec 21, 2010, at 2:36 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> We should be able to post our third release candidate tomorrow (Our
> RCs are zero-based). All current blockers and criticals have been
> cleared. Speak up if there is anything you want to get into 0.90.0RC2
> or if there is a good reason for not cutting the RC now.
>
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
Re: 0.90.0RC2 tomorrow?
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
+1
> From: Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> Subject: 0.90.0RC2 tomorrow?
> To: "HBase Dev List" <de...@hbase.apache.org>
> Date: Monday, December 20, 2010, 9:36 PM
>
> We should be able to post our third release candidate tomorrow (Our
> RCs are zero-based). All current blockers and criticals have been
> cleared. Speak up if there is anything you want to get into 0.90.0RC2
> or if there is a good reason for not cutting the RC now.