You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to nmaven-dev@incubator.apache.org by Jan Stevens Ancajas <ja...@exist.com> on 2008/06/11 06:39:59 UTC

Re: 0.14 Branch

On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Evan Worley <ev...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I got through a bunch of them, and a few remain.  Here is a status update..
> *
> *Previously applied, now closed
>
>   - NMAVEN-73
>   - NMAVEN-118
>
> Now applied and closed
>
>   - NMAVEN-107
>   - NMAVEN-108
>   - NMAVEN-109
>   - NMAVEN-114
>   - NMAVEN-117
>   - NMAVEN-121
>
> Remaining
>
>   - NMAVEN-106 - Shane, you started looking into this one, and a follow up
>   patch was added.  Can you take a look?
>   - NMAVEN-110 - Problem applying patch.. Unable to find source revision.
>   I will dig deeper later.


patch works fine applying it in my local. Evan, are you still encountering
this ?


>   - NMAVEN-112 - Unable to resolve 0.14-maestro-1.5-M3
>   - NMAVEN-115 - Need more time to review
>   - NMAVEN-116 - Posted follow up question to JIRA regarding the solution


>   - NMAVEN-119 - Shane you've been involved with this one, can you take
>   another look at the latest patch?
>
> Cheers,
> Evan
>
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 5:18 AM, Jan Stevens Ancajas <ja...@exist.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Evan!
> >
> > now to get the ball rolling  i listed 0.14 unresolved issues  w/
> submitted
> > patches,
> >
> > NMAVEN-106
> > NMAVEN-119
> > NMAVEN-121
> > NMAVEN-118
> > NMAVEN-117
> > NMAVEN-110
> > NMAVEN-111
> > NMAVEN-112
> > NMAVEN-116
> > NMAVEN-115
> > NMAVEN-114
> > NMAVEN-107
> > NMAVEN-108
> > NMAVEN-109
> > NMAVEN-73
> >
> > Can anyone apply/review them ? Thanks!
> >
> > -Jan
> >
> > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Evan Worley <ev...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Patch applied.  Thank you Jan.
> > >
> > > -Evan
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Jan Stevens Ancajas <
> jancajas@exist.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > created jira :
> > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/NMAVEN-123
> > > >
> > > > thanks.
> > > > -jan
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Shane Isbell <
> shane.isbell@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Cool. Getting rid of the Maven 2.1 snapshot dependency problem will
> > > help
> > > > > things along.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Shane
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Jan Stevens Ancajas <
> > > > jancajas@exist.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I removed service-embedder plugin dependencies (from Brett's
> > > previous
> > > > > > email)
> > > > > > > and the war dependency in VsInstallerMojo.java (see attached)
> for
> > > the
> > > > > > 0.14
> > > > > > > branch to be built successfully and for the vs-installer plugin
> > > > changed
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > favor for NMAVEN-106. I would love to see  the  0.14 patches
>  in
> > > jira
> > > > > are
> > > > > > > applied. Anything I can help  ? :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't think the list allows attachments.  Can you open a JIRA
> > with
> > > > > > your suggested patch?  Might as well include Brett's changes and
> > > point
> > > > > > to the mailing list message; patches in email don't always work
> > > right.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Wendy
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>