You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Robert Metzger (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/01/29 10:39:00 UTC

[jira] [Closed] (FLINK-12887) Schedule UnfencedMessage would lost envelope info

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Robert Metzger closed FLINK-12887.
----------------------------------
    Resolution: Invalid

Closing this ticket, as it is not about Flink, but a fork of Flink, and there was no more activity after the proposal to close it.

> Schedule UnfencedMessage would lost envelope info 
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-12887
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12887
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Runtime / Coordination
>    Affects Versions: 1.9.0
>            Reporter: Zili Chen
>            Assignee: Zili Chen
>            Priority: Major
>
> We provide {{runAsync}}, {{callAsync}} and {{scheduleRunAsync}} for {{MainThreadExecutable}}, while providing {{runAsyncWithoutFencing}} and {{callAsyncWithoutFencing}} additionally for {{FencedMainThreadExecutable}}.
> Let's think about a case when we want to schedule a unfenced runnable or any other unfenced message(currently, we don't have such code path but it's semantically valid.). 
> 1. {{FencedAkkaRpcActor}} received an unfenced runnable with delay
> 2. It extracted the runnable from unfenced message and call {{super.handleRpcMessage}}.
> 3. {{AkkaRpcActor}} enveloped the message and schedule it by {{AkkaRpcActor#L410}}.
> However, {{FencedAkkaRpcActor#envelopeSelfMessage}} was called for envelope. Thus the unfenced message now become a fenced message.
> We can anyway implement {{scheduleRunAsyncWithoutFencing}} to schedule unfenced message directly by {{actorsystem.scheduler.scheduleOnce(..., dispatcher)}}, but with current codebase I notice that {{RunAsync}} has a wried {{atTimeNanos}}(i.e., delay) property. Ideally how to schedule a message is shown on what params ScheduleExecutorService called with, at least we cannot extract an unfenced message and envelop it into a fence message and then schedule it, which goes into wrong semantic.
> cc [~till.rohrmann]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)