You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@oozie.apache.org by "Robert Kanter (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/07/25 03:00:06 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2315)
TestOozieCLI.testshareLibUpdate_withSecurity fails with Hadoop 2
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14641302#comment-14641302 ]
Robert Kanter commented on OOZIE-2315:
--------------------------------------
Given that it works with Hadoop 1, I'd guess that this is a hadoop-auth change. I need to look into it more, but it looks like the username isn't being picked up properly, so it's using "?" instead.
> TestOozieCLI.testshareLibUpdate_withSecurity fails with Hadoop 2
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-2315
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2315
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: security, tests
> Affects Versions: trunk
> Reporter: Robert Kanter
> Assignee: Robert Kanter
>
> TestOozieCLI.testshareLibUpdate_withSecurity fails with Hadoop 2:
> {noformat}
> testshareLibUpdate_withSecurity(org.apache.oozie.client.TestOozieCLI) Time elapsed: 0.002 sec <<< FAILURE!
> junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:<...0503 : E0503: User [[test]] does not have admi...> but was:<...0503 : E0503: User [[?]] does not have admi...>
> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:85)
> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:91)
> at org.apache.oozie.client.TestOozieCLI$44.call(TestOozieCLI.java:1262)
> at org.apache.oozie.client.TestOozieCLI$44.call(TestOozieCLI.java:1254)
> at org.apache.oozie.servlet.DagServletTestCase.runTest(DagServletTestCase.java:94)
> at org.apache.oozie.client.TestOozieCLI.testshareLibUpdate_withSecurity(TestOozieCLI.java:1254)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
> at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:168)
> at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:134)
> at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:110)
> at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:128)
> at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:113)
> at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:124)
> at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:243)
> at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:238)
> at org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit38ClassRunner.run(JUnit38ClassRunner.java:83)
> at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:128)
> at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:24)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231)
> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)