[jira] [Commented] (YARN-6025) Few issues in synchronization in CapacityScheduler & AbstractYarnScheduler

["Wangda Tan (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15771517#comment-15771517 ] 

Wangda Tan commented on YARN-6025:
----------------------------------

Thanks [~naganarasimha_gr@apache.org], 

Minor comments:
1) Should not remove synchronized lock of recoverContainersOnNode / nodeUpdate in AbstractYarnScheduler, as they are used by FifoScheduler 
2) Should keep readlock inside CS#nodeUpdate, since it is possible that collection of applications / queues / nodes could be updated during the call. The readlock is added to protect this happens.

> Few issues in synchronization in CapacityScheduler & AbstractYarnScheduler
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-6025
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6025
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: capacity scheduler, scheduler
>            Reporter: Naganarasimha G R
>            Assignee: Naganarasimha G R
>         Attachments: YARN-6025.01.patch
>
>
> YARN-3139 does optimization on the locks by introducing ReentrantReadWriteLock to remove synchronized but seems to have some issues.
> # CapacityScheduler
> #* nodeUpdate(RMNode) need not be synchronized, as its the only one to be in the class
> #* setLastNodeUpdateTime in nodeUpdate needs to be updated with readLock ? then getLastNodeUpdateTime is done without any lock and more over its volatile.
> #* getUserGroupMappingPlacementRule need not be public as its held called within and not used in test and further is called from initScheduler and reinitialize where both are holding write locks so i presume getting read locks are of no use.
> # AbstractYarnScheduler
> #* recoverContainersOnNode is synchronized as well as holds write lock on the complete method so i presume we do not require synchronized here.
> #* nodeUpdate method too is synchronized but if i see the updates done inside i do not see any place where node update from two different nodes will have any issues (except for schedulerHealth which is taken care internally with concurrentHashMap), And even if require we could better use write lock. (also depends on the decision of next point)
> #* readLock is only used in containerLaunchedOnNode which i am not completely sure whether its required to have a read lock here, suppose we do not require then whether there is any use of read write locks in AbstractYarnScheduler as in general there is performance overhead in using readwrite lock over synchronized blocks on frequently accessed code path.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org